Yuh-Min Cheng

Low tibial osteotomy for moderate ankle arthritis.

Abstract Low tibial osteotomy is one of the significant advances of ankle reconstruction techniques that has been made recently in an effort to halt arthritis in its early stages and leave fusion as the last, not the only, alternative treatment of ankle arthritis. From 1989 to 1995, we performed 18 low tibial osteotomies which included 6 cases of post-traumatic arthritis and 12 cases of degenerative arthritis. The ages of the 7 male and 11 female patients ranged from 18 to 78 years with an average of 41.9 years. The follow-up period lasted a mean of 47.7 months, ranging from 25 to 82 months. The average functional score changed from 49.6 pre-operatively to 88.5 at the last follow up, and showed yearly improvement. Complications included one case of late infection and two cases of implant failure, none of which led to nonunion. The indication for low tibial osteotomy is the intermediate stage of moderate ankle arthritis with a medial joint lesion and intact lateral facet. Using pressure redistribution on the joint surface, this procedure is an alternative treatment for ankle arthritis which may save an arthritic ankle from the fate of fusion or at least postpone fusion surgery.

Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.

BACKGROUND Thirty-two displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus in 30 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Fracture classification was based on Sanders computed tomographic classification. There were 18 type II fractures, 10 type III fractures, and 4 type IV fractures. METHODS The operations were performed using a standard extended lateral approach, and the fractures were fixed with small-fragment AO T-plates without bone grafting. Average follow-up was 35.4 months (range, 24-53 months). The Creighton-Nebraska Health Foundation Assessment score for fractures of the calcaneus was used for evaluation. RESULTS The average score was 86.7 for type II, 82.3 for type III, and 59.2 for type IV fractures. There was a clear statistically significant superiority with type II and type III fractures treated with open reduction when compared with type IV fractures (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION On the basis of our result, we recommend that type II and type III fractures be treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Despite the results of type IV fractures being significantly worse than that of type II and type III fractures, we recommend open reduction and internal fixation for type IV fractures to restore the hindfoot architecture and the subtalar joint, if possible. When the disrupted subtalar joint is so comminuted that it is beyond the surgeons ability to reconstruct, primary subtalar arthrodesis should be performed in addition to open reduction and internal fixation.

Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis for talonavicular arthritis.

We have reviewed a single surgeons experience with isolated talonavicular fusion in 16 patients with talonavicular arthritis. Fixation was either by staples or screws. Fifteen solid unions were achieved in the 16 patients who were followed (mean: 51 months). The average Ankle-Hindfoot Scale improved from 77.2 preoperatively to 92.9 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Subjectively, 15 patients were satisfied and one patient dissatisfied with the results. Further osteoarthritis in the adjacent joints was noted in five patients. We concluded that isolated talonavicular fusion is an effective method of treatment of talonavicular arthritis regarding pain relief and functional improvement. Though osteoarthritis was found in some adjacent joints postoperatively, the results were still satisfactory.

Subtalar Arthrodesis for Late Sequelae of Calcaneal Fractures: Fusion In Situ Versus Fusion with Sliding Corrective Osteotomy

Primary subtalar arthritis is not common. In most cases, it is the late sequela of intra-articular calcaneal fracture. 7 Subtalar arthrodesis is mostly used for the treatment of traumatic subtalar arthritis in our clinics. We have compared our early cases of in-situ subtalar fusion with our recent cases of fusion with sliding corrective osteotomy in this clinical report. From 1989 to 1992, 15 feet of 13 patients were treated with subtalar arthrodeses for subtalar arthritis caused by malunion of calcaneal fractures. Fusion in situ was done by Olliers approach, and resection of bony protrusion was done if there was lateral entrapment syndrome. From 1992 to 1995, 13 feet of 12 patients also received subtalar arthrodeses to salvage their calcaneal fractures, but the subtalar fusion was done by wide lateral approach, calcaneal sliding corrective osteotomy, and sometimes (11 of 13 feet) with Achilles tendon lengthening to restore the calcaneal height and width. Patients of both groups experienced obvious clinical improvement in subtalar pain relief, but there was no difference with walking distance, running, or jumping. The group undergoing fusion with sliding corrective osteotomy was more satisfied with regard to cosmetic results and shoe wear. The overall satisfactory rate in the group who underwent fusion with sliding corrective osteotomy (92%) was superior to the group who underwent fusion in situ (77%). Though our method of sliding corrective osteotomy does not provide much improvement to the talus declination angle, it is suitable for those patients with a “banana”-shaped calcaneus malunion. If the patient has prominent anterior ankle pain caused by tibiotalar impingement, we believe that a distraction subtalar arthrodesis would be more appropriate.

Revision of Ankle Arthrodesis

From 1989 to 1996, we treated 18 cases (10 males, eight females; average age 48.2 years) of failed ankle arthrodesis by revision of ankle arthrodesis and followed their progress for at least two years. The average time interval between original surgery and revision was 17.3 months. Revisions were needed due to infection in one case, nonunion in 10 cases, and malalignment in seven cases. The salvage operations included debridement in the infected case, refreshed pseudoarthrosis in nonunion cases, and corrective osteotomy in malalignment cases. Sixteen cases were fixed by crossed screws with internal compression, one infected case was fixed by an external fixator, and one case with bone loss was fixed with buttress plate. The average follow-up period was 40.4 months. There was one nonunion and two delayed unions, with an ultimate fusion rate of 94%. The average AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 70.9 at final follow up. There was one excellent result (5.6%), five good results (27.8%), 11 fair results (61%), and one poor result (5.6%), and the overall results were poorer compared with our series of primary arthrodesis. The time to fusion also took longer in the revision cases (average 2.7 months in primary cases and 4.8 months in revision cases). Fusion techniques that ensure solid union in a functional position are essential. If an ankle arthrodesis fails, however, revision is a salvage procedure that can achieve an acceptable result.

Modified Mitchell osteotomy for hallux valgus.

From 1988 to 1995, 96 patients (161 feet) underwent a modified Mitchell distal metatarsal osteotomy performed for mild-to-moderate hallux valgus. On AP x-rays of the standing foot, the average intermetatarsal angle was corrected from 15° to 9°, and the first metatarsophalangeal angles were corrected from an average of 41° to 15°. Criteria for evaluation of clinical results included relief of pain, appearance of foot, and shoe wear. After an average follow-up of 38 months, the overall satisfaction rate was 92.5%. Complications included 13 pin tract infections, two delayed unions, and two correction losses. The most common late sequela was transfer metatarsalgia of the lesser toes, which occurred in 20 feet (12.4%), leading to some dissatisfaction. The Mitchell osteotomy can be used on cases with less than 20° of intermetatarsal angle, offering a stable construct with easy postoperative care.

Successful teriparatide treatment of atypical fracture after long-term use of alendronate without surgical procedure in a postmenopausal woman: a case report.

Objective Bisphosphonates are used as first-line therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis owing to their potent inhibition of bone resorption. Long-term use of bisphosphonates may lead to low-energy femoral subtrochanteric or shaft fractures in a very few patients. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course of a patient treated with alendronate for 3 years who developed an atypical femoral fracture and to hypothesize the beneficial effects of teriparatide on the healing of the patient’s atypical femoral fracture. Methods A 63-year-old Asian woman had a lumbar osteoporotic fracture and received 70 mg of alendronate for 3 years. Pain and soreness in the thigh presented initially and exacerbated thereafter. X-ray revealed a right femoral diaphysis stress fracture. She then received teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis and the femoral atypical fracture. Results Pain and tenderness improved remarkably after teriparatide treatment for 1 month, and these symptoms disappeared after teriparatide treatment for 9 months. The patient also received raloxifen as further therapy, and the fracture line had completely disappeared by 15 months after treatment. Conclusions Even though a previous study has reported that teriparatide healed stress fractures in a rat model and even with the time course of fracture healing in our patient, we are still not certain that teriparatide played a primary role in the positive response to therapy. Vitamin D therapy, calcium, and alendronate discontinuation may have played secondary roles. This case report may serve to introduce a direction for future research into the pharmacological treatment of atypical femoral fractures. Surgical treatment of incomplete atypical femoral fractures may be a safer method.

