Zacharenia Kallinikou
University of Fribourg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Zacharenia Kallinikou.
Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions | 2015
Florim Cuculi; Serban Puricel; Peiman Jamshidi; Jérémy Valentin; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Stefan Toggweiler; Melissa Weissner; Thomas Münzel; Stéphane Cook; Tommaso Gori
Background—Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been developed to improve late outcomes after coronary interventions. However, recent registries raised concerns regarding an increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis (ScT). The mechanism of ScT remains unknown. Methods and Results—The present study investigated angiographic and optical coherence tomography findings in patients experiencing ScT. Fifteen ScT (14 patients, 79% male, age 59±10 years) occurred at a median of 16 days (25%–75% interquartile range: 1–263 days) after implantation. Early ScT (<30 days) occurred in 8 cases (53%). Possible causal factors in these patients included insufficient platelet inhibition in 2 cases and procedural factors (scaffold underexpansion, undersizing, or geographical miss) in 4 cases. No obvious cause could be found in 2 early ScT. In late (>1 month) and very late (>1 year) ScT (respectively, 5 and 2 cases), 5 scaffolds showed intimal neovessels or marked peristrut low-intensity areas. Scaffold fractures were additionally found in 2 patients, and scaffold collapse was found in 1 patient with very late ScT. Extensive strut malapposition was the presumed cause for ScT in 1 case. One scaffold did not show any morphological abnormality. Thrombectomy specimens were analyzed in 3 patients and did not demonstrate increased numbers of inflammatory cells. Conclusions—The mechanisms of early ScT seem to be similar to metallic stents (mechanical and inadequate antiplatelet therapy). The predominant finding in late and very late ScT is peristrut low-intensity area.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2017
Diego Arroyo; Gregoire Gendre; Sara Schukraft; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Olivier Muller; Gérard Baeriswyl; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Jean-Jacques Goy; Mario Togni; Stéphane Cook; Serban Puricel
BACKGROUND Data from randomized controlled trials have shown that the ABSORB BVS is non-inferior to Cobalt Chromium everolimus-eluting stents at 2years. METHODS & RESULTS The EVERBIO II trial (Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) is a single-center, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolling 240 patients with an allocation ration of 1:1:1 conducted at University and Hospital Fribourg, Switzerland. The studied devices were an everolimus-eluting persistent polymer stent (EES), a biolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer (BES) and a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). Clinical end points collected at 9months, 12months, and 2years, were academic research consortium defined composites, device thrombosis and target-vessel revascularization. Clinical follow-up at 2years was available in 96% (N=77) of patients in the EES group, in 100% (N=80) in the BES and 99% (N=77) in the BVS group. The device-oriented composite end point of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization occurred in 13 (16%) patients treated with EES, in 7 (9%) patients treated with BES and in 16 (21%) patients treated with BVS. There was no significant difference when the metallic stents were compared to the BVS (p=0.12). There was one late scaffold thrombosis throughout the trial in the BVS group, and no definite stent thrombosis in either EES or BES treated patients. CONCLUSIONS The current analysis shows no significant differences with regard to clinical outcomes at 2years between BVS and the best-in-class metallic DES. Event rates were numerically higher in BVS-treated patients. However, when BVS were compared to BES alone, the occurrence of device related adverse events was significantly increased.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Serban Puricel; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Jaqueline Espinola; Diego Arroyo; Jean-Jacques Goy; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Gérard Baeriswyl; Pieter C. Smits; Stéphane Cook; Mario Togni
BACKGROUND Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been associated with local endothelial dysfunction in the segments proximal and distal to the stent (peristent segments) and increased thrombotic risk in long term follow-up. Little data exists on endothelial function post-implantation of new DES with biodegradable polymer. The aim of our study was to compare the local endothelial function assessed by exercise induced coronary vasomotion after implantation of a biolimus A9-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer (BES) with an everolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer (EES). METHODS Coronary vasomotion was evaluated with quantitative coronary angiography at rest and during supine bicycle exercise in nine patients with EES and thirteen patients with BES, 16 months after stent implantation. Mean luminal diameter of the stent, peristent segments, and of a control vessel were determined at rest, during exercise, and after the administration of nitroglycerine. RESULTS The control vessel showed exercise-induced vasodilatation in both groups (EES: +6.4±5.5%, p=0.07; BES: +7.8±10.1%, p=0.07). Vasomotion in the stented vessel segment was abolished. There was exercise-induced vasoconstriction in both groups in the segments proximal (EES: -9.6±4.5%; p=0.03; BES: -4.3±5.4%, p=0.02) and distal to the stent (EES: -3.2±9.3%; p=0.41, BES -8.6±8.0%, p<0.01). Sublingual nitroglycerin was associated with maximal vasodilatation of the peristent segments in both groups. CONCLUSION Alike DES with durable polymer, stents with a biodegradable polymer are associated with exercise-induced paradoxical coronary vasoconstriction of the peristent segments. This data suggests that endothelial dysfunction after DES implantation is not primarily caused by the durability of the polymer coating.
