Yosuke Tajima

Comprehensive genomic sequencing detects important genetic differences between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancer

Objectives Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy has been found to be more effective against left-sided colorectal cancer (LCRC) than right-sided colorectal cancer (RCRC). We hypothesized that RCRC is more likely to harbor genetic alterations associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy and tested this using comprehensive genomic sequencing. Materials and methods A total of 201 patients with either primary RCRC or LCRC were analyzed. We investigated tumors for genetic alterations using a 415-gene panel, which included alterations associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy: TK receptors (ERBB2, MET, EGFR, FGFR1, and PDGFRA), RAS pathway (KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, and MAPK2K1), and PI3K pathway (PTEN and PIK3CA). Patients whose tumors had no alterations in these 12 genes, theoretically considered to respond to anti-EGFR therapy, were defined as “all wild-type”, while remaining patients were defined as “mutant-type”. Results Fifty-six patients (28%) and 145 patients (72%) had RCRC and LCRC, respectively. Regarding genetic alterations associated with anti-EGFR therapy, only 6 of 56 patients (11%) with RCRC were “all wild-type” compared with 41 of 145 patients (28%) with LCRC (P = 0.009). Among the 49 patients who received anti-EGFR therapy, RCRC showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) than LCRC (P = 0.022), and “mutant-type” RCRC showed significantly worse PFS compared with “all wild-type” LCRC (P = 0.004). Conclusions RCRC is more likely to harbor genetic alterations associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy compared with LCRC. Furthermore, our data shows primary tumor sidedness is a surrogate for the non-random distribution of genetic alterations in CRC.

Utility of comprehensive genomic sequencing for detecting HER2-positive colorectal cancer

HER2-targeted therapy is considered effective for KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In general, HER2 status is determined by the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Comprehensive genomic sequencing (CGS) enables the detection of gene mutations and copy number alterations including KRAS mutation and HER2 amplification; however, little is known about the utility of CGS for detecting HER2-positive CRC. To assess its utility, we retrospectively investigated 201 patients with stage I-IV CRC. The HER2 status of the primary site was assessed using IHC and FISH, and HER2 amplification of the primary site was also assessed using CGS, and the findings of these approaches were compared in each patient. CGS successfully detected alterations in 415 genes including KRAS codon 12/13 mutation and HER2 amplification. Fifty-nine (29%) patients had a KRAS codon 12/13 mutation. Ten (5%) patients were diagnosed as HER2 positive because of HER2 IHC 3+, and the same 10 (5%) patients had HER2 amplification evaluated using CGS. The results of HER2 status and HER2 amplification were completely identical in all 201 patients (P < .001). Nine of the 10 HER2-positive patients were KRAS 12/13 wild-type and were considered possible candidates for HER2-targeted therapy. CGS has the same utility as IHC and FISH for detecting HER2-positive patients who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, and facilitates precision medicine and tailor-made treatment.

Small Bowel Obstruction After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Purpose Small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains a common complication after pelvic or abdominal surgery. However, the risk factors for SBO in ulcerative colitis (UC) surgery are not well known. The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk factors associated with SBO after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with a loop ileostomy for patients with UC. Methods The medical records of 96 patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1999 and 2011 were reviewed. SBO was confirmed based on the presence of clinical symptoms and radiographic findings. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the SBO group and the non-SBO group. We also analyzed the relationship between SBO and computed tomography (CT) scan image parameters. Results The study included 49 male and 47 female patients. The median age was 35.5 years (range, 14–72 years). We performed a 2- or 3-stage procedure as a total proctocolectomy and IPAA for patients with UC. SBO in the pretakedown of the loop ileostomy after IPAA occurred in 22 patients (22.9%). Moreover, surgical intervention for SBO was required for 11 patients. In brief, closure of the loop ileostomy was performed earlier than expected. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the 2-stage procedure (odds ratio, 2.850; 95% confidence interval, 1.009–8.044; P = 0.048) was a significant independent risk factor associated with SBO. CT scan image parameters were not significant risk factors of SBO. Conclusion The present study suggests that a 2-stage procedure is a significant risk factor associated with SBO after IPAA in patients with UC.

