Yong-Gyun Park

Removal of bisphenol A and 17α-ethinyl estradiol from landfill leachate using single-walled carbon nanotubes

In this study, the adsorption of bisphenol A (BPA) and 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE2) from landfill leachate onto single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) was investigated. Different leachate solutions were prepared by altering the pH, ionic strength, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the solutions to mimic the varying water conditions that occur in leachate during the various stages of waste decomposition. The youngest and oldest leachate solutions contained varying DOC and background chemistry and were represented by leachate Type A (pH = 5.0; DOC = 2500 mg/L; conductivity = 12,500 μS/cm; [Ca(2+)] = 1200 mg/L; [Mg(2+)] = 470 mg/L) and Type E (pH = 7.5; DOC = 250 mg/L; conductivity = 3250 μS/cm; [Ca(2+)] = 60 mg/L; [Mg(2+)] = 180 mg/L). These solutions were subsequently combined in different ratios to produce intermediate solutions, labeled B-D, to replicate time-dependent changes in leachate composition. Overall, a larger fraction of EE2 was removed as compared to BPA, consistent with its higher log K(OW) value. The total removal of BPA and EE2 decreased in older leachate solutions, with the adsorptive capacity of SWCNTs decreasing in the order of leachate Type A > Type B > Type C > Type D > Type E. An increase in the pH from 3.5 to 11 decreased the adsorption of BPA by 22% in young leachate and by 10% in old leachate. The changes in pH did not affect the adsorption of EE2 in the young leachate, but did reduce adsorption by 32% in the old leachate. Adjusting the ionic strength using Na(+) did not significantly impact adsorption, while increasing the concentration of Ca(2+) resulted in a 12% increase in the adsorption of BPA and a 19% increase in the adsorption of EE2. DOC was revealed to be the most influential parameter in this study. In the presence of hydrophilic DOC, represented by glucose in this study, adsorption of the endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) onto the SWCNTs was not affected. In the absence of SWCNTs, hydrophobic DOC (i.e., humic acid) adsorbed 15-20% of BPA and EE2. However, when the humic acid and SWCNTs were both present, the overall adsorptive capacity of the SWCNTs was reduced. Hydrophobic (π-π electron donor-acceptor) interactions between the EDCs and the constituents in the leachate, as well as interactions between the SWCNTs and the EDCs, are proposed as potential adsorption mechanisms for BPA and EE2 onto SWCNTs.

High-Salinity Pressure Retarded Osmosis Using Seawater Reverse Osmosis Brine

Abstract Water scarcity as a result of increasing population and limited fresh water sources, especially in certain part of the world, have developed an increasing demand for the seawater desalination. Among various desalination techniques, seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) has become the most sought for technology due to its lower energy consumption over conventional distillation techniques, including multistage flash (MSF) and multieffect distillation (MED). However, SWRO desalination has still has high energy consumption and the brine (or concentrate) discharge from an SWRO plant is often problematic to the aquatic environment. Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) is one of the most promising approaches that can simultaneously solve both problems, which utilizes the osmotic energy in SWRO brine. PRO can convert and/or produce energy from the salinity gradient resulting from the difference in the salt concentrations between two aqueous solutions. In this chapter we have investigated the feasibility of PRO, which utilizes several different water sources such as seawater, SWRO brine, and wastewater. In a practical application SWRO desalination plants, PRO can be retrofitted to SWRO plants as an energy recovery device and can utilize both the brine and impaired water from wastewater plants.