Yelin Zhao

Validation of residual SYNTAX score with second-generation drug-eluting stents: one-year results from the prospective multicentre SEEDS study.

AIMS The SYNTAX score has been proposed as a valuable tool to characterise coronary anatomy prospectively based on its complexity. This study evaluated the prognostic value on adverse outcomes of the residual SYNTAX score (rSS) in patients with complex lesions treated with an everolimus-eluting stent (EES). METHODS AND RESULTS One thousand eight hundred and fifty-one patients with small vessel (reference diameter <2.75 mm), long lesion (length >25 mm), or multivessel (>2 target vessels) disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with EES in the prospective SEEDS (A Registry To Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness Of Everolimus Drug Eluting Stent For Coronary Revascularization) trial were categorised into low (<6), mid (>6-<12) and high (>12) baseline SYNTAX score (bSS) groups, and into low (=0), mid (>0-<5) and high (>5) rSS groups. Mean bSS and rSS were 10.87±7.26 and 2.18±3.97, respectively; 64% of patients had complete revascularisation (rSS=0). At 12 months the primary outcome of ischaemia-driven target vessel failure (TVF, composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation) was significantly higher in the high bSS and rSS groups than in the respective lower groups (p<0.01 for both). In multivariable analysis, rSS was an independent predictor of TVF (hazard ratio: 1.403, 95% confidence interval: 1.081 to 1.820, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Twelve-month TVF was significantly higher in the highest rSS group; rSS with a cut-off of 5 might therefore allow the risk stratification of patients with complex lesions treated with a second-generation drug-eluting stent (Clinical-Trials.gov identifier: NCT 01157455).

Left atrial appendage closure monitoring without sedation: a pilot study using intracardiac echocardiography through the oesophageal route.

AIMS To compare stent strut coverage using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at three-month follow-up between a PLGA-polymer with electro-grafting base layer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (BuMA) and a PLA-polymer SES (EXCEL). METHODS AND RESULTS This prospective, single-centre, non-inferiority randomised BuMA-OCT trial enrolled patients with de novo coronary artery lesions, treated with either the BuMA or the EXCEL stent. The study primary endpoint was OCT-evaluated stent strut coverage at three months. Secondary endpoints were neointimal thickness of stent struts, and incomplete stent apposition evaluated with OCT. A total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive the BuMA (n=40) or the EXCEL (n=40) stent. In OCT follow-up (achieved in 86.3% of cases: BuMA, n=33; EXCEL, n=36), the percentage of stent strut coverage was significantly higher in the BuMA vs. the EXCEL group (strut level: 94.2% vs. 90.0%, p<0.01; p(non-inferiority)<0.0001; p(superiority) <0.0001), while the proportion of malapposed struts (strut level: 1.28% vs. 1.80%, p=0.51) and the mean neointimal thickness (strut level: 0.07±0.03 mm vs. 0.06±0.02 mm, p=0.31) were similar. Rates of myocardial infarction (periprocedural non-Q-wave, 7.5% vs. 7.5%, p=1.00) and target lesion failure (7.5% vs. 7.5%, p=1.00) were similar between groups, with no cardiac death or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS In the BuMA-OCT randomised trial, the novel BuMA PLGA-polymer with electro-grafting base layer SES was superior to the EXCEL PLA-polymer SES in the primary endpoint of stent strut coverage at three-month follow-up.AIMS We evaluated the safety and feasibility of an intracardiac echocardiography probe through the oesophageal route (ICE-TEE) for the monitoring of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure to avoid general anaesthesia. METHODS AND RESULTS The study included 16 consecutive patients (75±7 years) in atrial fibrillation with high embolism (CHADS-VASc=5±1.4) and bleeding risk (HAS-BLED=4±0.9) referred for LAA closure (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug [ACP]). Standard TEE was performed before device implantation for LAA analysis. During the procedure, ICE-TEE was used under local anaesthesia to determine LAA size and monitor ACP positioning. Maximum and minimum LAA diameter by standard TEE averaged 21±3 mm and 18±1 mm, respectively. Eccentricity index (1.1±0.2) increased with LAA diameter (r=0.73, p=0.001). Maximum LAA size (21±3 mm) obtained by ICE-TEE during the procedure closely correlated with standard TEE measurement (r=0.9, p<0.0001). LAA closure was successfully performed in 15 patients without complication (one failed despite testing three ACP). Implanted ACP size averaged 25±3 mm (range 22-30 mm) and correlated with the size predicted by ICE-TEE (r=0.89) and standard TEE (r=0.57). Procedure duration (62±27 min) correlated with LAA size by ICE-TEE (r=0.71, p=0.002) and eccentricity index (r=0.58, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS An ICE-TEE probe through the oesophageal route without general anaesthesia may be used for the monitoring of ACP device implantation.Aims: To compare stent strut coverage using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at three-month follow-up between a PLGA-polymer with electro-grafting base layer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (BuMA) and a PLApolymer SES (EXCEL). Methods and results: This prospective, single-centre, non-inferiority randomised BuMA-OCT trial enrolled patients with de novo coronary artery lesions, treated with either the BuMA or the EXCEL stent. The study primary endpoint was OCT-evaluated stent strut coverage at three months. Secondary endpoints were neointimal thickness of stent struts, and incomplete stent apposition evaluated with OCT. A total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive the BuMA (n=40) or the EXCEL (n=40) stent. In OCT follow-up (achieved in 86.3% of cases: BuMA, n=33; EXCEL, n=36), the percentage of stent strut coverage was significantly higher in the BuMA vs. the EXCEL group (strut level: 94.2% vs. 90.0%, p<0.01; p non-inferiority <0.0001; p superiority <0.0001), while the proportion of malapposed struts (strut level: 1.28% vs. 1.80%, p=0.51) and the mean neointimal thickness (strut level: 0.07±0.03 mm vs. 0.06±0.02 mm, p=0.31) were similar. Rates of myocardial infarction (periprocedural non-Q-wave, 7.5% vs. 7.5%, p=1.00) and target lesion failure (7.5% vs. 7.5%, p=1.00) were similar between groups, with no cardiac death or stent thrombosis.

