Yuko Akiyama

CYP2A6 and the plasma level of 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine are determinants of the pharmacokinetic variability of tegafur and 5-fluorouracil, respectively, in Japanese patients with cancer given S-1

S‐1 is an oral anticancer agent composed of tegafur (FT), 5‐chloro‐2,4‐dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate. CDHP is added to prevent degradation of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. CYP2A6 is involved in the biotransformation of FT to 5‐FU. Thus, we prospectively analyzed the effects of the CYP2A6 genotype, plasma level of CDHP, and patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of FT and 5‐FU. Fifty‐four Japanese patients with metastatic or recurrent cancers who received S‐1 were enrolled. The CYP2A6 polymorphisms (*4A, *7, and *9) with deficient or reduced activity were analyzed. All subjects were classified into three groups according to their CYP2A6 genotype: wild type (*1/*1), one‐variant allele (*1/any), or two‐variant alleles (combination other than *1). The PK of FT, 5‐FU, and CDHP were measured on day 1 of treatment. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that oral clearance of FT was associated with the CYP2A6 genotype (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P = 0.000838). The oral clearance of FT seen in patients with the two‐variant alleles was significantly lower than those in wild type and the one‐variant allele (95% confidence intervals 0.75–2.41 and 0.41–1.82, respectively; Tukey‐Kramer test). The area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) of 5‐FU was significantly correlated with the AUC of CDHP (ANOVA, P = 0.00126). The AUC of 5‐FU and CDHP were inversely correlated with creatinine clearance (ANOVA, P = 0.0164 and P = 0.000762, respectively). Although the CYP2A6 variants are the cause of the PK variability of FT, the AUC of CDHP affected by renal function is the key determinant of the variability in the PK of 5‐FU. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 1049–1054)

Genetic testing for UGT1A1*28 and *6 in Japanese patients who receive irinotecan chemotherapy

Polymorphisms of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 gene, such as UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, can cause severe neutropenia and diarrhea in patients who receive irinotecan [1, 2]. Homozygosity for UGT1A1*28 is associated with less efficient glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, resulting in increased plasma SN-38 concentrations. Four pharmacogenetic trials have demonstrated an association between UGT1A1*28 genotype and irinotecan-induced hematologic toxicity, diarrhea, or both [3]. In response to these findings, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved genetic testing for UGT1A1*28 and recommends that the initial dose of irinotecan is reduced by at least one level in patients who are homozygous for UGT1A1*28, albeit the effectiveness of such testing remains to be confirmed prospectively. UGT1A1*6 is also associated with severe irinotecan-related toxicity [4]. Given that the area under the time versus concentration curve ratio (SN-38 glucuronide/SN-38) seen in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and *6 are almost equal [4], the impact of these variants on glucuronidation capacity of UGT1A1 for SN-38 is almost the same. The distribution of genotypes associated with these polymorphisms varies considerably among ethnic groups. UGT1A1*28 is found in Japanese and whites, but the allele frequency in Japanese is lower than that in whites [2, 4]. UGT1A1*6 is found in Japanese, but not in whites [4]. Homozygosity for UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 and heterozygosity for both UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 are associated with severe irinotecan-related neutropenia in Japanese patients [1, 4]. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan has therefore recently approved genetic testing for UGT1A1*28 and *6. The value of genetic testing for UGT1A1 depends on genotype frequency and the association of genetic variants with irinotecan-induced toxicity. The higher the frequency of toxicity-related polymorphisms, the greater is the number of patients who would benefit from genetic testing. Large prospective studies are needed to accurately estimate the distribution of UGT1A1 polymorphisms in a given population. We have carried out the largest prospective study to date, examining the distributions of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 genotypes in 300 Japanese patients (male/female, 172 of 128) with various solid tumors (200 colorectal, 43 gastric, 15 ovarian, 14 breast, 10 lung, and 18 others). All patients gave written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Saitama Medical University. Genotyping was carried out as described elsewhere [5]. UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.05). Only 2 of 300 patients were UGT1A1*28 homozygotes (0.7%) (Table 1). The frequency of homozygosity for UGT1A1*28 was much lower than that in other prospective studies in Japan (2.3%, 4 of 176) [4]. The frequency of UGT1A1*6 homozygosity was 5.7% (Table 1), higher than that reported previously (2.8%) [4]. Eleven patients were both heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 (3.7%). The combined frequency of patients with two ‘risk alleles’ (i.e. *28/*28, *6/*6, and *6/*28) was 10.1% (95% confidence interval, 6.8% to 14.0%). Such patients might be at increased risk for irinotecan-related neutropenia. Given the genotype frequencies of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, genetic testing for UGT1A1 might not be essential for identifying homozygotes for UGT1A1*28, but useful for identifying homozygotes for UGT1A1*6 as well as heterozygotes for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28, thereby avoiding severe irinotecan-induced toxicity in Japanese patients. The present results and considerations are likely to have application across East Asia. Prospective evaluations of genetic testing for UGT1A1 polymorphisms, encompassing both medical aspects and cost effectiveness, appear to be warranted, especially in East Asian countries including Japan. Table 1. Genotype frequencies of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 in Japanese

