Yoshiteru Takekita

ABCB1 (MDR1) gene polymorphisms are associated with the clinical response to paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.

Variability in antidepressant response is due to genetic and environmental factors. Among genetic factors, the ones controlling for availability of the drug at the target site are interesting candidates. Multidrug resistance 1 (ABCB1, MDR1) gene encodes a blood-brain barrier transporter P-glycoprotein that plays an important role in controlling the passage of substances between the blood and brain. In the present study, we therefore examined the possible association of 3 functional ABCB1 polymorphisms (C3435T: rs1045642, G2677T/A: rs2032582 and C1236T: rs1128503) with response to paroxetine in a Japanese major depression sample followed for 6 weeks. Analysis of covariance at week 6 with baseline scores included in the model as covariate showed significant association of the non-synonymous SNP G2677T/A with treatment response to paroxetine (p=0.011). Furthermore, the wild variants haplotype (3435C-2677G-1236T) resulted associated with poor response (p=0.006). To our best knowledge, this study is the first suggestion of a possible association of ABCB1 variants with SSRIs response.

Effects of the serotonin type 2A, 3A and 3B receptor and the serotonin transporter genes on paroxetine and fluvoxamine efficacy and adverse drug reactions in depressed Japanese patients.

In this study, we tested the influence of the serotonin type 2A, 3A and 3B receptor genes (HTR2A, HTR3A, HTR3B) in addition to a polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter (SERTPR), and investigated the different characteristics of clinical responses to paroxetine and fluvoxamine. A total of 100 Japanese patients affected by major recurrent depression were enrolled in a randomized 6-week study. The clinical response was evaluated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and adverse drug reactions were assessed at each visit. Patients with the l allele of SERTPR showed a better response to SSRIs than s/s genotype carriers (p = 0.015–0.042), more significantly to fluvoxamine. The –1438G/G genotype of HTR2A was associated with a good response to SSRIs (p = 0.010–0.039), especially to fluvoxamine, and significantly with severe nausea in paroxetine-treated patients (p = 0.013). The 178C/C genotype of the HTR3A was associated with an antidepressant response (p = 0.022–0.042), and more significantly in paroxetine-treated patients (p = 0.002–0.042). These effects were independent of one another. We replicated the finding that the SERPTR polymorphism was associated with a response to SSRIs. We additionally found that HTR2A and HTR3A polymorphisms are associated with the efficacy, and the HTR2A polymorphism is also associated with adverse drug reactions. Furthermore, the effects of these polymorphisms varied from one SSRI to another and thus may depend on the characteristics of each SSRI.

Effect of 5‐HT1A gene polymorphisms on antidepressant response in major depressive disorder

Variability in antidepressant response is due to genetic and environmental factors. Among genetic factors, the ones controlling for availability of the drug at the target site are interesting candidates. Rs6295C/G SNP in the 5‐HT1A gene (HTR1A) has been found to affect the expression and function of HTR1A. In fact rs6295C/G is in strong linkage disequilibrium with other polymorphisms of HTR1A suggesting that those functional effects could be associated with polymorphisms other than or together with the synonymous rs6295C/G. In the present study we examined the possible association of a panel of markers in strong linkage disequilibrium of the HTR1A with SSRI/SNRI response in 137 Japanese major depression subjects followed for 6 weeks. We observed a significant association of better response to antidepressant in rs10042486C/C (P < 0.0001), rs6295G/G (P < 0.0001) and rs1364043T/T (P = 0.018) genotype carriers (minor allele homozygotes), independently from clinical variables. Furthermore minor allele homozygous carriers in all these three SNPs were associated with treatment response by various assessment such as HAM‐D score change over time (P = 0.001), week 2 (P < 0.0001), 4 (P = 0.007), and 6 (P = 0.048) as well as response rate (P = 0.0005) and remission rate (P = 0.004). We also pointed out the genotyping mis‐definition of rs6295C/G in the previous four articles. In conclusion, this is the first study that reports a significant association of antidepressant response with rs10042486C/T and rs1364043T/G variants of HTR1A and also with rs10042486–rs6295–rs1364043 combination. This finding adds an important information for the pathway of detecting the genetics of antidepressant response even if results must be verified on larger samples.

