Yutaka Kasai

A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the draize rabbit eye irritation test.

The principal goal of this study was to determine whether the results from a set of selected currently available alternative methods as used by cosmetics companies are valid for predicting the eye irritation potential of cosmetics formulations and ingredients and, as a consequence, could be valid replacements for the Draize eye irritation test. For the first time in a validation study, prediction models (PMs) that convert the in vitro data from an assay to a prediction of eye irritation were developed for each alternative method before the study began. The PM is an unequivocal description of the relationship between the in vitro and the in vivo data and allows an objective assessment of the reliability and relevance of the alternative methods. In this study, 10 alternative methods were evaluated using 55 test substances selected as representative of substances commonly used in the cosmetics industry (23 ingredients and 32 formulations). Twenty of the single ingredients were common to the European Commission/British Home Office (EC/HO) eye irritation validation study (Balls et al., 1995b). The test substances were coded and supplied to the participating laboratories. The results were collected centrally and analysed independently, using statistical methods that had been agreed before the testing phase began. Each alternative method was then evaluated for reliability and relevance in assessing eye irritation potential. Using the criteria of both reliability and relevance as defined in the study, the preliminary results indicate that none of the alternative methods evaluated could be confirmed as a valid replacement for the Draize eye irritation test across the full irritation scale. However, three alternative methods-the fluorescein leakage test, the red blood cell assay (classification model) and the tissue equivalent assay-each satisfied one criterion of reliability or relevance. Further investigation of the decoded data from this study to explore more fully the relationship between the in vitro data and the in vivo data is recommended. Such a review may allow the development of new prediction models to be tested in a subsequent validation study.

Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests

A three-step interlaboratory validation of alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test (Draize test) was conducted by the co-operation of 27 organizations including national research institutes, universities, cosmetic industries, kit suppliers and others. Twelve alternative methods were evaluated using 38 cosmetic ingredients and isotonic sodium chloride solution. Draize tests were conducted according to the OECD guidelines using the same lot of test substances as was evaluated in the alternative tests. Results were as follows. (1) Variation in Draize scores was large near the critical range (maximal average Draize total scores (MAS)=15-50) for the evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. (2) Interlaboratory variation was relatively small for the alternative tests. The mean coefficients of variation (CV%) were less than 50 for all assays except for the hens egg-chorioallantoic membrane test (HET-CAM), chorioallantoic membrane-trypan blue staining test (CAM-TB) and haemoglobin denaturation test (HD). The CV% of these three methods came into the same range as the other tests when non-irritants were excluded from the data analysis. (3) Results for acids (pH of 10% solution <2.5), alkalis (pH of 10% solution >11.5) and alcohols (lower mono-ol) in cytotoxicity tests clearly deviated from the other samples in the comparison of cytotoxicity with Draize results. (4) Pearsons correlation coefficients (r) between results from cytotoxicity tests using serum and MAS were -0.86 to -0.92 for samples excluding acids, alkalis and alcohols. (5) When the samples were divided into liquids and powders, r of CAM-TB increased from 0.71 for all samples to 0.80 and 0.92, respectively. (6) Spearmans rank correlation coefficients between the results of alternative methods and MAS were relatively high (r>0.8) in the case of HET-CAM and CAM-TB. Those for cytotoxicity tests were high if the data for acids, alkalis and alcohols were excluded (SIRC-CVS: r=0.945, SIRC-NRU: r=0.931, HeLa-MTT: r=0.926, CHL-CVS: r=0.880). Exclusion of data for powdered samples also increased the coefficient of HET-CAM and CAM-TB to 0.831 and 0.863, respectively. These results suggest that no single method can constitute an evaluation system applicable to all types of test substances by itself. However, several methods will be useful for the prediction of eye irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients if they are used with clear understanding of the characteristics of those methods.

Human health risk assessment of long chain alcohols.

Representative chemicals from the long chain alcohols category have been extensively tested to define their toxicological hazard properties. These chemicals show low acute and repeat dose toxicity with high-dose effects (if any) related to minimal liver toxicity. These chemicals do not show evidence of activity in genetic toxicity tests or to the reproductive system or the developing organism. These chemicals also are not sensitizers. Irritation is dependant on chain length; generally, alcohols in the range C(6-)C(11) are considered as irritant, intermediate chain lengths (C(12-)C(16)) alcohols are considered to be mild irritants and chain lengths of C(18) and above are considered non-irritants. These chemicals are broadly used across the consumer products industry with highest per person consumer exposures resulting from use in personal care products. Margins of exposure adequate for the protection of human health are documented for the uses of these chemicals.

COLIPA validation project on in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients and finished products (phase I): the red blood cell test for the estimation of acute eye irritation potentials. Present status

The red blood cell test (RBC test) is part of the COLIPA Validation Project on Alternatives to Draize Eye Irritation. It shows good intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility (reliability) and represents one of the promising in vitro alternatives of this project with a good fit to prediction models (relevance) for the assessment of acute ocular irritancy caused by certain classes of chemicals (mainly surfactants) and formulations. Results obtained during the period of test development, prevalidation, and validation are summarized. The method is based on that of Pape et al. (1987), Pape and Hoppe (1990) and Lewis et al. (1993). The protocol has two endpoints: cellular lysis and changes in protein conformation which can be correlated with initial events in tissue injury inducing inflammatory responses as assessed by Draize eye irritation scoring. Both endpoints are detected by spectrophotometric changes in the haemoglobin absorption at 541nm. The protocol also includes a set of prediction models (PM). One PM is designed to predict three classes of irritancy (classification model) based on both endpoints and the three other PMs are designed to predict modified maximum average scores (MMAS) by algorithms based on data from cellular lysis only. These three PMs [with prediction intervals (PIs)] are: (i) for surfactant ingredients, (ii) for surfactant containing finished products, and (iii) for both groups together. The three PMs are based on a common algorithm derived from historic data. It is shown that PMs derived from historic data from several laboratories, by the same procedure, also produce a good fit with the presented data. Therefore, participating laboratories concluded that the protocol as used in this formal validation study can be considered to be validated for the estimation of acute eye irritation potential of surfactant-containing finished products.

Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (3) Evaluation of the haemolysis test

The haemolysis test using sheep red blood cells (RBC) was evaluated as an alternative method to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test (Draize test) by six to nine laboratories. The participating laboratories performed the test according to the standard operating procedure (SOP). Thirty-eight cosmetic ingredients and isotonic sodium chloride solution were used as test substances in this validation study. The concentrations of the test substances that induced 50% haemolysis (HC(50) value) was obtained to serve as a toxicological index and compared with in vivo Draize scores. HC(50) values were not obtained for coloured or water-insoluble (turbid) substances. Three acids caused denaturation of haemoglobin leaked from RBC and consequently interfered with the determination of the HC(50) value. Interlaboratory reproducibility was relatively good except in the case of water-insoluble substances. The average values of coefficient of variation (CV) was 37%. The correlation coefficient and Spearmans rank correlation between the HC(50) value and maximum average Draize total score (MAS) were -0.631 and 0.641, respectively. The equivalence ratio between the haemolysis test and MAS was 70.0% when MAS 15 was set as the in vivo cut-off point. On the other hand, strong irritants (MAS50) could be correctly classified by this method. These results suggest that the haemolysis test might be applied to cosmetic ingredients as a screening method to distinguish strong irritants that directly affect the cell membrane permeability and do not disturb spectrophotometrical determination of haemoglobin. In order to evaluate the potential for eye irritation of cosmetic ingredients, a combination of haemolysis with other methods based on different mechanism should be employed to improve the predictability.

Assessment of the environmental risk of long-chain aliphatic alcohols

An environmental assessment of long-chain alcohols (LCOH) has recently been conducted under the OECD SIDS High Production Volume (HPV) Program via the Global International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) Aliphatic Alcohols Consortium. LCOH are used primarily as intermediates, as a precursor to alcohol-based surfactants and as alcohol per se in a wide variety of consumer product applications. Global production volume is approximately 1.58 million metric tonnes. The OECD HPV assessment covers linear to slightly branched LCOH ranging from 6 to 22 alkyl carbons (C). LCOH biodegrade exceptionally rapidly in the environment (half-lives on the order of minutes); however, due to continuous use and distribution to wastewater treatment systems, partitioning properties, biodegradation of alcohol-based surfactants, and natural alcohol sources, LCOH are universally detected in wastewater effluents. An environmental risk assessment of LCOH is presented here by focusing on the most prevalent and toxic members of the linear alcohols, specifically, from C(12-15). The assessment includes environmental monitoring data for these chain lengths in final effluents of representative wastewater treatment plants and covers all uses of alcohol (i.e., the use of alcohol as a substance and as an intermediate for the manufacturing of alcohol-based surfactants). The 90th percentile effluent discharge concentration of 1.979microg/L (C(12)-C(15)) was determined for wastewater treatment plants in 7 countries. Chronic aquatic toxicity studies with Daphnia magna demonstrated that between C(13) and C(15) LCOH solubility became a factor and that the structure-activity relationship was characterized by a toxicity maximum between C(13) and C(14). Above C(14) the LCOH was less toxic and become un-testable due to insolubility. Risk quotients based on a toxic units (TU) approach were determined for various scenarios of exposure and effects extrapolation. The global average TU ranged from 0.048 to 0.467 depending on the scenario employed suggesting a low risk to the environment. The fact that environmental exposure calculations include large fractions of naturally derived alcohol from animal, plant, and microbially mediated biotransformations further supports a conclusion of low risk.

