Yoichiro Hongo

Augmentation of vessel squeezing at coronary-myocardial bridge by nitroglycerin: Study by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound☆☆☆★★★

BACKGROUND Nitroglycerin is known to augment vessel wall squeezing at the site with coronary-myocardial bridging (CMB). This study was designed to define the mechanism of nitroglycerin-induced augmentation of CMB in clinical settings. METHODS We analyzed nitroglycerin reactivity at the site with CMB in 39 patients. Maximal and minimal diameters of CMB during a cardiac cycle were measured by quantitative angiography before and after intracoronary administration of 250 microgram nitroglycerin. In 15 patients, CMB sites were observed by intravascular ultrasound to determine the intimal thickness and the time-serial change in vessel area. RESULTS Before nitroglycerin, CMB was demonstrated with angiography in 25 patients, and the remaining 14 patients showed CMB after nitroglycerin. The maximal diameter during diastole increased from 1. 4 +/- 0.4 mm to 1.9 +/- 0.4 mm after nitroglycerin, whereas the minimal diameter during systole decreased from 1.0 +/- 0.4 mm to 0.7 +/- 0.4 mm (P <.01). Thus nitroglycerin augmented the percent vessel narrowing during systole from 24% +/- 21% to 65% +/- 16% (P <.01). Under these conditions, intravascular ultrasound showed the reduction of the cross-sectional area of the sites with CMB by -38% +/- 16% (P <.01) during systole, and this phenomenon continued to early diastole (-30% +/- 16%). The intimal thickness was 0.32 +/- 0. 10 mm, which suggests the absence of atherosclerotic disease at CMB sites. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that nitroglycerin-induced augmentation of the percent narrowing of CMB can be derived from further systolic compression of the vessel lumen as well as diastolic expansion, probably because of the increase in vessel compliance after nitroglycerin. We suggest that the delayed dilation of coronary lumen during the early diastole may contribute to the occurrence of myocardial ischemia.

New electrocardiographic criteria for predicting the site of coronary artery occlusion in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction

In patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the site of the culprit lesion is an important determinant of outcome. Patients with right ventricular infarction have a poor prognosis, whereas those with occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) have a good prognosis. Therefore, we assessed whether standard 12-lead electrocardiograms obtained on admission could identify the site of coronary artery occlusion, (i.e., a site proximal to the origin of the right ventricular branch of the right coronary artery [RCA], a site distal to the origin of the right ventricular branch of the RCA, or a site in the LCx). The ratio of ST depression in lead V3 to ST elevation in lead III (V3/III ratio) was evaluated immediately before coronary angiography in 152 patients with a first inferior wall AMI confirmed by coronary angiography within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. For occlusion of the proximal RCA, distal RCA, and LCx, V3/III ratio was 0.2+/-0.3, 0.8+/-0.5, and 2.5+/-2.5 (p = 0.0001), respectively. The V3/III ratio <0.5 identified proximal RCA occlusion, 0.5 <V3/III ratio < or = 1.2 identified distal RCA occlusion, and 1.2 <V3/III ratio identified LCx occlusion with sensitivities of 91%, 84%, and 84%, and specificities of 91%, 93%, and 95%, respectively. We conclude that the V3/III ratio is useful in predicting the site of coronary artery occlusion in patients with inferior wall AMI.

Impact of Polymer Formulations on Neointimal Proliferation After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With Different Polymers Insights From the RESOLUTE Trial

