Yasuyuki Nakata

Late-onset bile leakage after hepatic resection

BACKGROUND Postoperative bile leakage can be a serious complication after hepatic resection. Few studies have analyzed patients according to the time of onset of bile leakage. We analyzed differences between patients with early- and late-onset bile leakage after hepatic resection and assessed clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with late-onset leakage. METHODS Between 2008 and 2010, 1,009 patients underwent hepatic resection at 4 participating university hospitals and 2 community hospitals. Fifty-two patients (5.1%) with postoperative bile leakage were divided into an early-onset group (<2 weeks after surgery, n = 34) and a late-onset group (≥2 weeks after surgery, n = 18). Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS The proportion of patients who underwent intra-abdominal placement of a drainage catheter was significantly less in the late-onset group than the early-onset group. All 18 patients in the late-onset group developed intra-abdominal infection, and 2 died of sepsis. The proportion of patients who underwent invasive treatment (abdominal paracentesis, endoscopic biliary drainage, or second hepatic resection) was significantly greater in the late-onset group than in the early-onset group. The time to resolution of bile leakage was significantly greater in the late-onset group than the early-onset group. CONCLUSION Patients should be monitored carefully for bile leakage for several weeks after hepatic resection, because late-onset bile leakage can cause serious complications. Intra-abdominal infection should also be treated as soon as possible, because it may induce refractory bile leakage with serious complications.

Do patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas without macroscopically vascular invasion require anatomic resection? Propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND The benefits of anatomic resection in patients with small (<5 cm), solitary hepatocellular carcinomas remain unclear. Outcomes were therefore evaluated in patients who underwent anatomic resection or nonanatomic resection of small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS Factors affecting overall survival and disease-free survival were investigated in 330 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for solitary (≤5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas without macroscopic vascular invasion. In addition, a propensity score matching model with 330 patients was constructed to overcome bias, with subgroups analyzed by tumor diameter (<3 cm and 3-5 cm). RESULTS ICG-R15 ≥25% was confirmed as being independently associated with poorer overall survival and disease-free survival. One-to-one matching of preoperative characteristics yielded 72 pairs of patients receiving anatomic resection and nonanatomic resection, with long-term outcomes, including overall survival and disease-free survival, being similar in these 2 groups. Subgroup analysis showed that, in patients with tumors <3 cm in diameter, short-term outcomes were better in the nonanatomic resection group than in the anatomic resection group, including significantly reduced operation time (P = .02), blood loss (P = .01), blood transfusion (P < .01), complications (particularly bile leakage and abdominal abscess) (P = .04), and postoperative hospital stay (P < .01). CONCLUSION Anatomic resection was not superior to nonanatomic resection in survival outcomes in patients with solitary small hepatocellular carcinomas without macroscopic vascular invasion. Rather, postoperative short-term outcomes were more favorable with nonanatomic resection.

Two cases of hepatocellular carcinoma located adjacent to the Glisson's capsule treated by laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation with intraductal chilled saline perfusion through an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a commonly used local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, for tumors located adjacent to the Glissons capsule in the hepatic hilar region, RFA may cause bile duct injury and may be difficult to perform using the standard procedure. We describe 2 HCC cases in which RFA was performed laparoscopically under general anesthesia while cooling bile ducts to prevent bile duct injury. An endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube was preoperatively inserted, through which chilled saline was rapidly infused during laparoscopic RFA for HCC adjacent to the Glissons capsule in the hepatic hilar region. The patient was discharged from hospital without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT revealed complete tumor cauterization and no evidence of late bile duct stenosis. This procedure is performed under general anesthesia and, unlike those performed under local anesthesia, is associated with minimal stress to patients and minimal risk of bile duct injury.

Extraperitoneal Fluid Collection due to Chronic Pancreatitis

A 39-year-old man was referred to our hospital for the investigation of abdominal fluid collection. He was pointed out to have alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Laboratory data showed inflammation and slightly elevated serum direct bilirubin and amylase. An abdominal computed tomography demonstrated huge fluid collection, multiple pancreatic pseudocysts and pancreatic calcification. The fluid showed a high level of amylase at 4,490 IU/l. Under the diagnosis of pancreatic ascites, endoscopic pancreatic stent insertion was attempted but was unsuccessful, so surgical treatment (Frey procedure and cystojejunostomy) was performed. During the operation, a huge amount of fluid containing bile acid (amylase at 1,474 IU/l and bilirubin at 13.5 mg/dl) was found to exist in the extraperitoneal space (over the peritoneum), but no ascites was found. His postoperative course was uneventful and he shows no recurrence of the fluid. Pancreatic ascites is thought to result from the disruption of the main pancreatic duct, the rupture of a pancreatic pseudocyst, or possibly leakage from an unknown site. In our extremely rare case, the pancreatic pseudocyst penetrated into the hepatoduodenal ligament with communication to the common bile duct, and the fluid flowed into the round ligament of the liver and next into the extraperitoneal space.