Yuval Mika

First human chronic experience with cardiac contractility modulation by nonexcitatory electrical currents for treating systolic heart failure: Mid-term safety and efficacy results from a multicenter study

Introduction: Conventional electrical therapies for heart failure (HF) encompass defibrillation and ventricular resynchronization for patients at high risk for lethal arrhythmias and/or with inhomogeneous ventricular contraction. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) by means of nonexcitatory electrical currents delivered during the action potential plateau has been shown to acutely enhance systolic function in humans with HF. The aim of this multicenter study was to assess the chronic safety and preliminary efficacy of an implantable device delivering this novel form of electrical therapy.

Cardiac Contractility Modulation by Electric Currents Applied During the Refractory Period in Patients With Heart Failure Secondary to Ischemic or Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

We assessed the feasibility of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) by electric currents applied during the refractory period in patients with heart failure (HF). Extracellular electric currents modulating action potential and calcium transients have been shown to potentiate myocardial contractility in vitro and in animal models of chronic HF. CCM signals were biphasic square-wave pulses with adjustable amplitude, duration, and time delay from sensing of local electric activity. Signals were applied to the left ventricle through an epicardial vein (in 12 patients) or to the right ventricular (RV) aspect of the septum endocardially (in 6 patients). Simultaneous left ventricular (LV) and aortic pressure measurements were performed using a Millar catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas). Hemodynamics during RV temporary dual-chamber pacing was regarded as the control condition. Both LV and RV CCM stimulation increased dP/dt(max) to a similar degree (9.1 +/- 4.5% and 7.1 +/- 0.8%, respectively; p <0.01 vs controls), with associated aortic pulse pressure changes of 10.3 +/- 7.2% and 10.8 +/- 1.1% (p <0.01 vs controls). Regional systolic wall motion assessed quantitatively by color kinesis echocardiography was markedly enhanced near the CCM electrode, and the area of increased contractility involved 4.6 +/- 1.2 segments per patient. In 6 patients with HF with left bundle branch block, CCM signals delivered during biventricular pacing (BVP) produced an additional 16.1 +/- 3.7% increase in dP/dt(max) and a 17.0 +/- 7.5% increase in pulse pressure compared with BVP alone (p <0.01). CCM stimulation in patients with HF enhanced regional and global measures of LV systolic function, regardless of the varied delivery chamber or whether modulation was performed during RV pacing or BVP.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) delivers nonexcitatory electrical signals to the heart during the absolute refractory period intended to improve contraction. METHODS We tested CCM in 428 New York Heart Association class III or IV, narrow QRS heart failure patients with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% randomized to optimal medical therapy (OMT) plus CCM (n = 215) versus OMT alone (n = 213). Efficacy was assessed by ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), primary end point, peak Vo₂ (pVo₂), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWFQ) at 6 months. The primary safety end point was a test of noninferiority between groups at 12 months for the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations (12.5% allowable delta). RESULTS The groups were comparable for age (58 ± 13 vs 59 ± 12 years), EF (26% ± 7% vs 26% ± 7%), pVo₂ (14.7 ± 2.9 vs 14.8 ± 3.2 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹), and other characteristics. While VAT did not improve at 6 months, CCM significantly improved pVo₂ and MLWHFQ (by 0.65 mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ [P = .024] and -9.7 points [P < .0001], respectively) over OMT. Forty-eight percent of OMT and 52% of CCM patients experienced a safety end point, which satisfied the noniferiority criterion (P = .03). Post hoc, hypothesis-generating analysis identified a subgroup (characterized by baseline EF ≥ 25% and New York Heart Association class III symptoms) in which all parameters were improved by CCM. CONCLUSIONS In the overall target population, CCM did not improve VAT (the primary end point) but did improve pVo₂ and MLWHFQ. Cardiac contractility modulation did not have an adverse affect on hospitalizations or mortality within the prespecified boundaries. Further study is required to clarify the role of CCM as a treatment for medically refractory heart failure.

Cardiac contractility modulation by non-excitatory currents: Studies in isolated cardiac muscle

Myocardial contractility can be altered using voltage clamp techniques by modulating amplitude and duration of the action potential resulting in enhanced calcium entry in the cell of isolated muscle strips (Non‐Excitatory Currents; NEC). Extracellular electrical stimuli delivered during the absolute refractory period (Cardiac Contractility Modulation; CCM) have recently been shown to produce inotropic effects in‐vivo.

Electric currents applied during the refractory period can modulate cardiac contractility in vitro and in vivo.

Daniel Burkhoff MD PhD , Itzik Shemer , Bella Felzen , Juichiro Shimizu , Yuval Mika , Marc Dickstein , David Prutchi , Nissim Darvish 3 and Shlomo A. Ben-Haim 2,5 Divisions of Circulatory Physiology and Cardiology, Cardiac Physiology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, N.Y., Impulse Dynamics, Tirat HaCarmel 39120, Israel, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, P.O.B. 9649, Haifa 31096, Israel, Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, N.Y., Harvard-Thorndike Arrhythmia Institute, Beth-Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

Cardiac contractility modulation with the impulse dynamics signal: studies in dogs with chronic heart failure.

