Yolanda García-Álvarez

Inter-observer reproducibility of diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis based on a combination of probe-to-bone test and simple radiography

Probe-to-bone test and simple X-rays are both standard tests for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. This study demonstrates the importance of considering jointly clinical information (probe-to-bone test) and diagnostic tests (simple radiography) to increase agreement among clinicians on diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Histopathologic characteristics of bone infection complicating foot ulcers in diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND A universally accepted histopathologic classification of diabetic foot osteomyelitis does not currently exist. We sought to evaluate the histopathologic characteristics of bone infection found in the feet of diabetic patients and to analyze the clinical variables related to each type of bone infection. METHODS We conducted an observational prospective study of 165 diabetic patients with foot ulcers who underwent surgery for bone infection. Samples for microbiological and histopathologic analyses were collected in the operating room under sterile conditions. RESULTS We found four histopathologic types of osteomyelitis: acute osteomyelitis (n = 46; 27.9%), chronic osteomyelitis (n = 73; 44.2%), chronic acute osteomyelitis (n = 14; 8.5%), and fibrosis (n =32; 19.4%). The mean ± SD time between the initial detection of ulcer and surgery was 15.4 ± 23 weeks for acute osteomyelitis, 28.6 ± 22.4 weeks for chronic osteomyelitis, 35 ± 31.3 weeks for chronic acute osteomyelitis, and 27.5 ± 27.3 weeks for the fibrosis stage (analysis of variance: P = .03). Bacteria were isolated and identified in 40 of 46 patients (87.0%) with acute osteomyelitis, 61 of 73 (83.5%) with chronic osteomyelitis, 11 of 14 (78.6%) with chronic acute osteomyelitis, and 25 of 32 (78.1%) with fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS Histopathologic categorization of bone infections in the feet of diabetic patients should include four groups: acute, chronic, chronic acute, and fibrosis. We suggest that new studies should identify cases of fibrosis to allow comparison with the present results.

The Best Way to Reduce Reulcerations: If You Understand Biomechanics of the Diabetic Foot, You Can Do It

Foot ulcer recurrence is still an unresolved issue. Although several therapies have been described for preventing foot ulcers, the rates of reulcerations are very high. Footwear and insoles have been recommended as effective therapies that prevent the development of new ulcers; however, the majority of studies have analyzed their effects in terms of reducing peak plantar pressure rather than ulcer relapse. Knowledge of biomechanical considerations is low, in general, in the team approach to diabetic foot because heterogeneous professionals having competence in recurrence prevention are involved. Assessment of biomechanical alterations define a foot type position; examining foot structure and recording plantar pressure could help in appropriate insole and footwear prescription and design. Patient education and compliance should be taken into consideration for better therapy success. When patients suffer from rigid deformities or have undergone an amputation, surgical offloading should be considered as an alternative.

Surgical complications associated with primary closure in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of complications associated with primary closure in surgical procedures performed for diabetic foot osteomyelitis compared to those healed by secondary intention. In addition, further evaluation of the surgical digital debridement for osteomyelitis with primary closure as an alternative to patients with digital amputation was also examined in our study. Methods: Comparative study that included 46 patients with diabetic foot ulcerations. Surgical debridement of the infected bone was performed on all patients. Depending on the surgical technique used, primary surgical closure was performed on 34 patients (73.9%, Group 1) while the rest of the 12 patients were allowed to heal by secondary intention (26.1%, Group 2). During surgical intervention, bone samples were collected for both microbiological and histopathological analyses. Post-surgical complications were recorded in both groups during the recovery period. Results: The average healing time was 9.9±SD 8.4 weeks in Group 1 and 19.1±SD 16.9 weeks in Group 2 (p=0.008). The percentage of complications was 61.8% in Group 1 and 58.3% in Group 2 (p=0.834). In all patients with digital ulcerations that were necessary for an amputation, a primary surgical closure was performed with successful outcomes. Discussion: Primary surgical closure was not associated with a greater number of complications. Patients who received primary surgical closure had faster healing rates and experienced a lower percentage of exudation (p=0.05), edema (p<0.001) and reinfection, factors that determine the delay in wound healing and affect the prognosis of the surgical outcome. Further research with a greater number of patients is required to better define the cases for which primary surgical closure may be indicated at different levels of the diabetic foot.

Relationship of limited joint mobility and foot deformities with neurological examination in patients with diabetes.

AIMS The aim is to define the association of forefoot deformity and limited joint mobility in the ankle and hallux joints in patients with diabetes mellitus subject to different diagnostic tests for diabetic neuropathy. Prospective study with 118 type 2 diabetic patients (68 men, mean age of 65.6±9.9 years) enrolled consecutively from the Diabetic Foot Unit of the Complutense University of Madrid subject to evaluation of plantar surface sensitivity by 10-g Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament, vibratory threshold by biothesiometer, and sudomotor dysfunction by Neuropad®. The patients presented with limited joint mobility of the ankle and the first metatarsophalangeal joints, and forefoot deformities were registered. Statistical analysis was done through a univariate model to test the association between neurological and biomechanical alteration. There was an association of abnormal Monofilament (p=0.01; OR=3.9) and biothesiometer tests (p=0.01; OR=2.6) with the presence of forefoot deformity. Furthermore, a relation was found between abnormal Monofilament (p=0.02; OR=4.8) and biothesiometer (p<0.00; OR=12.8) tests with limited mobility of the first metatarsophalangeal joint both in loading and off-loading. Abnormal sudomotor function test was related with limited joint mobility of the ankle joint with the knee flexed (p=0.04; OR=2.8). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show discordance between biomechanical abnormalities and neuropathy depending on the diagnostic test used. Tests that assess large myelinated nerve fibers are associated with the presence of deformities. Abnormal sudomotor function test is associated with limited joint mobility and this test has a greater capacity for selecting patients at risk.

