Young Ju Noh
University of Ulsan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Young Ju Noh.
Lung Cancer | 2012
Jin Ho Baek; Hawk Kim; Jong-Joon Ahn; Yangjin Jegal; Kwang Won Seo; Seung Won Ra; Chang Ryul Park; Jong Pil Jung; Jeong Won Kim; Yong Jik Lee; Hee Jeong Cha; Woon Jung Kwon; Young Ju Noh; Sukjoong Oh; Jae-Hoo Park; Young Joo Min
BACKGROUNDnThe standard regimen in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still uncertain. Gemcitabine is one of the most widely used drugs for the treatment of NSCLC, and several phase II trials specifically designed for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC have confirmed the role of gemcitabine in this setting. In addition, oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) was associated with a survival advantage in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, we performed a phase II study using the combination of gemcitabine and UFT as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.nnnMETHODSnChemotherapy-naïve, elderly (≥ 70 years) patients who had histologically or cytologically confirmed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with a performance status of 1-2 were enrolled. Patients received gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, respectively) and UFT (400mg/day on days 1-14) every 3 weeks for up to four cycles. Patients who had not progressed after four cycles continued UFT monotherapy until progression. Primary endpoint was overall response rate and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time to progression and safety profiles.nnnRESULTSnBetween March 2008 and November 2010, 48 patients were enrolled. The median age was 74.5 years (range: 70-84 years), and there were 29 males. The performance status was 1 in 41 and 2 in 7 patients. Thirty-one (64.6%) patients were stage IV and seventeen (35.4%) patients were stage IIIB. Thirty patients (62.5%) completed four cycles of chemotherapy. Response was evaluated in 44 patients. Partial response was achieved in twelve (25.0%) patients and stable disease in 23 (47.9%) patients. Disease control rate was 72.9%. The median survival time was 6.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]; 5.1-7.0 months), the 1-year survival rate was 29.1% and the median time to progression was 4.6 months (95% CI; 3.7-5.5 months). Toxicities were mild and mostly hematological adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 8.3% of patients and one patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 2.1% and 2.1% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were tolerable.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe combination of gemcitabine and UFT was effective in disease control and well tolerated first-line regimen in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.
Cancer Research and Treatment | 2002
Sangwook Lee; Eun Kyung Choi; Suk Joong Oh; Cheol Won Suh; Sang We Kim; Jung Shin Lee; Dong Soon Kim; Won Dong Kim; Woo Seong Kim; Sang Do Lee; Jong Hoon Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Kyoung Ju Kim; Young Ju Noh
PURPOSEnTo investigate the feasibility, toxicity and response rate, of concurrent chemoradiation therapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin in stage III locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnBetween May 1999 and December 2000, 80 patients with stage III NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective protocol. Radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 70.2 Gy (daily fraction of 1.8 Gy for 5 days), over an 8 week period, on the gross tumor volume, combined with chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) and 20 mg/m2 cisplatin per week for 8 consecutive weeks. All patients received 3-D conformal radiotherapy using CT-simulated planning. Acute toxicities were evaluated by the RTOG scale. The median follow-up period was 16 months, ranging from 3 to 29 months.nnnRESULTSnOf the 80 patients, 71 received treatment per protocol, with minor variation of protocol delivery. The median age of the patients was 60 years. Karnofsky Performance status were 100 and 90 in 62 patients, and 80 and 70 in 9, respectively. Weight loss of less than 5% for 6 months was observed in 22 patients. The response to treatment was evaluated from the radiological findings. Complete and partial responses were observed in 8 and 51 patients, respectively. Ultimately, 82% of patients (included complete responses: 8 cases) obtained more than a partial response. Although, radiation induced esophagitis was the most common treatment related toxicity, occurring in 44 patients (69%), severe radiation esophagitis like, grade 3, was observed in only 3 patients, and the most acute toxicities had completely recovered 1 month following treatment. The overall 2-year actuarial and progression free survivals were 56 and 45%, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONnThis combined modality has activity with manageable toxicity and 23 months in mean survival time in patients with stage III NSCLC. A longer follow up will be required to realise the expected higher survival of these results.