The intravenous use of positive inotropic agents, such as sympathomimetics and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, in heart failure is limited by pro-arrhythmic and positive chronotropic effects. Chronic use of these agents, while eliciting an improvement in the quality of life of patients with advanced heart failure, has been abandoned because of marked increase in mortality when compared to placebo. Nevertheless, patients with advanced heart failure can benefit from long-term positive inotropic support if the therapy can be delivered ‘on demand’ and in a manner that is both safe and effective. In this review, we will examine the use of a novel, non-stimulatory electrical signal that can acutely modulate left ventricular (LV) contractility in dogs with chronic heart failure in such a way as to elicit a positive inotropic support. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) with the Impulse Dynamic™ signal was examined in dogs with chronic heart failure produced by intracoronary microembolizations. Delivery of the CCM signal from a lead placed in the great coronary vein for periods up to 10 minutes resulted in significant improvements in cardiac output, LV peak+dP/dt, LV fractional area of shortening and LV ejection fraction measured angiographically. Discontinuation of the signal resulted in a return of all functional parameters to baseline values. In cardiomyocytes isolated from dogs with chronic heart failure, application of the CCM signal resulted in improved shortening, rate of change of shortening and rate of change of relengthening suggesting that CCM application is associated with intrinsic improvement of cardiomyocyte function. The improvement in isolated cardiomyocyte function after application of the CCM signal was accompanied by an increase in the peak and integral of the Ca2+ transient suggesting modulation of calcium cycling by CCM application. In a limited number of normal dogs, intermittent chronic delivery of the CCM signal for up to 7 days showed chronic maintenance of LV functional improvement. In conclusion, pre-clinical results to date with the Impulse Dynamics CCM signal indicate that this non-pharmacologic therapeutic modality can provide short-term positive inotropic support to the failing heart and as such, may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of advanced heart failure. Additional, long-term studies in dogs with heart failure are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic modality for the chronic treatment of this disease syndrome.

Long‐term effects of non‐excitatory cardiac contractility modulation electric signals on the progression of heart failure in dogs

We previously showed that acute delivery of non‐excitatory cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) electric signal during the absolute refractory period improved LV function in dogs with chronic heart failure (HF). In the present study we examined the long‐term effects of CCM signal delivery on the progression of LV dysfunction and remodeling in dogs with chronic HF.

Electrical modulation of cardiac contractility: Clinical aspects in congestive heart failure

Heart failure is a highly prevalent disease in western society. Drug therapies aimed at increasing myocardial contractility have been associated with decreased survival. Several short and mid term clinical studies have suggested adjuvant or alternative therapies to congestive heart failure using modified pacing techniques that were aimed to increase contractility (e.g. Paired pacing) or restore synchrony of contraction (biventricular pacing). While delivery of paired pacing was abandoned during the early 70s, biventricular pacing has recently emerged as an adjuvant treatment to limited group of congestive heart failure patients with aberrant left ventricular conduction. In this brief review, we describe our initial safety and efficacy experience in patients with heart failure using a novel non-stimulatory electrical approach to the delivery of positive inotropic therapy to the failing myocardium. The study suggests that unlike modified pacing techniques, delivery of the signal to the left ventricle during the refractory period resulted in a rapid increase in myocardial contractility and improved hemodynamic performance. The near instantaneous contractility improvement achieved by this type of stimulus was shown to be safe and effective independently of the primary cause of heart failure or the function of the conduction system. Unlike pharmacologic treatments, which have a relatively constant effect, use of electrical stimuli may prove useful as a new therapeutic modality in the treatment of heart failure with which contractility can be improved when and as needed.

Ca2+‐Binding Proteins in Dogs with Heart Failure: Effects of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Electrical Signals

Background: In dogs with heart failure (HF), chronic therapy with cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) electrical signals delivered to left ventricular (LV) muscle during the absolute refractory period improves LV function. This study examined the effects of CCM therapy on the expression of calcium (Ca2+)‐binding proteins (CBPs) in dogs with HF.

Effects of Chronic Therapy with Cardiac Contractility Modulation Electrical Signals on Cytoskeletal Proteins and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Dogs with Heart Failure

Objectives: Therapy with cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) electrical signals delivered to left ventricular (LV) muscle during the absolute refractory period improves LV systolic and diastolic function in dogs with heart failure (HF). This study examined the effects of CCM therapy on mRNA and protein expression of cytoskeletal proteins, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) in the LV myocardium of dogs with HF. Methods: HF was produced in 14 dogs by coronary microembolizations. Dogs were randomized to 3 months of CCM therapy (n = 7) or to sham-operated controls (n = 7). LV tissue from 6 normal (NL) dogs was used for comparison. mRNA expression was measured using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and protein expression using Western blots. Results: Compared with NL dogs, controls showed upregulation of mRNA and protein expression of the cytoskeletal proteins tubulin and fibronectin and MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9, and downregulation of the cytoskeletal protein titin. Normalized expression of all these genes and proteins was seen after CCM therapy. No differences in expression of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were observed among groups. Conclusions: CCM therapy normalizes expression of key cytoskeletal proteins and MMPs and may partly explain the improvement in LV function seen in HF following CCM therapy.