Yi-Fen Lee

Protective role of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 against oxidative stress in nonmalignant human prostate epithelial cells

Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), through either endogenous or exogenous sources, could induce DNA damage, and accumulation of DNA damage might lead to multistep carcinogenesis. The antioxidative effects of vitamin D have been suggested by epidemiological and many in vitro and in vivo laboratory studies. While exploring the antioxidative effects of vitamin D in prostate cells, we found that the active form of vitamin D, 1α, 25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25‐VD), can protect nonmalignant human prostate epithelial cell lines, BPH‐1 and RWPE‐1, but not malignant human prostate epithelial cells, CWR22R and DU 145, from oxidative stress‐induced cell death. Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), a key antioxidant enzyme, was dose‐ and time‐dependently induced by 1,25‐VD. Mechanistic studies using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay revealed that a direct repeat‐3 (DR3) vitamin D response element located in the first intron of the G6PD genome can be bound by liganded vitamin D receptor, thereby regulating G6PD gene expression. Increasing G6PD activity and glutathione level by 1,25‐VD can scavenge cellular ROS. Moreover, the protective effects of 1,25‐VD were abolished by dehydroepiandrosterone, a noncompetitive inhibitor of G6PD activity. Together, our results showed that 1,25‐VD can protect nonmalignant prostate cells from oxidative stress‐induced cell death by elimination of ROS‐induced cellular injuries through transcriptional activation of G6PD activity. The antioxidative effect of vitamin D strengthens its roles in cancer chemoprevention and adds to a growing list of beneficial effects of vitamin D against cancer.

Recent advances in the TR2 and TR4 orphan receptors of the nuclear receptor superfamily.

The human testicular receptor 2 (TR2) and TR4 orphan receptors are two evolutionarily related proteins belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Numerous TR2 and TR4 variants and homologs have been identified from different species, including vertebrates (e.g. human, murine, rabbit, fish, and amphibian) and invertebrates (e.g. Drosophila, sea urchin, and nematode) since TR2 was initially isolated over a decade ago. Specific tissue distribution, genomic organization, and chromosomal assignment of both orphan receptors have been investigated. In order to reveal the physiological functions played by both TR2 and TR4, upstream modulators of TR2 and TR4 gene expression, their downstream target gene regulation, feedback mechanisms, and differential modulation mediated by the recruitment of other nuclear receptors and coregulators have been investigated. Studies summarized in the present report have provided unexpected insights into the TR2 and TR4 functions in a variety of biological processes. The essential and difficult tasks of identifying orphan receptor ligands, agonist/antagonist assignment, their physiological functions, and mechanisms of action will continue to challenge nuclear receptor researchers in the future.

TR4 nuclear receptor functions as a fatty acid sensor to modulate CD36 expression and foam cell formation

Testicular orphan nuclear receptor 4 (TR4) is an orphan member of the nuclear receptor superfamily with diverse physiological functions. Using TR4 knockout (TR4−/−) mice to study its function in cardiovascular diseases, we found reduced cluster of differentiation (CD)36 expression with reduced foam cell formation in TR4−/− mice. Mechanistic dissection suggests that TR4 induces CD36 protein and mRNA expression via a transcriptional regulation. Interestingly, we found this TR4-mediated CD36 transactivation can be further enhanced by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as omega-3 and -6 fatty acids, and their metabolites such as 15-hydroxyeico-satetraonic acid (15-HETE) and 13-hydroxy octa-deca dieonic acid (13-HODE) and thiazolidinedione (TZD)-rosiglitazone. Both electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrate that TR4 binds to the TR4 response element located on the CD36 5′-promoter region for the induction of CD36 expression. Stably transfected TR4-siRNA or functional TR4 cDNA in the RAW264.7 macrophage cells resulted in either decreased or increased CD36 expression with decreased or increased foam cell formation. Restoring functional CD36 cDNA in the TR4 knockdown macrophage cells reversed the decreased foam cell formation. Together, these results reveal an important signaling pathway controlling CD36-mediated foam cell formation/cardiovascular diseases, and findings that TR4 transactivation can be activated via its ligands/activators, such as PUFA metabolites and TZD, may provide a platform to screen new drug(s) to battle the metabolism syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.

