Yves Ozog

The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair

Implant materials are increasingly being used in an effort to reduce recurrence after prolapse repair with native tissues. Surgeons should be aware of the biology behind both the disease as well as the host response to various implants. We will discuss insights into the biology behind hernia and abdominal fascial defects. Those lessons from “herniology” will, wherever possible, be applied to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) problems. Then we will deal with available animal models, for both the underlying disease and surgical repair. Then we will go over the features of implants and describe how the host responds to implantation. Methodology of such experiments will be briefly explained for the clinician not involved in experimentation. As we discuss the different materials available on the market, we will summarize some results of recent experiments by our group.

Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study

Please cite this paper as: Ozog Y, Konstantinovic M, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Mazza E, Deprest J. Persistence of polypropylene mesh anisotropy after implantation: an experimental study. BJOG 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471‐0528.2011.03018.x.

One-year outcome of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for augmentation of large abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND Long-term efficacy of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for large hernia repair is currently unclear. This rabbit study is aimed at investigating 1-y outcome of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for augmentation of large abdominal wall defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 46 rabbits, an 11 × 4 cm, full-thickness abdominal wall defect was repaired primarily, or with cross-linked (Permacol, Collamend) or non-cross-linked (Surgisis 4-ply, Surgisis Biodesign) biological, synthetic bioabsorbable (GORE BIO-A Tissue Reinforcement [TR], TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh [MSM]), or polypropylene (Bard Mesh) meshes, using the underlay augmentation technique. One year after surgery, primary outcome was recurrence; secondary outcomes were tensile strength, histologic degree of tissue remodeling, and intraabdominal adhesion formation. RESULTS Only two Surgisis 4-ply animals (50%) presented with a recurrent hernia. All GORE BIO-A TR meshes were completely resorbed and, as after primary repair, well-organized connective tissue without inflammation was present, with moderate adhesion formation and sufficient tensile strength. Cross-linked biological and TIGR MSM meshes demonstrated highest tensile strength but were only partially incorporated, with similar foreign body reaction and adhesion formation as polypropylene meshes in the TIGR MSM group, and minimal degradation and moderate adhesion formation in the cross-linked biological group. In the non-cross-linked biological group sufficient tensile strength and moderate adhesion formation were found, with pronounced inflammation if mesh remnants were present. CONCLUSIONS Synthetic bioabsorbable GORE BIO-A TR meshes were associated with optimal tissue remodeling, with complete resorption, presence of well-organized tissue, and no inflammation. However, mesh augmentation had no advantages regarding recurrence rate versus primary repair of large abdominal wall defects.

Biomechanical findings in rats undergoing fascial reconstruction with graft materials suggested as an alternative to polypropylene

Graft materials used for pelvic floor reinforcement should still be considered as investigational and, therefore, evaluated experimentally and within clinical trials. The present report describes our biomechanical findings in rats implanted with selected novel implant materials, which in recent years have been suggested as alternatives to plain polypropylene (PP) meshes.

Combined biaxial and uniaxial mechanical characterization of prosthetic meshes in a rabbit model

The present experimental study is aimed at a combined uniaxial and biaxial mechanical characterization of the deformation behavior of two types of prosthetic meshes, SPMM (heavy-weight) and Gynemesh M (light-weight, partly absorbable), after integration in the host tissue. Explants from a full-thickness-abdominal-wall-defect-rabbit-model were tested in the two loading conditions. Corresponding protocols and data analysis procedures for biaxial inflation tests and uniaxial tensile tests were developed. Biaxial responses were observed to be by factor 2-4 stiffer compared to corresponding uniaxial experiments, depending on the material tested. In biaxial loading conditions, SPMM explants were stiffest. Gynemesh M explants and native tissue were similarly compliant at low membrane tensions (<5N/cm) (abdominal wall: 40±23N/cm, Gynemesh M: 59±44N/cm, SPMM: 145±36N/cm). At high membrane tensions (>5N/cm), there were distinct differences in the stiffness of the three groups, SPMM explants being the stiffest, followed by Gynemesh M explants and native tissue being the most compliant. In uniaxial loading conditions, the two explants were similarly stiff and distinctly stiffer than native tissue at low membrane tensions (<5N/cm) (abdominal wall: 9±1N/cm, Gynemesh M: 21±5N/cm, and SPMM: 24±5N/cm). At high membrane tension (>5N/cm), differences between all groups vanished. Biaxial and uniaxial tests yield different results with respect to the mechanical behavior of mesh explants. These findings demonstrate that an evaluation of the mechanical biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes should be based on an experimental configuration (uniaxial or biaxial tension) which reproduces the expected in vivo conditions of mechanical loading and deformation.

