Yukinobu Yajima
Kanagawa University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yukinobu Yajima.
Topology and its Applications | 1990
Gary Gruenhage; Yukinobu Yajima
We show that there is a filter on ω such that for any sumetacompact space X and any open cover U of X, there is a sequence {Vn:nϵω} of open refinements of U such that {n: ord(x,Vn<gw} is in the filter for every x ϵ X. We apply this result to submetacompactness of product spaces, showing, e.g., that if X has a σ-closure-preserving cover by compact sets, then X × Y is submetacompact for every submetacompact space Y.
Topology and its Applications | 1987
Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract Let ∑ be a ∑-product of semi-stratifiable spaces as in our title. First, we consider when ∑ is normal. Secondly, we consider when ∑ is collectionwise normal if it is normal. Moreover, it is shown that ∑ is subnormal.
Topology and its Applications | 2000
Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract We introduce a new concept, which is called special refinements. We illustrate that this concept plays certain roles to study normality of products. In fact, several known results concerning normality of products follow from our results as their corollaries.
Topology and its Applications | 1998
Heikki Junnila; Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract We introduce and study several subclasses of the class of σ-spaces. The smallest of the classes considered, that of LF-netted spaces, contains all F σ -discrete spaces and all stratifiable F σ -metrizable spaces. The main result of the paper establishes the equivalence of normality and countable paracompactness of the product of an LF-netted space with a countably paracompact and normal space.
Topology and its Applications | 2000
Nobuyuki Kemoto; Kenichi Tamano; Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract We will characterize metacompactness, subparacompactness and paracompactness of subspaces of products of two ordinal numbers. Using them we will show: 1. For such subspaces, weak submetaLindelofness, screenability and metacompactness are equivalent. 2. Metacompact subspaces of ω 1 2 are paracompact. 3. Metacompact subspaces of ω 2 2 are subparacompact. 4. There is a metacompact subspace of ( ω 1 +1) 2 which is not paracompact. 5. There is a metacompact subspace of ( ω 2 +1) 2 which is not subparacompact.
Topology and its Applications | 1998
Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract First, as an analogue of Dowkers theorem for countable paracompactness, we prove a characterization of countable metacompactness in terms of subnormality of products. Second, as an analogue of Tamanos theorem for paracompactness, we give a characterization of Lindelofness in terms of normality of products.
Topology and its Applications | 1993
Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract First, we prove that the product X × κ of a strong Σ-space X and a cardinal factor κ is (sub)shrinking if and only if it is (sub)normal. Secondly, we prove that a Σ-product of strong Σ-spaces is subshrinking if and only if it is subnormal. This answers a question raised by the author. Moreover, we discuss the subnormality of the product X × κ of a semi-stratifiable space X and a cardinal factor κ. Thus, we can find several similarities between X × κ and Σ-products.
Topology and its Applications | 2003
Masami Sakai; Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract In 1989, Chiba raised the problem of whether a σ-product of spaces, each finite subproduct of which is subparacompact (respectively, submetacompact), is subparacompact (respectively, submetacompact). In the present paper, we give an affirmative answer to this problem in each case.
Topology and its Applications | 2002
Hidenori Tanaka; Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract Many results have been obtained for the normality of Σ -products of generalized metric spaces. In this paper, we give another line for the study of the normality of Σ -products. That is, it is proved that a Σ -product of paracompact C -scattered spaces is (collectionwise) normal if it has countable tightness.
Topology and its Applications | 1998
Heikki Junnila; Yukinobu Yajima
Abstract We give an internal characterization of submetacompactness and then we use it to prove that a space X is submetacompact if and only if X × ( κ + 1) is suborthocompact, where κ is a cardinal no less than the Lindelof degree of X . Similarly, we also obtain that a space X is metacompact if and only if X × ( κ + 1) is orthocompact.