Yong Suk Cho

The use of AlloDerm on major burn patients: AlloDerm prevents post-burn joint contracture

In efforts to prevent and reduce joint contracture and scar formation after burn, we used the acellular human dermis (AlloDerm) as a dermal replacement in the acute stage. A total of 64 patients received AlloDerm graft selectively on joint areas during the study period from March, 2005 to July, 2007. From January to March, 2008, a total of 31 patients returned to our burn center to examine the functional results by measuring range of motion of joints. Additionally, the quality of grafted skin condition criteria of skin elasticity, scar thickness, trans-epidermal water loss, melanin and erythema level was measured in a total of 11 patients among them. By analyzing the limitation level of 55 joints excluding hand areas, we found that 24 joints (43.6%) showed no limitations, 12 joints (21.8%) showed limitations below 10%, 16 joints (29.1%) showed limitations between 10 and 19% and 3 joints (5.5%) showed limitations over 20%. The scar thickness of non-AlloDerm applied areas was 2.5+/-0.9 mm and AlloDerm applied areas was 1.8+/-0.7 mm (p = 0.396). Trans-epidermal water loss for non-AlloDerm applied areas was 20.9+/-7.7 g/h/m(2) and AlloDerm applied areas was 10.8+/-3.4 g/h/m(2) (p<0.001). Erythema value for non-AlloDerm applied areas was 436.1+/-65.8, whereas AlloDerm applied area was 394.4+/-61.2 (p<0.001). Acellular dermal matrix is a good option for treating major burns to prevent scar formation after burn and loss of joint function.

The effect of burn rehabilitation massage therapy on hypertrophic scar after burn: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of burn rehabilitation massage therapy on hypertrophic scar after burn. METHOD One hundred and forty-six burn patients with hypertrophic scar(s) were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. All patients received standard rehabilitation therapy for hypertrophic scars and 76 patients (massage group) additionally received burn scar rehabilitation massage therapy. Both before and after the treatment, we determined the scores of visual analog scale (VAS) and itching scale and assessed the scar characteristics of thickness, melanin, erythema, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), sebum, and elasticity by using ultrasonography, Mexameter(®), Tewameter(®), Sebumeter(®), and Cutometer(®), respectively. RESULTS The scores of both VAS and itching scale decreased significantly in both groups, indicating a significant intragroup difference. With regard to the scar characteristics, the massage group showed a significant decrease after treatment in scar thickness, melanin, erythema, TEWL and a significant intergroup difference. In terms of scar elasticity, a significant intergroup difference was noted in immediate distension and gross skin elasticity, while the massage group significant improvement in skin distensibility, immediate distension, immediate retraction, and delayed distension. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that burn rehabilitation massage therapy is effective in improving pain, pruritus, and scar characteristics in hypertrophic scars after burn.

Inhalation injury in burn patients: Establishing the link between diagnosis and prognosis

This study was to re-evaluate inhalation injury as a prognostic factor in burn patients and to determine the factors that should be considered when refining the definition of inhalation injury. A total of 192 burn patients (152 men, 40 women; mean age, 46.1±13.8 years) who were suspected to have an inhalation injury and underwent bronchoscopy between January 2010 and June 2012 were included in this prospective observational study. All patients underwent bronchoscopy within 24h of sustaining the burn. The bronchoscopic findings were classified as normal, mild, moderate, and severe. Mechanical ventilation was administered, when required. Age, percentage of TBSA burned, ABSI score, requirement of mechanical ventilation and PF ratio, but not inhalation injury, COHb level, and bronchoscopic grades, significantly differed between the survivors and non-survivors (p<0.05). Mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 9.787) and severe inhalation injury on bronchoscopy (adjusted OR: 45.357) were independent predictors of mortality on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Inhalation injury diagnosed through history does not predict mortality from burns. Other components such as severity of inhalation injury determined using bronchoscopy, and administration of mechanical ventilation might help predict the morbidity and mortality of burn patients with inhalation injury and all of the factors should be considered when the definition of inhalation injury is refined.

