Yu. V. Ilyin

Precise excision of long terminal repeats of the gypsy (mdg4) retrotransposon of Drosophila melanogaster detected in Escherichia coli cells is explained by its integrase function

An Escherichia coli model system was developed to estimate the capacity of the integrase of the Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon gypsy (mdg4) for precise excision of the long terminal repeat (LTR) and, hence, the entire gypsy. The gypsy retrotransposon was cloned in the form of a PCR fragment in the pBlue-Script II KS+ vector (pBSLTR), and the region of the second open reading frame (INT ORF2) of this element encoding integrase was cloned under the lacZ promoter in the pUC19 vector and then recloned in pACYC184 compatible with pBSLTR. The LTR was cloned in such a manner that its precise excision from the recombinant plasmid led to the restoration of the nucleotide sequence and the function of the lacZ gene; therefore, it was detected by the appearance of blue colonies on a medium containing X-gal upon IPTG induction. Upon IPTG induction of E. coli XL-1 Blue cells obtained by cotransformation with plasmids pACYCint and pBSLTR on an X-gal-containing medium, blue clones appeared with a frequency of 10−4 to 10−3, the frequency of spontaneously appearing blue colonies not exceeding 10−9 to 10−8. The presence of blue colonies indicated that that the integrase encoded by the INT ORF2 (pACYCint) fragment was active. After the expression of the integrase, it recognized and excised the gypsy LTR from pBSLTR, precisely restoring the nucleotide sequence and the function of the lacZ gene, which led to the expression of the β-galactosidase enzymatic activity. PCR analysis confirmed that the LTR was excised precisely. Thus, the resultant biplasmid model system allowed precise excisions of the gypsy LTR from the target site to be detected. Apparently, the gypsy integrase affected not only the LTR of this mobile element, but also the host genome nucleotide sequences. The system is likely to have detected only some of the events occurring in E. coli cells. Thus, the integrase of gypsy is actually capable of not only transposing this element by inserting DNA copies of the gypsy retrotransposon to chromosomes of Drosophila, but also excising them. gypsy is excised via a precise mechanism, with the original nucleotide sequence of the target site being completely restored. The obtained data demonstrate the existence of alternative ways of the transposition of retrotransposons and, possibly, retroviruses, including gypsy (mdg4).

Retrotransposon gtwin: Structural Analysis and Distribution in Drosophila Strains

A search for noncanonical variants of the gypsy retrotransposon (MDG4) in the genome of the Drosophila melanogaster strain G32 led to the cloning of four copies of the poorly studied 7411-bp gtwin element. Sequence analysis showed that gtwin belongs to a family of endogeneous retroviruses, which are widespread in the Drosophila genome and have recently been termed insect erantiviruses. The gtwin retrotransposon is evolutionarily closest to MDG4, as evident from a good alignment of their nucleotide sequences including ORF2 (the pol gene) and ORF3 (the env gene), as well as the amino acid sequences of their protein products. These regions showed more than 75% homology. The distribution of gtwin was studied in several strains of the genus Drosophila. While strain G32 contained more than 20 copies of the element, ten other D. melanogaster strains carried gtwin in two to six copies per genome. The gtwin element was not detected in D. Hydei or D. Virilis. Comparison of the cloned gtwin sequences with the gtwin sequence available from the D. melanogaster genome database showed that the two variants of the mobile element differ by the presence or absence of a stop codon in the central region of ORF3. Its absence from the gtwin copies cloned from the strain G32 may indicate an association between the functional state of ORF3 and amplification of the element.

The Distribution in Different Strains and Characteristic Features of Two Subfamilies of Drosophila melanogaster Retrotransposon MDG4 (gypsy)

The distribution of two variants of MDG4 (gypsy) was analyzed in severalDrosophila melanogasterstrains. Southern blot hybridization revealed the inactive variant of MDG4 in all strains examined and active MDG4 only in some of them. Most of the strains harboring the active MDG4 variant were recently isolated from natural populations. It is of interest that the active MDG4 prevailed over the inactive one only in strains carrying the mutantflamenco gene. Several lines were analyzed in more detail. The number of MDG4 sites on salivary-gland polytene chromosomes was established via in situ hybridization, and MDG4 was tested for transposition using the ovoD test.

Retrotransposon gypsy and Its Role in Genetic Instability of a Mutator Strain of Drosophila melanogaster

This article summarizes the results of a ten-year study of genetic instability of a mutator strain of Drosophila melanogaster caused by transposition of the gypsy retrotransposon. The results of other authors working with an analogous system are analyzed. Possible mechanisms are suggested for the interaction of gypsy with the cell gene flamenco that participates in transposition control of this mobile element.