Environmental properties of long-chain alcohols. Part 2: Structure-activity relationship for chronic aquatic toxicity of long-chain alcohols.

Daphnia magna reproduction tests were performed with C(10), C(12), C(14) and C(15) alcohols to establish a structure-activity relationship of chronic effects of long-chain alcohols. The data generation involved substantial methodological efforts due to the exceptionally rapid biodegradability of the test substances and the need to test as close as possible to their water solubility limits. Test concentrations were determined by GC-MS before and after test solution renewal. Whereas apparent toxicity based on survival and reproduction increased with increasing C-chain lengths up to C(14), observations of toxicity to C(15) alcohol were not in line with lower chain lengths due to the lack of toxicity below the level of water solubility. When omitting C(15), the slope of most (Q)SARs approach -1, being consistent with the expectation of a non-polar narcotic mode of action. Further testing at higher chain lengths is not sensible due to progressively lower solubility, at remaining biodegradability. Effects on mortality and reproduction are not expected below the level of water solubility.

An overview of hazard and risk assessment of the OECD high production volume chemical category - long chain alcohols [C6-C22] (LCOH).

This review summarizes the findings of the assessment report for the category, long chain alcohols (LCOH) with a carbon chain length range of C(6)-C(22) covering 30 substances, and >1.5million tonnes/year consumed globally. The category was evaluated under the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) high production volume chemicals program in 2006. The main findings of the assessment include: (1) no unacceptable human or environmental risks were identified; (2) these materials are rapidly and readily biodegradable; (3) a parabolic relationship was demonstrated between carbon chain length and acute and chronic aquatic toxicity; (4) category-specific (quantitative) structure-activity relationships were developed enabling prediction of properties across the entire category; (5) LCOH occur naturally in the environment in an equilibrium between synthesis and degradation; (6) industry coming together and sharing resources results in minimizing the need for additional animal tests, produces cost savings, and increases scientific quality of the assessment.

Environmental properties of long chain alcohols. Part 1: Physicochemical, environmental fate and acute aquatic toxicity properties

This paper summarises the physicochemical, biodegradation and acute aquatic ecotoxicity properties of long chain aliphatic alcohols. Properties of pure compounds are shown to follow somewhat predictable trends, which are amenable to estimation by quantitative structure-activity relationships ((Q)SARs). This allows predictions of data relating to human and environmental safety profiles and patterns. These alcohols have been shown to be rapidly degradable under standard conditions up to C(18). Furthermore, evidence suggests that longer chain lengths are also rapidly biodegradable. While logK(ow) values suggest possible bioaccumulation potential, available data suggest that these substances are not as bioaccumulative as estimations would predict. For acute aquatic toxicity, solubility limits the possibility of effects being appropriately observed and become increasingly challenging above C(12). Further, a model has been developed for multi-component mixtures which give an excellent account of aquatic ecotoxicity allowing for the prediction of acute effects of un-tested mixtures.

Interlaboratory Validation of the In Vitro Eye Irritation Tests for Cosmetic Ingredients. (6) Evaluation of MATREXTM

MATREX(TM) is a test system for evaluating eye irritation potential, using the living dermal model (LDM). The LDM consists of normal human dermal fibroblasts in a contracted collagen lattice, which eventually forms a three-dimensional structure. This system has several advantages. It can be applied to insoluble substances and does not require sterile conditions for operation. In the present study, MATREX was introduced as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test (Draize test) for cosmetics ingredients. MATREX was evaluated through a three-phase series interlaboratory validation as part of a joint project of the National Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS) and Japan Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA). Toxicity for LDM was mainly evaluated by cytotoxicity, the indicator was EC(50) (concentration that inhibits the viability of the cell to 50% of control) value. Additionally, MATREX score indicating the grade of cytotoxicity was also introduced in the third phase of the validation study. Both test procedures were controlled under the same standard operating procedure (SOP), at all the participating laboratories. A total of 39 test substances both water-soluble and -insoluble were examined. LDM was applicable to almost all substances that could be evaluated by the Draize test. Furthermore interlaboratory variance was relatively low. The correlation coefficient between the EC(50) value and the maximal average Draize total score (MAS) was -0.672. The MATREX score was closely related to the EC(50) value. Moreover, the MATREX scoring method showed a similar prediction ability for eye irritation potential to the EC(50) method. Thus, the MATREX scoring method, a simplified EC(50) method, appears to be a viable alternative to the current EC(50) measurement method. The present results demonstrate the possibility that the MATREX system would form part of a prediction system of Draize test results.