Yit Arn Teh

Effects of soil structure destruction on methane production and carbon partitioning between methanogenic pathways in tropical rain forest soils

[1] Controls on methanogenesis are often determined from laboratory incubations of soils converted to slurries. Destruction of soil structure during slurry conversion may disrupt syntrophic associations, kill methanogens, and/or alter the microsite distribution of methanogenic activity, suppressing CH4 production. The effects of slurry conversion on methanogenesis were investigated to determine if disruption of aggregate structure impacted methanogenesis, substrate utilization, and C partitioning between methanogenic pathways. Soils were collected from the tropical rain forest life zone of the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico, and exposed to different physical disturbances, including flooding and physical homogenization. Slurry conversion negatively impacted methanogenesis. Rates of CH4 production declined by a factor of 17 after well-aggregated soils were converted to slurries. Significantly more C-13-acetate was recovered in CO2 compared to CH4 after slurry conversion, suggesting that methanogens consumed less acetate after slurry conversion and may have competed less effectively with other anaerobes for acetate. Isotopic data indicate that the relative partitioning of C between aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic pathways was unchanged after slurry conversion. These data suggest that experiments which destroy soil structure may significantly underestimate methanogenesis and overestimate the potential for other microorganisms to compete with methanogens for organic substrates. Current knowledge of the factors that regulate methanogenesis in soil may be biased by the findings of slurry-based experiments, that do not accurately represent the complex, spatially heterogeneous conditions found in well-aggregated soils.

Evaluating the Classical Versus an Emerging Conceptual Model of Peatland Methane Dynamics

We appreciate discussions with M. Firestone and S. Blazewicz. We received assistance in the field and lab from K. Smetak, H. Dang, and A. McDowell. This research was funded by grants to W.L.S. from the U.S. National Science Foundation (ATM-0842385 and DEB-0543558) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and California Department of Water Resources (DWR) contract 4600011240. The data used are listed in the references, tables, supporting information, and the Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (IDEALS) repository at https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/.