Errantiviruses of Drosophila

The view on Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, which have three reading frames, as endogenous retroviruses or errantiviruses (ERVs, according to the latest ICTV nomenclature) is discussed. Data on the biology of ERVs and the mechanisms of their involvement in genetic instability of Drosophila are considered.

Specific endonuclease activity of integrase encoded by the mdg4 (gypsy) retrotransposon

To study the mechanism of precise excision ofgypsy from genomic sites, the integrase domain ofgypsy pol was cloned and expressed inEscherichia coli. The endonuclease activity of recombinant integrase was assayed with synthetic substrates corresponding to 3′-U5 ofgypsy LTR and to the known genomic insertion sites ofgypsy. Integrase nicked the 5′-A ⇓ YR-3′ triplet in the (+) strand of the double-stranded substrates; cleavage of a single-stranded substrate was nonspecific. Cleavage proved to be affected by the local conformation of the substrate: the (+) strand was cleaved more efficiently when the (−) strand had an unpaired base in the triplet and was not cleaved when the (−) strand was interrupted or branched. The triplet corresponded to the consensus region ofgypsy insertion (5′-YRYR ⇓ YR-3′), the site of cleavagein vitro coinciding with the site of insertionin vivo. The unique mechanism ofgypsy excision was assumed to depend to a great extent on the enzymic properties of its integrase.

Diversity of LTR retrotransposons and their role in genome reorganization

Current views of retrotransposons possessing long terminal repeats (LTRs) are described. The existing classification and element types isolated by genome organization are considered. Experimental data are summarized to demonstrate that the replicative cycle of a retrotransposon is not restricted to a single cell and that LTR retrotransposons are transferred between somatic cells with a rate comparable with the element transposition rate within the genome of one cell. The major mechanisms mediating the role of LTR retrotransposons in reorganization of the genome are considered with regard to the strategies of their horizontal and vertical transfer.

Georgii Pavlovich Georgiev

Georgii Pavlovich Georgiev is one of the founders of molecular biology of eukaryotes. When Georgiev began his research work in the late 1950s, only a few laboratories in the world were making first attempts to tackle molecular biology of higher organisms. In that period Escherichia coli cells, with their much simpler organization, were a classic object of molecular biology. However, Georgiev was interested in the structure and functions of the genetic material of animal and human cells; therefore, despite all the difficulties, he consciously embarked upon molecular biology of eukaryotes. In that time, which seems a remote past now, Georgiev’s works were substantially ahead of those by other researchers. Some findings made by Georgiev and his coworkers were not confirmed by other researchers until two or three years later. Georgiev has addressed a wide range of scientific problems. Although his preferences varied at different stages of his research work, he always obtained impressing results in every field. Undoubtedly, Georgiev is one of those researchers who choose not to remain within the scope of their “favorite” subject, but are permanently tackling new, more complicated problems instead. Amazingly, almost every time in every new field, Georgiev has managed to quickly perform brilliant studies and make discoveries that determined the development of the given branch of molecular biology for years to come. For some time now, Georgiev has been working in another new field, antitumor protection and gene therapy of cancer. Here, too, he made a considerable contribution into the development of one of the most promising aspects of this problem from the very beginning.

Homologous and Heterologous Type 2 Casein Kinases Have the Same Effect on the Affinity for RNA of the Gag Structural Protein of gypsy (mdg4)

The gypsy (mdg4) retrovirus of Drosophila is among retroelements intensely studied over the recent decade [1]. Its structural protein, Gag, forms viruslike particles, which can occur extracellularly [2] and contribute to the interspecific transfer of the element [3]. The protein lacks canonical domains of structural proteins of most retroviruses and retrotransposons. In amino acid sequence, gypsy Gag shares several features with human spumaviruses and some other retroelements [4]. The biology of capsid formation is poorly understood. We have previously reported that gypsy Gag forms virion-like particles in vitro and has high affinity for nucleic acids, most notably RNA [4]. The protein is a natural substrate of type 2 casein kinases (CK2) [6].

Retrotransposon mdg3 Is Transferred between Somatic Cells of Unrelated Species in Mixed Culture

Since retrovirus-like particles of gypsy (mdg4) are capable of interspecific transfer, other Drosophila melanogaster gypsy-related retrotransposons were tested for this property. As a donor and a recipient, D. melanogaster and D. virilis cultured cells were used. Recipient cell DNA was analyzed with probes directed to mdg1, mdg3, 17.6, 297, 412, or B104/roo. Transfer was demonstrated for mdg3, which lacks env. The possible mechanism of transfer is discussed.