Yiyang Wang

Solid predominant histologic subtype and early recurrence predict poor postrecurrence survival in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Introduction This study investigated the correlation between histologic predominant pattern and postrecurrence survival (PRS), and identified the clinicopathologic factors influencing PRS in patients with completely resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 136 stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients who experienced tumor recurrence after completely resection were included in this study. To analysis the association between histologic predominant pattern and PRS, invasive adenocarcinomas with mixed histologic components were divided into 2 groups: solid and nonsolid group (including lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary) based on the histologic predominant pattern. PRS was analyzed to identify the prognostic predictors using the Kaplan-Meier approach and multivariable Cox models. Results For all stage I invasive adenocarcinoma patients, the majority of postsurgical recurrences occurred within 2 years. Patients with solid predominant histological pattern were associated with unfavorable PRS (HR, 2.40; 95%CI 1.13-5.08, p=.022). There was a significant difference for poor PRS for patients who diagnosed tumor recurrence shorter than 12 months after surgery (HR, 2.34; 95%CI 1.12-4.90, p=.024). Extrathoracic metastasis was associated with poor media PRS in univariable analysis (p =.011), however, there was no significant PRS difference in multivariable analysis (HR, 1.56; 95%CI 0.65-3.73, p=.322) compared with intrathoracic metastasis. Conclusions Solid predominant histologic subtype and recurrence free interval less than 12 months predict worse PRS in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Prognosis of limited resection versus lobectomy in elderly patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma with tumor size less than or equal to 2 cm

Background This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic difference between limited resection and lobectomy among elderly patients with small size lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 666 patients >65 years old with stage I lung adenocarcinoma and tumor size ≤2 cm were included. The patient survival was evaluated by disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: No DFS or OS advantage was found between the lobectomy and wedge resection groups when tumor sizes were ≤1 cm (DFS, P=0.112; OS, P=0.294). The wedge resection group had a significantly worse OS (P=0.041) than that in the lobectomy group when tumor sizes were >1 cm and ≤2 cm. Conclusions We conclude that wedge resection may be a reasonable surgical choice for elderly patients with tumor sizes ≤1 cm.

Appropriate lymphadenectomy significantly reduced recurrence after segmentectomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background Segmentectomy has been widely used for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study is to determine the impact of number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) on survival for patients undergoing segmentectomy. Methods The clinicopathologic data of patients undergoing segmentectomy for NSCLC from July 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results A total of 259 patients with NSCLC were eligible for analysis. Patients with harvested LN ≥6 had higher frequency of nodal metastasis in pathologic examination (9.4% vs. 1.5%, P=0.005). The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with harvested LN ≥6 (90.2%) was significantly higher than that of patients with harvested LN <6 (73.7%, log-rank P=0.038). Multivariable Cox analysis identified harvested LN ≥6 as an independent predictor for improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.90; P=0.029]. There was no significant difference in RFS between patients with harvested LN station ≥3 and <3 (log-rank P=0.34). Conclusions The number of harvest LN ≥6 was independently associated with improved RFS for NSCLC patients undergoing segmentectomy, supporting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines of appropriate LN sampling.

Predicting prognosis of post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Background Recently, nomogram has been widely used in cancer prognoses. However, the predicting model for post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still remains scarce. Here, we tried to develop nomograms for predicting the recurrence and survival of these patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed our database from October 2007 to May 2013 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. 437 qualified patients were included. Univariable and multivariable analyses of cox regression were performed successively to select prognostic factors and nomograms for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were developed. Concordance indexes (C-index) and calibration curves were created to measure the consistency between predicted and actual survivals. Finally, risk group stratifications according to risk scores calculated from nomograms were delineated. Results With a total of 437 patients, five independent prognostic factors related to RFS and two to OS were selected to develop nomograms, respectively. Both 3- and 5-year RFS and OS calibration curves indicated a moderate concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes, consisted with the C-index 0.656 (95% CI: 0.626-0.687) for RFS and 0.651 (95% CI: 0.611-0.691) for OS. Different risk groups showed significant differences in RFS and OS. Conclusions We developed nomograms of RFS and OS for predicting recurrence and survival of post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA NSCLC. These nomograms could help doctors more easily estimate the prognosis and choose optimal decisions for individual during clinical practices.