Identification of microRNA-98 as a Therapeutic Target Inhibiting Prostate Cancer Growth and a Biomarker Induced by Vitamin D

Background: MicroRNAs play an important role in the anti-tumor effect of vitamin D in prostate cancer. Results: Vitamin D regulates miR-98 which suppresses CCNJ and prostate cancer cell growth. Conclusion: miR-98 mediates vitamin D anti-proliferative effect and correlates with vitamin D treatment in blood. Significance: miR-98 can inhibit the growth of prostate cancer and measure vitamin D treatment. The anti-tumor effect of vitamin D has been well recognized but its translational application is hindered by side effects induced by supra-physiological concentration of vitamin D required for cancer treatment. Thus, exploring the vitamin D tumor suppressive functional mechanism can facilitate improvement of its clinical application. We screened miRNA profiles in response to vitamin D and found that a tumor suppressive miRNA, miR-98, is transcriptionally induced by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-VD) in LNCaP. Mechanistic dissection revealed that 1,25-VD-induced miR-98 is mediated through both a direct mechanism, enhancing the VDR binding response element in the promoter region of miR-98, and an indirect mechanism, down-regulating LIN-28 expression. Knockdown of miR-98 led to a reduction of 1,25-VD anti-growth effect and overexpression of miR-98 suppressed the LNCaP cells growth via inducing G2/M arrest. And CCNJ, a protein controlling cell mitosis, is down-regulated by miR-98 via targeting 3′-untranslated region of CCNJ. Interestingly, miR-98 levels in blood are increased upon 1,25-VD treatment in mice suggesting the biomarker potential of miR-98 in predicting 1,25-VD response. Together, the finding that growth inhibitive miR-98 is induced by 1,25-VD provides a potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer and a potential biomarker for 1,25-VD anti-tumor action.

Loss of TR4 Orphan Nuclear Receptor Reduces Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase-Mediated Gluconeogenesis

OBJECTIVE—Regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), the key gene in gluconeogenesis, is critical for glucose homeostasis in response to quick nutritional depletion and/or hormonal alteration. RESEARCH DESIGN/METHODS AND RESULTS— Here, we identified the testicular orphan nuclear receptor 4 (TR4) as a key PEPCK regulator modulating PEPCK gene via a transcriptional mechanism. TR4 transactivates the 490-bp PEPCK promoter-containing luciferase reporter gene activity by direct binding to the TR4 responsive element (TR4RE) located at −451 to −439 in the promoter region. Binding to TR4RE was confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Eliminating TR4 via knockout and RNA interference (RNAi) in hepatocytes significantly reduced the PEPCK gene expression and glucose production in response to glucose depletion. In contrast, ectopic expression of TR4 increased PEPCK gene expression and hepatic glucose production in human and mouse hepatoma cells. Mice lacking TR4 also display reduction of PEPCK expression with impaired gluconeogenesis. CONCLUSIONS—Together, both in vitro and in vivo data demonstrate the identification of a new pathway, TR4 → PEPCK → gluconeogenesis → blood glucose, which may allow us to modulate metabolic programs via the control of a new key player, TR4, a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily.

NEGATIVE FEEDBACK CONTROL OF THE RETINOID-RETINOIC ACID/RETINOID X RECEPTOR PATHWAY BY THE HUMAN TR4 ORPHAN RECEPTOR, A MEMBER OF THE STEROID RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY

Amino acid sequence analysis indicates that the human TR4 orphan receptor (TR4) is a member of the estrogen/thyroid receptor subfamily of the steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily and recognizes the AGGTCA direct repeat (DR) of the hormone response element. Here we demonstrate using the electrophoretic mobility shift assay that TR4 binds specifically to DR with a spacing of 1 and 5 base pairs (DR1 and DR5), which are the response elements for retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoid X receptor (RXR), respectively. A reporter gene assay using chloramphenicol acetyltransferase demonstrated that TR4 repressed RA-induced transactivation in a TR4 dose-dependent manner. Inhibition of the retinoid signal pathway also occurs through natural response elements found in CRBPII and RARβ genes. Our data suggest that the mechanism of repression may not involve the formation of functionally inactive heterodimers between TR4 and RAR or RXR. Instead, we show that TR4 may compete for hormone response elements with RAR and RXR due to its higher binding affinity. Furthermore, treatment of F9 murine teratocarcinoma (F9) cells with 10−6 m all-trans-retinoic acid increased TR4 mRNA levels, and this change was accompanied by an increased amount of endogenous TR4 protein that can bind to RXRE in electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Our data therefore strongly suggest that the retinoid signal pathway can be regulated by TR4 in a negative feedback control mechanism, which may restrict retinoic acid signaling to certain elements in a cell-specific fashion.

Androgen signaling is required for the vitamin D-mediated growth inhibition in human prostate cancer cells

Epidemiological data on prostate cancer incidence has suggested that vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for prostate cancer. The antiproliferative activity of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-VD) and its analogues has been demonstrated in many prostate cancer models, yet the detailed mechanisms underlying this protective effect of vitamin D remain to be determined. Here, we demonstrate that two androgen receptor (AR)-positive prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP and CWR22R, are more sensitive to the growth inhibitory effects of 1,25-VD compared to the AR-negative prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3 and DU 145. 1,25-VD treatment inhibited cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2) activity and induced G0/G1 arrest. Interestingly, we also found that 1,25-VD treatment induced the expression of AR, and that the onset of the G0/G1 arrest in LNCaP and CWR22R cells is correlated with the onset of increasing expression of AR. This implies that the antiproliferative actions of 1,25-VD in AR-positive prostate cancer might be mediated through AR. Furthermore, a reduction in 1,25-VD-mediated growth inhibition was observed when AR signaling was blocked by antiandrogens, AR RNA interference, or targeted disruption of AR. Taken together, our data suggest that the androgen/AR signaling plays an important role in the antiproliferative effects of 1,25-VD and restoration of androgen responsiveness by 1,25-VD might be beneficial for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients.

