Yukiyasu Kuzumoto
Nara Medical University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yukiyasu Kuzumoto.
Transplantation | 2005
Satoru Akashi; Masayuki Sho; Hisanori Kashizuka; Kaoru Hamada; Naoya Ikeda; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Yoshikazu Tsurui; Takeo Nomi; Takashi Mizuno; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Michiyoshi Hisanaga; Saiho Ko; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Background. Chemokines and chemokine receptors are critical in leukocyte recruitment, activation, and differentiation. Among them, CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) and CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) have been reported to play important roles in alloimmune responses and may be potential targets for posttransplant immunosuppression. Methods. Fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched murine cardiac and islet transplant models were used to test the effect in vivo of a novel, small-molecule compound TAK-779 by targeting CCR5 and CXCR3 in acute allograft rejection. An MHC class II mismatched cardiac transplant model was used to evaluate its efficacy in chronic allograft rejection. Intragraft expression of cytokines, chemokines, and chemokine receptors was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and by histological analysis. Results. Treatment of TAK-779 significantly prolonged allograft survival across the MHC barrier in two distinct transplant models. The treatment downregulated local immune activation as observed by the reduced expression of several chemokines, cytokines, and chemokine receptors. Thereby, the recruitment of CD4, CD8, and CD11c cells into transplanted allografts were inhibited. Furthermore, TAK-779 treatment significantly attenuated the development of chronic vasculopathy, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration. Conclusions. Antagonism of CCR5 and CXCR3 has a substantial therapeutic effect on inhibiting both acute and chronic allograft rejection. CCR5 and CXCR3 are functional in the process of allograft rejection and may be potential targets in clinical transplantation in the future.
Hepatology | 2005
Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Masayuki Sho; Naoya Ikeda; Kaoru Hamada; Takashi Mizuno; Satoru Akashi; Yoshikazu Tsurui; Hisanori Kashizuka; Takeo Nomi; Atsushi Kubo; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) mediates a variety of innate and adaptive immunity through four distinct receptors: EP1‐EP4. It has been suggested that each EP plays a unique and pivotal role in various disease conditions. We investigated the pathophysiological role of EP receptors in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. In this study, a 70% hepatic ischemic model was used in male C57BL/6 mice. Selective EP agonists were used to clarify the function of each PGE2 receptor in I/R injury. Although all four receptors were expressed in the naïve liver, EP4 expression was significantly upregulated after hepatic I/R. Although EP1, 2, or 3 agonists did not show any protective effect on liver function, the EP4 agonist significantly inhibited hepatic I/R injury as determined by serological and histological analyses. Furthermore, the EP4 agonist downregulated the local expressions of several proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules in the early phase of reperfusion. In contrast, it augmented the local expression of an anti‐inflammatory cytokine, interleukin 10. Additionally, the neutrophil accumulation was also inhibited by EP4 agonist treatment. Finally, to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of the EP4 agonist in hepatic I/R injury, the nonischemic shunt liver was removed after 120 minutes of ischemia, resulting in the death of 86% of control mice within 48 hours. In sharp contrast, 80% of mice treated with the EP4 agonist survived. In conclusion, the PGE2‐EP4 signaling pathway has an inhibitory role in hepatic I/R injury. An EP4 agonist effectively protects against ischemic injury. (HEPATOLOGY 2005.)
Journal of Hepatology | 2007
Takahiro Akahori; Masayuki Sho; Kaoru Hamada; Yasue Suzaki; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Takeo Nomi; Shinji Nakamura; Koji Enomoto; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Transplantation | 2005
Yoshikazu Tsurui; Masayuki Sho; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Kaoru Hamada; Satoru Akashi; Hisanori Kashizuka; Naoya Ikeda; Takeo Nomi; Takashi Mizuno; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Transplantation | 2005
Hisanori Kashizuka; Masayuki Sho; Takeo Nomi; Naoya Ikeda; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Satoru Akashi; Yoshikazu Tsurui; Takashi Mizuno; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Hideo Yagita; Yoshiyuki Nakajima; Mohamed H. Sayegh
Transplantation | 2005
Masayuki Sho; Satoru Akashi; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Kaoru Hamada; Hisanori Kashizuka; Naoya Ikeda; Takeo Nomi; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Yoshikazu Tsurui; Hitoshi Yoshiji; Yan Wu; Daniel J. Hicklin; David M. Briscoe; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Transplantation Proceedings | 2005
Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Masayuki Sho; Naoya Ikeda; Takashi Mizuno; Kaoru Hamada; Satoru Akashi; Yoshikazu Tsurui; Hisanori Kashizuka; Takeo Nomi; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Y. Nakajima
Transplantation | 2004
Hisanori Kashizuka; Masayuki Sho; Naoya Ikeda; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Satoru Akashi; Yoshikazu Tsurui; Takashi Mizuno; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Hideo Yagita; Yoshiyuki Nakajima; Mohamed H. Sayegh
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (journal of Japan Surgical Association) | 1999
Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Yukishige Yamada; Akihiko Watanabe; Teruyuki Sakaguchi; Hiroshige Nakano
Transplantation | 2004
Yoshikazu Tsurui; Masayuki Sho; Yukiyasu Kuzumoto; Satoru Akashi; Hisanori Kashizuka; Naoya Ikeda; Takashi Mizuno; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Daniel J. Hicklin; David M. Briscoe; Yoshiyuki Nakajima