l Yuce

Retrospective analysis of patients with burn injury treated in a burn center in Turkey during the Syrian civil war

Objectives: To report the management of burn injuries that occured in the Syria civil war, which were referred to our burn center. Methods: Forty-three patients with burns, injured in the civil war in Syria and whom were referred to Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Educating and Training Hospital Burn Centre of İstanbul, Turkey between 2011-2015 were analyzed in a retrospective study. Results: Most of our patients were in major burn classification (93%; 40/43) and most of them had burns >15% total on body surface area. Most of them were admitted to our center late after first management at centers with improper conditions and in cultures of these patients unusual and resistant strains specific to the battlefield were produced. Conclusion: Immediate transfer of the patients from the scene of incidence to burn centers ensures early treatment, this factor may be effective on the outcome of these patients.

Risk Assessment in Surgical Patients: American Society of Anesthesiologist’s (ASA) Classification vs Intraoperative Therapeutic and Diagnostic Interventions (I-ITS)

Background: In this prospective study of 859 surgical patients in a tertiary research hospital, we examined the association between ASA physical status classification and Intraoperative Therapeutic Intervention Score (I-TIS). Methodology: All patients were assigned by ASA classification before the operation and received a value of 1-4 points for I-TIS score during surgical procedures. Surgical complexity was also classified and correlation with I-TIS was examined. Results: The correlation coefficient of the ASA with I-TIS was r=0.55 (p 25 and surgical complexity of major plus were admitted to the intensive care unit. Two of them were followed up six hours and the other three stayed more than 24 hours in the intensive care unit. Conclusions: It’s concluded that I-TIS score may be validated for our surgical patients but this assessment may show variability among institutions. The ASA classification is the most valued and widely used scoring system for evaluation of perioperative risk in surgical patients. It is simple, easy and also a useful tool to assist descriptions of workload and ‘anesthetic risk’ for analysis and research purposes.

The effect of surgical technique on hemodynamics, arterial oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics in radical prostatectomy operations

OBJECTIVE The effects of surgical technique on respiratory mechanics, arterial oxygenation and hemodynamics in radical prostatectomy operation were investigated. METHODS The study was planned on ASA II-III, 40-65 years old, fourty patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy under general anesthesia. They were divided into two groups: perineal and suprapubic (Group P, n = 20; Group S, n = 20). Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PEtCO2), Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), plato pressure (Pplato), partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) values were evaluated at 10 minutes after induction. After the position applied for surgery in the 30.60 and 90th minutes, the Alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient (P(A-a) O2), the ratio of physiologic dead space over tidal volume (VD/VT), arterial to end tidal CO2 gradient (P(a-et) CO2), static compliance (CS), dynamic compliance (CD) were assessed. RESULTS In the assessment of groups, there were not statistical differences about mean blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, PetCO2, PaO2, plateau pressure, and P (A-a) values (p > 0.05). Peak inspiratory pressure was higher in Group P. Peak inspiratory pressure and plateau pressure increased with CO2 insufflation in Group P. PaCO2 and P(a-et) CO2 were higher statistically significantly in Group 0. There was no difference in terms of the PetCO2 values. VD/VT ratios were statistically significantly lower in the Group P. CONCLUSIONS Suprapubic surgery was shown to improve oxygenation and respiratory mechanics without causing any hemodynamic side effect in radical prostatectomy operation.

Ciddi yanık hastalarında erken “do not resuscitate-resüsite etme” talimatı verilebilir mi?

BACKGROUND The present study was conducted to examine topic of issuing early do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order at first diagnosis of patients with severe burn injuries in light of current law in Turkey and the medical literature. DNR requires withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in event of respiratory or cardiac arrest and allowing natural death to occur. It is frequently enacted for terminal cancer patients and elderly patients with irreversible neurological disorders. METHODS Between January 2009 and December 2014, 29 patients (3.44%) with very severe burns were admitted to burn unit. Average total burn surface area (TBSA) was 94.24% (range: 85-100%), and in 10 patients, TBSA was 100%. Additional inhalation burns were present in 26 of the patients (89.65%). All of the patients died, despite every medical intervention. Mean survival was 4.75 days (range: 1-24 days). Total of 17 patients died within 72 hours. Lethal dose 50 (% TBSA at which certain group has 50% chance of survival) rate of our burn center is 62%. Baux indices were used for prognostic evaluation of the patients; mean total Baux score of the patients was 154.13 (range: 117-183). RESULTS It is well known that numerous problems may be encountered during triage of severely burned patients in Turkey. These patients are referred to burn centers and are frequently transferred via air ambulance between cities, and even countries. They are intubated and mechanical ventilation is initiated at burn center. Many interventions are performed to treat these patients, such as escharotomy, fasciotomy, tangential or fascial excision, central venous catheterization and tracheostomy, or hemodialysis. Yet despite such interventions, these patients die, typically within 48 to 96 hours. Integrity of the body is often lost as result of aggressive intervention with no real benefit, and there are also economic costs to hospital related to use of materials, bed occupancy, and distribution of workforce. For these reasons, as well as patient comfort, early do-not-resuscitate or do-not-intubate protocol for these patients is suggested. Resources could then be directed to other patients with high expectancy of life and patients with burns that are beyond treatment can experience more comfortable end of life. CONCLUSION At present in Turkey, it is not possible to give DNR order for patient with severe burns that are incompatible with survival due to legal interdiction. This subject should be discussed at high-level meetings with participation of doctors, legal experts, economists, and theologians.