Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Yvonne Ulrich is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Yvonne Ulrich.


American Journal of Public Health | 2003

Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study.

Jacquelyn C. Campbell; Daniel W. Webster; Jane Koziol-McLain; Carolyn Rebecca Block; Doris Campbell; Mary Ann Curry; Faye A. Gary; Nancy Glass; Judith McFarlane; Carolyn J. Sachs; Yvonne Ulrich; Susan Wilt; Jennifer Manganello; Xiao Xu; Janet Schollenberger; Victoria Frye; Kathryn Laughon

OBJECTIVES This 11-city study sought to identify risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships. METHODS Proxies of 220 intimate partner femicide victims identified from police or medical examiner records were interviewed, along with 343 abused control women. RESULTS Preincident risk factors associated in multivariate analyses with increased risk of intimate partner femicide included perpetrators access to a gun and previous threat with a weapon, perpetrators stepchild in the home, and estrangement, especially from a controlling partner. Never living together and prior domestic violence arrest were associated with lowered risks. Significant incident factors included the victim having left for another partner and the perpetrators use of a gun. Other significant bivariate-level risks included stalking, forced sex, and abuse during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS There are identifiable risk factors for intimate partner femicides.


Homicide Studies | 1999

Stalking and Intimate Partner Femicide

Judith McFarlane; Jacquelyn C. Campbell; Susan Wilt; Carolyn J. Sachs; Yvonne Ulrich; Xiao Xu

An 18-item stalking inventory and personal interviews with knowledgeable proxy informants and victims of attempted femicide were used to describe the frequency and type of intimate partner stalking that occurred within 12 months of attempted and actual partner femicide. One hundred forty-one femicide and 65 attempted femicide incidents were evaluated. The prevalence of stalking was 76% for femicide victims and 85% for attempted femicide victims. Incidence of intimate partner assault was 67% for femicide victims and 71% for attempted femicide victims. A statistically significant association existed between intimate partner physical assault and stalking for femicide victims as well as attempted femicide victims. Stalking is revealed to be a correlate of lethal and near lethal violence against women and, coupled with physical assault, is significantly associated with murder and attempted murder. Stalking must be considered a risk factor for both femicide and attempted femicide, and abused women should be so advised.


Violence & Victims | 2006

Risk factors for femicide-suicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study

Jane Koziol-McLain; Daniel W. Webster; Judith McFarlane; Carolyn Rebecca Block; Yvonne Ulrich; Nancy Glass; Jacquelyn C. Campbell

The killing of women by men who then take their own lives (femicide-suicide) is the most common form of homicide-suicide. This study identified femicide-suicide risk factors in an 11-city case-control study of femicide in the United States. Perpetrator, victim, relationship, and incident characteristics were analyzed for femicide-suicide cases (n = 67) and controls (n = 356, women living in the community with nonfatal physical abuse) using logistic regression modeling. Two risk factors emerged that were unique to femicide-suicides cases compared to overall femicide risk analyses: prior perpetrator suicide threats and victims having ever been married to the perpetrator.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2003

Could we have known? A qualitative analysis of data from women who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner

Christina Nicolaidis; Mary Ann Curry; Yvonne Ulrich; Judith McFarlane; Doris Campbell; Faye A. Gary; Kathryn Laughon; Nancy Glass; Jacquelyn C. Campbell

AbstractOBJECTIVE: To examine in-depth the lives of women whose partners attempted to kill them, and to identify patterns that may aid in the clinician’s ability to predict, prevent, or counsel about femicide or attempted femicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of 30 in-depth interviews. SETTING: Six U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women, aged 17–54 years, who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. RESULTS: All but 2 of the participants had previously experienced physical violence, controlling behavior, or both from the partner who attempted to kill them. The intensity of the violence, control, and threats varied greatly, as did the number of risk factors measured by the Danger Assessment, defining a wide spectrum of prior abuse. Approximately half (14/30) of the participants did not recognize that their lives were in danger. Women often focused more on relationship problems involving money, alcohol, drugs, possessiveness, or infidelity, than on the risk to themselves from the violence. The majority of the attempts (22/30) happened around the time of a relationship change, but the relationship was often ending because of problems other than violence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not be falsely reassured by a woman’s sense of safety, by the lack of a history of severe violence, or by the presence of few classic risk factors for homicide. Efforts to reduce femicide risk that are targeted only at those women seeking help for violence-related problems may miss potential victims.


Health Care for Women International | 1991

Women's reasons for leaving abusive spouses

Yvonne Ulrich

Research has focused on factors associated with leaving physically abusive relationships, yet little is known about what the woman thinks when she leaves. Fifty-one formerly battered women from rural and metropolitan areas in two midwestern states described 86 reasons for leaving a physically abusive relationship. During open-ended interviews, women who rated themselves as severely abused spontaneously emphasized leaving as a process. Content analysis resulted in reasons categorized as safety, dependency, and personal growth. Self-report retrospective data from a nonrandom sample limit generalizability of results; however, the awareness and reasoning of the women, coupled with their emphasis on leaving as process and personal growth, suggest the importance of education and support programs for abused women and women at risk for abuse.


Violence & Victims | 1997

A Career and Life Planning Guide for Women Survivors

Patricia A. Murphy; Yvonne Ulrich

Section I: The Tools-Gathering the Words of Power Introduction Glossary Naming the Trauma Reclaiming My Innocent Body Overcoming Verbal-Emotional Abuse Section II: The Process-Moving Through the Flower Introduction Making Your Work Visible Analyzing, Respecting, and Celebrating Your Work Understanding Your Vocational Impairment Section III: The Plan-Re-weaving Your Own Life and Work Introduction Making the Frame Stretching the Self Weaving a Life Index


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2003

Medical care utilization patterns in Women with diagnosed domestic violence

Yvonne Ulrich; Kevin C. Cain; Nancy K Sugg; Frederick P. Rivara; David Rubanowice; Robert S. Thompson


National Institute of Justice journal | 2003

Assessing Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide

Jacquelyn C. Campbell; Daniel W. Webster; Jane Koziol-McLain; Carolyn Rebecca Block; Doris Campbell; Mary Ann Curry; Faye A. Gary; Judith McFarlane; Carolyn J. Sachs; Yvonne Ulrich; Susan Wilt


Nursing Research | 1990

A protocol of safety: Research on abuse of women

Barbara Parker; Yvonne Ulrich; Linda Bullock; Doris Campbell; Jacquelyn C. Campbell; Christine King; Karen Landenburger; Judith McFarlane; Josephine Ryan; Daniel Sheridan; Laura Smith McKenna; Sara Torres


Nursing Research | 1990

A protocol of safety

Barbara Parker; Yvonne Ulrich; Linda Bullock; Doris Campbell; Jacquelyn C. Campbell; Christine King; Karen Landenburger; Judith McFarlane; Josephine Ryan; Daniel Sheridan; Laura Smith McKenna; Sara Torres

Collaboration


Dive into the Yvonne Ulrich's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Josephine Ryan

University of Massachusetts Boston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christine King

University of Massachusetts Boston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Faye A. Gary

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge