Yongming Qu

Skeletal Effects of Raloxifene After 8 Years: Results from the Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista (CORE) Study

In the CORE breast cancer trial of 4011 women continuing from MORE, the incidence of nonvertebral fractures at 8 years was similar between placebo and raloxifene 60 mg/day. CORE had limitations for assessing fracture risk. In a subset of 386 women, 7 years of raloxifene treatment significantly increased lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD compared from the baseline of MORE.

A Randomized, Controlled Study of Once-Daily LY2605541, a Novel Long-Acting Basal Insulin, Versus Insulin Glargine in Basal Insulin–Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether LY2605541 results in lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) versus insulin glargine (GL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 12-week, randomized, open-label, Phase 2 study enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [A1C] ≤ 10.5%), taking metformin and/or sulfonylurea with GL or NPH insulin once daily. Patients converted to morning insulin administration during lead-in were randomized 2:1 from GL (n = 248) or NPH insulin (n = 39) to LY2605541 (n = 195) or GL (n = 95) once daily in the morning. RESULTS At 12 weeks, FBG (mean ± SE) was similar with LY2605541 and GL (118.2 ± 2.0 mg/dL [6.6 ± 0.1 mmol/L] vs. 116.9 ± 2.7 mg/dL [6.5 ± 0.2 mmol/L], P = 0.433) as was A1C (7.0 ± 0.1 vs. 7.2 ± 0.1%, P = 0.279). Intraday blood glucose variability was reduced with LY2605541 (34.4 vs. 39.1 mg/dL [1.9 vs. 2.2 mmol/L], P = 0.031). LY2605541 patients had weight loss (−0.6 ± 0.2 kg, P = 0.007), whereas GL patients gained weight (0.3 ± 0.2 kg, P = 0.662; treatment difference: −0.8 kg, P = 0.001). The incidence and rate of both total hypoglycemia and nocturnal hypoglycemia were comparable between LY2605541 and GL, although, LY2605541 had a 48% reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia after adjusting for baseline hypoglycemia (P = 0.021). Adverse events were similar across treatments. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase remained within normal range but were significantly higher with LY2605541 (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes, LY2605541 and GL had comparable glucose control and total hypoglycemia rates, but LY2605541 showed reduced intraday variability, lower nocturnal hypoglycemia, and weight loss relative to GL.

Better Glycemic Control and Weight Loss With the Novel Long-Acting Basal Insulin LY2605541 Compared With Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes: A randomized, crossover study

OBJECTIVE To compare effects of LY2605541 versus insulin glargine on daily mean blood glucose as part of a basal-bolus regimen for type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this randomized, Phase 2, open-label, 2 × 2 crossover study, 137 patients received once-daily basal insulin (LY2605541 or glargine) plus mealtime insulin for 8 weeks, followed by crossover treatment for 8 weeks. Daily mean blood glucose was obtained from 8-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles. The noninferiority margin was 10.8 mg/dL. RESULTS LY2605541 met noninferiority and superiority criteria compared with insulin glargine in daily mean blood glucose (144.2 vs. 151.7 mg/dL, least squares mean difference = −9.9 mg/dL [90% CI −14.6 to −5.2], P < 0.001). Fasting blood glucose variability and A1C were reduced with LY2605541 compared with insulin glargine (both P < 0.001). Mealtime insulin dose decreased with LY2605541 and increased with insulin glargine. Mean weight decreased 1.2 kg with LY2605541 and increased 0.7 kg with insulin glargine (P < 0.001). The total hypoglycemia rate was higher for LY2605541 (P = 0.04) and the nocturnal hypoglycemia rate was lower (P = 0.01), compared with insulin glargine. Adverse events (including severe hypoglycemia) were similar, although more gastrointestinal-related events occurred with LY2605541 (15% vs. 4%, P < 0.001). Mean changes (all within normal range) were higher for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol and lower for HDL-cholesterol with LY2605541 compared with insulin glargine (all P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In type 1 diabetes, compared with insulin glargine, LY2605541, a novel, long-acting basal insulin, demonstrated greater improvements in glycemic control, increased total hypoglycemia, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia, as well as reduced weight and lowered mealtime insulin doses.

Rate of Hypoglycemia in Insulin-Treated Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Can Be Predicted from Glycemic Variability Data

BACKGROUND We set out to study the relationship between different measures of glycemic variability and the rate of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Data were pooled from three 24-week insulin trials including patients on twice-daily (BID) insulin lispro mix 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension, 25% insulin lispro) (n=805), daily (QD) insulin glargine (n=1,019), insulin lispro protamine suspension (n=353) (QD or BID), and insulin detemir (n=166) (QD or BID), all with continuation of prestudy oral antihyperglycemic medications. Glycemic variability measures were derived from seven-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles. RESULTS At baseline, mean (±SD) age was 56.9±9.7 years, duration of type 2 diabetes was 9.5±6.1 years, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 8.9±1.1%, and 51.9% were male. Intra-day glucose coefficient of variation (CV), fasting blood glucose, intra-day minimum glucose and inter-day glucose CV at 24 weeks, and intra-day glucose CV at baseline were significantly correlated with the rate of hypoglycemia events between Weeks 12 to 24 (P<0.05 for all measures). CONCLUSIONS Intra-day and inter-day glycemic variability is significantly associated with the risk of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, even after adjusting for mean glucose and HbA1c. The intra-day glycemic variability before starting insulin is significantly associated with the risk of hypoglycemia during insulin treatment, which points at treatment- and patient-related factors mediating this relationship.

