Yoo-Joung Ko

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single group, multicentre, phase 2 study

BACKGROUNDnNo standard treatment exists for patients with platinum-refractory urothelial cancer. Taxanes and vinflunine are commonly used, but response is less than 20% with no survival benefit. In this phase 2 study, we assessed efficacy and tolerability of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel in platinum-refractory urothelial cancer.nnnMETHODSnWe did an open-label, single-group, two-stage study at five centres in Canada. We enrolled patients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, or metastatic measurable urothelial cancer, with documented progression on or within 12 months of treatment with one previous platinum-containing regimen. Patients received nab-paclitaxel at 260 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects. The primary endpoint was objective tumour response, defined by a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.0) criteria. Tumour response and safety were assessed in all patients who received at least one cycle of nab-paclitaxel. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00683059.nnnFINDINGSnWe enrolled 48 patients between Oct 16, 2008, and June 23, 2010. Patients received a median of six cycles (range one to 15). 47 patients were evaluable; one (2·1%) had a CR and 12 (25·5%) had PRs, resulting in an overall response of 27·7% (95% CI 17·3-44·4). The most frequently recorded adverse events of any grade were fatigue (38 of 48; 79%), pain (37 of 48; 77%), alopecia (34 of 48; 71%), and neuropathy (30 of 48; 77%). The most frequently recorded adverse events of grade 3 or higher were pain (11 of 48; 23%), fatigue (five of 48; 23%), hypertension (three of 48; 6%), neuropathy (three of 48, 6%), and joint stiffness or pain (two of 48; 4%).nnnINTERPRETATIONnNab-paclitaxel was well tolerated in this population of patients with pretreated advanced urothelial cancer with an encouraging tumour response. These results warrant further study of nab-paclitaxel in second-line treatment of urothelial cancer.nnnFUNDINGnAbraxis Bioscience, Celgene.

Rapid Improvement in Pain and Functional Level in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents approximately 3% of all adult cancers and is more common in males. Systemic treatment for RCC has improved following the introduction of sunitinib. Bone metastases are present in up to 50% of RCC patients. We report a case of rapid improvement in metastatic bone lesions, recorded by nuclear bone scan, in a male patient receiving localized palliative radiotherapy in addition to systemic sunitinib and zoledronic acid. Concurrently, quality of life and performance status improved dramatically. Although we are unsure of the exact mechanism for such rapid improvement in metastatic bone lesions, the swiftness this improvement deserves reporting.

Temsirolimus Maintenance Therapy After Docetaxel Induction in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

LESSONS LEARNEDnTemsirolimus maintenance therapy after docetaxel induction chemotherapyis safe in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, although biochemical or tumor responses are rare;does not diminish quality of life; anddelays radiological and/or symptomatic progression by approximately 6 months.nnnBACKGROUNDnNo standard therapy is available for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who have responded to docetaxel and do not yet have disease progression. Hence, we designed a single-arm phase II trial to explore whether the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus can maintain the response to docetaxel without compromising quality of life.nnnMETHODSnAfter successful docetaxel induction (75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks; 6-10 cycles), 21 CRPC patients underwent temsirolimus maintenance treatment (25 mg weekly; 4 weeks per cycle). The primary endpoint was the time to treatment failure (TTTF) (i.e., radiological and/or symptomatic progression). The secondary endpoints included the tumor response rate (RECIST 1.0), safety (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P]), pain (Present Pain Intensity [PPI] scale), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) parameters, including time to PSA progression (TTPP) according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group criteria, and serial enumeration of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs).nnnRESULTSnPatients received a median of 7 cycles of temsirolimus (range, 1-28), resulting in a median TTTF of 24.3 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.1-33.0), 1 partial tumor response (4.8%), 1 PSA response (4.8%), and a median TTPP of 12.2 weeks (95% CI, 7.8-23.9). Grade 3-4 adverse events were infrequent, and FACT-P and PPI scores remained stable during treatment. CECs did not predict clinical benefit, and CEPs were not consistently detectable.nnnCONCLUSIONnTemsirolimus maintenance therapy after successful docetaxel induction is feasible, does not adversely affect quality of life, and, in this exploratory single-arm phase II study, resulted in a median TTTF of 24.3 weeks.

