Yoshiko Urata

Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gefitinib With Erlotinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L

PURPOSE The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase has been an important target for non-small-cell lung cancer. Several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved, and both gefitinib and erlotinib are the most well-known first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This randomized phase III study was conducted to investigate the difference between these two EGFR-TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Previously treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or erlotinib. This study aimed to investigate the noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Five hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned, including 401 patients (71.7%) with EGFR mutation. All baseline factors (except performance status) were balanced between the arms. Median PFS and overall survival times for gefitinib and erlotinib were 6.5 and 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.125; 95% CI, 0.940 to 1.347; P = .257) and 22.8 and 24.5 months (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.294; P = .768), respectively. The response rates for gefitinib and erlotinib were 45.9% and 44.1%, respectively. Median PFS times in EGFR mutation-positive patients receiving gefitinib versus erlotinib were 8.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.879 to 1.358; P = .424). The primary grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (2.2% for gefitinib v 18.1% for erlotinib) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (6.1%/13.0% for gefitinib v 2.2%/3.3% for erlotinib). CONCLUSION The study did not demonstrate noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib in terms of PFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to the predefined criteria.

Bevacizumab beyond disease progression after first‐line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (West Japan Oncology Group 5910L): An open‐label, randomized, phase 2 trial

Bevacizumab combined with platinum‐based chemotherapy has been established as a standard treatment option in the first‐line setting for advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there has been no evidence to support the use of bevacizumab beyond disease progression in such patients.

Randomized Phase II Study of Two Different Schedules of Gemcitabine and Oral S-1 in Chemo-naïve Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety and to compare dosing schedules of gemcitabine combined with S-1 in chemo-naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients. Methods: Patients with chemo-naïve stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer were randomized into two treatment arms. Patients were given oral S-1 (60 mg/m2/d, twice a day) from days 1 to 14 with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2/d) on days 1 and 8 (arm A) or on days 8 and 15 (arm B). This cycle was repeated every 21 days. Results: A total of 80 patients were entered in this trial. The primary end point of this study was response rate. The response rates of arm A and arm B were 22.0 and 28.9%, respectively (p = 0.606). Median time to treatment failure in arm A was 3.6 months and 4.8 months in arm B. Median time to progression in arm A was 4.1 months and 5.5 months in arm B. Median survival time in arm A and arm B was 15.5 months and 18.8 months, respectively. The toxicity profile was relatively mild and did not differ very much between two arms. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine and S-1 was determined to be feasible and effective for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We selected arm B for further studies because of its higher response rate and survival data.

A phase 2 study of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) after failing first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HANSHIN Oncology Group 0109)

OBJECTIVES We have conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive and for whom EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) 1st-line has failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC harbored activating EGFR mutations that has failed 1st-line EGFR-TKI and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were included in this study. Patients received carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve 5 or 6, paclitaxel 200mg/m(2), and bevacizumab 15mg/kg on D1. The combination therapy was repeated every 21 days for up to three to six cycles. Bevacizumab was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for patients without disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Thirty-one patients were enrolled between March 2010 and January 2013, with 30 patients being eligible. ORR was 37% (90% CI; 24-52%) and disease control rate, 83% (95% CI; 66-92%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months (95% CI; 4.8-12.0 months) and median overall survival, 18.2 months (95% CI; 12.0-23.4 months). The most common grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (93%), and non-hematologic toxicity, febrile neutropenia (20%). There were no clinically relevant grade ≥3 bleeding events and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION The combination therapy of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab did not achieve the initial treatment goal.

Phase 2 study of S‐1 and carboplatin plus bevacizumab followed by maintenance S‐1 and bevacizumab for chemotherapy‐naive patients with advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer

A previous phase 3 trial demonstrated noninferiority in terms of overall survival for combined S‐1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine) and carboplatin compared with combined paclitaxel and carboplatin as first‐line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the current study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined S‐1, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance with S‐1 and bevacizumab in chemotherapy‐naive patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

A randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel or S-1 in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy (HANSHIN Oncology Group 0110).