Predictors of recurrence and survival of pathological T1N0M0 invasive adenocarcinoma following lobectomy

BackgroundThis retrospective research was designed to investigate the relationship between pT1N0M0 invasive adenocarcinoma (IADC) harboring solid (SOL) and/or micropapillary (MIP) components and its prognosis following lobectomy.MethodsClinical data of pT1N0M0 IADC patients were retrospectively collected from Shanghai Chest Hospital. Survival curves were plotted by Kaplan–Meier methods. Multivariable cox regressions were conducted to discover the independent risk factors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), through which nomograms were performed to visualize the risk of recurrences and outcomes in personalized information.ResultsTotally, 1965 patients were enrolled, including 248 harboring SOL/MIP and 1717 not. IADC demonstrated worse 5-year RFS (81.9 vs. 92.2%, p < 0.001) and OS (85.7 vs. 94.4%, p < 0.001) when harboring SOL and/or MIP components. And this status became an independent factor associated with poorer RFS (HR 2.445, 95% CI 1.565–3.821, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 2.139, 95% CI 1.180–3.878, p = 0.012) instead of novel classification of IADC predominant patterns. No difference existed between SOL/MIP predominant and minor patterns. In addition, age > 60, smoking, post-chemotherapy and T1b were all indicating poorer RFS and smoking was also related with worse OS. The c-indexes of nomograms were 0.723 for RFS (95% CI, 0.662–0.784) and 0.703 for OS (95% CI, 0.629–0.777) respectively.ConclusionsOnce the pT1N0M0 IADC harboring SOL/MIP, it strongly indicated the worse clinical recurrence and survival outcome, no matter whether the SOL and/or MIP was predominant. Smoking was correlated with worse prognosis for those patients. Age > 60 and stage T1b also indicated poorer RFS. Whether post-chemotherapy was harmful to pT1N0M0 IADC patients needed further research.

Development and Validation of Web-Based Nomograms to Precisely Predict Conditional Risk of Site-Specific Recurrence for Patients With Completely Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multiinstitutional Study

BACKGROUND: There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal postoperative follow‐up strategy for patients with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to develop web‐based nomograms to precisely predict site‐specific postoperative recurrence in patients with NSCLC and to guide individual surveillance strategies including when to follow up and what diagnostic tests to perform. METHODS: We investigated the pattern of recurrence in a series of 2,017 patients with NSCLC (squamous cell carcinoma and nonlepidic invasive adenocarcinoma) who underwent complete surgical resection at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (development cohort), and developed web‐based clinicopathologic prediction models for conditional risk of site‐specific recurrence based on Cox regression. The variables used in the analysis included sex, age, smoking history, tumor size, tumor histology, lymphovascular invasion, visceral pleural invasion, and pathologic TNM stage. A separate cohort of 3,308 patients with NSCLC from Shanghai Chest Hospital was used for external validation. RESULTS: In the development cohort and the external validation cohort for the established nomograms to predict overall recurrence, thorax recurrence, abdomen recurrence, neck recurrence, brain recurrence, and bone recurrence, the C‐statistics of Harrell et al were 0.743 and 0.748, 0.728 and 0.703, 0.760 and 0.749, 0.779 and 0.757, 0.787 and 0.784, and 0.777 and 0.739, respectively. The calibration plots showed optimal agreement between nomogram‐predicted 3‐year recurrence‐free survival and actual 3‐year recurrence‐free survival. CONCLUSIONS: These user‐friendly nomograms can precisely predict site‐specific recurrence in patients with completely resected NSCLC, based on clinicopathologic features. They may help physicians to make individual postoperative follow‐up plans.

Visceral pleural invasion predict a poor survival among lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤ 3cm

Introduction The impact of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on survival remains controversial for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the survival status of VPI among patients with lymph node-negative lung invasive adenocarcinoma smaller than 3cm. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 2537 consecutive patients with pathologic stage I lung invasive adenocarcinoma. All patients had received lobectomy and system lymph nodes resection. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to tumor size and visceral pleural invasion status. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate survival difference between these groups. Results 548 patients with VPI while 1989 patients without VPI were included in this study. For patients with tumor size ≤2cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR,4.85; 95% CI, 2.98-7.91; p = .000) and OS(HR,3.52; 95% CI, 1.59-7.78; p = .002) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with tumor size between 2-3cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; p = .006) but no significant OS (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.76-2.24; p = .330) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with VPI, there were no survival difference between tumor size 2-3cm group and ≤2cm group for both DFS(HR,1.02; 95% CI, 0.65-1.61; p = .939) and OS(HR,1.45; 95% CI, 0.71-2.97; p = .315). Conclusions VPI could predict a poor survival even for node-negative invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size less than 3cm.INTRODUCTION The impact of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on survival remains controversial for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the survival status of VPI among patients with lymph node-negative lung invasive adenocarcinoma smaller than 3cm. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 2537 consecutive patients with pathologic stage I lung invasive adenocarcinoma. All patients had received lobectomy and system lymph nodes resection.Patients were classified into 4 groups according to tumor size and visceral pleural invasion status. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate survival difference between these groups. RESULTS 548 patients with VPI while 1989 patients without VPI were included in this study. For patients with tumor size ≤2cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR,4.85; 95% CI, 2.98-7.91; p = .000) and OS(HR,3.52; 95% CI, 1.59-7.78; p = .002) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with tumor size between 2-3cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; p = .006) but no significant OS (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.76-2.24; p = .330) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with VPI, there were no survival difference between tumor size 2-3cm group and ≤2cm group for both DFS(HR,1.02; 95% CI, 0.65-1.61; p = .939) and OS(HR,1.45; 95% CI, 0.71-2.97; p = .315). CONCLUSIONS VPI could predict a poor survival even for node-negative invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size less than 3cm.

Predicting the recurrence risk factors and clinical outcomes of peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma ≤3 cm with wedge resection

PurposeThis study was designed to investigate the risk factors of recurrence and survival of clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma underwent wedge resection by the use of Shanghai Chest Hospital Lung Cancer Database.Patients and methodsA total of 746 patients with clinical stage I adenocarcinoma underwent wedge resection from 2010 to 2015 in our database were included in this study. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were performed successively to select significant risk factors and then nomograms as well as the concordance indexes for RFS, OS and LCSS were developed, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were performed if necessary, with the identification of log-rank test.ResultsThe 5-year RFS, OS and LCSS of clinical stage I adenocarcinoma underwent wedge resection were 86.1, 83.6 and 85.2%, respectively. There were three independent risk factors related with RFS (sex, pathology, pleural invasion), two related with OS (sex, volume ratio) and two with LCSS (sex, volume ratio) with the analysis of Cox regression and were selected to develop nomograms. The C-indexes of RFS, OS and LCSS were 0.767 (95% CI 0.667–0.867), 0.782 (95% CI 0.660–0.904) and 0.794 (95% CI 0.669–0.919), respectively. Lymphadenectomy did not show differences statistically but had tendencies of better RFS, OS and LCSS among the subgroup of invasive adenocarcinoma.ConclusionSex, pathology and pleural invasion could be recommended as criteria for clinical stage I adenocarcinoma undergoing wedge resection. And the larger the wedge volume and/or the smaller the tumor volume was, the better OS and LCSS were. If the volume ratio reached 10:1 or more, the survival rate was approximately 90% for both OS and LCSS. Whether lymphadenectomy was necessary for WR, especially in invasive adenocarcinoma, needed further research.

Comprehensive study of prognostic risk factors of patients underwent pneumonectomy

Introduction: To investigate postoperative complications and the prognostic risk factors of patients underwent pneumonectomy. Methods: Four hundred and six patients underwent pneumonectomy were subjected to the study. All the clinicopathologic data including age, gender, smoking history, surgical treatment, postoperative complications, tumor staging and the follow-up information were investigated. Results: The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 3.2% and 6.2%, respectively. Postoperative complications developed in 149 patients (36.7%), mainly included arrhythmia, transfusion, pulmonary infection, bronchopleural fistula and acute respiratory distress syndrome. During the follow-up, 189 patients experienced a relapse, consisting of 51 patients with local recurrence and 138 with distant recurrence. The median survival time was 24.4 months and the overall 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 82.7%, 50.9% and 32.5%, respectively. Moreover, the overall 1-year, 3-year, 5-year survival rates for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were 84.1%, 52.1% and 32.5%, respectively and patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were 56.1%, 38.5% and 28.8%, respectively. Among NSCLCs, adenocarcinomas had a worse prognosis than squamous carcinomas. Compared to right pneumonectomy, patients with left pneumonectomy had a better prognosis. Multivariable analysis revealed ICU stay, disease stage, nodal stage and adjuvant chemotherapy were all significant predictors of overall survival (OS). Conclusions: Pneumonectomy is still a valuable and effective treatment option for patients with advanced lung cancer. Surgeons should be more cautious when patients had higher disease stage, adenocarcinoma and right-side lung cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not affect the prognosis. Pneumonectomy could also achieve acceptable survival outcomes in well-selected SCLC patients.