Yoko Kusunoki

CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To evaluate the activity of CPT-11, which is a new derivative of camptothecin, against refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixteen patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC were entered onto a prospective, non-randomized, single-institution phase II trial. All 16 patients had been pretreated heavily with some form of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Five patients had received previous chemotherapy with cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) as an induction therapy. Six patients had been treated with concurrent cisplatin and etoposide plus chest x-ray. The median time off chemotherapy was 7.3 months (range, 1.9 to 15.1 months). Patients were treated with a CPT-11 starting dose of 100 mg/m2 body surface given as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every week with subsequent doses based on toxicity. Fifteen patients were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. RESULTS Seven patients (47%; 95% confidence limits for an overall response rate, 21.4% to 71.9%) responded to CPT-11 with a median duration of response of 58 days. The major toxicities were myelosuppression (predominantly leukopenia), diarrhea, and pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION CPT-11 is an active agent against refractory or relapsed SCLC and deserves to be studied more closely as both a single agent and in combination with other drugs to treat patients with SCLC.

A prospective phase II study on photodynamic therapy with photofrin II for centrally located early-stage lung cancer. The Japan Lung Cancer Photodynamic Therapy Study Group

PURPOSE A phase II study was conducted between June 1989 and February 1992 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with photofrin II in centrally located early-stage lung cancer and to determine the complete response (CR) rate as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had histologically proven lung cancer and endoscopically superficial thickening or small protrusions. All lesions were located in subsegmental or larger bronchi. All patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 and arterial oxygen pressure tension (PaO2) > or = 60 mm Hg. No lymph node or distant metastases were present. All patients received photofrin II (2 mg/kg) intravenously 48 hours before PDT. Tumor lesions were superficially photoradiated by an argon dye laser or an excimer dye laser. RESULTS Of 54 patients with 64 carcinomas, 51 with 61 carcinomas were eligible for toxicity evaluation and 49 with 59 carcinomas were assessable for response. Of the 59 assessable carcinomas, 50 (84.8%; 95% confidence interval, 73.0% to 92.8%) showed a CR after initial PDT. The median duration of CR was 14.0+ months (range, 2.0+ to 32.4+). The multiple regression model indicates that estimated length of longitudinal tumor extent was the only independent prognostic factor for CR (P = .002). Five carcinomas that had a CR had a local recurrence at 6, 10, 12, 16, and 18 months after initial PDT, respectively. Toxicity assessment (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 2) showed transient elevation of ALT (1.9%), pulmonary toxicity (7.7%), and allergic reaction (7.7%), as well as sunburn (1.9%). CONCLUSION PDT with photofrin II has an excellent effect on patients with centrally located early-stage lung cancer who have limited tumor invasion extending over a small area (< or = 1 cm).

Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity after long-term follow-up of more than 2 years

BACKGROUND Pure ground-glass opacity (PGGO) is a new entity that has been clearly defined on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) during the last half decade. It is important to investigate the natural history of PGGO through long-term observation for the management of this new entity. METHODS We investigated 19 patients with PGGO(s) defined on high-resolution computed tomography and retained as PGGO for more than 2 years. The PGGOs of 11 patients were detected at annual mass screening by low-radiation-dose CT (low-dose CT), 7 at follow-up CT after cancer resection, and 1 incidentally on CT. After long-term observation, 10 of 19 patients underwent operation and 9 are currently being followed-up with CT. Their growth characteristics and histologic findings are reported. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 32 months, ranging from 24 to 124 months. The sizes of PGGOs at the time of discovery were 4 to 18 mm in largest diameter (average 8.6 mm). During follow-up, the size of PGGO showed no change in 8 patients, increased slightly (up to 5 mm) in 6 patients, and increased by more than 5 mm in 5 patients. Ten patients had limited resection (segmentectomy or wide wedge resection) with negative surgical margin by intraoperative lavage cytology of the resection margin of the lung. Of them, 5 patients had adenocarcinoma, 3 pulmonary lymphoproliferative disorder, and 1 each atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and focal fibrosis. There was no clear tendency between the degree of size change and histology. In all but 1 of 9 patients with follow-up only, the PGGOs showed either no change or only a slight increase within 5 mm in largest diameter. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that some PGGOs will never progress to clinical disease and would be included in the category of overdiagnosis bias. However, a prior history of lung cancer should significantly raise the index of suspicion, as 4 of 5 proven cancer cases in this small series fell into that category. Because of the difficulties of preoperative and intraoperative histodiagnosis of PGGO, minimally invasive surgery may be appropriate from the viewpoints of both diagnosis and curability.

CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-seven previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were assessable for toxicity, and 26 were assessable for response. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 30 mg/m2 given as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV on day 1) given every 4 weeks. The dose of CPT-11 was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxic effects were observed. RESULTS Significant toxicity was infrequent up to 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11. The maximum-tolerated toxicity was reached at a dose of 70 mg/m2. Three of six patients either had leukocyte count nadirs of less than 2,000/microL or experienced grade 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of therapy at 70 mg/m2. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and diarrhea. There were 14 partial responses (54%) among the 26 patients. CONCLUSIONS A combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin seems to be effective against NSCLC with acceptable toxicities. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15, and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks.

Combination of irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To determine the response rate, survival, and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC were entered onto the trial. All 25 patients had been pretreated with some form of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and had also received previous etoposide- or anthracyclinecontaining chemotherapy. The median time off chemotherapy was 6.7 months (range, 0.9 to 23.5). Patients were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (a starting dose of 70 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15) plus etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3), with a subsequent dose based on toxicity. In addition, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF; 2 microg/kg/d) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the days of CPT-11 administration. RESULTS All patients were assessable for toxicity and survival. Twenty-four patients were assessable for response. There were 14 partial responses (PRs) and three complete responses (CRs), for an overall response rate of 71% (95% confidence interval, 53% to 89%). The median response duration was 4.6 months. Median survival was 271 days. Major toxicities were myelosuppression (predominantly leukopenia) and diarrhea. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 56% and 20% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in 4%. There was one treatment-related death due to severe myelosuppression. CONCLUSION A combination of CPT-11 and etoposide with rhG-CSF support is an active therapy against refractory or relapsed SCLC and deserves to be studied more extensively in a phase III trial.

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin with granulocyte colony- stimulating factor support for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE Since leukopenia was one of the dose-limiting toxicities of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin in a previous trial, we conducted a phase I trial to investigate whether support with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) would permit further intensification of the CPT-11 dose in combination with a fixed cisplatin dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1. In addition, rhG-CSF (2 micrograms/kg/d) was administered on days 4 to 21, except on the days of CPT-11 treatment. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 70 mg/m2, and the CPT-11 dose was escalated in 10-mg/m2 increments until the maximum-tolerated dose was reached. RESULTS Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity at 90 mg/m2. Two of six patients experienced either grade 3 or 4 diarrhea or grade 3 leukopenia during the first course of therapy at this dose level. Modest escalation of the CPT-11 dose from 80 to 90 mg/m2 resulted in a marked increase in the plasma concentration of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). Occurrence of diarrhea was well correlated with the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of SN-38 (P = .035). There were 10 partial responses (50%) among 20 patients. CONCLUSION The recommended dose for phase II studies is 80 mg/m2 of CPT-11, and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin plus rhG-CSF. With the use of rhG-CSF, the CPT-11 dose can be increased 33% above that in the original regimen (60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin).

Phase I and pharmacologic study of irinotecan and etoposide with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for advanced lung cancer.

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) support because of the overlapping neutrophil toxicity of both drugs. The aim was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of CPT-11 combined with a fixed dose of etoposide in patients with advanced lung cancer, as well as the dose-limiting toxicities of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with stage III or IV lung cancer, 15 (60%) with prior chemotherapy, were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (90-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) plus etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3). In addition, rhG-CSF (2 micrograms/kg/d) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the days of CPT-11 administration. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and it was escalated in 10-mg/m2 increments until the maximum-tolerated dose was reached. RESULTS The maximum-tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 90 mg/m2, since two of the three patients developed grade 3 to 4 leukopenia or grade 3 to 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of treatment at this dose level. Diarrhea and leukopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities, while thrombocytopenia was only a moderate problem. Elimination of CPT-11 was biphasic, with a mean +/- SD beta half-life of 18.17 +/- 9.09 hours. The mean terminal half-life of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38; the major metabolite of CPT-11) was 43.40 +/- 37.84 hours. There was one complete response (5%) and eight partial responses (38%) among 21 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 43%. The response rates for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were 58% (seven of 12 patients) and 22% (two of nine patients), respectively. CONCLUSION The combination of CPT-11 and etoposide with rhG-CSF support seems to be active against lung cancer, especially SCLC, with acceptable toxicity. The recommended dose for phase II studies in previously untreated patients is 80 mg/m2 of CPT-11 (days 1, 8, and 15) and 80 mg/m2 of etoposide (days 1 to 3) plus 2 micrograms/kg of rhG-CSF (days 4 to 21, except when CPT-11 is given). In addition, 70 mg/m2 of CPT-11 appears to be the appropriate dose for previously treated patients receiving this regimen.

