Yuntao Xie

Cloning and characterization of spliced fusion transcript variants of synovial sarcoma: SYT/SSX4, SYT/SSX4v, and SYT/SSX2v. Possible regulatory role of the fusion gene product in wild type SYT expression

The synovial sarcoma translocation t(X;18)(p11.2; q11.2) results in the fusion of the SYT gene on chromosome 18 to exon 5 of either SSX1 or SSX2 genes on chromosome X. We recently reported that the SSX4 gene is also involved in such a translocation. In the present investigation we cloned and sequenced the full-length cDNA of SYT/SSX1, SYT/SSX2 and SYT/SSX4 from synovial sarcoma tissues. We isolated a novel fusion transcript type variant involving the fusion of SYT with exon 6 of the SSX4 gene (SYT/SSX4v). The SYT/SSX4 and SYT/SSX2 open reading frame also differed from previously reported SYT/SSX sequences by an in-frame addition of 93bp exon located in the junction between exon 7 and 8 of the SYT. This exon is identical to that reported for the murine SYT but has not been previously found in the human transcript. Two SYT transcripts, with and without the 93 bp exon, were co-expressed in mouse NIH3T3 cells, human malignant cells and human testis tissue, but not in human normal fibroblasts. Stable transfection of an SYT/SSX4 expression vector into human and murine cell lines correlated with a down-regulation of SYT transcripts. This was also observed in a synovial sarcoma tumor expressing SYT/SSX4. This suggests that the SYT/SSX fusion gene may regulate SYT expression from the normal allele and as such alter the normal function of SYT.

The SYT-SSX1 fusion type of synovial sarcoma is associated with increased expression of cyclin A and D1. A link between t(X;18)(p11.2; q11.2) and the cell cycle machinery

A recent large multi-centre study convincingly confirmed previous observations that the SYT-SSX1 fusion type, compared to SYT-SSX2, of synovial sarcoma is associated with a worse clinical outcome. Apart from the clinical impact, this fact also suggests (1) that the SYT-SSX fusion gene may influence molecular mechanisms involved in tumour growth and progression; and (2) that the SYT-SSX1 fusion type has a stronger influence on these mechanisms than SYT-SSX2. The nature of the underlying mechanisms is, however, still unknown. In this study we made use of the SYT-SSX1 vs SYT-SSX2 concept to investigate whether major, tumour relevant, and growth regulatory proteins (e.g. cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases) may be involved. Using Western blotting analysis on 74 fresh, fusion variant-typed, tumour samples from localized synovial sarcoma, we found a significant correlation between SYT-SSX1 and high expression of cyclin A (P=0.003) and D1 (P=0.025). Our data suggest that SYT-SSX may influence the cell cycle machinery, and that the more aggressive phenotype of the SYT-SSX1 variant is due to an accelerated tumour cell proliferation.

Co-existence of SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 fusions in synovial sarcomas

The chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) is tightly linked to the tumorigenesis of synovial sarcoma. Through this translation the SYT gene on chromosome 18 is fused with a testis/cancer antigen gene on the X chromosome, generating either a SYT-SSX1, SYT-SSX2, or less often a SYT-SSX4 fusion gene. It has been anticipated that the individual synovial sarcoma carries only one of these variants, however, in this study we demonstrated that SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 co-exist in a significant proportion of the cases. From 121 SYT-SSX positive primary tumors, co-expression of SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 was seen in 12 cases (10%), which were characterized in further detail both at the RNA, DNA and chromosomal level. In all 12 cases the SYT-SSX1 and SYT-SSX2 fusions resulted in identical SYT-SSX fusion transcripts. However, at the genomic level the translocations were different, and most likely occurred between variable intronic sites in the target genes. By interphase FISH analyses of 10 cases SYT-SSX2 translocations were found to be the most abundant in all but one of the cases, in which SYT-SSX1 was predominating. The findings reveal a new heterogenous feature of synovial sarcoma, accounting for approximately 10% of all cases, which may shed light on the molecular genetic mechanisms behind translocations in general, and on the etiology of synovial sarcoma in particular.

Characteristic sequence motifs located at the genomic breakpoints of the translocation t(X;18) in synovial sarcomas.

The SYT–SSXI and SYT–SSX2 fusion genes, derived by reciprocal translocations t(X;18), are acquired genetic events strongly associated with the tumorigenesis of synovial sarcoma. In approaching the mechanisms underlying the formation of these fusion oncogenes, we have analysed the genomic sequences surrounding the SYT–SSX breakpoints in 10 tumors, two expressing SYT–SSXI and eight expressing SYT–SSX2 fusion transcripts. The breakpoints were found to be clustered in the 5′ end of intron 10 of SYT, and in two cluster regions within intron 4 of SSX2, whereas the two breakpoints in SSX1 intron 4 were 0.5 kb apart. SYT intron 10 is abundant in repetitive regions with the interspersed repeats occupying 66% of the whole intron. Nine of the 10 breakpoints in intron 10 of SYT and six of the eight breakpoints in intron 4 of SSX2 were at or near repetitive regions. These findings suggest that repetitive regions may contribute to the distribution of genomic breakpoints. Several of the fusion sequences exhibited characteristic signs of nonhomologous end joining, including microhomologies at the end points as well as deletions. Sequences highly homologous (83–94%) to consensus topoisomerase II cleavage sites were identified at or near the breakpoints in all 10 tumors, suggesting a role of this enzyme in creating staggered ends at the breakpoint. Furthermore, sequences highly homologous to consensus Translin binding sequences were found at the breakpoints in two cases, and an Alu–Alu fusion and an insertion of a 206-bp LINE-1 element were found at the breakpoint in one case each. The demonstration of characteristic sequences at the SYT–SSX breakpoint regions is expected to improve our understanding of the molecular genetic mechanisms behind translocations in general, and of the SYT–SSX fusions in synovial sarcoma in particular.