Yukihiro Yano

A retrospective analysis of 335 Japanese lung cancer patients who responded to initial gefitinib treatment.

BACKGROUND Gefitinib treatment results in considerably better progression-free survival compared with that of platinum doublets in the first line treatment of nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Some patients who respond to gefitinib have an overall survival (OS) of more than 5 years, whereas other initial responders do less well. Although there has been considerable effort made to elucidate the mechanisms of acquired resistance, there have only been a few studies that addressed the effect of clinical backgrounds and treatment histories on the survival of the patients who had responded to an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). In this study, we especially focused on the clinical benefit of EGFR-TKI administration after progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who were diagnosed before October 2010, treated with gefitinib after July 2002, and responded to it. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate how clinical backgrounds and treatment histories influence survival of the patients who respond to gefitinib. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety of long-term gefitinib use and to establish the optimal treatment sequence using a dynamic treatment regimen analysis (DTRA). RESULTS A total of 335 patients were recruited. Twenty-eight (8.4%) patients survived more than 5 years. Sixty-five and 93 patients received gefitinib as rechallenge and beyond progressive disease (BPD), respectively. A statistically significant difference in OS was observed between the patients who underwent gefitinib rechallenge and those who did not rechallenge (median: 1272 days vs. 774 days; p < 0.001), a result supported by a DTRA. Patients treated with gefitinib BPD also showed a tendency of longer survival. CONCLUSIONS Gefitinib rechallenge and BPD played a central role in long term survival of the patients who initially responded to gefitinib.

Pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria: a retrospective study of 44 cases in Japan.

Background: The features of pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) have not been sufficiently documented. Objectives: To establish these features, we retrospectively evaluated 44 patients. Methods: We screened respiratory isolates at the National Toneyama Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between 2003 and 2007. Diagnosis was based on the latest guidelines of the American Thoracic Society. The patients were classified into 3 types according to their radiographic findings: fibrocavitary, nodular bronchiectatic and unclassified variant. Results: We obtained 1,348 nontuberculous mycobacteria respiratory isolates from 1,187 patients, including 119 RGM isolates from 100 patients. Forty-four of these 100 patients were definitively diagnosed with respiratory disease due to RGM. The most common pathogen was Mycobacteriumabscessus, which accounted for 65.9% of cases, followed by Mycobacterium fortuitum at 20.5%. There was a statistically significant difference in smoking history between patients infected with these 4 RGM species (excluding those with an unknown smoking history; p = 0.039). The overall evaluation of radiographic findings revealed 18.2% as fibrocavitary, 43.2% as nodular bronchiectatic and 38.6% as unclassified variants in these 44 patients. There was a significant difference in radiographic findings between the 4 RGM species (p = 0.002). There was also a significant difference in radiographic findings between M. abscessus and M. fortuitum infected patients (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Patients with M. abscessus seem to have less of a smoking history and more frequent nodular bronchiectatic radiographic patterns than patients with M. fortuitum. In contrast, fibrocavitary patterns might be more frequent with M. fortuitum infection.

Vitiligo in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma treated with nivolumab: A case report

Nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death-1 protein monoclonal antibody, is effective for treating patients with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab induce various kinds of immune-related adverse events, including vitiligo. Vitiligo has been reported in patients with melanoma but not lung cancer. We describe a 75-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma, stage 4 with pleural and pericardial effusion, that progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Subsequently, he was treated with nivolumab as second-line therapy. After 6days of administering nivolumab, he developed vitiligo suddenly on the trunk of his body. Except for vitiligo, his physical examination was normal, and treatment with nivolumab was well tolerated. Therefore, this treatment was continued without further development or expansion of vitiligo. A computed tomography scan showed a reduction in the size of the lung nodule and stabilization of the pleural and pericardial effusion. This is the first case of vitiligo associated with the use of nivolumab in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma.