Cancer Research and Treatment | 2006
Young Ju Noh; Wonsik Choi; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Hee Cheol Kim; Tae Won Kim; Heung Moon Chang; Min Hee Ryu; Seung Do Ahn; Sangwook Lee; Seong Soo Shin; Jung Eun Lee; Eun Kyung Choi
PURPOSEnCapecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate and it is known as an effective radiosensitizer. Capecitabine and its metabolite reach their peak concentration in the plasma at 1 approximately 2 hours after a single oral administration of capecitabine and the levels fall rapidly thereafter. To verify the radiosensitizing effect of capecitabine that is based on such pharmacokinetic characteristics, we performed a retrospective analysis on the optimal timing of capecitabine administration with performing preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnAmong 171 patients who were treated with preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine administration for rectal cancer, 56 patients were administered capecitabine at 1~2 hours before radiotherapy (group A), and at other time in the other 115 patients (group B). Total mesorectal excision was done at 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. The radiosensitizing effect of capecitabine was evaluated on the basis of the pathological response.nnnRESULTSnComplete pathological regression of the primary tumor was observed in 12 patients (21.4%) for group A and in 11 patients (9.6%) for group B (p=0.031). Residual disease less than 0.5 cm (a good response) was observed in 19 patients (33.9%) for group A and in 23 patients (20.0%) for group B (p=0.038). On multivariate analysis, the capecitabine ingestion time showed marginal significance.nnnCONCLUSIONnWhen performing preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer, the radiosensitizing effect of capecitabine was enhanced when it was administered 1 hour before radiotherapy.
Cancer Research and Treatment | 2002
Young Seok Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Eun Kyung Choi; J. Kim; Sangwook Lee; Young Ju Noh; Chong-Kook Kim; Kwun Bd
PURPOSEnWe evaluated the patterns of failure, survival rate, prognostic factors and treatment related complication in postoperative radiation treatment of patients with ependymoma.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with histologically confirmed ependymoma treated between Jun. 1990 and Jun. 2001 with postoperative radiotherapy at Asan Medical Center. The study group comprised of 16 men and 9 women, with a median age of 23 years; including 6 supratentorial, 15 infratentorial and 4 spinal cord lesions. The extents of resection were ranked as either: gross total, near total, subtotal, partial resection or biopsy, with these types of surgical resection being performed in 13, 3, 6, 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Twelve of the patients had low grade ependymoma, and the other 13 a high grade tumor. The postoperative irradiation was administered using 4 MV or 6 MV photons, up to median dose of 55.0 Gy (range, 45.0~59.4 Gy), with the radiation field encompassing the preoperative tumor volume plus a 2 cm margin. Only 8 of the patients received either pre- or postoperative chemotherapy. The median follow-up period of survivors was 43 months.nnnRESULTSnTen of the 25 patients (40%) developed a recurrence, and 5 died. Of the 10 recurred patients, 6 showed an in-field recurrence, and one developed both an in-field and an out of field recurrence. The remaining 3 patients showed an out of field recurrence, including one case with a leptomeningeal recurrence. The 5-year overall survival, and progression-free, survival rates were 74.0 and 56.1%, respectively. The histological grades were statistically significant prognostic factors of the overall and progression-free survival rates. There were no significant treatment related complications, with the exception of one case of panhypopituitarism, which occurred 30 months after completion of the radiotherapy.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe main pattern of recurrence was due to local failure. In order to improve the local control, and to reduce complications, advanced radiation treatment techniques, such as 3 dimensional radiotherapy, may be needed.
Lung Cancer | 2008
Su Jin Shin; Hawk Kim; Jin Ho Baek; Jong-Joon Ahn; Yangjin Jegal; Kwang Won Seo; Chang Ryul Park; Je Kyoun Shin; Jong Pil Jung; Jeong Won Kim; Hee Jeong Cha; Woon Jung Kwon; Ae Kyung Jeong; Young Ju Noh; Jae-Hoo Park; Young Joo Min
Lung Cancer | 2005
Byung-Tae Kim; Y. Ahn; Young Ju Noh; Chi Hong Kim; J. Lee; J. Kim; E. Yoon; Hyun-Kyung Lee; S. Choi
Journal of Korean Endocrine Society | 2007
Jun Ho Lee; Young Min Kim; Dae Seong Hwang; Young Tae Hwang; Jun Bum Eum; Jung Min Seo; Dae Hwa Choi; Byeong Seong Kang; Young Ju Noh; Il Seong Nam-Goong; Young Il Kim; Eun Sook Kim
Journal of Lung Cancer | 2008
Si Yeol Song; Young Ju Noh; Eun Kyung Choi; Jong Hoon Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Sangwook Lee; Cheolwon Suh
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine | 2004
Young Joo Min; Jong Joon Ahn; Young Ju Noh; Hee Jeong Cha; Jae Hee Suh; Jong Pil Jung; Chang Ryul Park; Ae Kyung Jeong; Jae Hoo Park; Ki Man Lee
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Jin Ho Baek; Young-Min Kim; Sungchan Park; Chang Hoon Moon; Won Lee; Hee Jeong Cha; Jong-Joon Ahn; Yangjin Jegal; Kwang Won Seo; Seung Won Ra; Tae-Hoon Lee; Byung Ju Kang; Chang Ryul Park; Yong Jik Lee; Woon Jung Kwon; Young Ju Noh; Young Joo Min