Yasuhisa Kitagawa

Cilostazol for prevention of secondary stroke (CSPS 2): an aspirin-controlled, double-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is efficacious for prevention of stroke recurrence compared with placebo. We designed the second Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study (CSPS 2) to establish non-inferiority of cilostazol versus aspirin for prevention of stroke, and to compare the efficacy and safety of cilostazol and aspirin in patients with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke. METHODS Patients aged 20-79 years who had had a cerebral infarction within the previous 26 weeks were enrolled at 278 sites in Japan and allocated to receive 100 mg cilostazol twice daily or 81 mg aspirin once daily for 1-5 years. Patients were allocated according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence by means of a dynamic balancing method using patient information obtained at registration. All patients, study personnel, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral haemorrhage, or subarachnoid haemorrhage). The predefined margin of non-inferiority was an upper 95% CI limit for the hazard ratio of 1·33. Analyses were by full-analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00234065. FINDINGS Between December, 2003, and October, 2006, 2757 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive cilostazol (n=1379) or aspirin (n=1378), of whom 1337 on cilostazol and 1335 on aspirin were included in analyses; mean follow-up was 29 months (SD 16). The primary endpoint occurred at yearly rates of 2·76% (n=82) in the cilostazol group and 3·71% (n=119) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio 0·743, 95% CI 0·564-0·981; p=0·0357). Haemorrhagic events (cerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or haemorrhage requiring hospital admission) occurred in fewer patients on cilostazol (0·77%, n=23) than on aspirin (1·78%, n=57; 0·458, 0·296-0·711; p=0·0004), but headache, diarrhoea, palpitation, dizziness, and tachycardia were more frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group. INTERPRETATION Cilostazol seems to be non-inferior, and might be superior, to aspirin for prevention of stroke after an ischaemic stroke, and was associated with fewer haemorrhagic events. Therefore, cilostazol could be used for prevention of stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. FUNDING Otsuka Pharmaceutical.

Influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on antiplatelet effect of aspirin

What is known and Objective:  It has been reported that ibuprofen interferes with the antiplatelet effect of low‐dose aspirin. This interaction is ascribed to steric hindrance at the active site of cyclooxygenase‐1 by ibuprofen, when aspirin is administered after ibuprofen. However, whether other non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) interact with aspirin similarly is not well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of nine NSAIDs on the antiplatelet effect of aspirin.

Benefit of Cilostazol in Patients with High Risk of Bleeding: Subanalysis of Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2

Background: The Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2 (CSPS 2) showed that cilostazol significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 25.7% relative to aspirin, with significantly fewer hemorrhagic events, in patients with prior ischemic stroke, excluding cardioembolic stroke. However, whether the benefit of cilostazol is sustained in patients with a high risk of bleeding has not been examined. Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of CSPS 2 to examine whether known risk factors for hemorrhagic stroke, such as stroke subtype and systolic blood pressure (SBP), influence the efficacy of the study drugs on hemorrhagic stroke. The relative risk reduction of hemorrhagic stroke was determined from the incidences calculated by the person-year method. The cumulative incidence rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidences of serious hemorrhage and hemorrhage requiring hospital admission were also evaluated in the two treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by the Cox proportion hazard model for cilostazol versus aspirin were assessed, and a log-rank test was used for the comparison between treatments. Results: The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with prior lacunar stroke (0.36 vs. 1.20% in person-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p < 0.01), but not among those with prior atherothrombotic stroke (0.31 vs. 0.59% in person-year, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-2.0, p = 0.34). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group throughout all SBP categories (Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p < 0.01) including SBP above 140 mm Hg (cilostazol 0.45% vs. aspirin 1.44% in person-year; Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p = 0.02). Cilostazol, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, p < 0.01), overall hemorrhage requiring hospital admission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p = 0.04), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding requiring hospital admission (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Hemorrhagic stroke was less frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with lacunar stroke as well as those with increased blood pressure levels. As for extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, GI bleeding was also less frequent in the cilostazol than in the aspirin group. Cilostazol is supposed to be a therapeutic option to replace aspirin for secondary stroke prevention, especially in these subgroups with high risks for hemorrhagic events.

Bromocriptine Mesylate Attenuates Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Research in Japanese Patients.