Targeted Inactivation of Testicular Nuclear Orphan Receptor 4 Delays and Disrupts Late Meiotic Prophase and Subsequent Meiotic Divisions of Spermatogenesis

ABSTRACT Testicular orphan nuclear receptor 4 (TR4) is specifically and stage-dependently expressed in late-stage pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids. In the developing mouse testis, the highest expression of TR4 can be detected at postnatal days 16 to 21 when the first wave of spermatogenesis progresses to late meiotic prophase. Using a knockout strategy to delete TR4 in mice, we found that sperm production in TR4−/− mice is reduced. The comparison of testes from developing TR4+/+ and TR4−/− mice shows that spermatogenesis in TR4−/− mice is delayed. Analysis of the first wave of spermatogenesis shows that the delay can be due to delay and disruption of spermatogenesis at the end of late meiotic prophase and subsequent meiotic divisions. Seminiferous tubule staging shows that stages X to XII, where late meiotic prophase and meiotic divisions take place, are delayed and disrupted in TR4−/− mice. Histological examination of testis sections from TR4−/− mice shows degenerated primary spermatocytes and some necrotic tubules. Testis-specific gene analyses show that the expression of sperm 1 and cyclin A1, which are genes expressed at the end of meiotic prophase, was delayed and decreased in TR4−/− mouse testes. Taken together, results from TR4+/+ and TR4−/− mice indicate that TR4 is essential for normal spermatogenesis in mice.

Metformin Inhibits Nuclear Receptor TR4–Mediated Hepatic Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase 1 Gene Expression With Altered Insulin Sensitivity

OBJECTIVE TR4 is a nuclear receptor without clear pathophysiological roles. We investigated the roles of hepatic TR4 in the regulation of lipogenesis and insulin sensitivity in vivo and in vitro. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS TR4 activity and phosphorylation assays were carried out using hepatocytes and various TR4 wild-type and mutant constructs. Liver tissues from TR4 knockout, C57BL/6, and db/db mice were examined to investigate TR4 target gene stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) 1 regulation. RESULTS TR4 transactivation is inhibited via phosphorylation by metformin-induced AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) at the amino acid serine 351, which results in the suppression of SCD1 gene expression. Additional mechanistic dissection finds TR4-transactivated SCD1 promoter activity via direct binding to the TR4-responsive element located at −243 to −255 on the promoter region. The pathophysiological consequences of the metformin→AMPK→TR4→SCD1 pathway are examined via TR4 knockout mice and primary hepatocytes with either knockdown or overexpression of TR4. The results show that the suppression of SCD1 via loss of TR4 resulted in reduced fat mass and increased insulin sensitivity with increased β-oxidation and decreased lipogenic gene expression. CONCLUSIONS The pathway from metformin→AMPK→TR4→SCD1→insulin sensitivity suggests that TR4 may function as an important modulator to control lipid metabolism, which sheds light on the use of small molecules to modulate TR4 activity as a new alternative approach to battle the metabolic syndrome.

Differential regulation of direct repeat 3 vitamin D3 and direct repeat 4 thyroid hormone signaling pathways by the human TR4 orphan receptor.

In situ hybridization analysis demonstrated that abundant testicular orphan receptor (TR4) transcripts were detected in kidney, intestine, and bone, which are vitamin D3 target organs. Cell transfection studies also demonstrated that the expression of the vitamin D3 target gene, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 24-hydroxylase, can be repressed by TR4 through high affinity binding (K d = 1.32 nm) to the direct repeat 3 vitamin D3 receptor response element (DR3VDRE). This TR4-mediated repression of DR3VDRE is in contrast to our earlier report that TR4 could induce thyroid hormone target genes containing a direct repeat 4 thyroid hormone response element (DR4T3RE). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay using several TR4 monoclonal antibodies when combined with either TR4-DR3VDRE or TR4-DR4T3RE showed a distinct supershifted pattern, and proteolytic analysis further demonstrated distinct digested peptides with either TR4-DR3VDRE or TR4-DR4T3RE. These results may therefore suggest that TR4 can adapt to different conformations once bound to DR3VDRE or DR4T3RE. The consequence of these different conformations of TR4-DR3VDRE and TR4-DR4T3RE may allow each of them to recruit different coregulators. The differential repression of TR4-mediated DR3VDRE and DR4T3RE transactivation by the receptor interacting protein 140, a TR4 coregulator, further strengthens our hypothesis that the specificity of gene regulation by TR4 can be modulated by protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions.