Young-Soo Seo

Adjunctive varenicline treatment with antipsychotic medications for cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

The aim of this study is to examine the effects of treatment with varenicline, a partial agonist at the α4β2 and full agonist at the α7 nicotine acetylcholine receptor, on cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. In all, 120 clinically stable people with schizophrenia participated in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week trial. Antipsychotic and concomitant medication doses remained fixed throughout the study. Varenicline was titrated up to 1 mg twice daily for weeks 2–8. Neuropsychological, clinical, and safety assessments were administered at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8. In the primary analyses of neurocognitive differences at week 8, no varenicline–placebo differences were significant. In secondary longitudinal analyses, varenicline improved compared with placebo on the Digital Symbol Substitution Test (p=0.013) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test non-perseverative errors (p=0.043). Some treatment effects were different between smokers and non-smokers. In smokers, Continuous Performance Test hit reaction time (p=0.008) and Stroop Interference (p=0.004) were reduced for varenicline compared with placebo, while there were no treatment differences in non-smokers. No significant treatment main effects or interactions were noted for total scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Scale for the Assessment for Negative Symptoms. Our findings suggest beneficial effects of adjunctive varenicline treatment with antipsychotics for some cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. In some cases, effects of treatment varied between smokers and non-smokers. Further study is required to assess the functional significance of these changes.

Adjunctive varenicline treatment for smoking reduction in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES Smoking is more common among patients with schizophrenia than it is in the general population. Varenicline, a partial and full agonist at the α4β2 and α7 nicotine acetylcholine receptors, respectively, has been shown to be an effective anti-smoking treatment. This study examined the effects of varenicline treatment on smoking reduction in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS Sixty smokers with schizophrenia were recruited and randomized to receive either varenicline or placebo. Smoking behavior was assessed with the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (mNWS), Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urge (QSU-brief), and Modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ). Exhaled carbon monoxide was also measured to assess smoking dependency and status. Data were analyzed with the two-tailed Students t-test, χ(2) test, and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS During the 8-week study, there was a significant time×group interaction, which showed that smoking decreased over time in the varenicline group. Expired CO levels also decreased in the varenicline group, showing a significant time effect, group effect, and time×group interaction. Total mCEQ scores decreased in the varenicline group, demonstrating a significant time×group interaction. Among the five domains of the mCEQ, the smoking satisfaction, psychological reward, and enjoyment of respiratory tract sensation domains showed significant time×group interactions in the varenicline group. The QSU-brief and mNWS demonstrated a significant time effect, but not significant time×group interactions. Adjunctive varenicline treatment with antipsychotics was generally well-tolerated and safe. CONCLUSIONS Varenicline showed significant efficacy in reducing smoking in people with schizophrenia.

The Korean Version of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment: Reliability and Validity

Objective The study’s aim was to develop and standardize a Korean version of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (K-UPSA), which is used to evaluate the daily living function of patients with schizophrenia. Methods Study participants were 78 patients with schizophrenia and 27 demographically matched healthy controls. We evaluated the clinical states and cognitive functions to verify K-UPSA’s reliability and validity. For clinical states, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale, and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale and Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale-fourth revision were used. The Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale, Short-form of Korean-Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test were used to assess cognitive function. Results The K-UPSA had statistically significant reliability and validity. The K-UPSA has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, 0.837) and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.381–0.792; p<0.001). The K-UPSA had significant discriminant validity (p<0.001). Significant correlations between the K-UPSA’s scores and most of the scales and tests listed above demonstrated K-UPSA’s concurrent validity (p<0.001). Conclusion The K-UPSA is useful to evaluate the daily living function in Korean patients with schizophrenia.

Differences in cognitive function and daily living skills between early- and late-stage schizophrenia.

Objectives. Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of schizophrenia; deficits often manifest prior to diagnosis and persist throughout the course of the illness. This study was performed to assess the difference in cognitive function and daily living skills between the early- and late-stage schizophrenia. Methods. Fifty-five clinically stable patients with schizophrenia were recruited (25 with < 5-year and 30 with > 5-year disease durations). We evaluated subjects’ clinical states, cognitive function, and psychosocial factors. The Korean versions of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery and UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment were used for evaluating cognitive function and daily living skills. Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t-tests were used to analyze the data. Results. The two groups did not differ for most demographic variables. No significant differences between groups were found for clinical symptoms, psychosocial factors, or non-social cognitive domains. However, the early-stage group had higher social cognition domain scores than the late-stage group (p = 0.01). Early-stage patients scored significantly higher than those in the late-stage group did in the communication and comprehension/planning domains (p = 0.037 and 0.027, respectively), and total score (p = 0.003) of the Performance-based Skills Assessment. Conclusions. We observed significant differences between patients with early- and late-stage illness with regard to social cognition and performance-based skills.

Adjunct transcranial direct current stimulation improves cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia: A double-blind 12-week study

OBJECTIVES Cognitive impairment is a common symptom of schizophrenia that has significant effects on quality of life and the activities of daily living. The present study examined the ability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve cognitive function and clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS Fifty-six patients with schizophrenia were randomized to real-tDCS and sham-tDCS groups. The participants were stable for a period of 3months before study enrollment. Each group received 30min of active 2-mA tDCS or sham stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (anode F3, cathode F4) once per day for 10 consecutive weekdays. The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were used to evaluate cognitive function, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) were used to evaluate symptoms at baseline, after 10 sessions, and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS There was a significant time×group interaction, indicating that MCCB working memory (P=0.008) and overall scores (P=0.031) improved over time in the real-tDCS group compared to the sham-tDCS group. There was also a significant time×group interaction for depressive symptoms as evaluated by the CGI-SCH, which decreased over time in the real-tDCS group (P=0.041). tDCS treatment combined with antipsychotic medication was generally well-tolerated and safe. CONCLUSIONS Adjunct tDCS treatment is safe and effective for improving cognitive status in patients with schizophrenia.

The Korean Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: Reliability and Validity

Objective This studys aim was to develop and standardize a Korean version (SCoRS-K) of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), which is used to evaluate the degree of cognitive dysfunction affecting the everyday functioning of people with schizophrenia. Methods Eighty-four schizophrenia patients with stable symptoms who were receiving outpatient treatment and rehabilitation therapy, and 29 demographically matched non-patient controls, participated in the study. Demographic data were collected, and clinical symptoms, cognitive function, and social function were evaluated to verify SCoRS-Ks reliability and validity. Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale. Cognitive function was evaluated using a short form of the Korean Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Social function was evaluated using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale, and the Social Functioning Scale. Results Data analysis demonstrated SCoRS-Ks statistically significant reliability and validity. SCoRS-K has high internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha; patient 0.941, informant 0.905, interviewer 0.964); test-retest reliability [patient 0.428 (p=0.003), informant 0.502 (p<0.001), interviewer 0.602 (p<0.001); and global rating 0.642 (p<0.001)]. The mean scores of subjects were significantly higher than those of the controls (p<0.001), demonstrating SCoRS-Ks discriminant validity. Significant correlations between the total scores and global rating score of SCoRS-K and those of the scales and tests listed above (except WCST) support SCoRS-Ks concurrent validity. Conclusion SCoRS-K is a useful instrument for evaluating the degree of cognitive dysfunction in Korean schizophrenia patients.