Objective Bromocriptine mesylate (BRC), a dopamine D2 receptor agonist has been shown to confer neuroprotection, sustained motor function and slowed disease progression in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) Here we report a first in human trial in ALS. Design A multicenter, Riluzole add-on, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled 102-week extension BRC clinical trial. Methods The trial was conducted between January 2009 and March 2012 on 36 Japanese ALS patients. A 12-week treatment with Riluzole observational period was followed by combined treatment (Riluzole + BRC; n = 29 or Riluzole + placebo; n = 7). The dosing commenced at 1.25 mg/day increasing in steps at two weeks intervals to a maximum of 15 mg/day. The efficacy of BRC was evaluated by comparing BRC and placebo groups upon completion of stepwise dosing at 14 weeks 2 points (1st endpoint) and upon completion or discontinuation of the study (2nd endpoint) of the dosing. Results Statistics analyses revealed a marginal BRC treatment efficacy with P≦20%to placebo by 1st and 2nd endpoint analysis. In the 1st endpoint analysis, BRC group was significantly effective on the scores of ALSAQ40-communicaton (P = 1.2%), eating and drinking (P = 2.2%), ALSFRS-R total (P = 17.6%), grip strength (P = 19.8%) compared to the placebo group. In the 2nd endpoint analysis, differences between the scores of Limb Norris Scale (P = 18.3%), ALSAQ40-communication (P = 11.9%), eating and drinking (P = 13.6%), and neck forward-bent test (P = 15.4%) of BRC group were detected between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for adverse events or serious drug reactions incidence. Conclusions BRC sustains motoneuronal function at least in part through BRC treatment. Further analysis involving a Phase 2b or 3 clinical trial is required but BRC currently shows promise for ALS treatment. Trial Registration UMIN Clinical Trials UMIN000008527

Relationship between atherosclerotic risk factors and aortic plaques in patients with first-ever ischaemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE Aortic plaque is considered a risk factor of ischaemic stroke, and both ulceration and plaque thickness are considered important. However, the relative importance of aortic plaque and carotid plaque remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to clarify the relation between aortic and carotid plaque lesions and atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS We enrolled 76 patients with first-ever ischaemic stroke, undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography, whose aetiology of ischaemic stroke was unknown. We divided the patients into two groups according to aortic plaque thickness, based on previous reports, i.e., a high-risk group (over 4mm) and a low-risk group (less than 4mm). We also examined several atherosclerotic risk factors. RESULTS Mean age, gender and hypertension was not significantly different between the low-risk and high-risk group. HDL-cholesterol (P<0.01), LDL/HDL ratio (P<0.05), non-HDL-cholesterol (P<0.05), HbA1c (P<0.05) and eGFR (P<0.01) were significantly different between the two groups. Max plaque thickness in the carotid artery was correlated with aortic plaque lesions. CONCLUSION Multiple atherosclerotic risk factors are associated with greater aortic plaque lesions. Aortic plaque is important not only as an embolic source, but also as one of the atherosclerotic markers.

Clinical efficacy of rizatriptan for patients with migraine: efficacy of drug therapy for migraine accompanied by tension headache-like symptoms, focusing on neck stiffness.

According to an epidemiological study in Japan, there are as many as 22 million patients with tension headache and 8.4 million with migraine. Furthermore, patients suffering from both types of headache concurrently are estimated to account for more than 50% of headache patients. We studied the efficacy of drug therapy for migraine accompanied by tension headache–like symptoms, focusing principally on neck stiffness. We evaluated the efficacy of rizatriptan by comparison of findings before and after therapy in 34 migraine patients, consisting of 16 without neck stiffness (migraine without neck factor: WONF) and 18 with it (migraine with neck factor: WNF), who received treatment at our neurology/internal medicine department from 1 March 2004 to 31 May 2005. In the study, all the patients were asked to keep a record of their migraine status. The severity of migraine was classified by physicians according to the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria, based on which drug efficacy was evaluated. We selected rizatriptan for migraine treatment in our study based on Dr. Ferrari’s report. In the efficacy study of rizatriptan, in the group of 34 migraine patients, the pain relief rate (79.4%) and pain–free rate (41.2%) at two hours after treatment were as high as those reported in the meta–analysis performed by Ferrari et al., indicating high efficacy of rizatriptan. In the efficacy comparison between the WONF and WNF groups, the painfree rates were 56.3% and 27.8%, and cumulative pain relief rates were 100% and 61.1%, respectively, with better results in the WONF group. A test result was also significantly better (p=0.0076) in the WONF group. Rizatriptan was proved effective in treating migraine patients accompanied by tension headachelike symptoms. Comparison of efficacy rates between patient groups with and without tension headache–like symptoms showed that the pain relief rate in the group without neck stiffness was higher.

