Zacharenia Nikitaki
National Technical University of Athens
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Zacharenia Nikitaki.
Frontiers in chemistry | 2015
Zacharenia Nikitaki; Christine E. Hellweg; Alexandros G. Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
A variety of environmental stresses like chemicals, UV and ionizing radiation and organisms endogenous processes such as replication stress and metabolism can lead to the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) that can attack cellular vital components like DNA, proteins and lipid membranes. Among them, much attention has been focused on DNA since DNA damage plays a role in several biological disorders and aging processes. Thus, DNA damage can be used as a biomarker in a reliable and accurate way to quantify for example radiation exposure and can indicate its possible long term effects and cancer risk. Based on the type of DNA lesions detected one can hypothesize on the most probable mechanisms involved in the formation of these lesions for example in the case of UV and ionizing radiation (e.g., X- or α-, γ-rays, energetic ions, neutrons). In this review we describe the most accepted chemical pathways for DNA damage induction and the different types of DNA lesions, i.e., single, complex DNA lesions etc. that can be used as DNA damage biomarkers. We critically compare DNA damage detection methods and their limitations. In addition, we suggest the use of DNA repair gene products as biomarkes for identification of different types of stresses i.e., radiation, oxidative, or replication stress, based on bioinformatic approaches and meta-analysis of literature data.
Cancer Letters | 2015
Vasiliki I. Hatzi; Danae A. Laskaratou; Ifigeneia V. Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Anastasios Mangelis; Mihalis I. Panayiotidis; Gabriel E. Pantelias; Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Radiation-induced bystander effects (RIBE), demonstrate the induction of biological non-targeted effects in cells which have not directly hit by radiation or by free radicals produced by ionization events. Although RIBE have been demonstrated using a variety of biological endpoints the mechanism(s) of this phenomenon still remain unclear. The controversial results of the in vitro RIBE and the evidence of non-targeted effects in various in vivo systems are discussed. The experimental evidence on RIBE, indicate that a more analytical and mechanistic in depth approach is needed to secure an answer to one of the most intriguing questions in radiobiology.
Free Radical Research | 2016
Zacharenia Nikitaki; Vladimir Nikolov; Ifigeneia V. Mavragani; Emil Mladenov; Anastasios Mangelis; Danae A. Laskaratou; Georgios I. Fragkoulis; Christine E. Hellweg; Olga A. Martin; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Vasiliki I. Hatzi; George Iliakis; Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Abstract Detrimental effects of ionizing radiation (IR) are correlated to the varying efficiency of IR to induce complex DNA damage. A double strand break (DSB) can be considered the simpler form of complex DNA damage. These types of damage can consist of DSBs, single strand breaks (SSBs) and/or non-DSB lesions such as base damages and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP; abasic) sites in different combinations. Enthralling theoretical (Monte Carlo simulations) and experimental evidence suggests an increase in the complexity of DNA damage and therefore repair resistance with linear energy transfer (LET). In this study, we have measured the induction and processing of DSB and non-DSB oxidative clusters using adaptations of immunofluorescence. Specifically, we applied foci colocalization approaches as the most current methodologies for the in situ detection of clustered DNA lesions in a variety of human normal (FEP18-11-T1) and cancerous cell lines of varying repair efficiency (MCF7, HepG2, A549, MO59K/J) and radiation qualities of increasing LET, that is γ-, X-rays 0.3–1 keV/μm, α-particles 116 keV/μm and 36Ar ions 270 keV/μm. Using γ-H2AX or 53BP1 foci staining as DSB probes, we calculated a DSB apparent rate of 5–16 DSBs/cell/Gy decreasing with LET. A similar trend was measured for non-DSB oxidized base lesions detected using antibodies against the human repair enzymes 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) or AP endonuclease (APE1), that is damage foci as probes for oxidized purines or abasic sites, respectively. In addition, using colocalization parameters previously introduced by our groups, we detected an increasing clustering of damage for DSBs and non-DSBs. We also make correlations of damage complexity with the repair efficiency of each cell line and we discuss the biological importance of these new findings with regard to the severity of IR due to the complex nature of its DNA damage.
Cancers | 2017
Ifigeneia V. Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Maria Souli; Asef Aziz; Somaira Nowsheen; Khaled Aziz; Emmy Rogakou; Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Cellular effects of ionizing radiation (IR) are of great variety and level, but they are mainly damaging since radiation can perturb all important components of the cell, from the membrane to the nucleus, due to alteration of different biological molecules ranging from lipids to proteins or DNA. Regarding DNA damage, which is the main focus of this review, as well as its repair, all current knowledge indicates that IR-induced DNA damage is always more complex than the corresponding endogenous damage resulting from endogenous oxidative stress. Specifically, it is expected that IR will create clusters of damage comprised of a diversity of DNA lesions like double strand breaks (DSBs), single strand breaks (SSBs) and base lesions within a short DNA region of up to 15–20 bp. Recent data from our groups and others support two main notions, that these damaged clusters are: (1) repair resistant, increasing genomic instability (GI) and malignant transformation and (2) can be considered as persistent “danger” signals promoting chronic inflammation and immune response, causing detrimental effects to the organism (like radiation toxicity). Last but not least, the paradigm shift for the role of radiation-induced systemic effects is also incorporated in this picture of IR-effects and consequences of complex DNA damage induction and its erroneous repair.
Cancers | 2017
Zacharenia Nikitaki; Athanasia Pavlopoulou; Marcela Holá; Mattia Donà; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Alma Balestrazzi; Karel J. Angelis; Alexandros G. Georgakilas
The mechanisms of response to radiation exposure are conserved in plants and animals. The DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are the predominant molecular pathways activated upon exposure to radiation, both in plants and animals. The conserved features of DDR in plants and animals might facilitate interdisciplinary studies that cross traditional boundaries between animal and plant biology in order to expand the collection of biomarkers currently used for radiation exposure monitoring (REM) in environmental and biomedical settings. Genes implicated in trans-kingdom conserved DDR networks often triggered by ionizing radiation (IR) and UV light are deposited into biological databases. In this study, we have applied an innovative approach utilizing data pertinent to plant and human genes from publicly available databases towards the design of a ‘plant radiation biodosimeter’, that is, a plant and DDR gene-based platform that could serve as a REM reliable biomarker for assessing environmental radiation exposure and associated risk. From our analysis, in addition to REM biomarkers, a significant number of genes, both in human and Arabidopsis thaliana, not yet characterized as DDR, are suggested as possible DNA repair players. Last but not least, we provide an example on the applicability of an Arabidopsis thaliana—based plant system monitoring the role of cancer-related DNA repair genes BRCA1, BARD1 and PARP1 in processing DNA lesions.
Seminars in Cancer Biology | 2016
Zacharenia Nikitaki; Ifigeneia V. Mavragani; Danae A. Laskaratou; Violeta Gika; Vadim Moskvin; Konstantinos Theofilatos; Konstantinos Vougas; Robert D. Stewart; Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Cancer Letters | 2015
Alexandros G. Georgakilas; Athanasia Pavlopoulou; Maria Louka; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Constantinos E. Vorgias; Pantelis G. Bagos; Ioannis Michalopoulos
Cancer Letters | 2015
Nezih Hekim; Zafer Çetin; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Aysegul Cort; Eyüp İlker Saygılı
Radiation Physics and Chemistry | 2016
Zacharenia Nikitaki; Vladimir Nikolov; Ifigeneia V. Mavragani; Ianik Plante; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; George Iliakis; Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Future Medicinal Chemistry | 2015
Zacharenia Nikitaki; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Alexandros G. Georgakilas