Yo-Jin Song

Moment Resistance Performance Evaluation of Larch Glulam Joint Bonded in Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Rods

국내산 낙엽송 집성재와 봉형 GFRP의 접착성능을 평가하기 위해 집성재에 선공을 한 후 봉형 GFRP를 삽입하고 접착제로 목재와의 간극을 충진시켜 인발시험편을 제작하였다. 인발시험편은 접착 깊이, 접착층 두께, 접착제 종류를 다르게 적용하여 실험하였다. 봉형 GFRP를 삽입접착한 캔틸레버형 라멘구조 시험체는 인발시험 결과를 토대로 제작, 강판삽입형 시험체와 모멘트 저항 성능을 비교검토 하였다. 인발시험결과 봉형 GFRP의 삽입깊이가 봉형 GFRP 직경의 5배일 때 가장 우수한 접착력이 측정되었으며, 접착층 두께는 1 mm일 경우 2 mm일 때보다 17%∼29% 향상된 접착력이 측정되었다. 또한 폴리우레탄(poly-urethane) 접착제를 사용한 시험편이 레조시놀(resorcinol) 접착제를 사용한 시험편보다 2.9∼4.0배 높은 성능을 발휘하였다. 봉형 GRFP로 접합한 캔틸레버형 라멘구조 시험체는 드리프트 핀을 사용한 강판삽입형 시험체와 비교하여 평균0.82배 낮은 모멘트 저항 성능이 측정되었지만 초기강성은 0.93배로 대등한 성능을 보였다.

Performance Evaluation for Bending Strength and Tensile Type Shear Strength of GFRP Reinforced Laminated Wooden Pin

By replacing the previous metal connector on the joints of timber structure, the GFRP reinforced laminated wooden pin was produced using a wooden material and Glass fiber reinforced plastic(GFRP) composite laminate. In addition, using the reinforced wooden pin, the tensile type shear strength test was conducted. Based on the result of the bending strength test of the reinforced laminated wooden pin according to the GFRP arrangement, a specimen(Type-A) with a single insertion of GFRP for each layer have shown the most favorable performance. Also, it was verified that densi- fied specimen hot pressed for an hour at the temperature of 150°C and with the oppression pressure 1.96 N/mm 2 have shown the improved performance of 1.57 times than the specimen without the densification.

Shear Strength of Reinforced Glulam-bolt Connection by Glass Fiber Combination*

In order to know the shear performances of a bolted connection in reinforced glulam depending upon the combination of textile glass fiber, a tensile-type shear test was conducted. Textile glass fiber was used as a reinforcement, whose glass fiber arrangement was a plain weaving type or a diagonal cloth type. Reinforced glulam was made up of 5 plies and it was produced by inserting and laminating the plies between laminas depending upon a changed insert position and combination form of textile glass fiber. Tensile-type shear test specimens were a steel plate insert-type and joined at end-distance 7D with bolts whose diameter 12 or 16 mm.

Structural Performance of Joints for Partial Reinforced Beam Using GFRP Laminated Plate and Cylindrical Reinforced LVL Column

After being laminated with a combination of glass fiber reinforced plastic and plywood, the GFRP laminated plate was densificated for 1 hour at with pressure of . A partial reinforced beam was produced by attaching the 5 GFRP laminated plates to the joint of glulam and the column. In addition, the column to beam joint was produced by using reinforced laminated wooden pin which was made of GFRP sheet and plywood, fiber glass reinforced cylindrical-LVL column. The joint was made of round log, glulam and drift pin as the reference specimen, and its moment resistance was evaluated. As a result, the strength performance of specimens with partial reinforced beams were 1.8 times stronger than the reference specimen on average. Furthermore, rupture was neither occurred on partial reinforced beam nor column. Toughness and stiffness of joints were also fine. The GFRP sheet reinforced laminated plate showed better reinforcement effect than GFRP textile reinforced one. GFRP sheet was inserted into each layer of laminate, and it showed good condition in rotation-angle and strength, therefore it is the most appropriate to reinforce the part of the beam.