Background— Polymer formulation may affect the efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Resolute, Endeavor, and ZoMaxx are zotarolimus-eluting stents with different stent platforms and different polymer coatings and have been tested in clinical trials. The aim of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents with different polymers. Methods and Results— Data were obtained from the first-in man trial or first randomized trials of each stent, The Clinical RESpOnse EvaLUation of the MedTronic Endeavor CR ABT-578 Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (RESOLUTE), Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), and ZoMaxx I trials. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound analyses (8 to 9 months of follow-up) were possible in 353 patients (Resolute: 88, Endeavor: 98, ZoMaxx: 82, Driver: 85). Volume index (volume/stent length) was obtained for vessel, stent, lumen, peristent plaque, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound–detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. At baseline, vessel, lumen, and peristent plaque volume index were not significantly different among the 4 stent groups. At follow-up, percent neointimal obstruction was significantly lower in Resolute compared with Endeavor, ZoMaxx, and Driver (Resolute: 3.7±4.0, Endeavor: 17.5±10.1, ZoMaxx: 14.6±8.1, Driver: 29.4±17.2%; P<0.001). Greater maximum cross-sectional narrowing and higher neointima-free frame ratio, suggesting less neointimal coverage, were observed in Resolute compared with other stent groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that the biodurable polymer used in Resolute independently correlated with neointimal suppression among 3 zotarolimus-eluting stents. Conclusions— The different polymer formulations significantly affect the relative amount of neointima for zotarolimus-eluting stents. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00248079.

Sex differences in neointimal hyperplasia following endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Inconsistent results in outcomes have been observed between the genders after drug-eluting stent implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in neointimal proliferation for the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the Driver bare-metal stent (BMS). A total of 476 (n = 391 ZES, n = 85 BMS) patients whose volumetric intravascular ultrasound analyses were available at 8-month follow-up were studied. At 8 months, neointimal obstruction and maximum cross-sectional narrowing (CSN) were significantly lower in women than in men receiving ZES (neointimal obstruction 15.5 ± 9.5% vs 18.2 ± 10.9%, p = 0.025; maximum CSN 30.3 ± 13.2% vs 34.8 ± 15.0%, p = 0.007). Conversely, these parameters tended to be higher in women than in men receiving BMS (neointimal obstruction 36.3 ± 15.9% vs 27.5 ± 17.2%, p = 0.053; maximum CSN 54.3 ± 18.6% vs 45.6 ± 18.3%, p = 0.080). There was a significant interaction between stent type and gender regarding neointimal obstruction (p = 0.001) and maximum CSN (p = 0.003). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that female gender was independently associated with lower neointimal obstruction (p = 0.027) and maximum CSN (p = 0.004) for ZES but not for BMS. Compared to BMS, ZES were independently associated with a reduced risk for binary restenosis in both genders (odds ratio for women 0.003, p = 0.001; odds ratio for men 0.191, p <0.001), but the magnitude of this risk reduction with ZES was significantly greater in women than men (p = 0.015). In conclusion, female gender is independently associated with decreased neointimal hyperplasia in patients treated with ZES. The magnitude of risk reduction for binary restenosis with ZES is significantly greater in women than in men.

Comparison of results of early reperfusion in patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with and without complete atrioventricular block

We investigated the effect of reperfusion in patients with complete atrioventricular block within 6 hours after the onset of inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Early reperfusion may promote the restoration of normal sinus rhythm and effectively reduce infarct size in these patients.

Impact of Polymer Formulations on Neointimal Proliferation After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With Different PolymersClinical Perspective

Background— Polymer formulation may affect the efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Resolute, Endeavor, and ZoMaxx are zotarolimus-eluting stents with different stent platforms and different polymer coatings and have been tested in clinical trials. The aim of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents with different polymers. Methods and Results— Data were obtained from the first-in man trial or first randomized trials of each stent, The Clinical RESpOnse EvaLUation of the MedTronic Endeavor CR ABT-578 Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (RESOLUTE), Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), and ZoMaxx I trials. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound analyses (8 to 9 months of follow-up) were possible in 353 patients (Resolute: 88, Endeavor: 98, ZoMaxx: 82, Driver: 85). Volume index (volume/stent length) was obtained for vessel, stent, lumen, peristent plaque, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound–detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. At baseline, vessel, lumen, and peristent plaque volume index were not significantly different among the 4 stent groups. At follow-up, percent neointimal obstruction was significantly lower in Resolute compared with Endeavor, ZoMaxx, and Driver (Resolute: 3.7±4.0, Endeavor: 17.5±10.1, ZoMaxx: 14.6±8.1, Driver: 29.4±17.2%; P<0.001). Greater maximum cross-sectional narrowing and higher neointima-free frame ratio, suggesting less neointimal coverage, were observed in Resolute compared with other stent groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that the biodurable polymer used in Resolute independently correlated with neointimal suppression among 3 zotarolimus-eluting stents. Conclusions— The different polymer formulations significantly affect the relative amount of neointima for zotarolimus-eluting stents. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00248079.

