Young-Geun Choi

Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Study Design Retrospective clinical data analysis. Objective To compare clinical results with radiologic results of 2 fusion techniques for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data There is clear evidence that lumbar interbody fusion using anterior and posterior approaches provides a high fusion rate, good sagittal alignment, and good clinical outcomes. However, there are no recent studies that compare these 2 fusion techniques. Methods Between March 2004 and December 2004, 48 patients underwent instrumented mini-anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and 46 underwent instrumented mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The mean follow-up periods were 32.6 and 29.7 months, respectively. Results The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain decreased, respectively, from 7.7 and 7.5 to 2.9 and 2.7 in the ALIF group and from 7.0 and 6.3 to 2.3 and 2.2 in the TLIF group. The mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores improved from 51.4% to 23.2% in the ALIF group and from 52% to 14.4% in the TLIF group. In both groups, the VAS and ODI scores significantly changed preoperatively to postoperatively (P<0.001). However, statistical analysis showed no significant difference in postoperative VAS/ODI scores between groups. Radiologic evidence of fusion was noted in 95.8% and 92.3% of the patients in the ALIF group and the TLIF group, respectively. In both the groups, changes in the disc height, segmental lordosis, degree of listhesis, and whole lumbar lordosis (WL) between the preoperative and postoperative periods were significant except for WL in the TLIF group. The amount of change between preoperative and postoperative disc height, segmental lordosis, and WL demonstrated significant intergroup differences (P<0.05). Conclusions The mini-ALIF group demonstrated key radiographic advantages compared with the mini-TLIF group for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. However, clinical and functional outcomes did not demonstrate significant differences between groups.

Operative failure of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a radiologic analysis of 55 cases.

Learning Objectives: After participating in this CME activity, the obstetrician/gynecologist should be better able to: 1. Accurately counsel patients on the risks and benefits of initiating hormone therapy (HT) for vasomotor symptoms (VMS). 2. Apply current evidence to select appropriate HT for treatment of VMS in uncomplicated postmenopausal women. 3. Compare the risks and benefits of HT for special subpopulations of menopausal patients, such as women with a history of breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers, those with hypertension, women older than 65 years, and those at a high risk for or with a history of venous thromboembolism.

Anterior debridement and fusion followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: autologous iliac bone strut versus cage

OBJECT An anterior approach for debridement and fusion with autologous bone graft has been recommended as the gold standard for surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The use of anterior foreign body implants at the site of active infection is still a challenging procedure for spine surgeons. Several authors have recently introduced anterior grafting with titanium mesh cages instead of autologous bone strut in the treatment of spondylodiscitis. The authors present their experience of anterior fusion with 3 types of cages followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation. They also compare their results with the use of autologous iliac bone strut. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of 60 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis treated by anterior debridement between January 2003 and April 2005. Fusion using either cages or iliac bone struts was performed during the same course of anesthesia followed by posterior fixation. Twenty-three patients underwent fusion with autologous iliac bone strut, and 37 patients underwent fusion with 1 of the 3 types of cages. RESULTS The infections resolved in all patients, as noted by normalization of their erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive protein levels. Patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of their preoperative and postoperative clinical and imaging findings. CONCLUSIONS Single-stage anterior debridement and cage fusion followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation can be effective in the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. There was no difference in clinical and imaging outcomes between the strut group and cage group except for the subsidence rate. The subsidence rate was higher in the strut group than in the cage group. The duration until subsidence was also shorter in the strut group than in the cage group.

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) for recurrent disc herniation. METHODS Fifty-four patients, who underwent surgery, either PELD (25 patients) or repeated OLM (29 patients), due to recurrent disc herniation at L4-5 level, were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods. Excluded were patients with sequestrated disc, calcified disc, severe neurological deficit, or instability. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological variables were assessed using plain radiography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Mean operating time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in PELD group (45.8 minutes and 0.9 day, respectively) than OLM group (73.8 minutes and 3.8 days, respectively) (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 4% in PELD group and 10.3% in OLM group in the perioperative period. At a mean follow-up duration of 34.2 months, the mean improvements of back pain, leg pain, and functional improvement were 4.0, 5.5, and 40.9% for PELD group and 2.3, 5.1, and 45.0% for OLM group, respectively. Second recurrence occurred in 4% after PELD and 10.3% after OLM. Disc height did not change after PELD, but significantly decreased after OLM (p = 0.0001). Neither sagittal rotation angle nor volume of multifidus muscle changed significantly in both groups. CONCLUSION Both PELD and repeated OLM showed favorable outcomes for recurrent disc herniation, but PELD had advantages in terms of shorter operating time, hospital stay, and disc height preservation.

Comparison Study of the Instrumented Circumferential Fusion with Instrumented Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as a Surgical Procedure for Adult Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND Instrumented circumferential fusion has been used as a primary and salvage procedure in lumbar spine fusion, especially for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Recently, instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has been shown to provide good clinical and radiologic results that are comparable with those attained with traditional lumbar fusion. However, there have been no reports available that compare instrumented circumferential fusion with instrumented ALIF. METHODS Between January 2003 and November 2004, a total of 43 consecutive patients underwent instrumented ALIF (group I) at one hospital of the authors. Between February 2003 and October 2006, a total of 32 consecutive patients underwent instrumented circumferential fusion (group II) at the other hospital of the authors. The authors retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiologic data from patients. The time spent on the operation, blood loss, blood transfusions, the length of hospital stay, complications, clinical results, and radiologic results, including disc height (DH), degree of listhesis, segmental lordosis (SL), and whole lumbar lordosis (WL), were analyzed and compared. Clinical outcomes were graded using visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Functional outcomes were measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and return-to-work status. RESULTS The mean follow-up period was 41.1 and 32.9 months in group I and group II, respectively. Radiologic evidence of fusion was noted in 42 of 43 patients in group I and in 32 of 32 patients in group II. In both groups, all of the radiologic data, including the DH, degree of listhesis, SL, and WL significantly changed from the preoperative to postoperative period except for WL in group II. In both groups, VAS scores for back and leg pain and ODI scores significantly changed from the preoperative to postoperative period. There was no significant difference for VAS scores for back ODI scores in the two treatment groups after surgery. The mean time until return to work was 3.7 months in group I and 3.6 months in group II (p < .05). The mean hospital stay for group I (7.4 days) was shorter than that for group II (15.2 days) (p < .05). The mean operation time in group I (190 minutes) was shorter than that in group II (260.8 minutes) (p < .05). The mean blood loss in group I (300 mL) was less than that in group II (379 mL) (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS According to the present clinical outcome, instrumented ALIF is at least as effective as instrumented circumferential fusion for the treatment of back pain in adult patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Moreover, in terms of operative data including the duration of operation and hospital stay, as well as blood loss, instrumented ALIF demonstrates better results.

An analysis of general surgery-related complications in a series of 412 minilaparotomic anterior lumbosacral procedures.

OBJECT Anterior lumbar surgery is associated with certain perioperative visceral and vascular complications. The aim of this study was to document all general surgery-related adverse events and complications following minilaparotomic retroperitoneal lumbar procedures and to discuss strategies for their management or prevention. METHODS The authors analyzed data obtained in 412 patients who underwent anterior lumbosacral surgery between 2003 and 2005. The series comprised 114 men and 298 women whose mean age was 56 years (range 34-79 years). Preoperative diagnoses were as follows: isthmic spondylolisthesis (32%), degenerative spondylolisthesis (24%), instability/stenosis (15%), degenerative disc disease (15%), failed-back surgery syndrome (7%), and lumbar degenerative kyphosis or scoliosis (7%). A single level was exposed in 264 patients (64%), 2 in 118 (29%), and 3 or 4 in 30 (7%). The average follow-up period was 16 months. RESULTS Overall, 52 instances of complications and adverse events occurred in 50 patients (12.1%), including sympathetic dysfunction in 25 (6.06%), vascular injury repaired with/without direct suture in 12 (2.9%), ileus lasting > 3 days in 5 (1.2%), pleural effusion in 4 (0.97%), wound dehiscence in 2 (0.49%), symptomatic retroperitoneal hematoma in 2 (0.49%), angina in 1 (0.24%), and bowel laceration in 1 patient (0.24%). There was no instance of retrograde ejaculation in male patients, and most complications had no long-term sequelae. CONCLUSIONS This report presents a detailed analysis of complications related to anterior lumbar surgery. Although the incidence of complications appears low considering the magnitude of the procedure, surgeons should be aware of these potential complications and their management.

Lymphocele formation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 : Case report

In this report, the authors present the case of patient with a lymphocele in the retroperitoneal area following anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5. A lymphocele is a rare complication of spinal operations, especially lower lumbar spinal surgeries. The authors discuss this complicating factor and describe its features and treatments.