Effect of exenatide on 24-hour blood glucose profile compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 2-week study.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the glucose-lowering effect of exenatide over 24 hours in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using metformin, with or without a thiazolidinedione (TZD). METHODS This randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 2-week study was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control, despite metformin with or without a TZD. Patients underwent a baseline and a week-2 (study end) 24-hour admission during which serial serum glucose measurements were taken. Preprandial and postprandial concentrations of triglycerides and free fatty acids were also measured. Meals provided for each patient were identical at the baseline and week-2 assessments. Following the baseline admission, patients were randomized to receive SC injections of either exenatide (5 microg BID for 1 week, then 10 microg BID for the next week) or placebo (volume equivalent) for 14 days. RESULTS A total of 30 patients (19 women [63%], 11 men [37%]; mean [SD] age, 52.6 [11.2] years; weight, 94.3 [23.0] kg; body mass index, 34.2 [6.1] kg/m(2); glycosylated hemoglobin value, 8.0% [0.9%]; diabetes duration, 8.7 [5.6] years; race, Hispanic 18 [60%], white 10 [33%], black 2 [7%]) were eligible. Seventeen patients (57%) were randomized to treatment with exenatide and 13 patients (43%) received placebo. Concurrent antidiabetic medications were metformin only (n = 19 [63%]) and metformin plus a TZD (n = 11 [37%]). All postbaseline values were least squares mean (SE). After 2 weeks (study end), the 24-hour time-average glucose values were 7.0 (0.2) and 8.8 (0.3) mmol/L for exenatide-treated and placebo-administered patients, respectively (P < 0.001). The glucose values for patients treated with exenatide were lower compared with those in patients who received placebo 2 hours after the morning meal (6.6 [0.4] vs 12.0 [0.5] mmol/L; P < 0.001), the midday meal (8.8 [0.5] vs 11.8 [0.6] mmol/L; P = 0.001), and the evening meal (6.8 [0.4] vs 11.3 [0.4] mmol/L; P < 0.001). The mean durations of patient exposure to glucose concentrations >7.8 and >11.1 mmol/L were significantly shorter for the exenatide group compared with the placebo group (>7.8 mmol/L: 6.8 [0.9] vs 14.1 [1.1] hours; >11.1 mmol/L: 1.0 [0.7] vs 4.7 [0.8] hours; both, P < 0.001). After 2 weeks, the postprandial triglyceride excursions after the morning and evening meals for patients treated with exenatide were significantly lower compared with those treated with placebo. There was no apparent effect on free fatty acid concentrations. CONCLUSIONS In these patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide was associated with significantly reduced glucose concentrations at multiple time points during 24 hours, with the greatest effect seen on postprandial glucose concentrations. In addition, exenatide was associated with decreased overall hyperglycemic exposure and significantly decreased postprandial triglyceride excursions. These results are consistent with those seen in other studies that reported the effectiveness of exenatide in controlling hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach

Propensity scores have been used widely as a bias reduction method to estimate the treatment effect in nonrandomized studies. Since many covariates are generally included in the model for estimating the propensity scores, the proportion of subjects with at least one missing covariate could be large. While many methods have been proposed for propensity score-based estimation in the presence of missing covariates, little has been published comparing the performance of these methods. In this article we propose a novel method called multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) and compare it with the naive estimator (ignoring propensity score) and three commonly used methods of handling missing covariates in propensity score-based estimation (separate estimation of propensity scores within each pattern of missing data, multiple imputation and discarding missing data) under different mechanisms of missing data and degree of correlation among covariates. Simulation shows that all adjusted estimators are much less biased than the naive estimator. Under certain conditions MIMP provides benefits (smaller bias and mean-squared error) compared with existing alternatives.

Effects of exenatide versus insulin analogues on weight change in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a pooled post-hoc analysis

ABSTRACT Background and objective: In two previously reported multi-center, randomized, open-label, comparator (insulin) controlled trials in patients with type 2 diabetes sub-optimally controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea, treatment with exenatide and insulin analogue therapy produced similar reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (A1C). However, treatment with exenatide was associated with a reduction in body weight while insulin analogue therapy was associated with weight gain. This analysis further characterizes the relative impact of commonly employed insulin analogues versus exenatide on weight change over a 6-month period. Research design and methods: In this pooled post-hoc analysis of two trials, 1047 subjects with diabetes were compared regarding the relative impact of an adjunctive treatment – an insulin analogue (glargine or biphasic insulin aspart) or exenatide (5 µg twice daily for 4 weeks, 10 µg thereafter) – on body weight. Results: While exenatide treatment provided similarly effective glycemic control compared with insulin analogue therapy, it was also associated with weight reduction in the majority of subjects (73.3%, averaging 3 kg decrease by endpoint), with approximately 22% achieving ≥ 5% weight loss, and 3.2% of subjects achieving ≥ 10% weight loss. In contrast, by the end of the study most insulin-treated subjects (75.9%) had gained weight (mean 3 kg). Only 2% of insulin-treated subjects achieved ≥ 5% weight loss, and 0.2% of subjects achieved ≥ 10% weight loss. Conclusions: These findings support the use of exenatide as a treatment option in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes and who are overweight and sub-optimally controlled by metformin and sulfonylurea. However, these results should be interpreted with caution given the exploratory nature of this post-hoc analysis.

