Yehia M. Amin
Al-Azhar University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yehia M. Amin.
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | 1996
Mohamed Aboulghar; Ragaa T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Mehana A. Sattar; Yehia M. Amin
Purpose: In a prospective study, conventional IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were performed on sibling oocytes of 22 patients with unexplained infertility (Group A) and 24 patients with borderline semen (Group B).Results: In Group A, there was no significant difference (P=0.070) in the fertilization rate per oocyte between ICSI (63%) and conventional IVF (50.7%), however, there was total failure of fertilization in conventional IVF in 5 of the 22 patients with IVF and none in ICSI. In group B, there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between the fertilization rate per oocyte in ICSI (59%) and conventional IVF (27.1%). There was total failure of fertilization in 11 patients after conventional IVF and none after ICSI.Conclusions: The study showed that 22.7% of unexplained infertility and 45.8% of patients with borderline semen would have lost their chance of embryo transfer completely because of total failure of fertilization if ICSI was not performed on some oocytes in this cycle.
Fertility and Sterility | 1993
M.A. Aboulghar; R.T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Yehia M. Amin; Amal M. Abbas; Iman M. Salah
OBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and IUI in the treatment of unexplained infertility.nnnDESIGNnThe pregnancy rate (PR) in patients with unexplained infertility treated by COH and IUI (group A) was compared with a no-treatment control (group B).nnnSETTINGnThe Egyptian IVF-ET Center.nnnPARTICIPANTSnFour hundred ninety-two patients with the diagnosis of unexplained infertility.nnnINTERVENTIONnControlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURESnCycle fecundity per treatment cycle and PR per patient.nnnRESULTSnIn group A cycle fecundity was 20.1% per treatment cycle, and the PR was 34.7% per patient. In group B the PR was 8.9% per patient. Pregnancy rate per patient was significantly higher in group A when compared with the spontaneous PR in group B.nnnCONCLUSIONnControlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI significantly increased the PR in patients with unexplained infertility when compared with a no-treatment control group.
Fertility and Sterility | 1999
Ragaa T. Mansour; Mohamed Aboulghar; Gamal I. Serour; Mehany A. Sattar; A Kamal; Yehia M. Amin
OBJECTIVEnTo modify the technique of multifetal pregnancy reduction and to study the outcome of reduced twins in comparison with nonreduced twins and high-order multiple gestations.nnnDESIGNnProspective controlled study.nnnSETTINGnThe Egyptian IVF-ET Center, Cairo.nnnPATIENT(S)nSeventy-five patients with high-order multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction. Controls were 40 nonreduced twin pregnancies and 22 high-order multiple gestations.nnnINTERVENTION(S)nTransvaginal ultrasonically guided multifetal pregnancy reduction was performed. The first 30 cases were done using KCl as a cardiotoxic agent. The modified technique was used for the last 45 cases at an earlier gestational age (approximately 7 weeks) by eliminating the use of KCI and by aspirating the embryonic parts.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)nMiscarriage rate, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and pregnancy complications.nnnRESULT(S)nUsing the modified technique, the miscarriage rate was 8.8% and 41 patients delivered between 32 and 39 weeks of gestation (mean+/-SD, 36.9+/-2.45 weeks). The mean (+/-SD) birth weight was 2,450.51+/-235.44 g. The miscarriage rate, fetal wastage rate, mean gestational age, and mean birth weight were similar in reduced and nonreduced twins and were significantly better than in nonreduced triplets and quadruplets.nnnCONCLUSION(S)nThe modified technique of multifetal pregnancy reduction significantly improved outcomes, which were similar to those of nonreduced twins resulting from assisted reproduction and significantly better than those of nonreduced triplets and quadruplets.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online | 2004
Mohamed Aboulghar; Ragaa T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Hesham Al-Inany; Yehia M. Amin; M. Aboulghar
A significantly lower pregnancy rate following the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol as compared with the long GnRH agonist protocol has been reported. The objective of this study was to investigate whether increasing the dose of gonadotrophins on the day of antagonist administration would increase the pregnancy rate. This study is an open labelled, randomized controlled trial and allocation was done using sealed envelopes. One hundred and fifty-one subfertile couples undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were included in the study. Ovarian stimulation was started on day 3 of the cycle, using 150-300 IU human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)/day. From day 8 onward, daily vaginal ultrasound and daily urinary LH estimation were performed. If a premature LH rise was detected, the cycle was cancelled. The antagonist (0.25 mg daily) was started when the leading follicle reached 15 mm in mean diameter and LH testing in urine was negative up to and including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection. Patients were randomized on the day of starting the antagonist into two groups: group A, 72 patients with no increase in HMG dose, and group B, 79 patients in whom the dose of HMG was increased by 75 IU on the day of antagonist administration, and continued till the day of HCG administration. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding number of oocytes retrieved, embryos obtained, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy rate. It was concluded that there is no clinical evidence for increasing the dose of HMG on the day of antagonist administration.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2003
M. Aboulghar; Mohamed Aboulghar; Ragaa T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Yehia M. Amin; Ahmed M. Abou-Setta
OBJECTIVEnTo compare the outcome of assisted reproduction in day 2 versus day three embryo transfer.nnnDESIGNnProspective study.nnnPARTICIPANTSnA total of 927 consecutive embryo transfers for IVF and ICSI cycles including 626 embryo transfers on day 2 and 301 on day 3.nnnINTERVENTIONnIVF and ICSI.nnnOUTCOME MEASUREnClinical pregnancy rate.nnnRESULTSnThere is no significant difference in the pregnancy rate between ET on day 2 (50.9%) and ET on day 3 (50.5%).nnnCONCLUSIONnEmbryo transfer could be done on days 2 or 3 according to the convenience of the patient and the medical team.nnnCONDENSATIONnEmbryo transfer could be done on days 2 or 3 according to the convenience of the medical team with similar results.
Human Reproduction | 1998
Abdel Maguid Ramzy; M.A. Sattar; Yehia M. Amin; R.T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; M.A. Aboulghar
Human Reproduction | 1994
R.T. Mansour; M.A. Aboulghar; Gamal I. Serour; Yehia M. Amin
Human Reproduction | 1998
M.A. Aboulghar; R.T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Yehia M. Amin
Human Reproduction | 1995
M.A. Aboulghar; R.T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Yehia M. Amin
Human Reproduction | 1994
M.A. Aboulghar; R.T. Mansour; Gamal I. Serour; Yehia M. Amin