Influence of the location of nonischemic diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis on time to healing after undergoing surgery.

The forefoot has been reported as the most frequent location of osteomyelitis in the feet of patients with diabetes. The forefoot includes toes and metatarsal heads as common locations of bone infections, but the anatomy of these bones is quite different. As a result, such differences in anatomy may have an impact on the outcomes. The aim of the present study was to determine whether different locations of osteomyelitis in the forefoot have any influence on time to healing after undergoing surgery in a prospective series including 195 patients without peripheral arterial disease and osteomyelitis confirmed by histopathology. Location of the lesion was classified into 4 groups: hallux, first metatarsal head, lesser metatarsal heads, and lesser toes. The time required to achieve healing and the cumulative rate of wounds healed and likelihood of healing were analyzed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Time of healing (mean ± SD) in the whole series was 10.7 ± 8.4 weeks. Osteomyelitis located in the lesser toes has a higher probability of healing by the fourth week (odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8-11.6, P < .001), eighth week (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.6-6.4, P < .001), or twelfth week (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3-7.0, P = .008) than other osteomyelitis locations. Osteomyelitis located in the first metatarsal joint was less likely to heal by the eighth week (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9, P = .037) and 12th week (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-1.0, P = .040). In conclusion, time to healing is significantly different according to the location of the bone infection in the forefoot.

Morphofunctional characteristics of the foot in patients with diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy

AIMS To determine the structural and biomechanical characteristics associated with the conditions diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy. METHODS Observational study of 788 patients conducted between February 2007 and February 2009, which included subjects with and without diabetes mellitus who had no active ulcer at enrollment. Demographic variables and the general and specific history of diabetes mellitus were recorded. The patients foot type according to the Foot Posture Index, joint mobility and deformity were recorded. RESULTS No associations were found between the different foot types (neutral, pronated and supinated) and the structural and demographic variables at a general level, except for the pronated foot that was associated with a higher body mass index, longer suffering from diabetes and the presence of neuropathy [p<0.001, OR (95% CI): 6.017 (4.198-8.624); p<0.001, OR (95% CI): 1.710 (1.266-2.309); p=0.010, OR (95% CI): 0.759 (0.615-0.937), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS The confluence of risk factors such as neuropathy, body mass index, duration of diabetes and limited joint mobility in patients with diabetes mellitus and pronated foot may be a high-risk anthropometric pattern for developing associated complications such as Charcot foot. A prospective analysis of these patients is required to define the risk for developing Charcot neuroarthropathy.

What Is the Clinical Utility of the Ankle-Brachial Index in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Radiographic Arterial Calcification?

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of radiographic arterial calcification (RAC) on the clinical interpretation of ankle-brachial index (ABI) values in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. We analyzed a retrospective clinical database of 60 patients with diabetic foot ulcers from the Diabetic Foot Unit (Complutense University, Madrid, Spain) between January 2012 and March 2014. For each patient, anteroposterior XR-plains were evaluated, and the ABI and toe-brachial index (TBI) were assessed by an experienced clinician. To analyze the correlation among quantitative variables, we applied the Pearson correlation coefficient. Fifty percent (n = 9/18) of our patients with a normal ABI and RAC had a TBI < 0.7 associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In patients with RAC, the prevalence of a normal ABI (72%, 18/25) was higher than in patients without RAC (52%, 11/21). The Pearson correlation coefficient among the ABI and TBI in patients with an ABI < 1.4 (n = 46) was lesser (r = .484, P = .001) than in patients with an ABI < 1.4 but without RAC (n = 21; r = .686, P = .001). ABI values between 0.9 and 1.4 would be falsely considered as normal and could underestimate the prevalence of PAD, especially in patients with neuropathy, diabetic foot ulcers, or RAC.

Albuminuria is a predictive factor of in-hospital mortality in patients with diabetes admitted for foot disease

Albuminuria has been previously reported as a risk factor for mortality in people with diabetes. In a retrospective series of 455 patients with diabetes and foot ulcers, albuminuria was a predictive factor of in-hospital mortality. Other predictive factors were: white blood cell count>12.9×10(9)/L, haemoglobin<108g/L and age >75 years old.

Interobserver reliability of the ankle–brachial index, toe–brachial index and distal pulse palpation in patients with diabetes:

Objective: We conducted a prospective pilot study in patients with diabetes to analyse the interobserver reliability of the ankle–brachial index, toe–brachial index and distal pulse palpation depending on the training of the professional involved. Materials and Methods: The ankle–brachial index, toe–brachial index and distal pulses were assessed by three clinicians with different levels of experience on the same day. Measurements were supervised and recorded by a fourth clinician. Results: Twenty-one patients (42 ft) were included in this study. We observed moderate agreement between clinicians in the palpation of posterior tibial arteries (K = 0.45, p < 0.001) and low agreement in dorsalis pedis arteries (K = 0.33, p < 0.001). The measurement of ankle–brachial index had moderate agreement between clinicians in patients with medial arterial calcification (K = 0.43, p < 0.001) and low agreement in patients with normal ankle–brachial index (K = 0.4, p < 0.001). The measurement of toe–brachial index had moderate agreement between clinicians in patients with a normal toe–brachial index (K = 0.4, p < 0.001) and in patients with medial arterial calcification (K = 0.60, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Palpation of distal pulses, ankle–brachial index and toe–brachial index determination in patients with diabetes are not highly reproducible and reliable between clinicians with different levels of experience under routine conditions.