Sorafenib and Sunitinib, Two Anticancer Drugs, Inhibit CYP3A4-Mediated and Activate CY3A5-Mediated Midazolam 1′-Hydroxylation

Sorafenib and sunitinib are novel small-molecule molecularly targeted anticancer drugs that inhibit multiple tyrosine kinases. These medicines have shown survival benefits in advanced renal cell carcinomas as well as in advanced hepatocellular carcinomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, respectively. The effects of sorafenib and sunitinib on midazolam 1′-hydroxylation catalyzed by human CYP3A4 or CYP3A5 were investigated. Sorafenib and sunitinib inhibited metabolic reactions catalyzed by recombinant CYP3A4. Midazolam hydroxylation was also inhibited in human liver microsomes harboring the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (poor CYP3A5 expressor). In contrast, midazolam 1′-hydroxylation catalyzed by recombinant CYP3A5 was enhanced by the coexistence of sorafenib or sunitinib in a concentration-dependent manner, with saturation occurring at approximately 10 μM. Midazolam hydroxylation was also enhanced in human liver microsomal samples harboring the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype (extensive CYP3A5 expressor). Sorafenib N-oxidation and sunitinib N-deethylation, the primary routes of metabolism, were predominantly catalyzed by CYP3A4 but not by CYP3A5. The preincubation period of sorafenib and sunitinib before the midazolam addition in the reaction mixture did not affect the enhancement of CYP3A5-catalyzed midazolam hydroxylation, indicating that the enhancement was caused by parent sorafenib and sunitinib. Docking studies with a CYP3A5 homology model based on the structure of CYP3A4 revealed that midazolam closely docked to the heme of CYP3A5 compared with sorafenib or sunitinib, suggesting that these anticancer drugs act as enhancers, not as substrates. Our results thus showed that sorafenib and sunitinib activated midazolam 1′-hydroxylation by CYP3A5 but inhibited that by CYP3A4. Unexpected drug interactions involving sorafenib and sunitinib might occur via heterotropic cooperativity of CYP3A5.

Delayed Elimination of SN-38 in Cancer Patients with Severe Renal Failure

This prospective study is designed to examine the effects of severe renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan. The pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) in three cancer patients with severe renal failure [creatinine clearance (Ccr) ≤20 ml/min] who were undergoing dialysis and received 100 mg/m2 irinotecan as monotherapy were prospectively compared with those in five cancer patients with normal renal function (Ccr ≥60 ml/min). To ensure that the subjects had similar genetic backgrounds of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, patients with UGT1A1*1/*1, *1/*6, or *1/*28 were enrolled. The estimated terminal elimination rate constant of SN-38 in patients undergoing dialysis was approximately one tenth of that in patients with normal renal function (P = 0.025). Approximately 50% of SN-38 was dialyzed with a 2.1-m2 dialysis membrane, whereas 27% was dialyzed with a 1.5-m2 membrane. Our results showed that the elimination of SN-38 was significantly delayed in patients with severe renal failure compared with patients with normal renal function. We demonstrated that SN-38 was partly dialyzed.

Increased Plasma Concentrations of Unbound SN-38, the Active Metabolite of Irinotecan, in Cancer Patients with Severe Renal Failure

PurposeDelayed plasma concentration profiles of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 were observed in cancer patients with severe renal failure (SRF), even though SN-38 is eliminated mainly via the liver. Here, we examined the plasma concentrations of unbound SN-38 in such patients.MethodsPlasma unbound concentrations were examined by ultrafiltration. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of irinotecan and SN-38 were established to quantitatively assess the principal mechanism for delayed SN-38 elimination.ResultsThe area under the plasma unbound concentration-time curve (AUCu) of SN-38 in SRF patients was 4.38-fold higher than that in normal kidney patients. The unbound fraction of SN-38 was also 2.6-fold higher in such patients, partly because SN-38 protein binding was displaced by the uremic toxin 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionate (CMPF). This result was supported by correlation of the unbound fraction of SN-38 with the plasma CMPF concentration, which negatively correlated with renal function. PBPK modeling indicated substantially reduced influx of SN-38 into hepatocytes and approximately one-third irinotecan dose for SRF patients to produce an unbound concentration profile of SN-38 similar to normal kidney patients.ConclusionThe AUCu of SN-38 in SRF cancer patients is much greater than that of normal kidney patients primarily because of the reduced hepatic uptake of SN-38.