Antidepressant response and intolerance to SSRI is not influenced by G-protein β3 subunit gene C825T polymorphism in Japanese major depressive patients

The G-protein beta3 subunit (GNB3) gene is a key modulator of signal transduction and is a major candidate for SSRIs response. The aim of the present study is to test a possible effect of the C825T polymorphism on the antidepressant response and intolerance to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in 146 Japanese samples with major depression treated with paroxetine or fluvoxamine for 6 weeks. The severity of depression symptom was assessed using the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and adverse drug reactions were evaluated bi-weekly. No association with SSRIs treatment response was observed in 107 completers also including HAM-D baseline scores, SSRI type or/and 5-HTTLPR variants in the model as covariates. Furthermore, no significant association could be observed with intolerance to SSRIs in the whole subjects. The result suggests that C825T variants of GNB3 cannot play a major role as a predictor of treatment response as well as intolerance to SSRIs in Japanese patients with major depression.

Differences in quantitative EEG between frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease as revealed by LORETA

OBJECTIVE To determine the electrophysiological characteristics of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and the distinction with Alzheimers disease (AD). METHODS We performed analyses of global field power (GFP) which is a measure of whole brain electric field strength, and EEG neuroimaging analyses with sLORETA (standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography), in the mild stages of FTD (n = 19; mean age = 68.11 ± 7.77) and AD (n = 19; mean age = 69.42 ± 9.57) patients, and normal control (NC) subjects (n = 22; mean age = 66.13 ± 6.02). RESULTS In the GFP analysis, significant group effects were observed in the delta (1.5-6.0 Hz), alpha1 (8.5-10.0 Hz), and beta1 (12.5-18.0 Hz) bands. In sLORETA analysis, differences in activity were observed in the alpha1 band (NC > FTD) in the orbital frontal and temporal lobe, in the delta band (AD>NC) in widespread areas including the frontal lobe, and in the beta1 band (FTD > AD) in the parietal lobe and sensorimotor area. CONCLUSIONS Differential patterns of brain regions and EEG frequency bands were observed between the FTD and AD groups in terms of pathological activity. SIGNIFICANCE FTD and AD patients in the early stages displayed different patterns in the cortical localization of oscillatory activity across different frequency bands.

The Alpha 2A-Adrenergic Receptor Gene Polymorphism Modifies Antidepressant Responses to Milnacipran

Objective: The alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor (ADRA2A) plays a central role in the regulation of systemic sympathetic activity. Recently, the functional defect of ADRA2A has been implicated as a cause of depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and Tourette syndrome. In this study, the effect of genetic variants of the ADRA2A gene on the response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) was examined in depressed patients. Method: Ninety-three Japanese depressed patients were recruited in the present study, assigned randomly to paroxetine or milnacipran, and assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scoring every 2 weeks before and after drug administration. The ADRA2A C-1297G polymorphism was considered in the association analysis with the efficacy of antidepressants. Results: There were significant differences in the HAM-D percent score change over time (P = 0.019) among C/C, C/G, and G/G of the ADRA2A C-1297G polymorphism in the total subjects. The C allele carriers of the ADRA2A C-1297G polymorphism showed a significantly better improvement than G/G subjects at weeks 2, 4, and over time (P = 0.037) in the milnacipran group. Discussion: Our findings suggest that ADRA2A plays an important role in depression therapy. The level of ADRA2A expression could be associated with the efficacy of SSRIs/SNRIs, especially milnacipran, although the functional change brought about by C-1297G polymorphism has not yet been fully identified in vivo and in vitro. Conclusions: The ADRA2A polymorphism could be a reasonable candidate to predict the response to milnacipran. Our results are still preliminary, and a large sample size will be required to confirm our findings. However, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to suggest a possible association of ADRA2A variants with the SNRI response.

Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) gene polymorphisms on SSRIs treatment response and side effects

Antidepressant response usually appears in 2 to 4 weeks and 30-40% of patients do not show a significant response although biochemical changes of monoaminergic system occur within hours after administration. Genetic factors could play a role in this process and genes involved in synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis are possible candidates. In fact, antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy increase basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) and the rs1449683C/T polymorphism within this gene has been found to be a predictor for both an elevated mRNA and protein level of FGF2. Therefore we examined the possible association of rs1449683C/T and a panel of tagging SNPs in SSRI efficacy and side effects in 144 Japanese major depressive subjects followed for 6 weeks. We observed a significant association of rs1449683T (p=0.010) and rs308393C (p=0.029) variant carriers toward a better response to SSRI and of rs1048201 with higher frequency of drop out due to side effects (p=0.010), independently from clinical variables. Furthermore the rs308447T-rs308393C-rs1449683T haplotype was associated with higher response rate (p=0.012) while the rs1048201T-rs3747676T haplotype was significantly associated with higher dropped out rate (p=0.015). In conclusion, this is the first study investigating the association of antidepressant response and intolerance with FGF2 variants. This finding adds an important piece of information for the pathway of detecting the genetics of antidepressant response.

