Yun Shin Chun

How to Define and Manage Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Historically, borderline resectable (BLR) pancreatic cancer has had many definitions, which has made interpretation of treatment data and outcomes difficult. Advances in imaging, surgical technique, and the potential benefit of neoadjuvant therapy have emphasized the need for uniform classification. Despite recent efforts to provide a clearer definition, prospective randomized trials are lacking in the literature. This article reviews current definitions, treatment sequences, outcomes, and prognostic factors associated with BLR pancreatic cancer. Further clarification and consensus on the definition of BLR pancreatic cancer will allow for further data collection and cooperation in future efforts to make progress and standardize treatment.

The anatomic course of the first jejunal branch of the superior mesenteric vein in relation to the superior mesenteric artery.

Introduction. The purpose of this study is to determine the anatomic course of the first jejunal branch of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) in relation to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Methods. Three hundred consecutive contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed by a surgical oncologist with confirmation of findings by a radiologist. Results. The overall incidence of a first jejunal branch coursing anterior to the SMA was 41%. There was no correlation between patient gender and position of the jejunal branch. In addition, there was no correlation between size of the first jejunal branch and its location in relation to the SMA. The IMV drained into the SMV in 27% of the patients. The IMV drained into the SMV-portal vein confluence in 17% of patients and inserted into the splenic vein in 54%. An anterior coursing first jejunal branch statistically correlated with an IMV that drained into the SMV-portal vein confluence (P = 0.009). Conclusion. The first jejunal branch of the SMV has a highly variable course in relation to the SMA and has a higher incidence of an anterior location in this population than previously reported.

Impact of preoperative therapy on patterns of recurrence in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND A theoretical advantage of preoperative therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is that it facilitates the early treatment of micrometastases and reduces postoperative systemic recurrence. METHODS Medical records of 309 consecutive patients undergoing resection of adenocarcinoma in the head of the pancreas were reviewed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between preoperative therapy and patterns of recurrence were determined using chi-squared analysis. RESULTS Preoperative therapy was administered to 108 patients and upfront surgery was performed in 201 patients. Preoperative therapy was associated with a significantly longer median disease-free survival of 14 months compared with 12 months in patients submitted to upfront surgery (P = 0.035). The rate of local disease as a component of first site of recurrence was significantly lower with preoperative therapy (11.3%) than with upfront surgery (22.9%) (P = 0.016). Preoperative therapy was associated with a lower rate of hepatic metastasis (21.7%) than upfront surgery (34.3%) (P = 0.026). Preoperative therapy did not affect rates of peritoneal or pulmonary metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer was associated with longer disease-free survival and lower rates of local and hepatic recurrences. These data support the use of preoperative therapy to reduce systemic and local failures after resection.

445 Modern Chemotherapy Mitigates Adverse Prognostic Effect of Regional Nodal Metastases in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

Background In colorectal cancer, the involvement of regional lymph nodes with metastasis is an established prognostic factor. The impact of the number of positive nodes on patient outcome with stage IV disease is not well defined.

Preoperative or postoperative therapy for resectable gallbladder cancer? A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a single institution.

309 Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract. Less than 30% present at an early stage where surgical resection is curative. We examine a cohort of patients with GBC toward determining if preoperative and postoperative treatment of locally advanced GBC demonstrate any differing results in complications or survival. METHODS A retrospective review of patients seen at FCCC with GBC from Jan 1991 to Nov 2008 was performed. Demographics, clinical stage, surgical procedure, AJCC 7th stage, details of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment and complications of surgery were analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-one patients with GBC were identified. Of these, 66% had their GBC found incidentally, 77% had stage 2 or greater cancers, and 35 patients needed liver resection with portal lymphadenectomy. 13 patients had an extrahepatic bile duct resection. 10 patients had extended resections including pancreatoduodenectomy (5) or colectomy (5), while 6 had cholecystectomy alone. 25% (n=13) of the population had preoperative chemoradiation only, 30 % (n=15) had postoperative chemoradiation only, while 15% (n=8) received maintenance chemotherapy only. 10% (n=5) had preoperative and postoperative therapy, while twenty percent of the group (n=10) had surgery only. 49% had recurrences (n=25), with 48% percent of these being local-regional. Median survival was 30 months for the whole group, with 54.6 month median survival for the 41 patients without extended resection. No significant difference in survival was seen comparing preoperative therapy versus postoperative treatment (p=0.13). Five-year survival is 47% for those with minor hepatic resection compared to 25% for those with combined hepatic and colon or pancreatic resection. CONCLUSIONS We present a retrospective view of patients treated in our center, the majority of whom received either preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy, both of which had good median survival and acceptable morbidity and mortality. Given the poor survival and high recurrence rate for stage II and greater cancers, we suggest that preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy for these cases may be equally effective. No significant financial relationships to disclose.