Prediction of Antiplatelet Effects of Aspirin In Vivo Based on In Vitro Results

The aim of this study was to establish a method to predict the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in vivo based on in vitro results. Aspirin in 5 different concentrations was added to the platelet-rich plasma samples, and the rates of platelet aggregation induced by collagen were determined in vitro. In addition, platelet aggregation and plasma drug concentration values were determined in vivo before and after the administration of aspirin (162 mg). The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values obtained from the in vivo and in vitro experiments were shown to have relevance, because the EC50 ratio for each subject was the same (0.23 ± 0.03). The actual and predicted values for the rate of inhibition of platelet aggregation were well correlated (P < .0001, r = .95) when the predicted rate was determined using the present method. Our results suggest that the antiplatelet effects of aspirin can be predicted using blood samples obtained before its administration.

Investigation of Antiphosphatidyl-Serine Antibody and Antiphosphatidyl-Inositol Antibody in Ischemic Stroke Patients

Antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We measured β2-GPI aCL, IgGaCL, LA, antiphosphatidyl-serine antibody (PS), and antiphosphatidyl-inositol antibody (PI) in each patient at one month after the onset of stroke. In addition, carotid artery echography was performed in patients positive for PI or PS. Among the 250 patients, 13.6% (34/250) were positive for either PI or PS, and 6.8% (17/250) were positive for both. Carotid artery echography performed on these 34 patients showed that the frequencies of increased intimal-medial thickness (IMT) of 1.1 mm or more, plaque, and carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more were all significantly higher in patients positive for antinuclear antibody than those negative for the antibody (P < .05). PI and PS are associated with antinuclear antibody and precipitation of atherosclerosis. Ischemic stroke patients with SLE frequently showed a variety of antiphospholipid-protein antibodies.

Theory-based analysis of clinical efficacy of triptans using receptor occupancy

BackgroundTriptans, serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, exert their action by targeting serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptors, are used for treatment of migraine attack. Presently, 5 different triptans, namely sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, eletriptan, rizatriptan, and naratriptan, are marketed in Japan. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the relationships of clinical efficacy (headache relief) in Japanese and 5-HT1B/1D receptor occupancy (Φ1B and Φ1D). Receptor occupancies were calculated from both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of triptans.MethodsTo evaluate the total amount of exposure to drug, we calculated the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCcp) and the areas under the time curves for Ф1B and Ф1D (AUCФ1B and AUCФ1D). Moreover, parameters expressing drug transfer and binding rates (Acp, AФ1B, AФ1D) were calculated.ResultsOur calculations showed that Фmax1B and Фmax1D were relatively high at 32.0-89.4% and 68.4-96.2%, respectively, suggesting that it is likely that a high occupancy is necessary to attain the clinical effect. In addition, the relationships between therapeutic effect and AUCcp, AUCΦ1B, AUCΦ1D, and Acp · AUCcp differed with each drug and administered form, whereas a significant relationship was found between the therapeutic effect and AΦ1B · AUCΦ1B or AΦ1D · AUCΦ1D that was not affected by the drug and the form of administration.ConclusionsThese results suggest that receptor occupancy can be used as a parameter for a common index to evaluate the therapeutic effect. We considered that the present findings provide useful information to support the proper use of triptans.

Case of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with atopic factors

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory disease in which the primary lesions occur in the optic nerves and spinal cord. The presence of anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (anti-AQP-4 Ab) can differentiate NMO and multiple sclerosis (MS). Recently, NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD), which does not meet the diagnostic criteria of NMO, was proposed as a new concept. We experienced a case of NMOSD with the elevation of immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and discussed the involvement of atopic factors for pathology. A 69-year-old Japanese man, who had a history of hypertension and palmoplantar pustulosis, presented at a nearby hospital complaining of fever and respiratory symptoms in July 2009. He had no allergic and breeding history. He was diagnosed with myco-