Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Yue-Mei Hu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Yue-Mei Hu.


The Lancet | 2010

Efficacy and safety of a recombinant hepatitis E vaccine in healthy adults: a large-scale, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Fengcai Zhu; Jun Zhang; Xuefeng Zhang; Cheng Zhou; Zhong-Ze Wang; Shou-Jie Huang; Hua Wang; Chang-Lin Yang; Han-Min Jiang; Jia-Ping Cai; Yi-Jun Wang; Xing Ai; Yue-Mei Hu; Quan Tang; Xin Yao; Qiang Yan; Yang-Ling Xian; Ting Wu; Yimin Li; Ji Miao; Mun-Hon Ng; James Wai-Kuo Shih; Ningshao Xia

BACKGROUND Seroprevalence data suggest that a third of the worlds population has been infected with the hepatitis E virus. Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety of a recombinant hepatitis E vaccine, HEV 239 (Hecolin; Xiamen Innovax Biotech, Xiamen, China) in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. METHODS Healthy adults aged 16-65 years in, Jiangsu Province, China were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive three doses of HEV 239 (30 microg of purified recombinant hepatitis E antigen adsorbed to 0.8 mg aluminium hydroxide suspended in 0.5 mL buffered saline) or placebo (hepatitis B vaccine) given intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Randomisation was done by computer-generated permuted blocks and stratified by age and sex. Participants were followed up for 19 months. The primary endpoint was prevention of hepatitis E during 12 months from the 31st day after the third dose. Analysis was based on participants who received all three doses per protocol. Study participants, care givers, and investigators were all masked to group and vaccine assignments. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01014845. FINDINGS 11,165 of the trial participants were tested for hepatitis E virus IgG, of which 5285 (47%) were seropositive for hepatitis E virus. Participants were randomly assigned to vaccine (n=56,302) or placebo (n=56,302). 48,693 (86%) participants in the vaccine group and 48,663 participants (86%) in the placebo group received three vaccine doses and were included in the primary efficacy analysis. During the 12 months after 30 days from receipt of the third dose 15 per-protocol participants in the placebo group developed hepatitis E compared with none in the vaccine group. Vaccine efficacy after three doses was 100.0% (95% CI 72.1-100.0). Adverse effects attributable to the vaccine were few and mild. No vaccination-related serious adverse event was noted. INTERPRETATION HEV 239 is well tolerated and effective in the prevention of hepatitis E in the general population in China, including both men and women age 16-65 years. FUNDING Chinese National High-tech R&D Programme (863 programme), Chinese National Key Technologies R&D Programme, Chinese National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, Fujian Provincial Department of Sciences and Technology, Xiamen Science and Technology Bureau, and Fujian Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars.


The Lancet | 2013

Efficacy, safety, and immunology of an inactivated alum-adjuvant enterovirus 71 vaccine in children in China: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Fengcai Zhu; Fan-Yue Meng; Jing-Xin Li; Xiu-Ling Li; Qunying Mao; Hong Tao; Yun-Tao Zhang; Xin Yao; Kai Chu; Qing-Hua Chen; Yue-Mei Hu; Xing Wu; Pei Liu; Lin-Yang Zhu; Fan Gao; Hui Jin; Yi-Juan Chen; Yu-Ying Dong; Yong-Chun Liang; Nianmin Shi; Heng-Ming Ge; Lin Liu; Sheng-Gen Chen; Xing Ai; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Yu-Guo Ji; Fengji Luo; Xiao-Qin Chen; Ya Zhang; Li-Wen Zhu

BACKGROUND A vaccine for enterovirus 71 (EV71) is needed to address the high burden of disease associated with infection. We assessed the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, antibody persistence, and immunological correlates of an inactivated alum-adjuvant EV71 vaccine. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Healthy children aged 6-35 months from four centres in China were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive vaccine or alum-adjuvant placebo at day 0 and 28, according to a randomisation list (block size 30) generated by an independent statistician. Investigators and participants and their guardians were masked to the assignment. Primary endpoints were EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) and EV71-associated disease during the surveillance period from day 56 to month 14, analysed in the per-protocol population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01508247. FINDINGS 10,245 participants were enrolled and assigned: 5120 to vaccine versus 5125 to placebo. 4907 (with three cases of EV71-associated HFMD and eight cases of EV71-associated disease) versus 4939 (with 30 cases of EV71-associated HFMD and 41 cases of EV71-associated disease) were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Vaccine efficacy was 90·0% (95% CI 67·1-96·9) against EV71-associated HFMD (p=0·0001) and 80·4% (95% CI 58·2-90·8) against EV71-associated disease (p<0·0001). Serious adverse events were reported by 62 of 5117 (1·2%) participants in the vaccine group versus 75 of 5123 (1·5%) in the placebo group (p=0·27). Adverse events occurred in 3644 (71·2%) versus 3603 (70·3%; p=0·33). INTERPRETATION EV71 vaccine provides high efficacy, satisfactory safety, and sustained immunogenicity. FUNDING Chinas 12-5 National Major Infectious Disease Program, Beijing Vigoo Biological.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2014

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of an Enterovirus 71 Vaccine in China

Fengcai Zhu; Wenbo Xu; Jielai Xia; Zhenglun Liang; Yan Liu; Xuefeng Zhang; Xiaojuan Tan; Ling Wang; Qunying Mao; Junyu Wu; Yue-Mei Hu; Tianjiao Ji; Lifei Song; Qi Liang; Baomin Zhang; Qiang Gao; Jing-Xin Li; Shenyu Wang; Yuansheng Hu; Shanru Gu; Jianhua Zhang; Genhong Yao; Jianxiang Gu; Xushan Wang; Yuchun Zhou; Changbiao Chen; Minglei Zhang; Minquan Cao; Junzhi Wang; Hua Wang

BACKGROUND Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is one of the major causative agents of outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina worldwide. This phase 3 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an EV71 vaccine. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in which 10,007 healthy infants and young children (6 to 35 months of age) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular doses of either EV71 vaccine or placebo, 28 days apart. The surveillance period was 12 months. The primary end point was the occurrence of EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina. RESULTS During the 12-month surveillance period, EV71-associated disease was identified in 0.3% of vaccine recipients (13 of 5041 children) and 2.1% of placebo recipients (106 of 5028 children) in the intention-to-treat cohort. The vaccine efficacy against EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina was 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.2 to 97.9; P<0.001) in this cohort. Vaccine efficacies against EV71-associated hospitalization (0 cases vs. 24 cases) and hand, foot, and mouth disease with neurologic complications (0 cases vs. 8 cases) were both 100% (95% CI, 83.7 to 100 and 42.6 to 100, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 111 of 5044 children in the vaccine group (2.2%) and 131 of 5033 children in the placebo group (2.6%). In the immunogenicity subgroup (1291 children), an anti-EV71 immune response was elicited by the two-dose vaccine series in 98.8% of participants at day 56. An anti-EV71 neutralizing antibody titer of 1:16 was associated with protection against EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina. CONCLUSIONS The EV71 vaccine provided protection against EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina in infants and young children. (Funded by Sinovac Biotech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01507857.).


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2015

Long-Term Efficacy of a Hepatitis E Vaccine

Jun Zhang; Xuefeng Zhang; Shou-Jie Huang; Ting Wu; Yue-Mei Hu; Zhong-Ze Wang; Hua Wang; Han-Min Jiang; Yi-Jun Wang; Qiang Yan; Meng Guo; Xiao-Hui Liu; Jing-Xin Li; Chang-Lin Yang; Quan Tang; Ren-Jie Jiang; Huirong Pan; Yimin Li; J. Wai-Kuo Shih; Mun-Hon Ng; Fengcai Zhu; Ningshao Xia