Effect of final kissing balloon dilatation after one-stent technique at left-main bifurcation: a single center data.

Background:Whether final kissing balloon (FKB) dilatation after one-stent implantation at left-main (LM) bifurcation site remains unclear. Therefore, this large sample and long-term follow-up study comparatively assessed the impact of FKB in patients with unprotected LM disease treated with one-stent strategy. Methods:Total 1528 consecutive patients underwent LM percutaneous coronary intervention in one center from January 2004 to December 2010 were enrolled; among them, 790 patients treated with one drug-eluting stent crossover LM to left anterior descending (LAD) with FKB (n = 230) or no FKB (n = 560) were comparatively analyzed. Primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results:Overall, The prevalence of true bifurcation lesions, which included Medina classification (1,1,1), (1,0,1), or (0,1,1), was similar between-groups (non-FKB: 37.0% vs. FKB: 39.6%, P = 0.49). At mean 4 years follow-up, rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (non-FKB: 10.0% vs. FKB: 7.8%, P = 0.33), death, MI and TVR were not significantly different between-groups. In multivariate propensity-matched regression analysis, FKB was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. Conclusions:For patients treated with one-stent crossover LM to LAD, clinical outcomes appear similar between FKB and non-FKB strategy.

Clinical Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Use in Patients Following Everolimus-eluting Stent Implantation: Insights from the SEEDS Study

Background:Studies have suggested that use of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following new generation drug-eluting stent implantation may increase costs and potential bleeding events. This study aimed to investigate the association of DAPT status with clinical safety in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in the SEEDS study (A Registry to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Everolimus Drug-eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization) at 2-year follow-up. Methods:The SEEDS study is a prospective, multicenter study, where patients (n = 1900) with small vessel, long lesion, or multi-vessel diseases underwent EES implantation. Detailed DAPT status was collected at baseline, 6-month, 1- and 2-year. DAPT interruption was defined as any interruption of aspirin and/or clopidogrel more than 14 days. The net adverse clinical events (NACE, a composite endpoint of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium II-V)) were investigated according to the DAPT status at 2-year follow-up. Results:DAPT was used in 97.8% of patients at 6 months, 69.5% at 12 months and 35.4% at 2 years. It was observed that the incidence of NACE was low (8.1%) at 2 years follow-up, especially its components of all-cause death (0.9%), stroke (1.1%), and definite/probable ST (0.7%). DAPT was not an independent predictor of composite endpoint of all-cause death/MI/stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.693, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.096–4.980, P = 0.715) and NACE (HR: 1.041, 95% CI: 0.145–7.454, P = 0.968). Of 73 patients who had DAPT interruption, no patient had ST at 12-month, and only 1 patient experienced ST between 1- and 2-year (1.4%). There was a high frequency of major bleeding events (53/65, 82.5%) occurred in patients receiving DAPT treatment. Conclusions:Prolonged DAPT use was not associated with improved clinical safety. The study emphasized that duration of DAPT needs to be shortened in Chinese patients following EES implantation (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01157455).

TCT-294 Transradial versus Transfemoral Method of Two-Stent Implantation for True Bifurcation Lesions: Comparison of Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes

Timothy A. Sanborn, Roxana Mehran, Philippe Genereux, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Sorin Brener, Ajay J. Kirtane, Tom McAndrew, Dominic Francese, Ran Kornowski, Dariusz Dudek, Eugenia Nikolsky, Gregg Stone Northshore University Healthsystem, Chicago, IL, Mount Sinai Hospital / Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, Tel Aviv University, Petach Tikva, Israel, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel