Yukio Kinugasa
Toyota
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yukio Kinugasa.
Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2014
Susan Collet; Hiroaki Minoura; Toru Kidokoro; Yukihiro Sonoda; Yukio Kinugasa; Prakash Karamchandani; Jeremiah Johnson; Tejas Shah; Jaegun Jung; Allison DenBleyker
Three modeling approaches, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) zero-out, the Comprehensive Air quality Model with extensions (CAMx) zero-out, and the CAMx probing tools ozone source apportionment tool (OSAT), were used to project the contributions of various source categories to future year design values for summer 8-hr average ozone concentrations at selected U.S. monitors. The CMAQ and CAMx zero-out or brute-force approaches predicted generally similar contributions for most of the source categories, with some small differences. One of the important findings from this study was that both the CMAQ and CAMx zero-out approaches tended to apportion a larger contribution to the “other” category than the OSAT approach. For the OSAT approach, this category is the difference between the total emissions and the sum of the tracked emissions and consists of non-U.S. emissions. For the zero-out approach, it also includes the effects of nonlinearities in the system because the sum of the sensitivities of all sources is not necessarily equal to the sum of their contributions in a nonperturbed environment. The study illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of source apportionment approaches, such as OSAT, and source sensitivity approaches, such as zero-out. The OSAT approach is suitable for studying source contributions, whereas the zero-out approach is suitable for studying response to emission changes. Future year design values of summer 8-hr average ozone concentrations were projected to decrease at all the selected monitors for all the simulations in each city, except at the downtown Los Angeles monitor. Both the CMAQ and CAMx results showed all modeled locations project attainment in 2018 and 2030 to the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) level of 75 ppb, except the selected Los Angeles monitor in 2018 and the selected San Bernardino monitor in 2018 and 2030. Implications: This study illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of three modeling approaches, CMAQ zero-out, CAMx zero-out, and OSAT to project contributions of various source categories to future year design values for summer 8-hr average ozone concentrations at selected U.S. monitors. The OSAT approach is suitable for studying source contributions, whereas the zero-out approach is suitable for studying response to emission changes. Future year design values of summer 8-hr average ozone concentrations were projected to decrease, except at the downtown Los Angeles monitor. Comparing projections with the current NAAQS (75 ppb) show attainment everywhere, except two locations in 2018 and one location in 2030.
Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2014
Susan Collet; Hiroaki Minoura; Toru Kidokoro; Yukihiro Sonoda; Yukio Kinugasa; Prakash Karamchandani
To improve U.S. air quality, there are many regulations on-the-way (OTW) and on-the-books (OTB), including mobile source California Low Emission Vehicle third generation (LEV III) and federal Tier 3 standards. This study explores the effects of those regulations by using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for 8-hr ozone concentrations in the western and eastern United States in the years 2018 and 2030 during a month with typical high ozone concentrations, July. Alterations in pollutant emissions can be due to technological improvements, regulatory amendments, and changes in growth. In order to project emission rates for future years, the impacts of all of these factors were estimated. This study emphasizes the potential light-duty vehicle emission changes by year to predict ozone levels. The results of this study show that most areas have decreases in 8-hr ozone concentrations in the year 2030, although there are some areas with increased concentrations. Additionally, there are areas with 8-hr ozone concentrations greater than the current U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standard level, which is 75 ppb. Implications: To improve U.S. air quality, many regulations are on the way and on the books, including mobile source California LEV III and federal Tier 3 standards. This study explores the effects of those regulations for 8-hr ozone concentrations in the western and eastern United States in the years 2018 and 2030. The results of this study show that most areas have decreases in 8-hr ozone concentrations in 2030, although there are some areas with increased concentrations. Additionally, there are areas with 8-hr ozone concentrations greater than the current U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standard level.
Archive | 1996
Yukio Kinugasa; Kouhei Igarashi; Takaaki Itou
Archive | 1995
Yukio Kinugasa; Kouhei Igarashi; Takaaki Itou; Toshifumi Takaoka
Archive | 1995
Yukio Kinugasa; Toshifumi Takaoka; Kouhei Igarashi; Takaaki Itou
Archive | 1996
Yukio Kinugasa; Kouhei Igarashi; Takaaki Itou; Naoto Suzuki; Takehisa Yaegashi; Kouichi Takeuchi
Archive | 2000
Naohide Fuwa; Hiroshi Tanaka; Yukio Kinugasa; Takaaki Itou; Naoto Suzuki; Takehisa Yaegashi; Kouhei Igarashi; Kouichi Takeuchi
Archive | 1999
Koichi Hoshi; Yukio Kinugasa; Takaaki Itou
Archive | 1996
Yukio Kinugasa; Kouhei Igarashi; Takaaki Itou; Toshifumi Takaoka; Michihiro Ohashi; Koji Yokota
Archive | 1997
Toshifumi Takaoka; Yukio Kinugasa; Kouji Yoshizaki; Yoshiaki Taga; Shigeo Taga heir by; Takiko Taga heiress by