Regimen Selection for First-line FOLFIRI and FOLFOX Based on UGT1A1 Genotype and Physical Background is Feasible in Japanese Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE We examined the feasibility of regimen selection for first-line irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin or oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer based on UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 genotype as well as physical status of patients related to diarrhea. METHODS As first-line irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin is a little bit superior to oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with respect to efficacy and toxicity, patients without risk factors of irinotecan-induced toxicity were first assigned to irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Patients with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 28/ 28, 6/ 6, 28/ 6 or 28/ 27 and those with ascites, peritoneal dissemination or diarrhea first received oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin to avoid the irinotecan-induced neutropenia and diarrhea, respectively. We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility of this strategy by assessing toxicity and total progression-free survival in first- and subsequent second-line therapies in all patients studied. RESULTS In the first-line irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (n = 61), Grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 8.2, 3.3 and 3.3% of patients, respectively. In the first-line oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (n = 26), Grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 3 neuropathy were observed in 11.5, 3.8, 3.8 and 7.7% of patients, respectively. In the second-line oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (n = 38), Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 2.6% of patients. In the second-line irinotecan monotherapy (n = 11), Grade 4 or febrile neutropenia occurred in 18% of patients and Grade 3 diarrhea in 9.1% of patients. In second-line S-1 (n = 9), Grade 3 anemia occurred in 2 patients. Median total progression-free survival in all 87 patients was 11.5 months. CONCLUSIONS Present regimen selection strategy would be feasible, since it causes less toxicity and similar efficacy comparing to previous studies. Determination of appropriate reduced dose in the second-line irinotecan monotherapy or other standard second-line therapy for patients with high-risk to irinotecan-induced toxicity might make this strategy more effective.

A Phase I Study of Infusional 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Japanese Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Who Harbor UGT1A1*1/*1,*1/*6 or *1/*28

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This phase I dose-finding study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) or both of FOLFOXIRI. Patients with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*6/*6, *28/*28 and *6/*28 genotypes were excluded, because these UGT1A1 genotypes are linked to severe neutropenia in Japanese. Results: A total of 10 Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer were studied. The MTD of FOLFOXIRI in these Japanese patients was 165 mg/m2 irinotecan, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU. Accordingly, the RD of FOLFOXIRI was determined to be 150 mg/m2 irinotecan, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU. Toxic effects, evaluated until the completion of 4 cycles, were manageable. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 27% of cycles, but there was no febrile neutropenia. Among the 9 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 89%. Conclusions: We thus determined the RD of FOLFOXIRI in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who do not have UGT1A1*28/*28, *6/*6 or *6/*28 genotypes. Our results indicate that FOLFOXIRI is a well-tolerated regimen for these Japanese patients.

Phase I/II study of FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE This phase I/II study determined the recommended dose of FOLFIRI (irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin) for Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and evaluated safety at the recommended dose in patients without the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele which caused reduced enzyme expression. METHODS The phase I part assessed the maximum tolerated dose of FOLFIRI to determine the recommended doses of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil. The doses were escalated from 150 to 180 mg/m(2) (irinotecan) and 2000 to 2400 mg/m(2) (5-fluorouracil). UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 and *28, and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan were observationally examined. In the phase II part, patients without the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele received FOLFIRI at the recommended dose to evaluate safety. RESULTS Among 15 patients in the phase I part, dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea) occurred in one patient who received 150 mg/m(2) irinotecan and 2400 mg/m(2) infusional 5-fluorouracil. The respective recommended doses were 180 and 2400 mg/m(2) for irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil, without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. Twenty-five patients received FOLFIRI at the recommended doses. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 44%, and Grade 3 diarrhea in 4%. CONCLUSIONS This phase I/II study demonstrates that the recommended doses of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil in FOLFIRI for Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who do not possess the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele are 180 and 2400 mg/m(2), respectively. Toxicities occurring at the recommended doses are manageable in these patients.

Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in elderly Japanese patients with cancer treated with S-1 (a combination of tegafur and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine).

S-1 is an oral anticancer agent that combines tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. We examined the effects of aging on the pharmacokinetics of the components of S-1. The median area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of active 5-FU did not significantly differ between 10 patients 75 years or older and 53 patients younger than 75 years (P = 0.598, Mann-Whitney U test). It is interesting to note that the median oral clearance of tegafur in patients 75 years or older was significantly lower than that in patients younger than 75 years (P = 0.011). Furthermore, the median AUC of CDHP was significantly higher in patients 75 years or older than in those younger than 75 years (P = 0.004). This effect was caused by reduced renal function in the elderly, because CDHP is excreted in the urine by glomerular filtration. The opposing effects of aging on the oral clearance of tegafur and the AUC of CDHP may offset each other, leading to unchanged systemic exposure of 5-FU.

Fixed dosing and pharmacokinetics of S-1 in Japanese cancer patients with large body surface areas

BACKGROUND S-1 is an oral anticancer agent that combines tegafur (FT) with 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate. The recommended initial dose of S-1 is 120 mg/day for patients with a body surface area (BSA) of > or =1.5 m(2) in Japan. METHODS We examined the effects of using this fixed dose on the pharmacokinetics of FT, CDHP, and active 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on the basis of actual BSA. The pharmacokinetics was compared between patients with a BSA of 1.5-1.75 m(2) and those with a BSA of > or =1.75 m(2). RESULTS The median areas under the time-concentration curves (AUCs) of 5-FU and CDHP were significantly lower in patients with a BSA of > or =1.75 m(2) than in those with a BSA of 1.5-1.75 m(2) (P = 0.005 and 0.006, respectively; Mann-Whitney U-test). There was no difference between the groups in the median AUC of FT. CONCLUSION Systemic exposure to 5-FU is significantly lower in Japanese cancer patients with a large BSA of >1.75 m(2) who received the recommended fixed dose of S-1.