BACKGROUND Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a leading cause of acute hepatitis. The long-term efficacy of a hepatitis E vaccine needs to be determined. METHODS In an initial efficacy study, we randomly assigned healthy adults 16 to 65 years of age to receive three doses of either a hepatitis E vaccine (vaccine group; 56,302 participants) or a hepatitis B vaccine (control group; 56,302 participants). The vaccines were administered at 0, 1, and 6 months, and the participants were followed for 19 months. In this extended follow-up study, the treatment assignments of all participants remained double-blinded, and follow-up assessments of efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety were continued for up to 4.5 years. RESULTS During the 4.5-year study period, 60 cases of hepatitis E were identified; 7 cases were confirmed in the vaccine group (0.3 cases per 10,000 person-years), and 53 cases in the control group (2.1 cases per 10,000 person-years), representing a vaccine efficacy of 86.8% (95% confidence interval, 71 to 94) in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, rather than (95% confidence interval, 71 to 84) [corrected]. Of the participants who were assessed for immunogenicity and were seronegative at baseline, 87% of those who received three doses of the hepatitis E vaccine maintained antibodies against HEV for at least 4.5 years; HEV antibody titers developed in 9% in the control group. The rate of adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Immunization with this hepatitis E vaccine induced antibodies against HEV and provided protection against hepatitis E for up to 4.5 years. (Funded by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01014845.).


The Lancet | 2013

Immunogenicity and safety of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy Chinese children and infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial

Fengcai Zhu; Zhenglun Liang; Xiu-Ling Li; Heng-Ming Ge; Fan-Yue Meng; Qunying Mao; Yun-Tao Zhang; Yue-Mei Hu; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Jing-Xin Li; Fan Gao; Qing-Hua Chen; Qi-Yan Zhu; Kai Chu; Xing Wu; Xin Yao; Hui-Jie Guo; Xiao-Qin Chen; Pei Liu; Yu-Ying Dong; Fengxiang Li; Xinliang Shen; Junzhi Wang

BACKGROUND Enterovirus 71 (EV71) outbreaks are a socioeconomic burden, especially in the western Pacific region. Results of phase 1 clinical trials suggest an EV71 vaccine has a clinically acceptable safety profile and immunogenicity. We aimed to assess the best possible dose and formulation, immunogenicity, and safety profile of this EV71 vaccine in healthy Chinese children. METHODS This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was undertaken at one site in Donghai County, Jiangsu Province, China. Eligible participants were healthy boys or girls aged 6–36 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive either 160 U, 320 U, or 640 U alum-adjuvant EV71 vaccine, 640 U adjuvant-free EV71 vaccine, or a placebo (containing alum adjuvant only), according to a blocked randomisation list generated by SAS 9.1. Participants and investigators were masked to the assignment. The primary endpoint was anti-EV71 neutralising antibody geometric mean titres (GMTs) at day 56, analysed according to protocol. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01399853. FINDINGS We randomly assigned 1200 participants, 240 (120 aged 6–11 months [infants] and 120 aged 12–36 months [children]) of whom were assigned to each dose. 1106 participants completed the study and were included in the according-to-protocol analysis. The main reasons for dropout were withdrawal of consent and refusal to donate a blood sample. Infants who received the 640 U adjuvant vaccine had the highest GMTs on day 56 (742·2 [95% CI 577·3–954·3]), followed by those who received the 320 U formulation (497·9 [383·1–647·0]). For children, those who received the 320 U formulation had the highest GMTs on day 56 (1383·2 [1037·3–1844·5]). Participants who received the vaccine had significantly higher GMTs than did who received placebo (p<0·0001). For the subgroup of participants who were seronegative at baseline, both infants and children who received the 640 U adjuvant vaccine had the highest GMTs on day 56 (522·8 [403·9–676·6] in infants and 708·4 [524·1–957·6] in children), followed by those who received the 320 U adjuvant vaccine (358·2 [280·5–457·5] in infants and 498·0 [383·4–646·9] in children). 549 (45·8%) of 1200 participants (95 CI 42·9–48·6%) reported at least one injection-site or systemic adverse reaction, but the incidence of adverse reactions did not differ significantly between groups (p=0·36). The 640 U alum-adjuvant vaccine group had a significantly higher incidence of induration than did the 640 U adjuvant-free group (p=0·001). INTERPRETATION Taking immunogenicity, safety, and production capacity into account, the 320 U alum-adjuvant formulation of the EV71 vaccine is probably the best possible formulation for phase 3 trials. FUNDING The National Science and Technology Major Project (2011ZX10004-902) of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinas 12–5 National Major Infectious Disease Program (2012ZX10002-001), and Beijing Vigoo Biological.


The Lancet | 2015

Safety and immunogenicity of a novel recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine in healthy adults in China: preliminary report of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial

Fengcai Zhu; Lihua Hou; Jing-Xin Li; Shipo Wu; Pei Liu; Gui-Rong Zhang; Yue-Mei Hu; Fan-Yue Meng; Junjie Xu; Rong Tang; Jinlong Zhang; Wen-Juan Wang; Lei Duan; Kai Chu; Qi Liang; Jialei Hu; Li Luo; Tao Zhu; Junzhi Wang; Wei Chen

BACKGROUND Up to now, all tested Ebola virus vaccines have been based on the virus strain from the Zaire outbreak in 1976. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a novel recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine expressing the glycoprotein of the 2014 epidemic strain. METHODS We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial at one site in Taizhou County, Jiangsu Province, China. Healthy adults (aged 18-60 years) were sequentially enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1), by computer-generated block randomisation (block size of six), to receive placebo, low-dose adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine, or high-dose vaccine. Randomisation was pre-stratified by dose group. All participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was occurrence of solicited adverse reactions within 7 days of vaccination. The primary immunogenicity endpoints were glycoprotein-specific antibody titres and T-cell responses at day 28 after the vaccination. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02326194. FINDINGS Between Dec 28, 2014, and Jan 9, 2015, 120 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=40), low-dose vaccine (n=40), or high-dose vaccine. Participants were followed up for 28 days. Overall, 82 (68%) participants reported at least one solicited adverse reaction within 7 days of vaccination (n=19 in the placebo group vs n=27 in the low-dose group vs n=36 in the high-dose group; p=0·0002). The most common reaction was mild pain at the injection site, which was reported in eight (20%) participants in the placebo group, 14 (35%) participants in the low-dose group, and 29 (73%) participants in the high-dose vaccine group (p<0·0001). We recorded no statistical differences in other adverse reactions and laboratory tests across groups. Glycoprotein-specific antibody titres were significantly increased in participants in the low-dose and high-dose vaccine groups at both day 14 (geometric mean titre 421·4 [95% CI 249·7-711·3] and 820·5 [598·9-1124·0], respectively; p<0·0001) and day 28 (682·7 [424·3-1098·5] and 1305·7 [970·1-1757·2], respectively; p<0·0001). T-cell responses peaked at day 14 at a median of 465·0 spot-forming cells (IQR 180·0-1202·5) in participants in the low-dose group and 765·0 cells (400·0-1460·0) in those in the high-dose group. 21 (18%) participants had mild fever (n=9 in the placebo group, n=6 in the low-dose group, and n=6 in the high-dose group). No serious adverse events were recorded. INTERPRETATION Our findings show that the high-dose vaccine is safe and robustly immunogenic. One shot of the high-dose vaccine could mount glycoprotein-specific humoral and T-cell response against Ebola virus in 14 days. FUNDING China National Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, and Tianjin CanSino Biotechnology.


