Yuhua Sun

Remote periconditioning reduces myocardial no-reflow by the activation of KATP channel via inhibition of Rho-kinase

UNLABELLED Remote periconditioning is induced by brief cycles of ischemia and reperfusion of a remote organ applied during sustained myocardial ischemia. It remains unknown whether the remote periconditioning reduces myocardial no-reflow. The adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channel opening and inhibition of Rho-kinase may be the important mechanism of protection against myocardial no-reflow. Therefore, this study was sought to assess the effect of remote periconditioning on myocardial no-reflow and explore the possible mechanism. METHODS Coronary ligation area and area of no-reflow were determined with pathological means in 58 mini-swines randomized into 7 study groups: 9 controls, 8 in remote periconditioning, 8 in hydroxyfasudil (a specific inhibitor of Rho-kinase)-treated, 9 in glibenclamide (K(ATP) channel blocker)-treated, 8 in remote periconditioning and glibenclamide, 8 in hydroxyfasudil and glibenclamide and 8 sham-operated. The ischemia and reperfusion model was created with 3 h of left anterior descending artery occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion. RESULTS Compared with the control group, remote periconditioning decreased Rho-kinase activity (P<0.01), increased coronary blood volume (P<0.05), decreased area of no-reflow (from 82.3+/-3.9% to 45.5+/-5.7% of ligation area, P<0.01) and reduced necrosis size (from 98.5+/-1.3% to 74.7+/-6.3% of ligation area, P<0.05). Hydroxyfasudil had the same effect on the above parameters as remote periconditioning. Glibenclamide abrogated the effect of remote periconditioning or hydroxyfasudil on area of no-reflow and necrosis area, but not Rho-kinase activity. CONCLUSION Remote periconditioning can reduce myocardial no-reflow after ischemia and reperfusion. This beneficial effect could be due to its activation of K(ATP) channel via inhibition of Rho-kinase.

The Effect of Statins on the No-Reflow Phenomenon : An Observational Study in Patients with Hyperglycemia before Primary Angioplasty

BACKGROUND An association between admission plasma glucose levels and an increased risk of no-reflow has been well documented. Although HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy can reduce no-reflow, little is known about its effect on no-reflow in patients with hyperglycemia. In the present study, we investigated whether pretreatment with a statin could reduce no-reflow in patients with hyperglycemia, who underwent primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS A total of 259 consecutive patients who underwent primary angioplasty for a first AMI were studied. Blood glucose and creatinine kinase levels were measured on admission. All patients underwent 2-dimensional echocardiography and electrocardiographic analysis just after admission. No-reflow was defined as a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade <3. Hyperglycemia was defined as a blood glucose level >or=10 mmol/L. Statin administration prior to admission was determined by detailed interview or information in the medical records. RESULTS Hyperglycemia was diagnosed in 154 patients on admission. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 31 of the 154 patients with hyperglycemia. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly greater in patients with hyperglycemia compared with no hyperglycemia. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that hyperglycemia on admission was an independent predictor of no-reflow. Among the 154 patients with hyperglycemia, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between patients who received statin pretreatment and those who did not; however, hyperlipidemia occurred in a greater number of the patients who did not receive statin pretreatment. The 40 patients with hyperglycemia who received statins before admission had a lower incidence of no-reflow than those who did not receive statin pretreatment (5% and 25.4%; p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that absence of statin pretreatment was a significant predictor of no-reflow in patients with hyperglycemia, along with ejection fraction on admission, initial TIMI 0 flow, number of Q waves, and anterior AMI. CONCLUSION The results of our study show that pretreatment with statins could attenuate no-reflow after AMI in patients with acute hyperglycemia.

The Effect of Statins on the No-Reflow Phenomenon

BackgroundAn association between admission plasma glucose levels and an increased risk of no-reflow has been well documented. Although HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy can reduce no-reflow, little is known about its effect on no-reflow in patients with hyperglycemia. In the present study, we investigated whether pretreatment with a statin could reduce no-reflow in patients with hyperglycemia, who underwent primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).MethodsA total of 259 consecutive patients who underwent primary angioplasty for a first AMI were studied. Blood glucose and creatinine kinase levels were measured on admission. All patients underwent 2-dimensional echocardiography and electrocardiographic analysis just after admission. No-reflow was defined as a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade <3. Hyperglycemia was defined as a blood glucose level ≥10 mmol/L. Statin administration prior to admission was determined by detailed interview or information in the medical records.ResultsHyperglycemia was diagnosed in 154 patients on admission. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 31 of the 154 patients with hyperglycemia. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly greater in patients with hyperglycemia compared with no hyperglycemia. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that hyperglycemia on admission was an independent predictor of no-reflow. Among the 154 patients with hyperglycemia, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between patients who received statin pretreatment and those who did not; however, hyperlipidemia occurred in a greater number of the patients who did not receive statin pretreatment. The 40 patients with hyperglycemia who received statins before admission had a lower incidence of no-reflow than those who did not receive statin pretreatment (5% and 25.4%; p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that absence of statin pretreatment was a significant predictor of no-reflow in patients with hyperglycemia, along with ejection fraction on admission, initial TIMI 0 flow, number of Q waves, and anterior AMI.ConclusionThe results of our study show that pretreatment with statins could attenuate no-reflow after AMI in patients with acute hyperglycemia.