Impact of Polymer Formulations on Neointimal Proliferation After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With Different Polymers

Background— Polymer formulation may affect the efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Resolute, Endeavor, and ZoMaxx are zotarolimus-eluting stents with different stent platforms and different polymer coatings and have been tested in clinical trials. The aim of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents with different polymers. Methods and Results— Data were obtained from the first-in man trial or first randomized trials of each stent, The Clinical RESpOnse EvaLUation of the MedTronic Endeavor CR ABT-578 Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (RESOLUTE), Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), and ZoMaxx I trials. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound analyses (8 to 9 months of follow-up) were possible in 353 patients (Resolute: 88, Endeavor: 98, ZoMaxx: 82, Driver: 85). Volume index (volume/stent length) was obtained for vessel, stent, lumen, peristent plaque, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound–detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. At baseline, vessel, lumen, and peristent plaque volume index were not significantly different among the 4 stent groups. At follow-up, percent neointimal obstruction was significantly lower in Resolute compared with Endeavor, ZoMaxx, and Driver (Resolute: 3.7±4.0, Endeavor: 17.5±10.1, ZoMaxx: 14.6±8.1, Driver: 29.4±17.2%; P<0.001). Greater maximum cross-sectional narrowing and higher neointima-free frame ratio, suggesting less neointimal coverage, were observed in Resolute compared with other stent groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that the biodurable polymer used in Resolute independently correlated with neointimal suppression among 3 zotarolimus-eluting stents. Conclusions— The different polymer formulations significantly affect the relative amount of neointima for zotarolimus-eluting stents. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00248079.

Impact of Polymer Formulations on Neointimal Proliferation After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With Different PolymersClinical Perspective: Insights From the RESOLUTE Trial

Background— Polymer formulation may affect the efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Resolute, Endeavor, and ZoMaxx are zotarolimus-eluting stents with different stent platforms and different polymer coatings and have been tested in clinical trials. The aim of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents with different polymers. Methods and Results— Data were obtained from the first-in man trial or first randomized trials of each stent, The Clinical RESpOnse EvaLUation of the MedTronic Endeavor CR ABT-578 Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (RESOLUTE), Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), and ZoMaxx I trials. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound analyses (8 to 9 months of follow-up) were possible in 353 patients (Resolute: 88, Endeavor: 98, ZoMaxx: 82, Driver: 85). Volume index (volume/stent length) was obtained for vessel, stent, lumen, peristent plaque, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound–detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. At baseline, vessel, lumen, and peristent plaque volume index were not significantly different among the 4 stent groups. At follow-up, percent neointimal obstruction was significantly lower in Resolute compared with Endeavor, ZoMaxx, and Driver (Resolute: 3.7±4.0, Endeavor: 17.5±10.1, ZoMaxx: 14.6±8.1, Driver: 29.4±17.2%; P<0.001). Greater maximum cross-sectional narrowing and higher neointima-free frame ratio, suggesting less neointimal coverage, were observed in Resolute compared with other stent groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that the biodurable polymer used in Resolute independently correlated with neointimal suppression among 3 zotarolimus-eluting stents. Conclusions— The different polymer formulations significantly affect the relative amount of neointima for zotarolimus-eluting stents. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00248079.