Case series of pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung treated with nivolumab

Pleomorphic carcinoma (PC) of the lung is a rare type of non‐small cell lung cancer, exhibiting aggressive behavior and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A previous study reported that PCs expressed high levels of PD‐L1, suggesting the potential efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these tumors. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of three patients with PC of the lung treated with nivolumab: a 59‐year‐old woman (Case 1), a 66‐year‐old man (Case 2), and an 83‐year‐old man (Case 3). PD‐L1 was highly expressed in their tumor cells. Two cases showed a partial response with long progression‐free survival. However, in Case 2, brain and bone metastases progressed during nivolumab treatment in spite of high PD‐L1 expression. This case series indicates that nivolumab is effective to some extent for PC of the lung. However, the clinical course of patients treated with nivolumab should be carefully observed, even when PD‐L1 is highly expressed.

Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib following Gefitinib-Induced Hepatotoxicity: Review of 8 Clinical Cases.

Objective. Gefitinib often induces liver damage. A few reports have described that the subsequent administration of erlotinib was associated with less hepatotoxicity, but the safety and efficacy of this treatment are still not fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated retrospectively the patients with erlotinib following gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Methods and Patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records between December 2007 and March 2010. The patients were evaluated including the following information: age, gender, histology of lung cancer, performance status, smoking status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, liver metastasis, viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver injury, clinical response, and hepatotoxicity due to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Results. We identified 8 patients with erlotinib following gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. All achieved disease control by gefitinib. Hepatotoxicity was grades 2 and 3 in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. The median duration of treatment with gefitinib was 112.5 days and the median time to gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity was 51.5 days. The median duration of treatment with erlotinib was 171.5 days. Grade 1 and 2 erlotinib-induced hepatotoxicity was observed in 2 and 1 patient, respectively. Conclusions. Erlotinib administration with careful monitoring is thought to be a good alternative strategy for patients who respond well to gefitinib treatment but experience hepatotoxicity.

4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal induces endothelial cell injury via PKCdelta and biphasic JNK activation

Hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), a major product generated during oxidative stress, exhibits cytotoxic effects; however, the mechanisms of 4-HNE-induced endothelial cell injury are not well defined. To explore this issue, we examined how 4-HNE damages human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and found that 4-HNE induced biphasic activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). Both pre- and post-treatment of HUVECs with SP600125, a spe- cific JNK inhibitor, significantly suppressed the cytotoxic effects of 4-HNE. Inhibition of protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ), which was also phosphorylated by 4-HNE, reduced endothelial cell injury as well as late-phase JNK phosphorylation elicited by 4-HNE. Inversely, pre-treatment of HUVECs with SP600125 suppressed PKCδ activation. Taken together, these results support the concept that 4-HNE induces vascular endothelial cell injury by the interac- tion between biphasic JNK activation and the PKCδ pathway.

Hyperprogressive disease in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: A case series

Nivolumab is an anti‐PD‐1 blocking monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, some patients on immunotherapy may experience rapid progression and worsening clinical status, known as hyperprogressive disease. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with NSCLC administered nivolumab therapy at Toneyama National Hospital, Japan, from January 2016 to January 2018. Of the 87 patients administered nivolumab therapy, five experienced rapid progression during one cycle of nivolumab therapy. Four patients were treated with corticosteroids to overcome their symptomatic events. Nivolumab exhibited efficacy after temporal progression, so‐called “pseudoprogression”, in three patients, and their symptoms and laboratory results improved. In the other patient, pleural and pericardial effusions increased after nivolumab therapy, and drainage was required, with no subsequent recurrence. The clinical courses of our case series indicate that alternative treatment, namely high‐dose corticosteroids, antibiotics, and drainage, effectively treated the symptoms of rapid tumor progression. Of note, corticosteroids suppressed the temporary inflammatory reaction to nivolumab. Although hyperprogressive disease is thought to be associated with poor quality of life and survival, these treatment strategies may be useful in patients with expected responses to immunotherapy.

Post-progression survival after cessation of treatment with nivolumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

Objectives The effectiveness of treatment after cessation of nivolumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well investigated. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical benefit of post-nivolumab treatment in such patients. Materials and methods A retrospective review was conducted on patients who received treatment after cessation of nivolumab due to disease progression or adverse events at the Toneyama National Hospital between January 2016 and April 2017. Results Among 64 patients treated with nivolumab, 26 patients received treatment after cessation of nivolumab due to disease progression (n = 21) or adverse events (n = 5). The median age of the patients was 68 years and 19 patients were male. Nineteen patients had performance status (PS) 1 or less at initiation of post-nivolumab treatment. Four, 20, and 2 patients were treated with platinum doublets, a single agent, and molecular targeting agents, respectively. Response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of first-line post-nivolumab treatment were 34.6% (9 patients), 73.1% (19 patients), and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–5.2), respectively. Adverse events (≥ grade 3) and treatment cessation were observed in 57.7% (15 patients) and 19.2% (5 patients), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for the majority of patient characteristics between the groups with (n = 26) and without post-nivolumab treatment. However, PS at cessation of nivolumab and post-progression survival (PPS) after cessation of nivolumab (median PPS: 12.6 vs. 1.4 months, 95% CI: 3.8–14.7 vs. 0.4–2.2) were significantly different between the groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed significant correlation of PS at cessation of nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13–0.87) and post-nivolumab treatment (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43) with prolonged PPS after nivolumab. Conclusion Median post-progression survival in patients with advanced NSCLC who received post-nivolumab treatment was approximately 1 year.

Does afatinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy induce positive conversion of T790M in previously-negative patients?

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are markedly effective for T790M-positive patients. To confer their clinical benefit to more patients, a novel therapy to induce positive conversion in T790M-negative patients may be possible. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who had received rebiopsy after completion of ABC-study: a prospective phase II study of Afatinib plus Bevacizumab Combination (ABC)-therapy after acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. Between October 2014 and September 2016, 32 eligible patients were enrolled in ABC-study at our institutes. Eighteen patients were T790M-negative and 14 were T790M-positive before ABC-therapy. Rebiopsy was performed on 13 T790M-negative and 5 T790M-positive patients after progression of ABC-therapy. In 8 (62%) of 13 T790M-negative patients, T790M status changed from negative to positive after ABC-therapy. Seven of these 8 patients underwent osimertinib therapy. The response rate and median time to treatment failure were 86% and 12.2 months, respectively. There were no adverse events ≥grade 3, nor any treatment-related deaths. On the other hand, T790M remained positive after ABC-therapy in all 5 previous T790M-positive patients. ABC-therapy could induce positive conversion of T790M even in previously-negative patients. We hypothesize that ABC-therapy could provoke “clonal selection”, which purifies T790M-positive cancer cells in heterogeneous tumors. Further studies are warranted to confirm this phenomena.

Clinical implications of monitoring nivolumab immunokinetics in non–small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND. The PD-1–blocking antibody nivolumab persists in patients several weeks after the last infusion. However, no study has systematically evaluated the maximum duration that the antibody persists on T cells or the association between this duration and residual therapeutic efficacy or potential adverse events. METHODS. To define the duration of binding and residual efficacy of nivolumab after discontinuation, we developed a simplified strategy for T cell monitoring and used it to analyze T cells from peripheral blood from 11 non–small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with nivolumab. To determine the suitability of our method for other applications, we compared transcriptome profiles between nivolumab-bound and nivolumab-unbound CD8 T cells. We also applied T cell monitoring in 2 nivolumab-treated patients who developed progressive lung tumors during long-term follow-up. RESULTS. Prolonged nivolumab binding was detected more than 20 weeks after the last infusion, regardless of the total number of nivolumab infusions (2–15 doses) or type of subsequent treatment, in 9 of the 11 cases in which long-term monitoring was possible. Ki-67 positivity, a proliferation marker, in T cells decreased in patients with progressive disease. Transcriptome profiling identified the signals regulating activation of nivolumab-bound T cells, which may contribute to nivolumab resistance. In 2 patients who restarted nivolumab, T cell proliferation markers exhibited the opposite trend and correlated with clinical response. CONCLUSIONS. Although only a few samples were analyzed, our strategy of monitoring both nivolumab binding and Ki-67 in T cells might help determine residual efficacy under various types of concurrent or subsequent treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000024623. FUNDING. This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (JP17K16045, JP18H05282, and JP15K09220), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP17cm0106310, JP18cm0106335 and JP18cm059042), and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR16G2).