Evaluation of The Moment Resistance Joint Strength of Larch Glulam Using Glass Fiber Reinforced Wood Plate

ABSTRACT As a way of developing wooden joint development, a glass fiber reinforced wood plate was manufactured to replace a steel plate. Also, the fracture toughness was evaluated. Through application to a cantilever-type specimen made of a column and a beam, the moment resistance performance was evaluated. For the fracture toughness specimen of the wood plate, 12 types were manufactured by varying the combination of a main member (veneer and plywood) and reinforcement (glass fiber sheet and glass fiber cloth). The results of the fracture toughness test indicated that the 5% yield load of the specimen using plywood was 18% higher than that of the specimen using veneer, and that the specimen reinforced by inserting glass fiber sheets between testing materials (Type-3-PS) had the highest average 5% yield load 4841 N. Thus, a moment resistance strength test was performed by applying Type-3-PS to a column-beam joint. The results of the test indicated that compared to the specimen using a steel plate and a drift pin (Type-A), the maximum moment ratio of the specimen using a glass fiber reinforced wood plate (Type-3-PS) and a drift pin (Type-B) was 0.79; and that a rupture occurred in the wood plate due to high stiffness of the drift pin. The maximum moment ratio of the specimen using a glass fiber reinforced wood plate (Type-3-PS) and a glass fiber reinforced wooden laminated pin (Type-C) was 0.67, which showed low performance. However, unlike Type-A, a ductile fracture occurred on Type-C, and the load gradually decreased even after the max-imum moment.

Lateral Load Performance Evaluation of Larch Glulam Portal Frames Using GFRP-Reinforced Laminated Plate and GFRP Rod

The evaluation of the lateral load performance for larch glulam portal frames was carried out using glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) as connector in two different systems: the GFRP-reinforced laminated plates combined with veneer, and GFRP rod joints glued with epoxy resins to replace usual metal connectors for the structural glulam rahmen joints. As a result the yield strength, ultimate strength, initial stiffness of glulams of GFRP rod joints glued with epoxy resin decreased to 49%, 52% and 61% compared to those of the conventional metal connector. This connector will be a stress device where the bonding strength between the GFRP rod and glued laminated timber is important. Thus, there will be a high possibility that a problem may occur when it is applied to the field. On the other hand, the GFRP-reinforced laminated plates and wood (Eucalyptus marginata) pin were measured all within 3% for all measurements of the yield strength, ultimate strength, initial strength and ductility factor, regardless of high cross sectional loss on the glued laminated timber slit joint. In addition, the variation of stiffness on the cycle was 35%, which was the lowest, confirming that it was almost the same performance as the specimen prepared with the metal connector.

Moment Resistance Performance Evaluation of Larch Glulam Joints using GFRP-reinforced Laminated Plate and GFRP Rod

Instead of metal connector generally used on the structural glued laminated timber rahmen joints, the GFRP reinforced laminated plates combining veneer and GFRP (Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic) and bonded type GFRP rod were used as the connectors. As a result of moment resistance performance evaluation on the joint part applied with these connectors, the yield moment of specimen using the GFRP reinforced laminated plates and GFRP rod pin was measured 4 % lower in comparison to the specimen (Type-1) using the metal connectors, but the initial rotational stiffness was measured 29% higher. Also, the yield moment and rotational stiffness of the specimen using the GFRP-reinforced laminated plates and wood (Eucalyptus marginata) pin showed were measured 11% and 56% higher in comparison to the Type-1 specimen, showing the best performance. It was also confirmed through the failure shape and perfect elasto-plasticity analysis that it showed ductility behavior, not brittle fracture, from the shear resisting force by the pin and the bonding strength increased and the unification of member was carried out. On the other hand, in case of the specimen bonded with GFRP rod, it was impossible to measure the bonding performance or it was measured very low due to poor bonding.

