Yusuke Demizu

Clinical results and risk factors of proton and carbon ion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of proton and carbon ion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

High‐dose proton therapy and carbon‐ion therapy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer

A study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical outcome of particle therapy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

A phase I/II study of gemcitabine-concurrent proton radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastasis

PURPOSE We conducted the study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of gemcitabine-concurrent proton radiotherapy (GPT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Of all 50 patients who participated in the study, 5 patients with gastrointestinal (GI)-adjacent LAPC were enrolled in P-1 (50 Gy equivalent [GyE] in 25 fractions) and 5 patients with non-GI-adjacent LAPC in P-2 (70.2 GyE in 26 fractions), and 40 patients with LAPC regardless of GI-adjacency in P-3 (67.5 GyE in 25 fractions using the field-within-a-field technique). In every protocol, gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)/week for 3 weeks) was administered concurrently. Every patient received adjuvant chemotherapy including gemcitabine after GPT within the tolerable limit. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 12.5 months. The scheduled GPT was feasible for all except 6 patients (12%) due to acute hematologic or GI toxicities. Grade 3 or greater late gastric ulcer and hemorrhage were seen in 5 patients (10%) in P-2 and P-3. The one-year freedom from local-progression, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 81.7%, 64.3%, and 76.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION GPT was feasible and showed high efficacy. Although the number of patients and the follow-up periods are insufficient, the clinical results seem very encouraging.

Analysis of Vision loss caused by radiation-induced optic neuropathy after particle therapy for head-and-neck and skull-base tumors adjacent to optic nerves.

PURPOSE To assess the incident rates of vision loss (VL; based on counting fingers or more severe) caused by radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) after particle therapy for tumors adjacent to optic nerves (ONs), and to evaluate factors that may contribute to VL. METHODS AND MATERIALS From August 2001 to August 2006, 104 patients with head-and-neck or skull-base tumors adjacent to ONs were treated with carbon ion or proton radiotherapy. Among them, 145 ONs of 75 patients were irradiated and followed for greater than 12 months. The incident rate of VL and the prognostic factors for occurrence of VL were evaluated. The late effects of carbon ion and proton beams were compared on the basis of a biologically effective dose at alpha/beta = 3 gray equivalent (GyE(3)). RESULTS Eight patients (11%) experienced VL resulting from RION. The onset of VL ranged from 17 to 58 months. The median follow-up was 25 months. No significant difference was observed between the carbon ion and proton beam treatment groups. On univariate analysis, age (>60 years), diabetes mellitus, and maximum dose to the ON (>110 GyE(3)) were significant, whereas on multivariate analysis only diabetes mellitus was found to be significant for VL. CONCLUSIONS The time to the onset of VL was highly variable. There was no statistically significant difference between carbon ion and proton beam treatments over the follow-up period. Based on multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus correlated with the occurrence of VL. A larger study with longer follow-up is warranted.

Treatment outcomes of particle radiotherapy using protons or carbon ions as a single-modality therapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the outcomes of cases of adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) of the head and neck that were treated at a single institution with particle therapy consisting of either protons or carbon ions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between February 2002 and March 2012, 80 patients were treated with proton therapy (PT) or carbon ion therapy (CIT) alone. PT and CIT were employed in 40 (50%) patients each, and more than half of the patients received 65.0 GyE in 26 fractions (n=47, 59%). RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 38 months (range, 6-115 months). For all patients, the 5-year for overall survival (OS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and local control (LC) rate were 63%, 39%, and 75%, respectively. No significant differences between PT and CIT were observed. The 5-year LC rates for T4 and inoperable cases were 66% and 68%, respectively. Twenty-one patients (26%) experienced grade 3 or greater late toxicities, including three patients who developed grade 5 bleeding from nasopharyngeal ulcers. CONCLUSIONS Particle radiotherapy for ACC achieves favourable LC, and its efficacy in inoperable or T4 cases is promising. There were no significant differences between PT and CIT in terms of OS, PFS and LC.

Long-Term Outcome of Proton Therapy and Carbon-Ion Therapy for Large (T2a–T2bN0M0) Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Although many reports have shown the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1N0M0 non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is rather difficult to treat T2N0M0 NSCLC, especially T2b (>5 cm) tumor, with SBRT. Our hypothesis was that particle therapy might be superior to SBRT in T2 patients. We evaluated the clinical outcome of particle therapy for T2a/bN0M0 NSCLC staged according to the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) tumor, node, metastasis classification. Methods: From April 2003 to December 2009, 70 histologically confirmed patients were treated with proton (n = 43) or carbon-ion (n = 27) therapy according to institutional protocols. Forty-seven patients had a T2a tumor and 23 had a T2b tumor. The total dose and fraction (fr) number were 60 (Gray equivalent) GyE/10 fr in 20 patients, 52.8 GyE/4 fr in 16, 66 GyE/10 fr in 16, 80 GyE/20 fr in 14, and other in four patients, respectively. Toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0. Results: The median follow-up period for living patients was 51 months (range, 24–103). For all 70 patients, the 4-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 58% (T2a, 53%; T2b, 67%), 75% (T2a, 70%; T2b, 84%), and 46% (T2a, 43%; T2b, 52%), respectively, with no significant differences between the two groups. The 4-year regional recurrence rate was 17%. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in only two patients. Conclusion: Particle therapy is well tolerated and effective for T2a/bN0M0 NSCLC. To further improve treatment outcome, adjuvant chemotherapy seems a reasonable option, whenever possible.

Particle Radiotherapy Using Protons or Carbon Ions for Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers with Skull Base Invasion

OBJECTIVE To study the oncological outcome of the patients with unresectable locally advanced primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base, treated with particle radiotherapy. METHODS Fifty-seven patients with unresectable primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base received proton or carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center between 2003 and 2009. Forty-seven patients were treated with proton radiotherapy and 10 patients were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. A retrospective review was performed with clinical charts and recorded imagings. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3-year actual survival and local progression-free rates of all the patients were 61 and 56%, respectively. The 3-year actual survival rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma were 83, 44, 75, 0 and 38%, respectively. The 3-year actual local control rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma were 63, 31, 83, 50 and 0%, respectively. Distant metastasis was observed in 13 of 25 patients in adenoid cystic carcinoma, two of 14 patients in squamous cell carcinoma, one of six patients with olfactory neuroblastoma, two of four patients with adenocarcinoma, three of four patients with malignant melanoma and two of three patients with undifferentiated carcinoma. Mucositis and dermatitis were seen as acute toxicities. The most common late toxicity was visual disorder. Grades 2, 3 and 4 visual disorders were observed in seven, five and two patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy resulted in satisfactory local control in patients with locally advanced unresectable primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base.

Brain Injury After Proton Therapy or Carbon Ion Therapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer and Skull Base Tumors

PURPOSE To assess the incidence of early delayed or late morbidity of the brain after particle therapy for skull base tumors and head-and-neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between May 2001 and December 2005, 59 patients with cancerous invasion of the skull base were treated with proton or carbon ion therapy at the Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center. Adverse events were assessed according to the magnetic resonance imaging findings (late effects of normal tissue-subjective, objective, management, analytic [LENT-SOMA]) and symptoms (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 3.0). Dose-volume histograms were used to analyze the relationship between the dose and volume of the irradiated brain and the occurrence of brain injury. The median follow-up time was 33 months. RESULTS Of the 48 patients treated with proton therapy and 11 patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy, 8 (17%) and 7 (64%), respectively, developed radiation-induced brain changes (RIBCs) on magnetic resonance imaging (LENT-SOMA Grade 1-3). Four patients (7%) had some clinical symptoms, such as vertigo and headache (CTCAE Grade 2) or epilepsy (CTCAE Grade 3). The actuarial occurrence rate of RIBCs at 2 and 3 years was 20% and 39%, respectively, with a significant difference in the incidence between the proton and carbon ion radiotherapy groups. The dose-volume histogram analyses revealed significant differences between the brain lobes with and without RIBCs in the actuarial volume of brain lobes receiving high doses. CONCLUSION Particle therapies produced minimal symptomatic brain toxicities, but sequential evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging detected a greater incidence of RIBCs. Significant differences were observed in the irradiated brain volume between the brain lobes with and without RIBCs.

A retrospective comparison of proton therapy and carbon ion therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and late toxicities of proton therapy (PT) with those of carbon ion therapy (CIT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 111 patients who underwent particle therapy for stage I NSCLC between April 2003 and December 2009 were enrolled in this study. PT (n=70) and CIT (n=41) were delivered to total doses of 52.8-80 GyE in 4-26 fractions and 52.8-70.2 GyE in 4-26 fractions, respectively. The median follow-up time was 41 months. RESULTS Differences in outcome between the PT and CIT groups regarding 3-year overall survival (72% and 76%, respectively), progression-free survival (44% and 53%, respectively), and local control (81% and 78%, respectively) were not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, the type of treatment beam did not correlate with overall survival. The severity of late toxicities was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Clinical results in the PT group were comparable to those in the CIT group. However, this study was a retrospective analysis of a highly heterogeneous population. Consequently, more homogeneous prospective data, large multicentric databases and, ideally, randomized trials are warranted.

Proton beam therapy for pediatric malignancies: a retrospective observational multicenter study in Japan

Recent progress in the treatment for pediatric malignancies using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy has improved survival. However, late toxicities of radiotherapy are a concern in long‐term survivors. A recent study suggested reduced secondary cancer and other late toxicities after proton beam therapy (PBT) due to dosimetric advantages. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of PBT for pediatric patients treated in Japan. A retrospective observational study in pediatric patients who received PBT was performed. All patients aged <20 years old who underwent PBT from January 1983 to August 2014 at four sites in Japan were enrolled in the study. There were 343 patients in the study. The median follow‐up periods were 22.6 months (0.4–374.3 months) for all patients and 30.6 months (0.6–374.3 months) for survivors. The estimated 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival rates were 82.7% (95% CI: 78.5–87.0%), 67.4% (61.7–73.2%), 61.4% (54.8–67.9%), and 58.7% (51.5–65.9%), respectively. Fifty‐two events of toxicity ≥ grade 2 occurred in 43 patients. Grade 4 toxicities of myelitis, visual loss (two cases), cerebral vascular disease, and tissue necrosis occurred in five patients. This study provides preliminary results for PBT in pediatric patients in Japan. More experience and follow‐up with this technique are required to establish the efficacy of PBT in this patient population.