The Lancet | 2017

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine in healthy adults in Sierra Leone: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Fengcai Zhu; Alie H Wurie; Lihua Hou; Qi Liang; Yuhua Li; James B W Russell; Shipo Wu; Jing-Xin Li; Yue-Mei Hu; Qiang Guo; Wen-Bo Xu; Abdul R Wurie; Wen-Juan Wang; Zhe Zhang; Wen-Jiao Yin; Manal Ghazzawi; Xu Zhang; Lei Duan; Junzhi Wang; Wei Chen

BACKGROUND A recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based vaccine expressing the glycoprotein of Ebola Zaire Makona variant showed good safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 trial of healthy Chinese adults. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine in healthy adults in Sierra Leone and to determine the optimal dose. METHODS We did a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial at Sierra Leone-China Friendship Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone. We recruited healthy adults aged 18-50 years who were HIV negative, had no history of Ebola virus infection, and had no previous immunisation with other Ebola vaccine candidates. Participants were sequentially enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1:1), by computer-generated block randomisation (block size of eight), to receive the high-dose vaccine (1·6 × 1011 viral particles), low-dose vaccine (8·0 × 1010 viral particles), or placebo (containing only vaccine excipients, with no viral particles). Participants, investigators, and study staff (except two study pharmacists) were masked from treatment allocation. The primary safety outcome was occurrence of solicited adverse reactions within 7 days of vaccination, analysed by intention to treat. The primary immunogenicity outcome was glycoprotein-specific antibody responses at days 14, 28, and 168 after vaccination, analysed in all vaccinated participants who had blood samples drawn for antibody tests. The trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201509001259869, and is completed. FINDINGS During Oct 10-28, 2015, 500 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the high-dose vaccine (n=250), low-dose vaccine (n=125), or placebo (n=125). 132 (53%) participants in the high-dose group, 60 (48%) in the low-dose group, and 54 (43%) in the placebo group reported at least one solicited adverse reaction within 7 days of vaccination. Most adverse reactions were mild and self-limiting. Solicited injection-site adverse reactions were significantly more frequent in vaccine recipients (65 [26%] in high-dose group and 31 [25%] in low-dose group) than in those receiving placebo (17 [14%]; p=0·0169). Glycoprotein-specific antibody responses were detected from day 14 onwards (geometric mean titre 1251·0 [95% CI 976·6-1602·5] in low-dose group and 1728·4 [1459·4-2047·0] in high-dose group) and peaked at day 28 (1471·8 [1151·0-1881·8] and 2043·1 [1762·4-2368·4]), but declined quickly in the following months (223·3 [148·2-336·4] and 254·2 [185·0-349·5] at day 168). Geometric mean titres in the placebo group remained around 6·0-6·8 throughout the study period. Three serious adverse events (malaria, gastroenteritis, and one fatal asthma episode) were reported in the high-dose vaccine group, but none was deemed related to the vaccine. INTERPRETATION The recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic in healthy Sierra Leonean adults, and 8·0 × 1010 viral particles was the optimal dose. FUNDING Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology and the National Health and Family Planning Commission, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, and Tianjin CanSino Biotechnology.


Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal | 2012

Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of an Enterovirus 71 Vaccine in Chinese Healthy Children and Infants

Fengcai Zhu; Junzhi Wang; Xiu-Ling Li; Zhenglun Liang; Heng-Ming Ge; Fan-Yue Meng; Qunying Mao; Yun-Tao Zhang; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Hong Ji; Fan Gao; Hui-Jie Guo; Qi-Yan Zhu; Kai Chu; Xing Wu; Jing-Xin Li; Qing-Hua Chen; Xiao-Qin Chen; Wei-Wei Zhang; Yue-Mei Hu; Liang Li; Fengxiang Li; Xin Yao; Pei Liu; Hua Wang; Xinliang Shen

Background: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is highly contagious and can cause severe complications. A safe and effective vaccine is needed. We assessed the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an inactivated, alum-adjuvanted EV71 vaccine in this study. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was undertaken in 360 healthy participants who were stratified into 2 age groups (6–12 and 13–60 months), and randomly allocated to receive placebo or the investigational vaccine containing 160 U, 320 U or 640 U antigen per dose by the ratio of 1:1:1:1 at days 0 and 28. Reactogenic data within 28 days after each vaccination were recorded. Blood samples were obtained on days 0, 28 and 56 for neutralizing antibody assay. Results: Overall, 193 participants reported at least 1 injection-site or systemic adverse reaction with 53.3% and 54.4% participants receiving the study vaccine and placebo, respectively. Most of the reactions were mild or moderate. Three serious adverse events were observed, but none was related to vaccination. In the participants with seronegative baseline, after 2 doses all the participants receiving EV71 vaccines were seropositive and the seroconversion rates were more than 98.1%. In the participants with seropositive baseline, 1 dose induced good seroconversion rates of more than 64.3% in participants receiving EV71 vaccines. Conclusions: This study found that the inactivated EV71 vaccine was well tolerated and had good immunogenicity in healthy children and infants. A single dose induced typical booster response in the participants with a seropositive baseline, and 2 doses were needed for the immunologically naive participants.