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases | 2017
Zacharenia Kallinikou; Alexandre Berger; Patrick Ruchat; Gregory Khatchatourov; Isabelle Fleisch; Branislav Korkodelovic; Emmanuel Henchoz; René-Andréas Marti; Stéphane Cook; Mario Togni; Jean-Jacques Goy
BACKGROUND Transcarotid access is an alternative route for transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with impossible transfemoral access. AIMS We evaluated the safety, effectiveness and early and late clinical outcomes of CoreValve® implantation via the common carotid artery. METHODS Eighteen patients (10 men, 8 women; mean age 84±5 years) at high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 16±13%) with significant peripheral artery disease underwent TAVI via common carotid artery access under general anaesthesia. Mean aortic valve area was 0.64±0.13cm2 (0.36±0.07cm2/m2). RESULTS At a mean follow-up of 605±352 days, two patients (11%) had died in hospital, on days 6 and 20, as a result of sepsis with multiorgan failure (n=1) or pneumonia (n=1). There were no perioperative deaths, myocardial infarctions or strokes. Perioperative prosthesis embolization occurred in one patient (6%), requiring implantation of a second valve. In-hospital complications occurred in four patients (23%): blood transfusion for transient significant bleeding at the access site in one patient (6%); permanent pacemaker implantation in two patients (11%); and pericardial drainage in one patient (6%). The rate of event-free in-hospital stay was 66%. Post-procedural echocardiography showed very good haemodynamic performance, with a mean gradient of 8±3mmHg. Moderate paravalvular leak was present in one patient (6%). Mean intensive care unit stay was 48±31h; mean in-hospital stay was 7±3 days. CONCLUSION TAVI performed by transcarotid access in this small series of severely ill patients was associated with a low incidence of complications, which were associated with the procedure itself rather than the access route.
Open Heart | 2018
Diego Arroyo; Sara Schukraft; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Gérard Baeriswyl; Jean-Jacques Goy; Mario Togni; Stéphane Cook; Serban Puricel
Aims To compare endothelium-dependent vasomotor function and vascular healing 15 months after implantation of two new-generation drug-eluting stents and biovascular scaffolds (BVS). Methods and results A total of 28 patients previously treated with a SYNERGY stent (bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES)), a PROMUS stent (persistent polymer everolimus-eluting stents (PP-EES)) or an ABSORB (BVS) underwent control coronary angiography, 15 months after implantation, coupled with optical coherence tomography imaging and supine bicycle exercise. Intracoronary nitroglycerin was administered after exercise testing. Coronary vasomotor response was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography at rest, during supine bicycle exercise and after nitroglycerin. The primary end point was the percent change in mean lumen diameter compared with baseline. Secondary end points were strut coverage and apposition. There were no significant differences in vasomotor response between the three treatment groups. Patients with PP-EES showed significant vasoconstriction of the proximal peristent segment at maximum exercise (P=0.02). BP-EES (2.7%, 95% CI 0 to 5.5) and BVS (3.2%, 95% CI 0 to 6.7) showed less uncovered struts than PP-EES (12.1%, 95% CI 2.9 to 21.3, P=0.02 and 0.09, respectively). Complete strut apposition was more frequently seen with BP-EES (99.6%, 95% CI 99.2 to 100) than with BVS (98.9%, 95% CI 98.2 to 99.6, P=0.04) or PP-EES (95.0%, 95% CI 91.6 to 98.5, P=0.001). Conclusion BVS and thin strut BP-EES have a reassuring vasomotion profile, suggesting minimal endothelial dysfunction 15 months after implantation.
Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions | 2016
Diego Arroyo; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Nicloas Brugger; Nils Perrin; Gérard Baeriswyl; Jean-Jacques Goy; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Mario Togni; Stéphane Cook; Serban Puricel
New-generation thin strut bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown promising mid-term results in clinical trials and real-world registries. We sought to assess 1-year efficacy and safety outcomes in all-comer patients treated with the SYNERGY stent at our institution. All
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2015
Serban Puricel; Florim Cuculi; Peiman Jamshidi; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Melissa Weissner; Thomas Muenzel; Stéphane Cook; Tommaso Gori
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) have been developed to improve late outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. Recent registries in all-comer patients raised concerns regarding a potential increase in the incidence of in-scaffold thrombosis (ST). To gain further
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2015
Serban Puricel; Diego Arroyo; Noé Corpataux; Gérard Baeriswyl; Sonja Lehmann; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Olivier Muller; Ludovic Allard; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Mario Togni; Jean-Jacques Goy; Stéphane Cook
American Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Zacharenia Kallinikou; Serban Puricel; Nick Ryckx; Mario Togni; Gérard Baeriswyl; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Stéphane Cook; Francis R. Verdun; Jean-Jacques Goy
Swiss Medical Weekly | 2016
Zacharenia Kallinikou; Diego Arroyo; Mario Togni; Sonja Lehman; Noé Corpataux; Malica Cook; Olivier Muller; Gérard Baeriswyl; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Jean-Jacques Goy; Serban-George Puricel; Stéphane Cook