OBJECTIVES This randomized phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus bevacizumab and S-1 plus bevacizumab in the second-line treatment of non-squamous (non-Sq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with non-Sq NSCLC who experienced disease progression after prior platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus bevacizumab (DB) once every 3 weeks or S-1 orally twice daily on days 1-14 plus bevacizumab (SB) on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS Ninety patients were randomized. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=3.0-6.5) in DB and 3.5 months (95% CI=2.9-5.9) in SB. The objective response rate was significantly higher in DB than in SB (22.2% vs. 2.2%; P=0.004), whereas the disease control rates of the arms were identical (62.2% vs. 62.2%; P=1.00). Patients receiving DB were more likely to have ≥grade 3 neutropenia (93.4% vs. 4.4%) and febrile neutropenia (33.3% vs. 0%) than SB. In DB, PFS and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer among bevacizumab-naïve patients than among bevacizumab-experienced patients (median PFS: 7.2 vs. 2.9 months; P=0.004; and median OS: 21.3 vs. 14.1 months; P=0.012). CONCLUSION DB and SB produced modest PFS benefits in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-Sq NSCLC. Because of the toxicity of DB and the low response rate of SB, neither regimen warrants further investigation, excluding DB in bevacizumab-naïve patients with advanced non-Sq NSCLC.

Usefulness of the Oximetry Test for the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Japan

We evaluated the usefulness of oximetry tests that are frequently used as screening tools for sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) by determining the level of agreement between oximetry test results and polysomnography test (PSG) results. We retrospectively examined 135 patients suspected of having SAS. Although the oximetry desaturation index (DSI) seemed better than the oximetry apnea index in the agreement with the polysomnography respiratory disturbance index (RDI), the criteria of DSI greater than or equal to 15 was not sensitive enough to screen for moderate SAS (PSG-RDI ≥ 20). Multivariate analyses revealing that body mass index (BMI) as well as DSI correlated well with PSG-RDI, we established a new criterion by adding the BMI score (DSI ≥ 15 or BMI ≥ 25), which remarkably improved the sensitivity. This criterion may be useful not only in clinical practice but also in medical checkups for asymptomatic patients, and also suggests that obese patients with sleep disturbance should undergo PSGs, irrespective of the DSI score.

The safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

Background The optimal chemotherapy regimen for non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease is unclear. We therefore investigated the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line regimen for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease. Methods We retrospectively reviewed advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease who received carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy regimen at Hyogo Cancer Center between February 2013 and August 2016. interstitial lung disease was diagnosed according to the findings of pretreatment chest high-resolution computed tomography. Results Twelve patients were included (male, n = 11; female, n = 1). The overall response rate was 67% and the disease control rate was 100%. The median progression free survival was 5.1 months (95% CI: 2.9-8.3 months) and the median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI: 4.8-not reached). A chemotherapy-related acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease was observed in one patient; the extent of this event was Grade 2. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, as a first-line chemotherapy regimen for non-small cell lung cancer, showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease.

Immune-related Colitis Induced by the Long-term Use of Nivolumab in a Patient with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

We herein report a case of immune-related colitis induced by the long-term use of nivolumab. A 62-year-old Japanese man was treated with nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was admitted to our hospital due to non-bloody watery diarrhea after the 70th dose of nivolumab. A biopsy specimen of the colon mucosa revealed evidence of colitis with cryptitis and crypt microabscesses. He was diagnosed with immune-related colitis and started on predonisolone 60 mg/day. Subsequently, his symptoms remarkably resolved. Consideration of immune-related adverse events up to several years after the initiation of nivolumab is important.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and S-1 or vinorelbine for patients with stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the preferred treatment for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there have been few reports on combination chemotherapy with radiation for second- and third-generation antitumor drugs, although clinical guidelines have recommended the use of these drugs along with platinum agents. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and either S-1 or vinorelbine for treating stage III unresectable NSCLC patients who were treated with CCRT. RESULTS Between September 2006 and May 2014, 56 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with CCRT with S-1 and cisplatin (median age: 63 years) and 58 patients were treated with CCRT with vinorelbine and cisplatin (median age: 61 years). The median follow-up time was 14.6 months in the S-1 arm and 28.0 months in the vinorelbine arm. We found no significant difference in progression-free survival (15.8 months vs. 10.1 months; p=0.15) and overall survival (33.7 months vs. 31.1 months; p=0.63) between the S-1 and vinorelbine arms, respectively. Severe (more than grade 3) leukopenia (35.7% vs. 98.2%; p<0.01), neutropenia (44.6% vs. 98.2%; p<0.01), and febrile neutropenia (1.8% vs. 46.6%, p<0.01) were significantly less frequent in the S-1 arm than in the vinorelbine arm. Treatment-related deaths were not observed in either arm. CONCLUSIONS CCRT with both S-1 or vinorelbine with cisplatin appears feasible based on their efficacy and toxicity profiles. Both treatments may be recommended as treatment options for patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC.