Young Bin Song

Six-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents The Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting (EXCELLENT) Randomized, Multicenter Study

Background— The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents remains undetermined. We aimed to test whether 6-month DAPT would be noninferior to 12-month DAPT after implantation of drug-eluting stents. Methods and Results— We randomly assigned 1443 patients undergoing implantation of drug-eluting stents to receive 6- or 12-month DAPT (in a 1:1 ratio). The primary end point was a target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Rates of target vessel failure at 12 months were 4.8% in the 6-month DAPT group and 4.3% in the 12-month DAPT group (the upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.4%; P =0.001 for noninferiority with a predefined noninferiority margin of 4.0%). Although stent thrombosis tended to occur more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (0.9% versus 0.1%; hazard ratio, 6.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–49.96; P =0.10), the risk of death or myocardial infarction did not differ in the 2 groups (2.4% versus 1.9%; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.47; P =0.58). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, target vessel failure occurred more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (hazard ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–7.03; P =0.005) among diabetic patients. Conclusions— Six-month DAPT did not increase the risk of target vessel failure at 12 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents compared with 12-month DAPT. However, the noninferiority margin was wide, and the study was underpowered for death or myocardial infarction. Our results need to be confirmed in larger trials. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00698607][1]. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-31} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00698607&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2F125%2F3%2F505.atomBackground— The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents remains undetermined. We aimed to test whether 6-month DAPT would be noninferior to 12-month DAPT after implantation of drug-eluting stents. Methods and Results— We randomly assigned 1443 patients undergoing implantation of drug-eluting stents to receive 6- or 12-month DAPT (in a 1:1 ratio). The primary end point was a target vessel failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Rates of target vessel failure at 12 months were 4.8% in the 6-month DAPT group and 4.3% in the 12-month DAPT group (the upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.4%; P=0.001 for noninferiority with a predefined noninferiority margin of 4.0%). Although stent thrombosis tended to occur more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (0.9% versus 0.1%; hazard ratio, 6.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–49.96; P=0.10), the risk of death or myocardial infarction did not differ in the 2 groups (2.4% versus 1.9%; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.47; P=0.58). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, target vessel failure occurred more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month group (hazard ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–7.03; P=0.005) among diabetic patients. Conclusions— Six-month DAPT did not increase the risk of target vessel failure at 12 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents compared with 12-month DAPT. However, the noninferiority margin was wide, and the study was underpowered for death or myocardial infarction. Our results need to be confirmed in larger trials. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00698607.

Longitudinal 2D strain at rest predicts the presence of left main and three vessel coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality.

AIMS Non-invasive echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), even in left main or three-vessel CAD, usually requires a stress test since regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) are not always evident at rest. Strain is a more sensitive parameter of myocardial systolic function and may be abnormal in patients with severe CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated whether peak systolic longitudinal strain (PSLS) of left ventricle using 2D speckle tracking method might be useful for screening of severe CAD. One hundred and eight patients who underwent echocardiography and coronary angiography were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to the coronary angiographic findings as follows; high-risk group with left main or three-vessel CAD (n = 38), low-risk group with one- or two-vessel CAD (n = 28), and control group without CAD (n = 30). PSLSs of all left ventricular segments were obtained successfully in 96 (89%) patients. None had RWMA at resting echocardiogram. PSLS was significantly reduced, especially in mid- and basal segments, in the high-risk group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that mid- and basal PSLSs could effectively detect patients with severe CAD (area under ROC curve = 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.91). According to ROC curve analysis, -17.9% appears to be a helpful cutoff value for discriminating those with severe CAD (specificity 79% and sensitivity 79%). CONCLUSION PSLS at rest was significantly lower in patients with left main or three-vessel CAD without RWMA, and might be useful for identifying patients with a severe CAD.

The effects of atorvastatin on the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is still the most common arrhythmic complication. This study evaluated whether pretreatment with atorvastatin protects against AF after off-pump CABG. METHODS One hundred twenty-four patients without a history of AF or previous statin use, who were scheduled to undergo elective off-pump CABG, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to control group (n = 62) or to atorvastatin group (n = 62) who were administered atorvastatin 20 mg/d for 3 days before the surgery. Primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative AF. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, persistent AF at 1 month, and identification of the markers to predict inhospital postoperative AF. RESULTS The incidence of AF was significantly lower in the atorvastatin group than in the control group (13% vs 27%, P = .04). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and persistent AF at 1 month was similar in comparisons between the groups. Postoperative peak N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels were significantly higher in the patients with AF (P = .03). Multivariate analysis identified pretreatment with atorvastatin as an independent factor associated with a significant reduction in postoperative AF (odds ratio 0.34, P = .04). Higher postoperative peak N-terminus pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were associated with the development of postoperative AF (odds ratio 1.02 per 100 pg/mL, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment with atorvastatin significantly reduced the occurrence of postoperative AF after off-pump CABG.

Ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the effects of postconditioning on myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (POST) randomized trial.

Background— Ischemic postconditioning has been reported to reduce infarct size in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. However, cardioprotective effects of postconditioning have not been demonstrated in a large-scale trial. Methods and Results— We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial. A total of 700 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomly assigned to the postconditioning group or to the conventional primary PCI group in a 1:1 ratio. Postconditioning was performed immediately after restoration of coronary flow as follows: The angioplasty balloon was positioned at the culprit lesion and inflated 4 times for 1 minute with low-pressure (<6 atm) inflations, each separated by 1 minute of deflation. The primary end point was complete ST-segment resolution (percentage resolution of ST-segment elevation >70%) measured at 30 minutes after PCI. Complete ST-segment resolution occurred in 40.5% of patients in the postconditioning group and 41.5% of patients in the conventional PCI group (absolute difference, −1.0%; 95% confidence interval, −8.4 to 6.4; P=0.79). The rate of myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1 and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis) at 30 days did not differ significantly between the postconditioning group and the conventional PCI group (17.2% versus 22.4% [P=0.20] and 4.3% versus 3.7% [P=0.70], respectively). Conclusion— Ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with current standard practice. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00942500.Background —Ischemic postconditioning has been reported to reduce infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, cardioprotective effects of postconditioning have not been demonstrated in a large-scale trial. Methods and Results —We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. A total of 700 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomly assigned to the postconditioning group or the conventional primary PCI group in a 1:1 ratio. Postconditioning was performed immediately after restoration of coronary flow as follows: the angioplasty balloon was positioned at the culprit lesion, and inflated 4 times for 1 minute with low-pressure ( 70%) measured at 30 minutes after PCI. Complete ST-segment resolution occurred in 40.5% of patients in the postconditioning group and 41.5% of patients in the conventional PCI group (absolute difference, -1.0%; 95% confidence interval, -8.4% to 6.4%; P =0.79). The rate of myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1 and the major adverse cardiac events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis) at 30 days did not differ significantly between the postconditioning group and the conventional PCI group (17.2% versus 22.4%, P =0.20, and 4.3% versus 3.7%, P =0.70, respectively). Conclusions —Ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with current standard practice. Clinical Trial Registration Information —http://ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: [NCT00942500][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00942500&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2Fearly%2F2013%2F09%2F25%2FCIRCULATIONAHA.113.001690.atom

Predictors and Outcomes of Side Branch Occlusion After Main Vessel Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Results From the COBIS II Registry (COronary BIfurcation Stenting)

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the predictors and outcomes of side branch (SB) occlusion after main vessel (MV) stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND SB occlusion is a serious complication that occurs during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing PCI using drug-eluting stents for bifurcation lesions with SB ≥2.3 mm were enrolled. We selected patients treated with the 1-stent technique or MV stenting first strategy. SB occlusion after MV stenting was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3. RESULTS SB occlusion occurred in 187 (8.4%) of 2,227 bifurcation lesions. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of SB occlusion were pre-procedural percent diameter stenosis of the SB ≥50% (odds ratio [OR]: 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59 to 3.43; p < 0.001) and the proximal MV ≥50% (OR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.57 to 3.50; p < 0.001), SB lesion length (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.003 to 1.06; p = 0.03), and acute coronary syndrome (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.19; p = 0.02). Of 187 occluded SBs, flow was restored spontaneously in 26 (13.9%) and by SB intervention in 103 (55.1%) but not in 58 (31.0%). Jailed wire in the SB was associated with flow recovery (74.8% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.02). Cardiac death or myocardial infarction occurred more frequently in patients with SB occlusion than in those without SB occlusion (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.15 to 4.77; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Angiographic findings of SB, proximal MV stenosis, and clinical presentation are predictive of SB occlusion after MV stenting. Occlusion of sizable SB is associated with adverse clinical outcomes..

Long-Term Survival Benefit of Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion and Well-Developed Collateral Circulation

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) and well-developed collateral circulation treated with revascularization versus medical therapy. BACKGROUND Little is known about the clinical outcomes and optimal treatment strategies of CTO with well-developed collateral circulation. METHODS We screened 2,024 consecutive patients with at least 1 CTO detected on coronary angiogram. Of these, we analyzed data from 738 patients with Rentrop 3 grade collateral circulation who were treated with medical therapy alone (n = 236), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 170) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 332; 80.1% successful). Patients who underwent revascularization and medical therapy (revascularization group, n = 502) were compared with those who underwent medical therapy alone (medication group, n = 236) in terms of cardiac death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. RESULTS During a median follow-up duration of 42 months, multivariate analysis revealed a significantly lower incidence of cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.58; p < 0.01) and MACE (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.49; p < 0.01) in the revascularization group compared with the medication group. After propensity score matching, the incidence of cardiac death (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.80; p = 0.02) and MACE (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.82; p = 0.01) were still significantly lower in the revascularization group than in the medication group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with coronary CTO and well-developed collateral circulation, aggressive revascularization may reduce the risk of cardiac mortality and MACE.

Frequency of Myocardial Infarction and Its Relationship to Angiographic Collateral Flow in Territories Supplied by Chronically Occluded Coronary Arteries

Background— Despite complete interruption of antegrade coronary artery flow in the setting of a chronic total occlusion (CTO), clinical recognition of myocardial infarction is often challenging. Using cardiac MRI, we investigated the frequency and extent of myocardial infarction in patients with CTO, and assessed their relationship with regional systolic function and the extent of angiographic collateral flow. Methods and Results— We included 170 consecutive patients (median age, 62 years) with angiographically documented CTO. Regional late gadolinium enhancement and wall motion score index were assessed by cardiac MRI with the use of a 17-segment model. Angiographic collateral flow was assessed by the collateral connection grade and the Rentrop score. Evidence of previous myocardial infarction was found in 25% of patients by ECG Q waves, in 69% by regional wall motion abnormality, and in 86% of patients by late gadolinium enhancement. Increased angiographic collateral flow was associated with a lower frequency of Q waves on ECG, and a lower regional wall motion score index, late gadolinium enhancement volume (%), and degree of late gadolinium enhancement transmurality (all P<0.001), as well. Conclusions— The frequency of myocardial infarction in territories subtended by CTO is significantly higher than previously recognized. The degree of myocardial injury downstream epicardial CTO is inversely correlated with the degree of angiographic collaterals.

Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of the main and side branches in bifurcation lesions treated with the T-stenting technique.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the mechanism of restenosis and the predictive value of post-procedural minimum stent area (MSA) in the side branch (SB) after coronary bifurcation stenting. BACKGROUND The mechanism of restenosis, especially at the SB ostium, has not been fully elucidated. METHODS This study examined 73 bifurcation lesions with post-procedural and 9-month follow-up intravascular ultrasound images for both main vessel (MV) and SB. All lesions were treated with drug-eluting stents using the T-stenting technique. Analysis included 5 distinct locations: MV proximal stent, MV middle area, MV distal stent, SB ostium (<5 mm distal to the neocarina), and SB distal stent. RESULTS Stent expansion was significantly less in the SB than in the MV (87.1 +/- 20.4% vs. 97.0 +/- 29.1%, p = 0.007). The SB ostium was the most frequent site of post-procedural MSA. At the SB ostium, follow-up minimum lumen area (MLA) correlated with post-procedural MSA (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). The percentage of neointimal area was higher at the SB ostium than at the MV proximal, MV distal, and SB distal stent (23.8 +/- 18.9% vs. 13.3 +/- 17.3%, 15.4 +/- 20.5%, and 12.5 +/- 17.2%, p < 0.001). The optimal threshold of post-procedural MSA to predict follow-up MLA > or =4 mm(2) at the SB ostium was 4.83 mm(2), yielding an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that inadequate post-procedural MSA with increased neointimal hyperplasia may cause the SB ostium to be the most frequent site of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention on bifurcation lesions.

Sirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations: Results From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry

OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND There are limited data regarding comparisons of SES and PES for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. METHODS Patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention for non-left main bifurcation lesions were enrolled from 16 centers in Korea between January 2004 and June 2006. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE [cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization]) between the SES and PES groups in patients overall and in 407 patient pairs generated by propensity-score matching. RESULTS We evaluated 1,033 patients with bifurcation lesions treated with SES and 562 patients treated with PES. The median follow-up duration was 22 months. Treatment with SES was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.89, p < 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.97, p = 0.02), but not of cardiac death (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.40 to 18.99, p = 0.62) and cardiac death or myocardial infarction (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.49, p = 0.94). After propensity-score matching, patients with SES still had fewer MACE and target lesion revascularization incidences than did patients with PES (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.91, p = 0.02, and HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.91, p = 0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the occurrences of stent thrombosis between the groups (0.7% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS In patients with bifurcation lesions, the use of SES resulted in better long-term outcomes than did the use of PES, primarily by decreasing the rate of repeat revascularization. (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry in South Korea [COBIS]; NCT00851526).

Expedited PublicationSirolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations: Results From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry

OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND There are limited data regarding comparisons of SES and PES for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. METHODS Patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention for non-left main bifurcation lesions were enrolled from 16 centers in Korea between January 2004 and June 2006. We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE [cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization]) between the SES and PES groups in patients overall and in 407 patient pairs generated by propensity-score matching. RESULTS We evaluated 1,033 patients with bifurcation lesions treated with SES and 562 patients treated with PES. The median follow-up duration was 22 months. Treatment with SES was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.89, p < 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.97, p = 0.02), but not of cardiac death (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.40 to 18.99, p = 0.62) and cardiac death or myocardial infarction (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.49, p = 0.94). After propensity-score matching, patients with SES still had fewer MACE and target lesion revascularization incidences than did patients with PES (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.91, p = 0.02, and HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.91, p = 0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the occurrences of stent thrombosis between the groups (0.7% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS In patients with bifurcation lesions, the use of SES resulted in better long-term outcomes than did the use of PES, primarily by decreasing the rate of repeat revascularization. (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry in South Korea [COBIS]; NCT00851526).