Different roles of sphingosine kinase 1 and 2 in pancreatic cancer progression

BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is a disease with poor prognosis, and development of new treatments is necessary. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive lipid mediator produced by sphingosine kinases (SphK1 and SphK2), plays a critical role in progression of many types of cancer. However, little is known about the role of sphingosine kinases in pancreatic cancer. This study investigated the roles of sphingosine kinases in pancreatic cancer progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS S1P levels in pancreatic cancer and noncancerous pancreatic tissue were measured in 10 patients. We generated PAN02 murine pancreatic cancer cell lines with a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated system genes 9 (Cas9)-mediated deletion of SphK1 or SphK2 and assessed cell growth and migration. In an animal model, we assessed the survival of mice injected with PAN02 cells intraperitoneally. RESULTS S1P levels in the pancreatic cancer tissue were significantly higher than those in noncancerous tissue. SphK1 knockout (KO) cells showed greater proliferation and migration than wild type (WT) cells, and SphK2 KO cells showed less proliferation and migration than WT cells. Animal experiments showed that the survival of mice injected with SphK1 KO cells was significantly shorter than those injected with WT cells, and the survival of mice injected with SphK2 KO cells was longer than those injected with WT cells. Surprisingly, cytotoxic assay using gemcitabine showed that SphK1 KO cells survived less than WT cells, and SphK2 KO cells survived more than WT cells. CONCLUSIONS S1P produced by SphK1 and SphK2 may have different functions in pancreatic cancer cells. Targeting both SphK1 and SphK2 may be a potential strategy for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Genomic characterization of colitis-associated colorectal cancer

BackgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), is a chronic, idiopathic, repeated inflammatory disease. Colorectal cancer (CRC) that develops in patients with IBD is known as colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC), but the underlying carcinogenic mechanism remains unclear. Genomic analysis of sporadic CRC has been well described based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Using NGS, we compared all exons of 415 cancer-associated genes in patients in Japan and the USA who had CRC and found similar genomic alteration patterns among the two populations. However, genomic analysis of CAC has not been thoroughly investigated.Main bodyThe molecular pathogenesis of CAC shares many features with sporadic CRC, but there are distinct variations in the time and frequency of some alterations. Gene alterations in CAC are gradually being elucidated using genomic sequencing analyses. Some studies have shown that gene alteration patterns differ between UC and CD. The carcinogenesis of CAC depends on unique environmental, genetic, and immunological factors.ConclusionsIn this review, we have discussed the differences in genomic alterations between sporadic CRC and CAC. NGS in patients with IBD has the potential to detect early CAC and to suggest therapeutic targets.

Management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. However, rectal GIST is rare, the incident rate of it is approximately 5% of all GISTs. Rectal GIST symptoms generally include bleeding and/or pain and occasionally, urinary symptoms. Immunohistochemical evaluation finds that most rectal GIST tumors are CD117 (KIT) positive, and are sometimes CD34, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA), smooth muscle actin, S-100, or vimentin positive. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) classifies rectal GIST as very-low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk, and the frequencies have been estimated as 0-23.8% for very-low risk, 0-45% for low risk, 0-34% for intermediate risk, and 21-100% for high risk tumors. The first-line treatment for localized GIST is curative resection, but is difficult in rectal GIST because of anatomical characteristics such as the deep, narrow pelvis and proximity to the sphincter muscle or other organs. Several studies noted the efficacy of the minimally invasive surgery, such as trans-anal, trans-sacral, trans-vaginal resection, or laparoscopic resection. The appropriate surgical procedure should be selected depending on the case. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is indicated as first-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable GIST, and clinical outcomes are correlated with KIT mutation genotype. However, the KIT mutation genotypes in rectal GIST are not well known. In this review, as in other GISTs, a large proportion (59-100%) of rectal GISTs carry exon 11 mutations. Although curative resection is indicated for localized rectal GIST, a high rate of local recurrence is a problem. Multimodal therapy including perioperative IM may improve postoperative outcomes, contributing to anus-preserving surgery. Moreover, KIT mutation analysis before IM treatment is important. This review summarizes current treatment strategies for rectal GIST.

