Yuancheng Chen

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of levornidazole, its metabolites and comparators against clinical anaerobic bacteria

This study evaluated the in vitro anti-anaerobic activity and spectrum of levornidazole, its metabolites and comparators against 375 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria, including Gram-negative bacilli (181 strains), Gram-negative cocci (11 strains), Gram-positive bacilli (139 strains) and Gram-positive cocci (44 strains), covering 34 species. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of levornidazole, its five metabolites and three comparators against these anaerobic isolates were determined by the agar dilution method. Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of levornidazole and metronidazole were measured against 22 strains of Bacteroides fragilis. Levornidazole showed good activity against B. fragilis, other Bacteroides spp., Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens and Peptostreptococcus magnus, evidenced by MIC90 values of 0.5, 1, 0.25, 2 and 1mg/L, respectively. The activity of levornidazole and the comparators was poor for Veillonella spp. Generally, levornidazole displayed activity similar to or slightly higher than that of metronidazole, ornidazole and dextrornidazole against anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive bacilli and Gram-positive cocci, especially B. fragilis. Favourable anti-anaerobic activity was also seen with levornidazole metabolites M1 and M4 but not M2, M3 or M5. For the 22 clinical B. fragilis strains, MBC50 and MBC90 values of levornidazole were 2mg/L and 4mg/L, respectively. Both MBC50/MIC50 and MBC90/MIC90 ratios of levornidazole were 4, similar to those of metronidazole. Levornidazole is an important anti-anaerobic option in clinical settings in terms of its potent and broad-spectrum in vitro activity, bactericidal property, and the anti-anaerobic activity of its metabolites M1 and M4.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin injection in healthy Chinese volunteers and dosing regimen optimization

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of levofloxacin were investigated following administration of levofloxacin injection in healthy Chinese volunteers for optimizing dosing regimen.

Synergistic killing by meropenem and colistin combination of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Chinese patients in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is an important clinical threat. Combination therapy that exerts a synergistic effect has become a potential solution to combat CRAB. However, choosing an optimal combination regimen is challenging. A dynamic in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that can simulate the pharmacokinetic profiles of antibiotics provides a powerful tool to compare antibacterial responses to different clinical dosage regimens. In this study, the synergistic effect of the combination of meropenem and colistin was tested in 12 clinical CRAB isolates from Chinese patients using the chequerboard technique. The antibacterial effect was investigated in an in vitro PK/PD diffusion model by simulating different dosage regimens: meropenem monotherapy (0.5 g with 0.5-h infusion or 1 g with 3-h infusion); colistin monotherapy (fixed unbound concentration maintained at 0.25, 0.5 or 1 mg/L); and combination of meropenem and colistin. The chequerboard method showed that the combination of meropenem and colistin had synergistic effects against all 12 isolates, with fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) of ≤0.5. Moreover, the dynamic in vitro PK/PD model demonstrated that for clinical CRAB isolates with a meropenem MIC of 128 mg/L, the combination (meropenem 1 g with 3-h infusion combined with colistin maintained at 1 mg/L) could achieve 3.8 log10 killing after 24 h, whereas monotherapy was unable to provide such an antibacterial effect. Taken together, these results suggest that the combination of meropenem and colistin might be a promising therapy against CRAB.

Development and validation of a new ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method for vancomycin assay in serum and its application to therapeutic drug monitoring.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate an ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (UPLC) method with photodiode array detector for the measurement of vancomycin in human serum samples for therapeutic drug monitoring or other applications. Methods: The method included the extraction of vancomycin in serum by deproteinization with acetonitrile. The analyses were carried out using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 &mgr;m) using acetonitrile and 0.005 M KH2PO4 buffer (pH 2.5) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, with photodiode array detection at 230 nm. The method was validated for extraction recovery, inter- and intraday precision (relative standard deviation, RSD%), and accuracy and stability of vancomycin in serum. Both the established UPLC method and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) were used to measure the prepared quality control (QC) samples (1.0, 7.0, 35.0, 75.0 mg/L) to validate the accuracy of UPLC. Furthermore, both methods were subsequently used to assay the vancomycin concentration in 172 clinical serum samples collected from patients receiving vancomycin in the hospitals localized in Shanghai (China) and 32 control samples from United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS). Results: The retention time of vancomycin was 2.6 minutes. The calibration curve for UPLC was linear over the range 1.0–100.0 mg/L (R2 > 0.999). The method was fully validated in terms of recovery, selectivity, accuracy, precision, and various conditions. The absolute difference% and RSD% of the prepared QC samples assayed by UPLC were all better than the results by FPIA. A paired t test of the results of the prepared QC samples indicated that the results of all the QC samples had significant difference (P < 0.05), except for the 7.0 mg/L QC samples, which suggested that UPLC was more accurate for the samples containing low or high concentration of vancomycin. A correlation with the Deming model provided a good linear relation between the results of the 2 methods applied to 172 samples, with equation of UPLC = 0.99 × FPIA − 0.19 (R2= 0.923), and the agreement of the 2 methods was illustrated using Bland–Altman plot with a mean difference (UPLC − FPIA) of −0.428 mg/L and 95% confidence interval of −8.33 to 7.47 mg/L, respectively. A Student t test comparing results obtained by the UPLC method and group mean results of control samples from UK NEQAS were not significant (P = 0.057). Conclusions: A short analysis time, small amount of serum needed, high specificity, and accuracy make the UPLC method developed in this study appropriate and practical for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring and could be applied to other nonserum applications or where requiring superior validation parameters such as for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies.