Epidemiological trends and risk factors in major burns patients in South Korea: A 10-year experience

PURPOSE To determine epidemiological trends among burns patients admitted to our burns center during 2003-2012, and the usefulness of the Abbreviated Burns Severity Index (ABSI) for predicting burns-related mortality. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 4481 burns patients. We analyzed the epidemiological trends and ABSI scores using Student t-test and one-way analysis of variance (continuous variables), chi-square test (categorical variables) and stepwise logistic-regression analysis (predictors of mortality). RESULTS The mean age and male-to-female ratio were 39.9±19.7 years and 2.88, respectively. ABSI scores decreased from 7.7±3.0 in 2003 to 6.9±3.0 in 2012. Mortality rate improved from 24.5% in 2003 to 15.8% in 2012. Burns were caused by flames (67.3%), scalding (22.0%) and electrical (7.5%), chemical (1.6%) and contact (1.5%) injuries. Scalding and flames were the most common causes in patients aged ≤20 years and ≥21 years, respectively. Female sex, inhalation injury, full-thickness burns, large total body surface area (TBSA) burned and old age predicted mortality. ABSI scores <4 and >14 were associated with 0.7% and >90% mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mortality of major burns has decreased but remains high. ABSI scores predict burns-related mortality.

Change of serum phosphate level and clinical outcome of hypophosphatemia in massive burn patient.

BACKGROUND Hypophosphatemia is relatively common phenomenon in patients with massive burn injury. Therefore, we check serum phosphate level routinely and try to supply phosphate in a timely manner. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change of the serum phosphate level of early postburn period and the impact of hypophosphatemia on the prognosis of patients. METHODS A total of 227 patients with burn injury were reviewed retrospectively. We performed analysis of serum phosphate level within 20 days from burn injury. RESULTS Patients’ mean (SD) age was 47.0 (14.1) years, and mean (SD) percentage of total body surface area burned were 47.7 (21.9). Severe hypophosphatemia (phosphate < 1.0 mg/dL) was observed in 35 patients (15.8%), and moderate hypophosphatemia (1.0 ⩽ phosphate < 2.0 mg/dL) was found in 115 patients (50.6%). Therefore, overall incidence of hypophosphatemia was 66.4%. There was no significant difference in serum phosphate level with survival, total body surface area burned, and mechanical ventilation. Age (odds ratio [OR], 3.180; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.025–9.871; p = 0.045), total body surface area burned (OR, 20.934; 95% CI, 6.845–64.024; p = 0.000), and mechanical ventilation (OR, 5.581; 95% CI, 2.380–13.085; p = 0.002) were independently associated with mortality. However, serum phosphate level (OR, 0.828; 95% CI, 0.275–2.495; p = 0.737) does not have a statistical significance. CONCLUSION Although multiple studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of phosphate repletion regimens, the effect on mortality and morbidity is not well reported. However, our results show that patients with massive burn injury have high incidence of hypophosphatemia, and hypophosphatemia can result in many complications. Therefore, routine check and supply of phosphate can be suggested in patients with massive burn injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level II.

The application of cultured epithelial autografts improves survival in burns

This prospective observational study was performed to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with massive burns treated using cultured epithelial autografts (CEAs) and to determine the association of this treatment with survival outcomes. During 2006–2013, total 177 massive‐burns subjects treated with (96 subjects) or without (81 subjects) CEAs. Data were analyzed using the independent t test or chi‐square test. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier survival, and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors that influenced mortality. Age, percentage of total body surface area burned, incidence of inhalation injury, allograft‐application rate, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index score, length of hospital stay, and mortality significantly differed between the CEA and noncultured epithelial autograft groups. Mortality and other clinical parameters did not differ between the sheet‐type and spray‐type CEA groups. Allograft application (odds ratio, 4.44; p < 0.01) significantly influenced CEA application. The CEA group showed significantly higher survival rates (p = 0.05). Cultured epithelial autografting had a hazard ratio of 0.55 (p = 0.02) and 0.59 (p = 0.05) according to the uni‐ and multivariate Cox regression analysis, respectively. In conclusion, early and aggressive allograft application is required to facilitate CEA application. Furthermore, the use of CEAs was associated with a lower mortality, but this result should be interpreted with caution as the groups were not randomized.

Evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers for acute kidney injury in major burn patients

Purpose Acute kidney injury (AKI) in major burn patients is a common complication with high morbidity and mortality. The mainstream treatment is early diagnosis and rapid termination and prevention of the underlying insult. Therefore, its essential to identify early biomarkers predicting AKI. Methods A total of 85 patients who were admitted to the burn intensive care unit from June 2012 to July 2013 were included in this prospective cohort study. Ten biomarkers (blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, urine creatinine, cystatin C, cystatin C glomerular filtration rate, AST, lacate dehydrogenase [LD], creatine kinase, lactic acid, and myoglobin) were obtained at time of admission and evaluated as diagnostic biomarkers to predicting AKI and early AKI. Results Out of 85 patients, 35 patients were dead and overall mortality was 41.2%. The mean age was 49.4 years and mean percentage of total body surface area was 53.2%. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve of biomarkers on predicting AKI were 0.746, 0.718, and 0.717 in LD, lactic acid, and serum creatinine, respectively. AUC of cystatin C predicting AKI was much lower at 0.555. AUC of biomarkers on predicting early AKI were 0.833, 0.816, 0.790, and 0.759 in LD, serum creatinine, AST, and serum myoglobin. Conclusion LD, lactic acid and serum creatinine were acceptable as diagnostic biomarkers of AKI and LD, serum creatinine, AST, and serum myoglobin were reasonable as diagnostic biomarkers of early AKI. However, cystatin C was an unfavorable biomarker in major burn patients.

Serum cystatin C and microalbuminuria in burn patients with acute kidney injury.

This study was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of serum cystatin C and microalbuminuria as diagnostic markers for acute kidney injury (AKI) in major burn patients.

Improvement of burn pain management through routine pain monitoring and pain management protocol

INTRODUCTION Pain management is an important aspect of burn management. We developed a routine pain monitoring system and pain management protocol for burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of our new pain management system. METHODS From May 2011 to November 2011, the prospective study was performed with 107 burn patients. We performed control group (n=58) data analysis and then developed the pain management protocol and monitoring system. Next, we applied our protocol to patients and performed protocol group (n=49) data analysis, and compared this to control group data. Data analysis was performed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of background pain and procedural pain, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale (STAIS), and Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale (HRSS). RESULTS The NRS of background pain for the protocol group was significantly decreased compared to the control group (2.8±2.0 versus 3.9±1.9), and the NRS of procedural pain of the protocol group was significantly decreased compared to the control group (4.8±2.8 versus 3.7±2.5). CAPS and HDRS were decreased in the protocol group, but did not have statistical significance. STAIS and HRSS were decreased in the protocol group, but only the STAIS had statistical significance. CONCLUSION Our new pain management system was effective in burn pain management. However, adequate pain management can only be accomplished by a continuous and thorough effort. Therefore, pain control protocol and pain monitoring systems need to be under constant revision and improvement using creative ideas and approaches.

Analysis of prognostic factors for acute kidney injury with continuous renal replacement therapy in severely burned patients

BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical complications in severely burned patients associated with high morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of severity of AKI at the time of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) start on patient outcome and to identify the prognostic factors in severely burned patients with CRRT application. METHODS From January 2007 to June 2010, 84 burn patients with more than 40% of total body surface area (TBSA) burned who treated with continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS There was no significant difference of mortality by the severity of AKI at the time of CRRT start. However, the mean TBSA burned, abbreviated burn severity index, arterial pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine (Cr) ratio had a statistical significance to predict mortality in receiver operation characteristic curve. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, only sepsis had an independent association with mortality. CONCLUSIONS The severity of the AKI at the time of CRRT start did not have significant relationship with patient outcome. CRRT can be applied to minimize the complication of AKI including electrolyte imbalance and volume overload. Because only the presence of sepsis was independently associated with mortality, treatment for sepsis should be focused to improve the survival of the severely burned patients with CRRT.