A Comparative Study on Culture Conditions and Routine Expansion of Amniotic Fluid-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells

Background: Amniotic fluid (AF) cell populations will be applied in perinatology. We aimed to test the feasibility of large-scale cell expansion. Study Methods: We determined the best out of three published expansion protocols for mesenchymal progenitors (AF samples, n = 4) in terms of self-renewal ability. Characterization was performed based on morphology, surface marker analysis, cytogenetic stability, and differentiation potential. The conditions for the best self-renewal ability were further determined in a consecutive series (n = 159). Results: The medium containing fetal bovine serum (FBS), epidermal growth factor, insulin, transferrin, and tri-iodothyronine, combined with seeding on gelatin-coated wells, best stimulated the growth of cells with mesenchymal features, as demonstrated by flow cytometry; however, only osteogenic differentiation was possible. Large-scale testing (n = 44) failed to confirm a robust self-renewal ability. Better results were obtained (n = 88) using optimized FBS or an increased initial cell density. Eventually over 81% of cultures continued growing after the initial medium change and had mesenchymal features but failed differentiation assays. Discussion: Routine in vitro expansion of AF-derived mesenchymal cells remains problematic. Despite an increase in successful cell cultures from 40 up to 80% using optimized serum and an increased cell density, eventually cells failed to demonstrate differentiation abilities. Routine isolation and expansion from unselected AF samples remains a challenge.

Porous Acellular Porcine Dermal Collagen Implants to Repair Fascial Defects in a Rat Model: Biomechanical Evaluation up to 180 Days

Aim: To investigate the biomechanical properties of porous collagen matrices in a rat abdominal wall defect model. Study Design: 112 rats were implanted with non-cross-linked InteXèn LP, cross-linked Pelvicol, and two investigational acellular collagen matrices (ACMs) sterilized either with ethylene oxide (ACM ETO) or γ-irradiation (ACM GI). After 14, 30, 90 and 180 days, 7 animals per group were sacrificed to document adhesions, herniation, infection, stress resistance and histology. Results: The 2 sterilization methods did not cause measurable differences between ACMs. Pelvicol was more resistant than ACMs but showed degradation at 90 days without loss of strength. InteXèn LP became remodeled as a thin fibrous scar and was more resistant at all time points; however, some animals developed bulging. Conclusions: Non-cross-linked InteXèn LP became remodeled by 180 days with remarkable stress resistance. Despite cross-linking Pelvicol showed degradation. Comparable but investigational ACM explants were less resistant without morphologic differences to explain this.

Full thickness abdominal wall defect in growing rats as a model for congenital diaphragmatic hernia prosthetic repair

BACKGROUND Large congenital diaphragmatic hernia may require prosthetic correction. Acellular collagen matrices were introduced to avoid complications owing to the use of synthetic patches. We tested 3 different ACM for reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect in an animal model that mimics the fast growth during infancy. METHODS Pelvisoft® (CR Bard, Covington, GA) and 2 investigational ACM were used for primary reconstruction of a full thickness abdominal wall defect. 3months-old rats (n=26) were allowed to survive for 90days after implantation. Anatomical, tensiometric and histological analyses were performed. Based on good outcomes, we did the same with 1month-old rats (n=54). Unoperated rats were used for obtaining reference tensiometric values of selected native tissues. RESULTS Major wound complications were exclusively observed in 1month-old rats. All explants in both groups thinned significantly (p<0.03) and had an elastic modulus increasing over time, far above that from native tissues at 90days of life. Both investigational ACM induced a more vigorous foreign body reaction than Pelvisoft(®). CONCLUSIONS The shift from 3 to 1month-old rats was associated with wound complications. Pelvisoft® showed a better biocompatibility than the 2 investigational ACM. Passive biomechanical properties of all explants were still not comparable to that of native tissues.