Phase II study of concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Southern Osaka Lung Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE To evaluate the response rate, toxicity, and 2-year survival rate of concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 1989 and October 1990, 65 patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable stage III NSCLC without T3N0-1M0 disease were entered onto this study. Sixty-one patients were eligible for response, survival, and toxicity analysis. Chemotherapy consisted of vindesine (3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, and 36), cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), and mitomycin (8 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29). Radiotherapy was administered for 3 weeks (2 Gy given 13 times, five fractions per week), followed by 10-day rest periods and then the previous schedule of radiotherapy repeated for 3 weeks. RESULTS Of 61 eligible patients, 53 (86.9%) had a partial response (PR). The median response duration was 39.1 weeks (range, 8.4 to 163+). The median survival time was 16 months and the 2-year survival rate was 36.7%. Of 53 responding patients, 10 (16.4%) are alive and disease-free after 2 years. The major toxicity was leukopenia (> or = grade 3, 95%). Other toxicities of > or = grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (45%), anemia (28%), nausea/vomiting (16%), fever (11%), and esophagitis (6%). Treatment-related death occurred in two patients. One patient died of pulmonary toxicity (interstitial pneumonitis) and the other of esophagobronchial fistula with pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION Concurrent radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) can be safely administered to patients with stage III NSCLC, with excellent response rates and 2-year survival rates.

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: To compare the response rates, toxicities and survival durations of elderly patients (70 years of age or more) with those of younger patients ( less than 70 years of age) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods: We analyzed retrospectively the data of 203 assessable patients entered on a prospective randomized trial of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of three dosage regimens: (1) vindesine and cisplatin (VP); (2) mitomycin, vindesine and cisplatin (MVP); or (3) etoposide and cisplatin alternating with vindesine and mitomycin (EP/VM). Results: A greater proportion of elderly patients had localized disease and more squamous cell carcinoma than non-elderly patients. The overall response rates were 44% in the elderly group and 28% in the non-elderly group. In the EP/VM arm, the response rate was significantly better in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group. The frequency of grade 4 leukocytopenia in the MVP and EP/VM arms in the elderly group was significantly greater than in the non-elderly group (P < 0.05). No differences were found in nonhematological toxicities between the two groups. There was no difference in overall survival between the groups. Conclusion: Elderly patients treated with mitomycin-containing regimens have higher hematologic toxicities than younger patients. The results of this study are consistent with the previously reported pharmaco logic data on mitomycin suggesting altered pharmacokinetics in elderly patients. The improved response rate in the elderly patients was probably because more elderly patients had earlier disease, squamous cell carcinoma and better performance status. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was tolerable for most elderly NSCLC patients with good performance status.

A randomized study of cisplatin versus cisplatin plus vindesine for non-small cell lung carcinoma

Between August 1983 and March 1985, a randomized study was conducted that compared cisplatin (CDDP) (80 mg/m2 on day 1) alone with CDDP plus vindesine (VDS) (3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) in 160 consecutive patients with inoperable non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There were no complete responses. The response rate for CDDP plus VDS (22 of 77 patients, 29%) was significantly higher than that for CDDP alone (9 of 78 patients, 12%) (P 0.05). However, no difference existed in the median duration of response (20 weeks for CDDP plus VDS versus 20 weeks for CDDP alone) or the median survival time (45 weeks for CDDP plus VDS versus 39 weeks for CDDP alone). No significant differences in toxicity were detected between the two arms; myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy occurred more frequently with CDDP plus VDS and there was one lethal episode of hepatorenal syndrome in the CDDP plus VDS arm. Among the variables Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), age, sex, stage, weight loss, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, albumin level, histologic cell type, and chemotherapy arm, only chemotherapy arm was a significant factor leading to a major response (P = 0.019, multiple logistic regression analysis). The significant predictors of survival were PS (P = 0.000), sex (P = 0.000), and stage (P = 0.002) (Coxs proportional hazards model), with a PS of 0 or 1, female sex, and lower stage yielding the best survival. Although a significantly higher response rate was obtained in the combination arm than in the single agent arm, the survival benefit to patients receiving such combination chemotherapy was not determined and more effective chemotherapy regimens are required.