A qualitative study of patient and clinician attitudes regarding surveillance after a resection of pancreatic and peri‐ampullary cancer

BACKGROUNDnAfter surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, most patients will develop recurrence within 2 years. Intense follow-up is often recommended; however, its impact on survival is unknown. Patient and clinician attitudes towards follow-up were qualitatively assessed along with the perceived benefits and challenges.nnnMETHODSnA semi-structured interview guide was developed. Purposive sampling identified patients who were in active surveillance or had developed recurrence. Clinicians involved in patient care were also interviewed. Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached and themes were derived using standard qualitative methods.nnnRESULTSnA total of 15 patients and seven clinicians were interviewed. Patient themes included a limited understanding of disease prognosis, a desire for reassurance, a desire to know if and when recurrence occurred and minimal difficulties with follow-up. Clinician themes included expectation that patients are aware of the recurrence risk, a desire to provide reassurance, support for intense follow-up and perceived patient challenges in follow-up. Overall, the dominant theme was one of disconnect between patients and clinicians in the understanding of the disease and its prognosis.nnnDISCUSSIONnPatients have an intense need for reassurance and obtain this through follow-up appointments with their oncologists. Consequently, they express few difficulties with the process. Clinicians recognize this desire for reassurance. Patients understanding and expectations contrast starkly with clinicians perspectives regarding prognosis.

Doctor, what are my options? A prospective cohort study of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUNDnFor cancer patients, information about their disease and its treatment is often delivered within a short time period, potentially leading to patient misunderstanding, which can impede optimal patient care. In this 3-part clinical study, we investigated the utility of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal (gi) cancer starting a new treatment.nnnMETHODSnIn part 1, a comprehensive literature search identified items for potential inclusion in the care plan. Those items were formatted into a questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to patients as a structured interview. In part 2, health care professionals involved in the care of patients with gi cancer evaluated the resulting care plan for content and relevancy. In part 3, a 20-week prospective cohort study (10 weeks using standard of care, 10 weeks using individualized care plans) was conducted. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2-4 weeks after administration of the care plan.nnnRESULTSnIn part 1, a 73-item questionnaire was developed and completed by 20 patients in semi-structured interviews. In part 2, long and short versions of the care plan were created. Most health care professionals preferred the long version. Based on their comments, a final version of the care plan was created. The part 3 study enrolled 104 patients. Overall satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the intervention group at baseline (p = 0.010) and follow-up (p = 0.005). Compared with control patients, the intervention cohort also reported significantly higher overall quality of life (p = 0.044) and fewer symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.048) at follow-up.nnnCONCLUSIONSnProvision of an individualized care plan resulted in improvements in outcome measures at both baseline and follow-up. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The use of EGFR inhibitors in colorectal cancer: is it clinically efficacious and cost-effective?

Cetuximab (Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vectibix) are monoclonal antibodies to the EGFR. They are used as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy and increase both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The most common side effects of therapy are dermatological, including skin (acneiform) rash, pruritus and hair changes. Despite their clinical activity, cost–effectiveness of the two drugs should be addressed in a discussion of their usage in everyday care. This study provides an up-to-date review of the clinical efficacy and cost–effectiveness of anti-EGFR inhibitors.

Baseline Blood Work Before Initiation of Chemotherapy: What Is Safe in the Real World?

INTRODUCTIONnThis is an observational study of patterns of practice of the timing of baseline blood work (BBW) before chemotherapy initiation. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of significant changes in laboratory values within 6 weeks before therapy.nnnMETHODSnAll consecutive patients receiving chemotherapy within a 6-month period were analyzed retrospectively. Time interval between date of chemotherapy initiation and nearest blood work was calculated. Data from patients with one or more sets of values within 6 weeks were used to evaluate dosing changes. Changes in laboratory values collected closest to the date of chemotherapy and values collected before that but within 6 weeks were graded according to the National Cancer Institutes Common Toxicity Criteria. A change of ≥1 grade was considered clinically meaningful.nnnRESULTSnFive hundred ninety-two patients were included. Median interval between BBW and initiation of chemotherapy was 4 days. Three hundred thirty-five patients had two or more sets of laboratory tests within the 6-week period, 33% of patients had a meaningful change in one or more values. The majority of changes occurred in hemoglobin (22%), ALT (14%), WBC (11%) and AST(10%), yet only 66% of patients had liver function tests as part of the BBW.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAdherence to the institutional recommendation of BBW within 6 weeks was high. Baseline laboratory tests performed within 7 days of chemotherapy initiation would have detected nearly all significant changes; therefore, we suggest that this interval be tested in future randomized trials.

The impact of additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

A higher incidence of additional malignancies has been described in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). This study aimed to identify risk factors for developing additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with GIST and evaluate the impact on survival. Individuals diagnosed with GIST from 2001 to2009 were identified from the SEER database. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of additional malignancies and Cox‐proportional hazards regression used to identify predictors of survival. In the study period, 1705 cases of GIST were identified, with 181 (10.6%) patients developing additional malignancies. Colorectal cancer was the most common cancer developing within 6 months of GIST diagnosis (30%). The median time to diagnosis of a malignancy after 6 months of GIST diagnosis was 21.9 months. Older age (pu2009<u20090.0001) and extraoesophagogastric GIST (pu2009=u20090.0027) were significant prognostic factors associated with additional malignancies. The overall 5‐year survival was 65%, with the presence of additional malignancies within 6 months of GIST diagnosis associated with poor overall survival (54%, HR 1.55 1.05–2.3 95% CI, pu2009=u20090.04). Predictive factors of additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with GIST are increasing age and the primary disease site. Developing additional malignancies within 6 months of GIST diagnosis is associated with poorer overall survival. Targeted surveillance may be warranted in patients diagnosed with GIST that are at high risk of developing additional malignancies.