Pathogenic Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations and Familial Predisposition to Gastric Cancer

Most gastric cancers (GCs) are considered sporadic, however familial aggregation occurs in 10% of cases1, 2. Approximately 5% of GCs are caused by an autosomal dominant inherited trait, with carriers having a strongly increased risk of GC and other cancers3. Clinical criteria for this entity were defined by the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC)4. Among these, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a well-known type of familial GC (FGC). About 40% of families fulfilling the clinical criteria for HDGC have germline CDH1 mutations5. A subset of the remaining families of HDGC, and ones fulfilling the criteria of other familial GC, harbor pathogenic germline mutation in other genes which associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes4. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is one of the best-described inherited cancer predisposition syndromes, caused by pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations6–9. The increased risks of cancers other than breast and ovarian cancers were observed in the carriers10. The association between germline BRCA1/2 mutation and increased risk of GC were demonstrated in previous studies for HBOC families11–14. Regarding FGC, a recent large-scale study demonstrated that germline BRCA2 mutations were identified in patients who had a family history which fulfilled the criteria of HDGC, but lacking CDH1 mutations15. Therefore, it is possible that germline BRCA1/2 mutations may cause familial predisposition to GC. Recent advances of comprehensive genomic analysis enable us to identify the genomic alterations in GC16. BRCA1/2 mutations were shown in the subset of GC tumor tissues, however the association between germline BRCA1/2 mutations and familial predisposition to GC were not fully understood. Previously we performed genomic sequencing of 207 Japanese GCs using 435-gene panel, and identified BRCA1/2 mutations in tumor17. In this study, we conducted BRCA1/2 genetic testing in seven Japanese GC patients whose tumor had BRCA1/2 mutations. We identified pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations in three patients, who have a familial component of GC.

Prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in stage IV low rectal cancer

AIM To assess the clinical significance of prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in stage IV low rectal cancer. METHODS We selected 71 consecutive stage IV low rectal cancer patients who underwent primary tumor resection, and enrolled 50 of these 71 patients without clinical LPLN metastasis. The patients had distant metastasis such as liver, lung, peritoneum, and paraaortic LN. Clinical LPLN metastasis was defined as LN with a maximum diameter of 10 mm or more on preoperative pelvic computed tomography scan. All patients underwent primary tumor resection, 27 patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with LPLND (LPLND group), and 23 patients underwent only TME (TME group). Bilateral LPLND was performed simultaneously with primary tumor resection in LPLND group. R0 resection of both primary and metastatic sites was achieved in 20 of 50 patients. We evaluated possible prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival (OS), and compared 5-year cumulative local recurrence between the LPLND and TME groups. RESULTS For OS, univariate analyses revealed no significant benefit in the LPLND compared with the TME group (28.7% vs 17.0%, P = 0.523); multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection was an independent prognostic factor. Regarding cumulative local recurrence, the LPLND group showed no significant benefit compared with TME group (21.4% vs 14.8%, P = 0.833). CONCLUSION Prophylactic LPLND shows no oncological benefits in patients with Stage IV low rectal cancer without clinical LPLN metastasis.

Association between poorly differentiated clusters and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer

Abstract The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy differs according to poorly differentiated cluster grade in colorectal cancer. Poorly differentiated cluster may have an important role in determining the most suitable treatment strategy.

A Case of Obstructive Colitis with Elevated Serum CarcinoembryonicAntigen

We report the case of a 72-year-old female who was admitted to our hospital because of obstructive colitis. Blood analysis showed her serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level to be 156.0 ng/mL. A sigmoidectomy and descending colostomy were performed for obstructive colitis due to colonic diverticulitis. Histopathological examination revealed active inflammation of the sigmoid colon without neoplasia. Her serum CEA level decreased within normal limits immediately after surgery.