Yuanjun Zhao
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yuanjun Zhao.
Molecular Biotechnology | 2009
Shuwen Wang; Yuanjun Zhao; Melanie Leiby; Jiyue Zhu
Recombineering technology allows the modification of large DNA constructs without using restriction enzymes, enabling the use of bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) in genetic engineering of animals and plants as well as in the studies of structures and functions of chromosomal elements in DNA replication and transcription. Here, we report a new selection scheme of BAC recombineering. A dual kanamycin and streptomycin selection marker was constructed using the kanamycin resistance gene and bacterial rpsL+ gene. Recombination cassettes generated using this dual marker was used to make precise modifications in BAC constructs in a two-step procedure without leaving behind any unwanted sequences. The dual marker was first inserted into the site of modifications by positive selection of kanamycin resistance. In the second step, the counter-selection of streptomycin sensitivity resulted in the replacement of the dual marker with intended modified sequences. This method of BAC modification worked as efficiently as the previously reported galK method and provided a faster and more cost-effective alternative to the galK method.
Protein & Cell | 2010
Jiyue Zhu; Yuanjun Zhao; Shuwen Wang
Telomerase expression and telomere maintenance are critical for long-term cell proliferation and survival, and they play important roles in development, aging, and cancer. Cumulating evidence has indicated that regulation of the rate-limiting subunit of human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) is a complex process in normal cells and many cancer cells. In addition to a number of transcriptional activators and repressors, the chromatin environment and epigenetic status of the endogenous hTERT locus are also pivotal for its regulation in normal human somatic cells and in tumorigenesis.
The FASEB Journal | 2010
Renjith Mathew; Wenwen Jia; Arati Sharma; Yuanjun Zhao; Loren E. Clarke; Xiang Cheng; Huayan Wang; Ugur Salli; Kent E. Vrana; Gavin P. Robertson; Jiyue Zhu; Shuwen Wang
Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) express telomerase and have unlimited proliferative potential. To study telomerase activation during reprogramming, 3 classes of embryonic stem cell (ESC)‐like clones were isolated from mouse fibroblasts containing a transgenic hTERT reporter. Class I expressed few pluripotency markers, whereas class II contained many, but not Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2. Neither class of cells differentiated efficiently. Class III cells, the fully reprogrammed induced PSCs (iPSCs), expressed all pluripotency markers, formed teratomas indistinguishable from those of mESCs, and underwent efficient osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Interestingly, whereas the endogenous mTERT gene expression was only moderately increased during reprogramming, the hTERT promoter was strongly activated in class II cells and was further elevated in class III cells. Treatment of class II cells with chemical inhibitors of MEKs and glycogen synthase kinase 3 resulted in their further reprogramming into class III cells, accompanied by a strong activation of hTERT promoter. In reprogrammed human cells, the endogenous telomerase level, although variable among different clones, was dramatically elevated. Only in cells with the highest telomerase were telomeres restored to the lengths in hESCs. Our data, for the first time, demonstrated that the hTERT promoter was strongly activated in discrete steps, revealing a critical difference in human and mouse cell reprogramming. Because telomere elongation is crucial for self‐renewal of hPSCs and replicative aging of their differentiated progeny, these findings have important implications in the generation and applications of iPSCs.—Mathew, R., Jia, W., Sharma, A., Zhao, Y., Clarke, L. E., Cheng, X., Wang, H., Salli, U., Vrana, K. E., Robertson, G. P., Zhu, J., Wang, S. Robust activation of the human but not mouse telomerase gene during the induction of pluripotency. FASEB J. 24, 2702–2715 (2010). www.fasebj.org
Nucleic Acids Research | 2014
Yuanjun Zhao; De Cheng; Shuwen Wang; Jiyue Zhu
Human telomerase gene hTERT is important for cancer and aging. hTERT promoter is regulated by multiple transcription factors (TFs) and its activity is dependent on the chromatin environment. However, it remains unsolved how the interplay between TFs and chromatin environment controls hTERT transcription. In this study, we employed the recombinase-mediated BAC targeting and BAC recombineering techniques to dissect the functions of two proximal E-box sites at -165 and +44 nt in regulating the hTERT promoter in the native genomic contexts. Our data showed that mutations of these sites abolished promoter binding by c-Myc/Max, USF1 and USF2, decreased hTERT promoter activity, and prevented its activation by overexpressed c-Myc. Upon inhibition of histone deacetylases, mutant and wildtype promoters were induced to the same level, indicating that the E-boxes functioned to de-repress the hTERT promoter and allowed its transcription in a repressive chromatin environment. Unexpectedly, knockdown of endogenous c-Myc/Max proteins activated hTERT promoter. This activation did not require the proximal E-boxes but was accompanied by increased promoter accessibility, as indicated by augmented active histone marks and binding of multiple TFs at the promoter. Our studies demonstrated that c-Myc/Max functioned in maintaining chromatin-dependent repression of the hTERT gene in addition to activating its promoter.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2009