Radiographic evaluation of minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus.

Background: The use of minimally invasive surgical technique for hallux valgus is controversial. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the radiographic results of a minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus. Materials and Methods: From September 2005 to March 2008, a minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy was performed in 82 patients (125 feet) for hallux valgus. The average age was 40.8 (range, 13 to 71) years. The mean followup period was 18.3 (range, 9 to 38) months. These patients were categorized into groups based on their gender, age, preoperative hallux valgus angle, and preoperative 1–2 intermetatarsal angle. The radiographs were reviewed for preoperative and final followup hallux valgus angle, 1–2 intermetatarsal angle, and malunion or nonunion. A final followup hallux valgus angle greater than 20 degrees was defined as “recurrence of deformity” and represented a poor radiographic result. Results: There were no nonunions but one case of plantarflexion malunion. One case had skin irritation due to prominent bone. A poor radiographic result occurred in 29 feet (23.2%). Of those 36 feet whose preoperative hallux valgus angle was equal or greater than 30 degrees, 23 feet had a poor radiographic result (63.9%). Of those 89 feet whose preoperative hallux valgus angle was less than 30 degrees, only six feet had a poor radiographic result (6.7%) (p= 0.0001). The preoperative 1–2 intermetatarsal angle was found to have no statistically significant influence on poor radiographic results (p = 0.0539). Both the age and sex of the patients had no statistically significant influence (p = 0.8048 and 0.8604, respectively). Conclusion: Based on our results, we do not recommend use of this technique to treat moderate to severe hallux valgus (hallux valgus angle, 30) degrees. We believe a traditional open osteotomy with formal capsulorrhaphy would be a better choice of treatment. Level of Evidence: IV, Retrospective Case Series

Surgical treatment for ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft

Concomitant ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures are difficult to treat. There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment of these complex fractures. Forty-seven patients with these complex fractures were treated in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital between the periods of 1982 and 1998. Our standard treatment protocol is plate fixation for femoral shaft fracture and lag screw or dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation for hip fracture. Among 42 cases treated with this protocol, 34 were males and 8 were females with an average age of 36 years and average follow-up period of 55 months. We divided hip fractures into two groups: femoral neck fracture as group I and intertrochanteric fracture as group II. There were no non-union and osteonecrosis of the hip in either group. One diaphyseal non-union was observed in group I and four in group II. There were 92 and 76% good functional results in groups I and II, respectively. The result shows that our standard method can yield a reliable outcome in group I, but not in group II.

Subtalar Arthrodesis for Subtalar Arthritis

Primary subtalar arthritis is not common except in cases of generalized arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis. The majority of subtalar arthritis results from intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Arthrodesis seems to be the only way to solve this problem. Thirteen patients (15 feet) were treated with subtalar arthrodesis at KMCH. Preoperative diagnosis included 13 feet with traumatic arthritis secondary to a calcaneal fracture, one foot with rheumatoid arthritis and one foot with primary osteoarthritis. The mean follow up period was 24.9 months. Lateral approach without fibular osteotomy was done with decompression if there was entrapment syndrome and the arthrodesis were accomplished with use of staples for internal fixation. Eleven (85%) of the patients were satisfied with the results. Objectively, the results were excellent after 11 arthrodesis (73%), good or fair after three (20%), and poor after one (7%). There was no nonunion. Complications occurred in 1 patient who developed superficial wound infection, and in 1 patient with staple loosening. Though there was no case of nonunion, the fusion time was rather long. This might have been due to the fixation method because staples can not provide compression force which accelerates union. We believe subtalar arthrodesis is appropriate for isolated subtalar arthritis unless there are associated talonavicular or calcaneocuboid arthritis in which case triple arthrodesis will be more appropriate.