Performance Evaluation of Bending Strength of Curved Composite Glulams Made of Korean White Pine

본 연구에서는 잣나무 곡선부재의 휨 성능을 향상시키기 위하여 Glass fiber 소재의 보강재와 낙엽송 층재로 보강한 만곡 복합집성재를 제작하였다. 잣나무 만곡집성재는 보강유무 및 보강방법에 의하여 다섯 종류로 제작되었다. 대조시험편인 Type-A는 잣나무 층재로만 제작된 시험편이며, Type-B는 최외층에 잣나무 대신 동일한 두께의 국내산 낙엽송층재로 제작한 시험편이다. Type-C는 직물형태의 glass fiber cloth가 매 층재 사이에 삽입된 시험편이다. Type-D는 glass fiber cloth가 최외층재들의 안쪽과 바깥쪽에 2장씩 보강된 시험편이다. Type-E는 sheet 타입의 GFRP를 Type-D와 동일한 위치에 1장씩 보강한 시험편이다. 휨 강도 시험 결과, Type-A의 파괴계수와 비교하여 Type-B는 29%, Type-C는 6%, Type-E는 48% 증가되었으며 Type-D는 오히려 2% 감소하였다. 파괴모드에서 Type-A와 Type-B 그리고 Type-C는 최대하중에 도달하는 순간 완전히 파단되는 경향을 보였다. 그러나 Type-D와 Type-E는 보강재에 의해 파단이 억제되어 하중의 감소가 천천히 진행되었으며, 보강재 GFRP sheet(Type-E)는 압축응력과 인장응력에 대한 보강효과가 glass fiber cloth(Type-D)보다 양호한 것으로 확인되었다. 【In this study, to improve bending strength performance of Korean white pine, we made the curved composite glulam that was reinforced with glass fiber materials and larch lamina. Five types of Korean white pine curved glulams were made depending on whether they had been reinforced or not and how they had been reinforced. Type-A, reference specimen, was produced only with Korean white pine lamina, and Type-B was with larch lamina in the same thickness. Type-C was made by inserting a glass fiber cloth of textile shape between the each layer. Type-D was reinforced with two glass fiber cloths, which were placed inside and outside of the outermost lamina. Type-E was reinforced with GFRP sheet in the same way as Type-D. As a result of this bending strength test, the modulus of rupture (MOR) of Type-B, Type-C and Type-E were increased by 29%, 6%, and 48% in comparison with Type-A. However, MOR of Type-D was decreased by 2% in comparison with Type-A. In the failure modes, Type-A, Type-B and Type-C were totally fractured at the maximum load. However, load values of Type-D and Type-E decreased slowly because of reinforcement of fracture suppression, and the GFRP sheet (Type-E) had better reinforcing effect on compressive stress and tensile stress than the glass fiber cloth (Type-D).】본 연구에서는 잣나무 곡선부재의 휨 성능을 향상시키기 위하여 Glass fiber 소재의 보강재와 낙엽송 층재로 보강한 만곡 복합집성재를 제작하였다. 잣나무 만곡집성재는 보강유무 및 보강방법에 의하여 다섯 종류로 제작되었다. 대조시험편인 Type-A는 잣나무 층재로만 제작된 시험편이며, Type-B는 최외층에 잣나무 대신 동일한 두께의 국내산 낙엽송층재로 제작한 시험편이다. Type-C는 직물형태의 glass fiber cloth가 매 층재 사이에 삽입된 시험편이다. Type-D는 glass fiber cloth가 최외층재들의 안쪽과 바깥쪽에 2장씩 보강된 시험편이다. Type-E는 sheet 타입의 GFRP를 Type-D와 동일한 위치에 1장씩 보강한 시험편이다. 휨 강도 시험 결과, Type-A의 파괴계수와 비교하여 Type-B는 29%, Type-C는 6%, Type-E는 48% 증가되었으며 Type-D는 오히려 2% 감소하였다. 파괴모드에서 Type-A와 Type-B 그리고 Type-C는 최대하중에 도달하는 순간 완전히 파단되는 경향을 보였다. 그러나 Type-D와 Type-E는 보강재에 의해 파단이 억제되어 하중의 감소가 천천히 진행되었으며, 보강재 GFRP sheet(Type-E)는 압축응력과 인장응력에 대한 보강효과가 glass fiber cloth(Type-D)보다 양호한 것으로 확인되었다. 【In this study, to improve bending strength performance of Korean white pine, we made the curved composite glulam that was reinforced with glass fiber materials and larch lamina. Five types of Korean white pine curved glulams were made depending on whether they had been reinforced or not and how they had been reinforced. Type-A, reference specimen, was produced only with Korean white pine lamina, and Type-B was with larch lamina in the same thickness. Type-C was made by inserting a glass fiber cloth of textile shape between the each layer. Type-D was reinforced with two glass fiber cloths, which were placed inside and outside of the outermost lamina. Type-E was reinforced with GFRP sheet in the same way as Type-D. As a result of this bending strength test, the modulus of rupture (MOR) of Type-B, Type-C and Type-E were increased by 29%, 6%, and 48% in comparison with Type-A. However, MOR of Type-D was decreased by 2% in comparison with Type-A. In the failure modes, Type-A, Type-B and Type-C were totally fractured at the maximum load. However, load values of Type-D and Type-E decreased slowly because of reinforcement of fracture suppression, and the GFRP sheet (Type-E) had better reinforcing effect on compressive stress and tensile stress than the glass fiber cloth (Type-D).】

Strength Performance Evaluation of Deck Using Reinforced Plastic Connector

Existing wood decks brings out negligent accident because fastener can be pulled-out by cyclic load of pedestrians. When deck and joist are connected, it also causes the problems, which are cracking of wood decks and rapid decay by material of fastener. In this study, strength property of deck unit using reinforced plastic connector made by domestic A company was evaluated. Southern yellow pine (Pinus palustris Miller) were used for deck material. Bending strength of deck units were implemented for fastener type and joist spacing (400, 600 mm). In the result, carbon steel screw into reinforced plastic connector was the best in average bending strength(Joist spacing : 400, 600 mm). In the result of bending strength for joist-width (40, 50, 70, 80 mm), the average maximum bending strength was measured when the joist spacing was 40 mm.

Strength Evaluation of Pinus rigida Miller Wooden Retaining Wall Using Steel Bar

Pitch pine (Pinus rigida Miller) retaining walls using Steel bar, of which the constructability and strength performance are good at the construction site, were manufactured and their strength properties were evaluated. The wooden retaining wall using Steel bar was piled into four stories stretcher and three stories header, which is 770 mm high, 2,890 mm length and 782 mm width. Retaining wall was made by inserting stretchers into Steel bar after making 18 mm diameter of holes at top and bottom stretcher, and then stacking other stretchers and headers which have a slit of 66 mm depth and 18 mm width. The strength properties of retaining walls were investigated by horizontal loading test, and the deformation of structure by image processing (AlCON 3D OPA-PRO system). Joint (Type-A) made with a single long stretcher and two headers, and joint (Type-B) made with two short stretchers connected with half lap joint and two headers were in the retaining wall using Steel bar. The compressive shear strength of joint was tested. Three replicates were used in each test. In horizontal loading test the strength was 1.6 times stronger in wooden retaining wall using Steel bar than in wooden retaining wall using square timber. The timber and joints were not fractured in the test. When testing compressive shear strength, the maximum load of type-A and Type-B was 130.13 kN and 130.6 kN, respectively. Constructability and strength were better in the wooden retaining wall using Steel bar than in wooden retaining wall using square timber.