Shuwen Wang; Yuanjun Zhao; Chunguang Hu; Jiyue Zhu
Differential regulation of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) contributes to the distinct aging and tumorigenic processes in humans and mice. Here, we report that the hTERT gene was strongly repressed during differentiation of human cells, whereas modest mTERT expression was detected in terminally differentiated and post-mitotic cells. The stringent hTERT repression depended on the native chromatin environment because transiently transfected hTERT promoters were not repressed in differentiated cells. Conversely, the transiently transfected mTERT core promoter was repressed during cell differentiation, suggesting that the repression of mTERT promoter did not require its endogenous chromatin structures. To understand the mechanisms of this differential regulation, we examined chromatin structures of the endogenous TERT loci during cell differentiation. In both human and mouse cells, repression was accompanied by the loss of multiple DNase I hypersensitive sites at the TERT promoters and their upstream regions, revealing positions of potential regulatory elements. Interestingly, the hTERT locus was located within a nuclease-resistant chromatin domain in human cells, whereas a corresponding chromatin domain was not detected for the mTERT locus. Taken together, our study indicated that, unlike the repression of mTERT gene, the condensed native chromatin environment of hTERT locus was central to its silencing during cell differentiation.
Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer | 2009
Yuanjun Zhao; Shuwen Wang; Evgenya Y. Popova; Sergei A. Grigoryev; Jiyue Zhu
Telomerase expression, resulting from transcriptional activation of the hTERT gene, allows cells to acquire indefinite proliferative potential during cellular immortalization and tumorigenesis. However, mechanisms of hTERT gene activation in many immortal cell lines and cancer cells are poorly understood. Here, we report our studies on hTERT activation using genetically related pairs of telomerase‐negative (Tel−) and ‐positive (Tel+) fibroblast lines. First, whereas transiently transfected plasmid reporters did not recapitulate the endogenous hTERT promoter, the promoter in chromosomally integrated bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) reporters was activated in a subset of Tel+ cells, indicating that activation of the hTERT promoter required native chromatin context and/or distal regulatory elements. Second, the hTERT gene, located near the telomere of chromosome 5p, was translocated in all three Tel+ cell lines but not in their parental precrisis cells and Tel− immortal siblings. The breakage points were mapped to regions upstream of the hTERT promoter, indicating that the hTERT gene was the target of these chromosomal rearrangements. In two Tel+ cell lines, translocation of the endogenous hTERT gene appeared to be the major mechanism of its activation as the activity of hTERT promoter in many chromosomally integrated BAC reporters, with intact upstream and downstream neighboring loci, remained relatively low. Therefore, our results suggest that rearrangement of upstream sequences is an important new mechanism of hTERT promoter activation during cellular immortalization. The chromosomal rearrangements likely occurred during cellular crisis and facilitated by telomere dysfunction. Such translocations allowed the hTERT promoter to escape from the native condensed chromatin environment.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2015
De Cheng; Yuanjun Zhao; Shuwen Wang; Wenwen Jia; Jiuhong Kang; Jiyue Zhu
Background: Regulation of telomerase gene (hTERT) by Sp1 family proteins remains contradictory in previous studies. Results: In chromatinized BAC reporters, Sp1/Sp3 binding to the promoter was essential for hTERT transcription, but did not affect its repression. Conclusion: Chromatin remodeling, not Sp1 binding to the promoter, was a limiting step in hTERT transcription. Significance: Chromatinized reporters are better models for studying telomerase regulation. The transcription of human telomerase gene hTERT is regulated by transcription factors (TFs), including Sp1 family proteins, and its chromatin environment. To understand its regulation in a relevant chromatin context, we employed bacterial artificial chromosome reporters containing 160 kb of human genomic sequence containing the hTERT gene. Upon chromosomal integration, the bacterial artificial chromosomes recapitulated endogenous hTERT expression, contrary to transient reporters. Sp1/Sp3 expression did not correlate with hTERT promoter activity, and these TFs bound to the hTERT promoters in both telomerase-positive and telomerase-negative cells. Mutation of the proximal GC-box resulted in a dramatic decrease of hTERT promoter activity, and mutations of all five GC-boxes eliminated its transcriptional activity. Neither mutations of GC-boxes nor knockdown of endogenous Sp1 impacted promoter binding by other TFs, including E-box-binding proteins, and histone acetylation and trimethylation of histone H3K9 at the hTERT promoter in telomerase-positive and -negative cells. The result indicated that promoter binding by Sp1/Sp3 was essential, but not a limiting step, for hTERT transcription. hTERT transcription required a permissive chromatin environment. Importantly, our data also revealed different functions of GC-boxes and E-boxes in hTERT regulation; although GC-boxes were essential for promoter activity, factors bound to the E-boxes functioned to de-repress hTERT promoter.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2009
Shuwen Wang; Yuanjun Zhao; Melanie Leiby; Jiyue Zhu
The endogenous human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene is repressed in somatic cells. To study the mechanisms of its repression, we developed a strategy of retrovirus-directed Cre recombinase-mediated BAC targeting, or RMBT, to generate single-copy integrations of BAC at pre-engineered chromosomal sites. This technique involved retroviral transduction of acceptor loci, containing an HSV thymidine kinase marker, and subsequent integration of BAC constructs into the acceptor sites, utilizing the loxP and lox511 sites present in the vector backbones. The BAC reporter, with a Renilla luciferase cassette inserted downstream of the hTERT promoter, was retrofitted with a puromycin marker. Through puromycin selection and ganciclovir counter-selection, a targeting efficiency of over 50% was achieved. We demonstrated that the activity and chromatin structures of the hTERT promoter in chromosomally integrated BAC reporter recapitulated its endogenous counterpart of the host cells. Therefore, we have established a genetically amendable platform to study chromatin and epigenetic regulation of the hTERT gene. The highly efficient and versatile RMBT technique has general applicability for studying largely unexplored chromatin-dependent mechanisms of promoter regulation of various genes.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2015
Yanchun Ma; Sijie Hao; Shuwen Wang; Yuanjun Zhao; Bora Lim; Ming Lei; David J. Spector; Wafik S. El-Deiry; Siyang Zheng; Jiyue Zhu
Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have become an important biomarker for early cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. Recently, a replication-competent recombinant adenovirus driven by a human telomerase gene (hTERT) promoter was shown to detect live CTCs in blood samples of patients with cancer. Here, we report a new class of adenoviruses containing regulatory elements that repress the hTERT gene in normal cells. Compared with the virus with only the hTERT core promoter, the new viruses showed better selectivity for replication in cancer cells than in normal cells. In particular, Ad5GTSe, containing three extra copies of a repressor element, displayed a superior tropism for cancer cells among leukocytes and was thus selected for CTC detection in blood samples. To further improve the efficiency and specificity of CTC identification, we tested a combinatory strategy of microfiltration enrichment using flexible micro spring arrays and Ad5GTSe imaging. Our experiments showed that this method efficiently detected both cancer cells spiked into healthy blood and potential CTCs in blood samples of patients with breast and pancreatic cancer, demonstrating its potential as a highly sensitive and reliable system for detection and capture of CTCs of different tumor types. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(3); 835–43. ©2015 AACR.
The FASEB Journal | 2017
De Cheng; Yuanjun Zhao; Shuwen Wang; Fan Zhang; Mariano Russo; Steven B. McMahon; Jiyue Zhu
The human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene is repressed in most somatic cells, whereas the expression of the mouse mTert gene is widely detected. To understand the mechanisms of this human‐specific repression, we constructed bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) reporters using human and mouse genomic DNAs encompassing the TERT genes and neighboring loci. Upon chromosomal integration, the hTERT, but not the mTert, reporter was stringently repressed in telomerase‐negative human cells in a histone deacetylase (HDAC)–dependent manner, replicating the expression of their respective endogenous genes. In chimeric BACs, the mTert promoter became strongly repressed in the human genomic context, but the hTERT promoter was highly active in the mouse genomic context. Furthermore, an unrelated herpes simplex virus‐thymidine kinase (HSV‐TK) promoter was strongly repressed in the human, but not in the mouse, genomic context. These results demonstrated that the repression of hTERT gene was dictated by distal elements and its chromatin environment. This repression depended on class I HDACs and involved multiple corepressor complexes, including HDAC1/2‐containing Sin3B, nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase (NuRD), and corepressor of RE1 silencing transcription factor (CoREST) complexes. Together, our data indicate that the lack of telomerase expression in mosthumansomaticcells results fromits repressive genomic environment, providing new insight into the mechanismof long‐recognized differential telomerase regulation in mammalian species.—Cheng, D., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, F., Russo, M., McMahon, S. B., Zhu, J. Repression of telomerase gene promoter requires human‐specific genomic context and is mediated by multiple HDAC1‐containing corepressor complexes. FASEB J. 31, 1165–1178 (2017). www.fasebj.org