Quantification of levornidazole and its metabolites in human plasma and urine by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

We developed and validated an ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (UPLC) method coupled with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) mass spectrometry for simultaneous determination of levornidazole and its first-pass metabolites, l-chloro-3-(2-hydroxymethyl-5-nitro-l-imidazolyl)-2-propanol (Ml), 2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole (M2) and 3-(2-methyl-5-nitro-1-imidazolyl)-1,2-propanediol (M4), in human plasma and urine. The biological samples were pretreated by protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed using an ACQUITY UPLC CSH C18 column (2.1×50 mm, 1.7 μm) and a QTRAP mass spectrometer in multiple reaction monitoring mode via APCI. Acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water was used as the mobile phase in gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The lower limit of quantification of this method was 0.0100, 0.00500, 0.0200 and 0.00250 μg/mL for levornidazole, M1, M2 and M4, respectively. The linear calibration curves were obtained for levornidazole, M1, M2, and M4 over the range of 0.0100-5.00, 0.00500-2.50, 0.0200-10.0 and 0.00250-1.25 μg/mL, respectively. The intra- and inter-batch precision was less than 12.2% in plasma and less than 10.8% in urine. The intra- and inter-batch accuracy was 87.8-105.7% in plasma and 92.8-109.2% in urine. The mean recovery of levornidazole, M1, M2 and M4 was 91.1-105.1%, 95.8-103.8%, 87.8-96.8%, 96.8-100.6% from plasma and 96.0-100.9%, 96.9-107.9%, 95.1-102.7%, 103.7-105.9% from urine respectively. This method was validated under various conditions, including room temperature, freeze-thaw cycles, long-term storage at -40 ± 5°C, after pretreatment in the autosampler (at 10°C), and 10- and 100-fold dilution. This newly established analytical method was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study following single intravenous infusion of levornidazole in 24 healthy Chinese subjects.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimen Optimization of Meropenem in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma in Patients with Meningitis after Neurosurgery

ABSTRACT Meropenem is used to manage postneurosurgical meningitis, but its population pharmacokinetics (PPK) in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in this patient group are not well-known. Our aims were to (i) characterize meropenem PPK in plasma and CSF and (ii) recommend favorable dosing regimens in postneurosurgical meningitis patients. Eighty-two patients were enrolled to receive meropenem infusions of 2 g every 8 h (q8h), 1 g q8h, or 1 g q6h for at least 3 days. Serial blood and CSF samples were collected, and concentrations were determined and analyzed via population modeling. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) were predicted via Monte Carlo simulations, using the target of unbound meropenem concentrations above the MICs for at least 40% of dosing intervals in plasma and at least of 50% or 100% of dosing intervals in CSF. A two-compartment model plus another CSF compartment best described the data. The central, intercentral/peripheral, and intercentral/CSF compartment clearances were 22.2 liters/h, 1.79 liters/h, and 0.01 liter/h, respectively. Distribution volumes of the central and peripheral compartments were 17.9 liters and 3.84 liters, respectively. The CSF compartment volume was fixed at 0.13 liter, with its clearance calculated by the observed drainage amount. The multiplier for the transfer from the central to the CSF compartment was 0.172. Simulation results show that the PTAs increase as infusion is prolonged and as the daily CSF drainage volume decreases. A 4-hour infusion of 2 g q8h with CSF drainage of less than 150 ml/day, which provides a PTA of >90% for MICs of ≤8 mg/liter in blood and of ≤0.5 mg/liter or 0.25 mg/liter in CSF, is recommended. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02506686.)

Vancomycin serum trough concentration vs. clinical outcome in patients with gram-positive infection: a retrospective analysis

Vancomycin is still the first‐line treatment for resistant gram‐positive infections, particularly for methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. The vancomycin treatment guideline is based on the association between vancomycin trough concentration and clinical outcome. We here present a retrospective analysis of whether the trough level of vancomycin is associated with clinical outcome in Chinese patients with gram‐positive infections.

Improved pharmacokinetic profile of levornidazole following intravenous infusion of 750 mg every 24 h compared with 500 mg every 12 h in healthy Chinese volunteers

Levornidazole is the levo-isomer of ornidazole with similar anti-anaerobic activity and lower central neurotoxicity compared with ornidazole. This open-label, parallel, randomised, multidose trial was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of levornidazole following intravenous (i.v.) infusion 750mg every 24h (q24h) (test group, 12 subjects) versus 500mg every 12h (q12h) (reference group, 12 subjects) for 7 days in healthy Chinese volunteers. Following i.v. infusion for 7 days, the test group showed a 33.8% lower accumulation ratio (AR) and a 45.0% higher volume of distribution of levornidazole than the reference group. The cumulative urinary excretion rate of levornidazole during the 0-72h period (Ae0-72) was 16.6±20.9% in the test group and 24.2±5.7% in the reference group. The metabolite M1/parent and M4/parent ratios were, respectively, 2.18±0.77% and 2.94±0.37% in test group and 3.15±1.09% and 3.18±0.34% in the reference group. The Ae0-72 of M1, M2 and M4 were all <10% in both groups. Both regimens were well tolerated. Drug-related adverse events were generally transient and were mild or moderate in severity. These findings support the recommendation of i.v. infusion of levornidazole 750mg q24h in clinical practice, which shows a lower AR and similar safety compared with the conventional 500mg q12h regimen. [Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-14005574.].

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Nemonoxacin in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

ABSTRACT Nemonoxacin (TG-873870) is a novel nonfluorinated quinolone with potent broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and atypical pathogens, including vancomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), quinolone-resistant MRSA, quinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, and erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae. This first-in-human study was aimed at assessing the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of intravenous nemonoxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers. The study comprised a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalating safety and tolerability study in 92 subjects and a randomized, single-dose, open-label, 3-period Latin-square crossover pharmacokinetic study in 12 subjects. The study revealed that nemonoxacin infusion was well tolerated up to the maximum dose of 1,250 mg, and the acceptable infusion rates ranged from 0.42 to 5.56 mg/min. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were mild, transient, and confined to local irritation at the injection site. The pharmacokinetic study revealed that after the administration of 250, 500, and 750 mg of intravenous nemonoxacin, the maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) values were 4.826 μg/ml, 7.152 μg/ml, and 11.029 μg/ml, respectively. The corresponding values for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC0–72 h) were 17.05 μg · h/ml, 39.30 μg · h/ml, and 61.98 μg · h/ml. The mean elimination half-life (t1/2) was 11 h, and the mean cumulative drug excretion rate within 72 h ranged from 64.93% to 77.17%. Volunteers treated with 250 to 750 mg nemonoxacin exhibited a linear dose-response relationship between the AUC0–72 h and AUC0–∞. These findings provide further support for the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of intravenous nemonoxacin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01944774.)

Evaluation of Meropenem Penetration into Cerebrospinal Fluid in Patients with Meningitis After Neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE Meropenem is important for management of postneurosurgical meningitis, but the data about its penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are inadequate. This prospective, open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem in patients with postneurosurgical meningitis, especially its CSF penetration. METHODS A total of 82 patients with postneurosurgical meningitis were included to receive meropenem intravenously according to a regimen of 2 g every 8 hours, 1 g every 8 hours, or 1 g every 6 hours. After infusion of 4 doses, blood and CSF samples were collected simultaneously at predefined time points. The high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet method was used to determine the concentration of meropenem. RESULTS The peak meropenem concentration in blood and CSF was 43.2 ± 5.3 and 2.4 ± 0.3 mg/L in the group who received 2 g every 8 hours; 28.9 ± 2.7 and 1.2 ± 0.2 mg/L in the group who received 1g every 8 hours; and31.5 ± 3.4 and 1.6 ± 0.2 mg/L in the group who received 1g every 6 hours. The maximal percent penetration into CSF was 17.6% ± 7.3%, 14.3% ± 1.7%, and 30.9% ± 24.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Dosing regimens of meropenem 1 g every 6 hours and 2 g every 8 hours provided higher CSF penetration than 1 g every 8 hours. A higher dose and shorter dosing interval of meropenem may be more useful for clearance of pathogens.