Yoshikazu Yoshifuku

A Scoring System to Stratify Curability after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: "eCura system".

Objectives:Although radical surgery is recommended for patients not meeting the curative criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric cancer (EGC) because of the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), this recommendation may be overestimated and excessive. We aimed to establish a simple scoring system for decision making after ESD.Methods:This multicenter retrospective study consisted of two stages. First, the risk-scoring system for LNM was developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis in 1,101 patients who underwent radical surgery after having failed to meet the curative criteria for ESD of EGC. Next, the system was internally validated by survival analysis in another 905 patients who also did not meet the criteria and did not receive additional treatment after ESD.Results:In the development stage, based on accordant regression coefficients, five risk factors for LNM were weighted with point values: three points for lymphatic invasion and 1 point each for tumor size >30 mm, positive vertical margin, venous invasion, and submucosal invasion ≥500 μm. Then, the patients were categorized into three LNM risk groups: low (0–1 point: 2.5% risk), intermediate (2–4 points: 6.7%), and high (5–7 points: 22.7%). In the validation stage, cancer-specific survival differed significantly among these groups (99.6, 96.0, and 90.1%, respectively, at 5 years; P<0.001). The C statistic of the system for cancer-specific mortality was 0.78.Conclusions:This scoring system predicted cancer-specific survival in patients who did not meet the curative criteria after ESD for EGC. ESD without additional treatment may be an acceptable option for patients at low risk.

Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors

Study aims This study aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy (ME) for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Patients and methods We enrolled 103 consecutive patients with non-ampullary duodenal tumors that were observed by ME with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and had pit pattern analysis before endoscopic resection at Hiroshima University Hospital before December 2014. ME-NBI images were classified as Type B or Type C according to the Hiroshima classification, and pit patterns were classified as regular or irregular. We studied the clinicopathological features and diagnoses with ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses according to the Vienna classification (category 3: 73 patients; category 4: 30 patients). Results Category 4 lesions were significantly larger than category 3 lesions. According to ME-NBI images, category 4 Type C lesions (83 %) were significantly more common than category 4 Type B lesions (17 %). According to pit pattern analyses, category 4 irregular lesions 4 (77 %) were significantly more common than category 4 regular lesions (23 %). The accuracies of using Type C ME-NBI images and irregular pit patterns to diagnose category 4 lesions were 87 % and 84 %, the sensitivities were 83 % and 77 %, and the specificities were 89 % and 88 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between ME-NBI and pit pattern analyses for diagnosing the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. Conclusion Our study showed that ME-NBI and pit pattern analysis had equivalent abilities to determine the histologic grade of non-ampullary duodenal tumors. ME-NBI may be more useful because it is a simple, less time-consuming procedure.

Evaluation of the visibility of early gastric cancer using linked color imaging and blue laser imaging

BackgroundBlue laser imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) are the color enhancement features of the LASEREO endoscopic system, which provide a narrow band light observation function and expansion and reduction of the color information, respectively.MethodsWe examined 82 patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosed between April 2014 and August 2015. Five expert and 5 non-expert endoscopists retrospectively compared images obtained on non-magnifying BLI bright mode (BLI-BRT) and LCI with those obtained via conventional white light imaging (WLI). Interobserver agreement was also assessed.ResultsIn experts’ evaluation of the images, an improvement in visibility was observed in 73% (60/82) and 20% (16/82) of cases under LCI and BLI-BRT, respectively. In non-experts’ evaluation of the images, an improvement in visibility was observed in 76.8% (63/82) and 24.3% (20/82) of cases under LCI and BLI-BRT, respectively. There were no significant differences between experts and non-experts in the evaluation of the images. The improvement in visibility was significantly higher with LCI than with BLI-BRT in experts and non-experts (p < 0.01). With regard to tumor color on WLI, the improvement in the visibility of reddish and whitish tumors was significantly higher than that of isochromatic tumors when LCI was used. The improvement in visibility with LCI was observed in 71% (12/17) and 74% (48/65) of patients with and without Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, respectively; no significant difference in improvement was observed between these groups. The interobserver agreement was good to satisfactory at ≥ 0.62.ConclusionsIn conclusion, our study showed that LCI improved the visibility of EGC, regardless of the level of endoscopists’ experience or Hp eradication in patients, particularly for EGCs with a reddish or whitish color. The improvement in visibility was significantly higher with LCI than that with BLI.

