Yoshino Matsuo

Molecular Mechanism Underlying Inverse Agonist of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

To delineate the molecular mechanism underlying the inverse agonist activity of olmesartan, a potent angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, we performed binding affinity studies and an inositol phosphate production assay. Binding affinity of olmesartan and its related compounds to wild-type and mutant AT1 receptors demonstrated that interactions between olmesartan and Tyr113, Lys199, His256, and Gln257 in the AT1 receptor were important. The inositol phosphate production assay of olmesartan and related compounds using mutant receptors indicated that the inverse agonist activity required two interactions, that between the hydroxyl group of olmesartan and Tyr113 in the receptor and that between the carboxyl group of olmesartan and Lys199 and His256 in the receptor. Gln257 was found to be important for the interaction with olmesartan but not for the inverse agonist activity. Based on these results, we constructed a model for the interaction between olmesartan and the AT1 receptor. Although the activation of G protein-coupled receptors is initiated by anti-clockwise rotation of transmembrane (TM) III and TM VI followed by changes in the conformation of the receptor, in this model, cooperative interactions between the hydroxyl group and Tyr113 in TM III and between the carboxyl group and His256 in TM VI were essential for the potent inverse agonist activity of olmesartan. We speculate that the specific interaction of olmesartan with these two TMs is essential for stabilizing the AT1 receptor in an inactive conformation. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the inverse agonism could be useful for the development of new G protein-coupled receptor antagonists with inverse agonist activity.

High Density Lipoprotein–Induced Angiogenesis Requires the Activation of Ras/MAP Kinase in Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells

Objective—Plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels have been shown to be inversely correlated with coronary artery disease, but the mechanisms of the direct protective effect of HDL on endothelial cells (ECs) are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the role of the HDL-mediated promotion of angiogenesis in human coronary artery ECs (HCECs). Methods and Results—We developed an in vitro model of HCEC tube formation on a matrix gel. We optimized the maximum dose of HDL required to induce tube formation in initial experiments, in which the dose response showed that the maximum effective dose of HDL was 100 &mgr;g/mL. PD98059, an inhibitor of p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity, but not SB203580, an inhibitor of p38 MAPK activity, suppressed HDL-induced tube formation. Dominant-negative Ras N17 inhibited HDL-induced tube formation. HDL activated Ras according to a ras pull-down assay, and this effect was inhibited by pertussis toxin. Moreover, HDL activated phospho(p)-p42/44 MAPK, whereas Ras N17 blocked HDL-induced pp42/44 MAPK. Conclusions—These results indicate that HDL induced a potent signal through a Ras/MAPK pathway mediated by a pertussis toxin–sensitive G-protein coupled receptor to the angiogenic phenotype in HCECs.

Transactivation of KDR/Flk-1 by the B2 Receptor Induces Tube Formation in Human Coronary Endothelial Cells

Abstract—Endothelial cells (ECs) are the critical cellular element responsible for postnatal angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates angiogenesis via the activation of kinase insert domain–containing receptor/fetal liver kinase-1 (KDR/Flk-1) in ECs. In addition, transactivation of KDR/Flk-1 by the bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor induces the activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). These findings indicate that the precise role of BK in angiogenesis is likely to be more complex than initially thought, and it questions the importance of BK in angiogenic processes. Therefore, we examined whether transactivation by BK induced tube formation. We developed an in vitro model of human coronary artery EC (HCEC) tube formation on a matrix gel. We demonstrated that BK dose-dependently induced tube formation. Although a lower concentration of BK and VEGF did not separately induce tube formation, the formation was induced by a combination of lower concentrations of BK and VEGF, suggesting that VEGF and BK had a synergistic effect. The effect was blocked by a B2 receptor antagonist (HOE140) and specific inhibitors of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases (Tki) and NOS. In addition, BK induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the KDR/Flk-1 receptor, as did VEGF itself. The transactivation was also blocked by HOE140 and Tki. Our results showed that, in HCECs, stimulation of the B2 receptor leads to the transactivation of KDR/Flk-1, as well as to eNOS activation, which induces tube formation. To our knowledge, this is a novel mechanism in which transactivation of KDR/Flk-1 by a G protein–coupled receptor, B2 receptor, may be a potent signal for tube formation.

Nifedipine-Induced Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Secretion from Coronary Smooth Muscle Cells Promotes Endothelial Tube Formation via the Kinase Insert Domain-Containing Receptor/Fetal Liver Kinase-1/NO Pathway

Endothelial cells (ECs) are the critical cellular element responsible for postnatal angiogenesis. Since the calcium channel blocker (CCB) nifedipine indirectly upregulates endothelial superoxide dismutase expression by stimulating the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from smooth muscle cells (SMCs), we examined whether nifedipine would induce human coronary artery endothelial cell (HCEC) tube formation via an increase in VEGF production from human coronary artery SMCs (HCSMCs) in an in vitro model. Nifedipine stimulated VEGF production from HCSMCs, and this stimulation was abolished by protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors and a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist. In addition, supernatant derived from nifedipine-treated HCSMCs induced HCEC tube formation. This tube formation was inhibited by pretreatment with a specific inhibitor of kinase insert domain-containing receptor/fetal liver kinase-1 (KDR/Flk-1) tyrosine kinase and an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. In conclusion, nifedipine increases VEGF secretion through PKC activation via the B2 receptor. The VEGF secretion directly induces HCEC tube formation via the KDR/Flk-1/NO pathway. CCBs may thus have novel beneficial effects in improving coronary microvascular blood flow in addition to their main effect of reducing blood pressure.

Expression of four CEA family antigens (CEA, NCA, BGP and CGM2) in normal and cancerous gastric epithelial cells: Up‐regulation of BGP and CGM2 in carcinomas

Four human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family members, CEA (CD66e), non‐specific cross‐reacting antigen (NCA, CD66c), biliary glycoprotein (BGP, CD66a) and CEA gene‐family member 2 (CGM2), are expressed in normal mucosal epithelia of the colon. Expression of BGP and CGM2 has recently been demonstrated to be down‐regulated in colorectal adenocarcinomas. We have now investigated the expression of the 4 CEA family antigens in gastric adenocarcinoma and carcinoma cell lines in comparison with adjacent normal gastric mucosa. The transcripts of the CEA, NCA and BGP genes evaluated by reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction were detectable at various levels in all the gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines tested, while CGM2 mRNA was detectable in the cell lines of poorly differentiated but not of well‐differentiated carcinomas. The levels of CEA mRNA in normal gastric mucosa were variable but mostly increased in adenocarcinomas. The sparse expression of NCA observed in the normal tissues was markedly up‐regulated in the carcinomas. In contrast to previous findings on normal and cancerous colonic tissues, the transcripts of CGM2 were totally undetectable and those of BGP were recognized only marginally, if at all, in normal gastric mucosa, while both messages were detected at significant levels in most of the gastric adenocarcinomas. This was confirmed by in situ hybridization. Our findings indicate that expression of the CEA family antigens, particularly that of BGP and CGM2, is differently regulated in epithelial cells of the colon and the stomach. Int. J. Cancer 76:148–153, 1998.© 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Molecular mechanisms of the antagonistic action between AT1 and AT2 receptors.

Although angiotensin II (Ang II) binds to Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)) receptors, AT(1) and AT(2) receptors have antagonistic actions with regard to cell signaling. The molecular mechanisms that underlie this antagonism are not well understood. We examined AT(1) and AT(2) receptor-induced signal cross-talk in the cytoplasm and the importance of the hetero-dimerization of AT(1) receptor with AT(2) receptor on the cell surface. AT(1) and AT(2) receptors showed antagonistic effects toward inositol phosphate production. AT(1) receptors mainly formed homo-dimers, rather than hetero-dimers with AT(2) receptor, on the cell surface as determined by immunoprecipitation, and subsequently induced cell signals. AT(2) receptor mainly formed homo-dimers, rather than hetero-dimers with AT(1) receptor, on the cell surface. The expression levels of homo-dimerized AT(1) receptor or AT(2) receptor on the cell surface did not change after treatment with Ang II, the AT(1) receptor antagonist telmisartan or the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319. Finally, AT(1) and AT(2) receptor-induced signals antagonized phospholipase C-beta(3) phosphorylation. In conclusion, Ang II-induced AT(1) receptor signals may be mainly blocked by AT(2) receptor signals through their negative cross-talk in the cytoplasm rather than by the hetero-dimerization of both receptors on the cell surface. The proper balance of the expression levels of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors might be critical for the antagonistic action between these receptors.

Unique binding behavior of the recently approved angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan compared with that of candesartan

The angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan strongly reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and has been shown to have cardioprotective effects. A new ARB, azilsartan, was recently approved and has been shown to provide a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than candesartan. However, the molecular interactions of azilsartan with the AT1 receptor that could explain its strong BP-lowering activity are not yet clear. To address this issue, we examined the binding affinities of ARBs for the AT1 receptor and their inverse agonist activity toward the production of inositol phosphate (IP), and we constructed docking models for the interactions between ARBs and the receptor. Azilsartan, unlike candesartan, has a unique moiety, a 5-oxo-1,2,4-oxadiazole, in place of a tetrazole ring. Although the results regarding the binding affinities of azilsartan and candesartan demonstrated that these ARBs interact with the same sites in the AT1 receptor (Tyr113, Lys199 and Gln257), the hydrogen bonding between the oxadiazole of azilsartan-Gln257 is stronger than that between the tetrazole of candesartan-Gln257, according to molecular docking models. An examination of the inhibition of IP production by ARBs using constitutively active mutant receptors indicated that inverse agonist activity required azilsartan–Gln257 interaction and that azilsartan had a stronger interaction with Gln257 than candesartan. Thus, we speculate that azilsartan has a unique binding behavior to the AT1 receptor due to its 5-oxo-1,2,4-oxadiazole moiety and induces stronger inverse agonism. This property of azilsartan may underlie its previously demonstrated superior BP-lowering efficacy compared with candesartan and other ARBs.

Antiarrhythmogenic Effect of Reconstituted High-Density Lipoprotein Against Ischemia/Reperfusion in Rats

OBJECTIVES This study analyzed the antiarrhythmogenic effect of reconstituted high-density lipoprotein (rHDL) against ischemia/reperfusion in vivo. BACKGROUND Recent studies have suggested that a reduction in the plasma HDL level may contribute to cardiac sudden death. Although there are currently only a few therapeutic strategies for increasing HDL, an exciting new therapeutic option, rHDL, has recently been developed to prevent coronary artery disease. METHODS To analyze the suppression of reperfusion arrhythmia by rHDL (apolipoprotein A-I with 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidyl-choline), 92 male Wistar rats were divided into 10 groups: rats that had been pre-treated with or without rHDL, apolipoprotein A-I, or 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidyl-choline in the presence or absence of inhibitors of Akt protein kinase, nitric oxide (NO), or extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) administered intravenously before left coronary artery occlusion. We also used human coronary artery endothelial cells and adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter (ABC) A1-, ABCG1-, or scavenger receptor class B, type I-transfected ldlA7 cells systems. RESULTS The duration of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation after reperfusion in rHDL-pre-treated rats was much shorter than that in untreated rats. Apolipoprotein A-I or 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidyl-choline alone had no effect. The effect of rHDL was blocked by inhibitors of Akt, NO, and ERK. Plasma NO concentration in the rHDL group was significantly higher. In addition, rHDL activated phospho(p)-Akt, p-ERK, and p-endothelial NO synthesis in endothelial cells. The rHDL activated p-ERK in ABCA1- or ABCG1-transfected but not scavenger receptor class B, type I-transfected ldlA7 cells. CONCLUSIONS The rHDL-induced NO production, probably mediated by ABCA1 or ABCG1 through an Akt/ERK/NO pathway in endothelial cells, may suppress reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. The HDL-based therapy may hold the promise of reducing the incidence of such arrhythmias after ischemia/reperfusion.

Three novel molecular forms of biliary glycoprotein deduced from cDNA clones from a human leukocyte library

Three cDNA clones that encode three novel variants of biliary glycoprotein a (BGPa), a glycoprotein belonging to the CEA gene family, were identified in a human leukocyte cDNA library. The domain structures of the predicted proteins of the three clones W211, W233 and W239 are N-A1-B1-A2, N-A1-B1 and N-A1-B1-C, respectively; they lack the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains that exist in the four BGP species (BGPa, BGPb, BGPc and BGPd) previously reported. Their sequences from N to B1 or to A2 are virtually identical to those of BGPa-d. Comparison with the genomic sequence for BGPa-d suggested that these three new BGP variants as well as BGPa-d are generated from the same single gene by alternative splicing of RNA.

Augmented expression and release of nonspecific cross-reacting antigens (NCAs), members of the CEA family, by human neutrophils during cell activation.

Nonspecific cross‐reacting antigens (NCAs) are a group of human glycoproteins immunologically cross‐reactive with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Our previous studies have shown that at least seven NCA glycoproteins different in molecular weight and antigenic reactivity, including a species corresponding to CD67, can be detected in neutrophil granulocytes. In the present paper, it is demonstrated that neutrophil activation induced with soluble stimulators, the calcium ionophore A23187, N‐formylmethionyl‐leucyl‐phenylalanine, and phorbol myristate acetate, results in augmented release and cell surface expression of NCAs. The NCA release was correlated with the discharge of azurophil granules but not with that of specific granules and was attributable to the release of NCA species of 53 and 30 kd. The increased NCA expression on the cell surface was due to increments of the NCAs of 160, 100 (CD67), 95, 90, 30, and 26 kd. These results, together with the previous findings that the CEA family members can mediate intercellular adhesion and bind Escherichia coli in vitro, imply that the neutrophil NCAs participate in the functions of neutrophils such as phagocytosis, chemotaxis, and adherence.