HTR1A Gene Polymorphisms and 5-HT1A Receptor Partial Agonist Antipsychotics Efficacy in Schizophrenia.

Abstract Individual differences in serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) receptor may result in variable response to antipsychotics with 5-HT1A receptor partial agonism. We investigated the relationship between 5-HT1A receptor gene (HTR1A) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and efficacy of antipsychotics with 5-HT1A receptor partial agonism in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. Perospirone or aripiprazole was administered to 100 patients with schizophrenia in a randomized controlled study. Candidate SNPs were rs6295 (which affects HTR1A expression and function), rs1364043, rs878567, and rs10042486. Efficacy at week 12 of treatment was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) 5-factor subscales (excitement/hostility, depression/anxiety, cognition, positive, and negative). Rs1364043 T allele was correlated with the percent change in the PANSS 5-factor negative score (P < 0.01). Haplotype analysis showed that the rs10042486-rs6295-rs1364043 T-C-G haplotype was correlated with worse negative score improvement (haplotype frequency, 0.675; P = 0.014), and the relatively rare T-G-T haplotype correlated with better efficacy (haplotype frequency, 0.05; P = 0.031). This is the first study to show that rs10042486-rs6295-rs1364043 HTR1A variants may be correlated with the improvement of the PANSS 5-factor negative score during treatment with 5-HT1A partial agonist antipsychotics. Studies with larger sample sizes and in different ethnic groups are warranted.

A 12-week randomized, open-label study of perospirone versus aripiprazole in the treatment of Japanese schizophrenia patients

OBJECT To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole and perospirone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. METHODS In this 12-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label study, patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were randomized to receive aripiprazole (3-30 mg/day, n=49) or perospirone (8-48 mg/day, n=51). Efficacy and safety were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) and the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BAS) before treatment and every 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients completed this study (aripiprazole, n=31; perospirone, n=27). No significant differences in gender, episode, age, schizophrenia type, weight, previous treatment and PANSS score were observed between the two groups at baseline. Both groups showed significant improvements during the study, with reductions in the total PANSS scores (Repeated measure analysis of variance, both p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the PANSS change scores, CGI-S change scores, DIEPSS total score, BAS total score or over time between groups. The most common adverse event was insomnia in both groups. CONCLUSIONS In Japanese schizophrenia patients, aripiprazole and perospirone showed equal efficacy, tolerability and patient compliance. Both drugs showed good efficacy for treating schizophrenia. This paper is the first randomized study to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of aripiprazole and perospirone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

Genetic variants in combination with early partial improvement as a clinical utility predictor of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder: the result of two pooled RCTs.

Pharmacogenetics may allow for a personalized treatment, but a combination with clinical variables may further enhance prediction. In particular, in the present paper, we investigated early partial improvement (EPI) defined as 20% or more improvement by rating scales 2  weeks after treatment, in combination with selected gene variants as a predictor of treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder. Two randomized controlled trials with 168 Japanese depressed patients were used. A stepwise multiple linear regression model with HAM-D score change at week 6 as the dependent variable and genotypes, EPI, baseline HAM-D score, age and sex as independent variables was performed in paroxetine, fluvoxamine and milnacipran, respectively, to estimate the prediction of HAM-D change at week 6. In the paroxetine sample, only EPI (P<0.001) was significantly associated with HAM-D change (n=81, R2=0.25, P<0.001). In the fluvoxamine sample, 5-HTTLPR La/Lg, S (P=0.029), FGF2 rs1449683C/T (P=0.013) and EPI (P=0.003) were associated with HAM-D change (n=42, R2=0.43, P<0.001). In the milnacipran sample, HTR-1A-1019C/G (P=0.001), ADRA2A-1297C/G (P=0.028) and EPI (P<0.001) were associated with outcome (n=45, R2=0.71, P<0.001). EPI in combination with genetic variants could be a useful predictor of treatment outcome and could strengthen the practical use of pharmacogenetic data in clinical practice.