Effect of raloxifene on clinical fractures in Asian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is becoming a major public health problem in Asian countries, with a rapid increase in osteoporotic fractures projected as urbanization increases, particularly in China. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to assess the effects of 12 months of treatment with raloxifene on the incidence of clinical fractures in postmenopausal Asian women, compared to a placebo, by combining two independently designed studies (one Japanese study and one Chinese study). A total of 488 women, 284 in Japan and 204 in China were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics (mean ± SD) for the Japanese and Chinese women were: age, 64.8 ± 6.3 years and 65.3 ± 6.0 years; body mass index, 21.8 ± 2.8 kg/m2 and 23.0 ± 2.9 kg/m2; and prevalent vertebral fractures, 26.4% and 13.7%, respectively. In both studies, the clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were confirmed by radiographs or clinical reports at a central research facility. From the two combined studies, the incidence of new clinical vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the raloxifene 60 mg/day (RLX60) group (0 out of 194, P = 0.01) and in the pooled raloxifene group (those taking 60 mg/day and those taking 120 mg/day) (0 out of 289, P = 0.002), compared with the placebo group (7 out of 199, 3.5%). The pooled raloxifene group, as well as the RLX60 group, also had a significantly lower incidence of any new clinical fracture (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively) compared to the placebo group. In conclusion, raloxifene treatment at 60 mg/day for 1 year resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures and any new clinical fracture in postmenopausal Asian women with osteoporosis.

The effect of raloxifene therapy on the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures at three and six months: a secondary analysis of the MORE trial

ABSTRACT Objective: Raloxifene treatment (60 mg/day) significantly decreases the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures by 68% at 1 year compared with placebo. The objective of the present analysis is to evaluate the effects of raloxifene on the incidence of new clinical vertebral fractures at 3 and 6 months after initiation of treatment. Research design and methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4‐year Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial was conducted in 180 study centers. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N = 7705) were randomized to placebo, or raloxifene at 60 or 120 mg/day. Main outcome measures: Vertebral radiographs were obtained when patients reported symptoms suggestive of vertebral fracture at or between clinic visits, which were held at 3 and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. If a new adjudicated fracture was found, this was considered as a clinical vertebral fracture. The analyses included all randomized patients with a baseline and at least one follow-up radiograph (n = 6828). Results: One woman treated with raloxifene 60 mg/day (n = 2259) and 10 in the placebo group (n = 2292) had a clinical vertebral fracture in the first 6 months, resulting in a 90% relative risk (RR) reduction [RR 0.10 (95% CI 0.01, 0.63)] and a 0.39% absolute risk reduction (ARR). Similar results were observed with raloxifene 120 mg/day at 6 months. When the raloxifene groups were pooled, a significant ( p = 0.034) decrease in clinical vertebral fracture risk [RR 0.20 (95% CI 0.03, 0.90), ARR 0.17%] was seen as early as 3 months. Conclusion: The risk of new clinical vertebral fractures was reduced after 3 or 6 months of raloxifene.

Lower Glucose Variability and Hypoglycemia Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Novel Long-Acting Insulin LY2605541 Versus Insulin Glargine

OBJECTIVE To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to evaluate the impact of the novel, long-acting basal insulin analog LY2605541 on hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Hypoglycemia and glucose variability were assessed with CGM of interstitial glucose (IG) in a subset of patients with type 2 diabetes from a phase II, randomized, open-label, parallel study of LY2605541 (n = 51) or insulin glargine (GL) (n = 25). CGM was conducted on 3 consecutive days (72–84 h) during the week before week 0, 6, and 12 study visits. RESULTS Measured by CGM for 3 days prior to the 12-week visit, fewer LY2605541-treated patients experienced hypoglycemic events overall (50.0 vs. 78.3%, P = 0.036) and nocturnally (20.5 vs. 47.8%, P = 0.027) and spent less time with IG ≤70 mg/dL than GL-treated patients during the 24-h (25 ± 6 vs. 83 ± 16 min, P = 0.012) and nocturnal periods (11 ± 5 vs. 38 ± 13 min, P = 0.024). These observations were detected without associated differences in the average duration of individual hypoglycemic episodes (LY2605541 compared with GL 57.2 ± 5.4 vs. 69.9 ± 10.2 min per episode, P = NS). Additionally, LY2605541-treated patients had lower within-day glucose SD for both 24-h and nocturnal periods. CONCLUSIONS By CGM, LY2605541 treatment compared with GL resulted in fewer patients with hypoglycemic events and less time in the hypoglycemic range and was not associated with protracted hypoglycemia.