Z. Shao
California Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Z. Shao.
Physical Review D | 2017
B. Abbott; R. Abbott; M. R. Abernathy; R. Adhikari; S. Anderson; K. Arai; M. C. Araya; J. C. Barayoga; B. Barish; B. K. Berger; G. Billingsley; J. K. Blackburn; R. Bork; A. F. Brooks; C. Cahillane; T. Callister; C. Cepeda; R. Chakraborty; T. Chalermsongsak; P. Couvares; D. C. Coyne; V. Dergachev; R. W. P. Drever; P. Ehrens; T. Etzel; S. E. Gossan; K. E. Gushwa; E. K. Gustafson; E. D. Hall; A. W. Heptonstall
In Advanced LIGO, detection and astrophysical source parameter estimation of the binary black hole merger GW150914 requires a calibrated estimate of the gravitational-wave strain sensed by the detectors. Producing an estimate from each detector’s differential arm length control loop readout signals requires applying time domain filters, which are designed from a frequency domain model of the detector’s gravitational-wave response. The gravitational-wave response model is determined by the detector’s opto-mechanical response and the properties of its feedback control system. The measurements used to validate the model and characterize its uncertainty are derived primarily from a dedicated photon radiation pressure actuator, with cross-checks provided by optical and radio frequency references. We describe how the gravitational-wave readout signal is calibrated into equivalent gravitational-wave-induced strain and how the statistical uncertainties and systematic errors are assessed. Detector data collected over 38 calendar days, from September 12 to October 20, 2015, contain the event GW150914 and approximately 16 days of coincident data used to estimate the event false alarm probability. The calibration uncertainty is less than 10% in magnitude and 10° in phase across the relevant frequency band, 20 Hz to 1 kHz.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific | 2014
Yougang Wang; Hugh R. A. Jones; R. L. Smart; F. Marocco; D. J. Pinfield; Z. Shao; Iain A. Steele; Z. H. Zhang; A. H. Andrei; Adam J. Burgasser; Kelle L. Cruz; J. Yu; J. R. A. Clarke; C. J. Leigh; A. Sozzetti; D. N. Murray; B. Burningham
We report the parallax and proper motion of five L dwarfs obtained with observations from the robotic Liverpool Telescope. Our derived proper motions are consistent with published values and have considerably smaller errors. Based on our spectral type versus absolute magnitude diagram, we do not find any evidence for binaries among our sampleor, at least no comparable mass binaries. Their space velocities locate them within the thin disk, and based on the model comparisons, they have solar-like abundances. For all five objects, we derived effective temperature, luminosity, radius, gravity, and mass from an evolutionary model (CBA00) and our measured parallax; moreover, we derived their effective temperature by integrating observed optical and near-infrared spectra and model spectra (BSH06 or BT-Dusty) at longer wavelengths to obtain bolometric flux using the classical Stefan-Boltzmann law. Generally, the three temperatures for one object derived using two different methods with three models are consistent, although at lower temperature (e.g., for L4) the differences among the three temperatures are slightly larger than those at higher temperature (e.g., for L1).
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific | 2018
Yougang Wang; R. L. Smart; Z. Shao; Hugh R. A. Jones; F. Marocco; A-Li Luo; Adam J. Burgasser; Jing Zhong; B. Du
This is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article published in Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Under embargo until 14 May 2019. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is available online at https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aaacc5.