Oncology education for Canadian internal medicine residents: the value of participating in a medical oncology elective rotation

BackgroundnDespite the high incidence and burden of cancer in Canadians, medical oncology (mo) rotations are not mandatory in most Canadian internal medicine (im) residency training programs.nnnMethodsnAll im residents scheduled for a mo rotation at 4 Canadian teaching cancer centres between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015 were invited to complete an online survey before and after their rotation. The survey was designed to evaluate perceptions of oncology, comfort in managing cancer patients, and basic oncology knowledge.nnnResultsnThe survey was completed by 68 im residents pre-rotation and by 48 (71%) post-rotation. Cancer-related learning was acquired mostly from mo physicians in clinic (35%). Self-directed learning, didactic teaching, and resident or fellow teaching accounted for 31%, 26%, and 10% respectively of learning acquisition. Comfort level in dealing with cancer patients and patients at end of life improved to 4.0/5 from 3.2/5 (p < 0.001) and to 4.0/5 from 3.6/5 (p = 0.003) respectively. Mean knowledge assessment score improved to 83% post-rotation from 76% pre-rotation (p = 0.003), with the greatest increase observed in general knowledge of common malignancies. The 3 topics ranked as most important to learn during a mo rotation were oncologic emergencies, common complications of treatment, and approach to diagnosis of cancer.nnnConclusionsnA rotation in mo improves the perceptions of im residents about oncology and their comfort level in dealing with cancer patients and patients at end of life. Overall cancer knowledge is also improved. Given those benefits, im residency programs should encourage most of their residents to complete a mo rotation.

Abstract LB-231: Genomic profiling in serial metastatic colorectal tumors identifies copy number alterations and spatio temporal intra-patient heterogeneity profiles associated with clinical response. Q-CROC-01: NCT00984048

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer related deaths primarily due to its resistance to current treatments. Studies aiming at understanding mechanisms of resistance have largely investigated the genomic landscape of primary tumors at diagnosis. However, selective pressures during therapy can lead to the expansion of resistant clones and tumor heterogeneity. This highlights the need to characterize the molecular changes of metastasis over time of treatment and response to decipher tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance mechanisms. Methods: Metastatic liver tissue samples were collected at baseline (pre-biopsies) and at the time of resistance (post-biopsies) in responder and non-responder CRC patients undergoing the same first-line treatment. Paired pre/post biopsies were collected from 14 patients including 4 patients with multiple post-biopsies to assess temporal and spatio-temporal tumor heterogeneity following treatment exposure. Biopsies were profiled using exome and transcriptome sequencing as well as high-density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array analysis to capture chromosomal anomalies, loss of heterozygosity and copy number (CN) variations. Results: Profiling of 45 samples with both high-density SNP array and exome sequencing revealed 97.4% similarity between both technologies in the identification of genes targeted by copy number changes. Using chemo-naive biopsies, we identified 120 CN gains and 47 CN loss that were significantly associated with patient progression free survival. Integrative analysis with transcriptome data revealed that only 10% of the genomic CN gains and 17% of the CN loss correlated with their gene expression levels. Based on CN variants comparison between paired pre/post treatment samples, we found high temporal intra-patient heterogeneity over time of treatment. Interestingly, we observed a relationship between heterogeneity and tumor response; showing that acquired resistant tumors have the highest temporal variations. Conclusion: This study, using a multi-omic approach to profile serial liver metastatic samples in CRC patients, highlights the genomic changes in tumor composition after treatment exposure and constitutes an innovative approach to identify clinical biomarkers and molecular signatures of resistance. Citation Format: Mathilde Couetoux du Tertre, Maud Marques, Karen Gambaro, Michael Witcher, Benoit Samson, Bernard Lesperance, Yoo-Joung Ko, Richard Dalfen, Eve St-Hilaire, Lucas Sideris, Felix Couture, Sabine Tejpar, Ronald Burkes, Mohammed Harb, Errol Camlioglu, Adrian Gologan, Vincent Pelsser, Andre Constantin, Suzan McNamara, Petr Kavan, Claudia Kleinman, Gerald Batist. Genomic profiling in serial metastatic colorectal tumors identifies copy number alterations and spatio temporal intra-patient heterogeneity profiles associated with clinical response. Q-CROC-01: NCT00984048 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-231.