Yoan Renaud
Blaise Pascal University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yoan Renaud.
international conference on formal concept analysis | 2005
Alain Gély; Raoul Medina; Lhouari Nourine; Yoan Renaud
Mannila and Raiha [5] have shown that minimum implicational bases can have an exponential number of implications. Aim of our paper is to understand how and why this combinatorial explosion arises and to propose mechanisms which reduce it.
concept lattices and their applications | 2012
Rokia Missaoui; Lhouari Nourine; Yoan Renaud
The objective of this article is to define an approach towards generating implications with (or without) negation when only a formal context K = (G, M, I) is provided. To that end, we define a two-step procedure which first (i) computes implications whose premise is a key in the context K |
international conference on formal concept analysis | 2008
Rokia Missaoui; Lhouari Nourine; Yoan Renaud
\tilde{\rm K}
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence | 2013
Pierre Colomb; Alexis Irlande; Olivier Raynaud; Yoan Renaud
representing the apposition of the context K and its complementary
modelling computation and optimization in information systems and management sciences | 2008
Yoan Renaud
\tilde{\rm K}
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence | 2014
Pierre Colomb; Alexis Irlande; Olivier Raynaud; Yoan Renaud
with attributes in
concept lattices and their applications | 2010
Rokia Missaoui; Lhouari Nourine; Yoan Renaud
\tilde{\rm M}
Elementos | 2013
Pierre Colomb; Alexis Irlande; Olivier Raynaud; Yoan Renaud
(negative attributes), and then (ii) uses an inference axiom we have defined to produce the whole set of implications.
international conference on formal concept analysis | 2011
Pierre Colomb; Alexis Irlande; Olivier Raynaud; Yoan Renaud
The objective of this article is to investigate the problem of generating both positive and negative exact association rules when a formal context K of (positive) attributes is provided. A straightforward solution to this problem consists of conducting an apposition of the initial context K with its complementary context K, construct the concept lattice B(K|K) of apposed contexts and then extract rules. A more challenging problem consists of exploiting rules generated from each one of the contexts K and K to get the whole set of rules for the context K|K. In this paper, we analyze a set of identified situations based on distinct types of input, and come out with a set of properties. Obviously, the global set of (positive and negative) rules is a superset of purely positive rules (i.e., rules with positive attributes only) and purely negative ones since it generally contains mixed rules (i.e., rules in which at least a positive attribute and a negative attribute coexist). The paper presents also a set of inference rules to generate a subset of all mixed rules from positive, negative and mixed ones. Finally, two key conclusions can be drawn from our analysis: (i) the generic basis containing negative rules, ΣK, cannot be completely and directly inferred from the set ΣK of positive rules or from the concept lattice B(K), and (ii) the whole set of mixed rules may not be completely generated from ΣK alone, ΣK ∪ ΣK alone, or B(K) alone.
concept lattices and their applications | 2011
Pierre Colomb; Alexis Irlande; Olivier Raynaud; Yoan Renaud
A collection of sets on a ground set Un (Un = {1,2,...,n}) closed under intersection and containing Un is known as a Moore family. The set of Moore families for a fixed n is in bijection with the set of Moore co-families (union-closed families containing the empty set) denoted