Taking Warfarin with Heparin Replacement and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Is a Risk Factor for Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

Background: Although bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) remains problematic, especially in patients taking anticoagulants, there are differing views on the ideal and optimal management for these patients. This study investigated the risk of bleeding after ESD in patients taking anticoagulants. Methods: We enrolled 61 consecutive patients taking anticoagulants (anticoagulant group) and 968 patients taking no antithrombotic agents (non-antithrombotic group) treated with ESD for EGC between December 2010 and October 2016. We analyzed the risk factors for bleeding after ESD in relation to the various clinical factors. Results: Incidences of bleeding after ESD were significantly higher (14%; 11/76) in the anticoagulant group compared to the non-antithrombotic group (3%; 40/1,167). Moreover, bleeding after ESD was significantly more common in patients in the warfarin monotherapy group (14%; 5/37) and in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) monotherapy group (22%; 4/18), compared to the non-antithrombotic group. Multivariate analysis revealed that dialysis, the use of anticoagulants, and an operation time ≥75 min were independent risk factors for bleeding after ESD. Conclusions: Our data suggest that patients who take warfarin and receive heparin bridging, and those who take DOAC medication, are prone to bleeding after ESD for EGC.

The Role of an Undifferentiated Component in Submucosal Invasion and Submucosal Invasion Depth After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

Background/Aims: The role of an undifferentiated component in submucosal invasion and submucosal invasion depth (SID) for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of early gastric cancer (EGC) with deep submucosal invasion (SID ≥500 μm from the muscularis mucosa) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not been fully understood. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors (RFs), including these factors, for LNM in such patients. Methods: We enrolled 513 patients who underwent radical surgery after ESD for EGC with deep submucosal invasion. We evaluated RFs for LNM, including an undifferentiated component in submucosal invasion and the SID, which was subdivided into 500–999, 1,000–1,499, 1,500–1,999, and ≥2,000 µm. Results: LNM was detected in 7.6% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that an undifferentiated component in submucosal invasion (OR 2.22), in addition to tumor size >30 mm (OR 2.51) and lymphatic invasion (OR 3.07), were the independent RFs for LNM. However, the SID was not significantly associated with LNM. Conclusion: An undifferentiated component in submucosal invasion was one of the RFs for LNM, in contrast to SID, in patients who underwent ESD for EGC with deep submucosal invasion. This insight would be helpful in managing such patients.

Investigation of each histological type in undifferentiated early gastric cancer and validity of diagnosis of the disease range

To the editor We read with interest the article entitled ‘‘Accuracy of diagnostic demarcation of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers for magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging: endoscopic submucosal dissection cases’’ by Horiuchi et al. [1]. The authors determined demarcation lines of undifferentiated (UD)-type early gastric cancer (EGC) by using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and marking the utmost oral and anal sites of the lesion using argon plasma coagulation. After performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), they evaluated the rate of accurate diagnosis by defining it as the consistency of the utmost oral and anal demarcation lines of the lesion with the postoperative pathological findings. As a result, the rate of accurate diagnosis was 81.6 %, and the authors concluded that the use of ME-NBI in the diagnostic demarcation of UD-type EGC should be recommended. However, we have several questions. The first concerns the histologic type of UD-type EGC. There are several histologic types, such as signet ring cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and mixed type [2]. Choi et al. [3] reported that the rate of lateral margin positivity in both poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features was significantly higher than that for signet ring cell carcinoma alone. Thus, there might be a difference among histologic types of UD-type EGC when calculating the rate of accurate diagnosis based on the demarcation line. Did the authors investigate the differences of each histological type? In addition, the findings of ME-NBI for each histological type were also considered interesting and useful for the actual clinical practice. Therefore, these results should be suggested additionally. Were there any differences in endoscopic images when using ME-NBI in each histological type? The second question relates to the diagnosis based on the demarcation lines before ESD. The authors reported that 81.6 % of the EGCs could be correctly diagnosed on the basis of demarcation lines by using ME-NBI. However, it seems that this accuracy is not enough when diagnosing the range of EGCs appropriate for ESD. Generally, UDtype EGC has been reported as being at high risk for lateral margin positivity following ESD [4–6]. Therefore, we always perform a biopsy to determine negative margins around the lesion before ESD for UD-type EGC. Do the authors determine the cutting line before ESD only by using ME-NBI without negative biopsy? We hope this letter will contribute to the further understanding of gastric cancer and to the fruitful growth of gastric cancer research. This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s10120015-0488-x.