Expert Review of Vaccines | 2016

Two-year efficacy and immunogenicity of Sinovac Enterovirus 71 vaccine against hand, foot and mouth disease in children

Jing-Xin Li; Yu-Fei Song; Ling Wang; Xuefeng Zhang; Yuansheng Hu; Yue-Mei Hu; Jielai Xia; Jing Li; Fengcai Zhu

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and immunogenicity of the Sinovac Enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine for up to two years. Methods: We did a follow-up study of our initial randomized trial in 10,077 participants, who were randomized to receive EV71 vaccine or placebo in a 1:1 ratio and followed for 14 months. The extended follow-up study lasted for another 12 months and EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) was the primary endpoint. Results: The EV71 vaccine showed an efficacy of 95.1% (95%CI 63.6, 99.3) against EV71-associated HFMD during the extended follow-up and an overall efficacy of 94.7% (95%CI 87.8, 97.6) for two years. The EV71 vaccine elicited a sustained high level of neutralizing antibodies in participants, and no serious adverse event was judged to be related to the vaccination. Conclusion: The Sinovac EV71 vaccine could provide a sustained high protection against EV71-associated HFMDs for up to 2 years.


Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics | 2014

Clinical evaluation for batch consistency of an inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in a large-scale phase 3 clinical trial

Yi-Juan Chen; Fan-Yue Meng; Qunying Mao; Jing-Xin Li; Hua Wang; Zhenglun Liang; Yun-Tao Zhang; Fan Gao; Qing-Hua Chen; Yue-Mei Hu; Zi-Jun Ge; Xin Yao; Hui-Jie Guo; Fengcai Zhu; Xiu-Ling Li

The demonstration of batch-to-batch consistency to confirm the reliability of the manufacturing process has become a mandatory step in vaccine development. This is a post-hoc analysis aimed to provide more solid evidence on the immunogenicity and consistency of 3 consecutive batches of a novel inactivated enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine. In total 10 245 healthy Chinese children aged 6–35 months had been recruited and randomized to receive one of 3 batches of EV71 vaccine or placebo according to a two-dose immunization schedule in a phase 3 clinical trial. Blood samples were taken just before and 28 days after vaccinations for serological tests of EV71 neutralizing antibody (NTAb) titer from the subjects. Among them, 7263 (70.9%) subjects with seronegative EV71 NTAb at baseline and the data of serological tests post-vaccination available were included for the analysis. The results showed that EV71 vaccine elicited high geometric mean titers (GMTs) of 407.0 U/mL (95% CI, 373.5–443.6) for batch 1, 468.1 U/mL (95% CI, 432.2–507.0) for batch 2, and 520.6 U/mL (95% CI, 481.2–563.3) for batch 3. The two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the GMT ratios between each pair of vaccine batches were all within an interval of [0.67, 1.5]. Subjects who received EV71 vaccines demonstrated significant higher GMTs than those received placebos did (P < 0.001). In terms of incidence of both local and general adverse reactions, no differences were found among 3 vaccine batches and placebos. EV71 vaccine was highly immunogenic in children, and the 3 consecutive batches were well consistent.

Collaboration


Dive into the Yue-Mei Hu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fengcai Zhu

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jing-Xin Li

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kai Chu

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fan-Yue Meng

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Qi Liang

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hua Wang

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pei Liu

Southeast University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chang-Lin Yang

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Han-Min Jiang

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xuefeng Zhang

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge