Zachary AbuRahma

Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis

BACKGROUND Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been advocated as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in high-risk surgical patients, including stenosis after CEA. This study compared early and midterm clinical outcomes for primary CAS vs CAS for post-CEA stenosis. METHODS This study analyzed 180 high-risk surgical patients: 68 had primary CAS (group A), and 112 had CAS for post-CEA stenosis (group B). Patients were followed-up prospectively and had duplex ultrasound imaging at 1 month and every 6 months thereafter. All patients had cerebral protection devices. Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to estimate rates of freedom from stroke, stroke-free survival, > or =50% in-stent stenosis, > or =80% in-stent stenosis, and target vessel reintervention (TVR). RESULTS Patients had comparable demographic and clinical characteristics. Carotid stent locations were similar. Indications for CAS were transient ischemic attacks (TIA) or stroke in 50% for group A and 45% for group B. The mean follow-up was comparable, at 21 (range, 1-73) vs 25 (range, 1-78) months, respectively. The technical success rate was 100%. The perioperative stroke rates and combined stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) rates were 7.4% for group A vs 0.9% for group B (P = .0294). No perioperative MIs occurred in either group. One death was secondary to stroke. The combined early and late stroke rates were 10.8% for group A and 1.8% for group B (P = .0275). The stroke-free rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years for groups A and B were 89%, 89%, 89%, and 89%; and 98%, 98%, 98%, and 98%, respectively (P = .0105). The rates of freedom from > or =50% carotid in-stent stenosis were 94%, 83%, 83%, and 66% for group A vs 96%, 91%, 83%, and 72% for group B (P = .4705). Two patients (3%) in group A and seven patients (6.3%) in group B had > or =80% in-stent stenosis (all were asymptomatic except one). The freedom from > or =80% in-stent stenosis at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years for groups A and B were 100%, 98%, 98%, and 78% vs 99%, 96%, 92%, and 87%, respectively (P = .7005). Freedom from TVR rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years for groups A and B were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% vs 99%, 97%, 97%, and 92%, respectively (P = .261). CONCLUSIONS CAS for post-CEA stenosis carried a lower risk of early postprocedural neurologic events than primary CAS, with a trend toward a higher restenosis rate during follow-up.

Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL (Gore-Tex) vs Finesse (Hemashield) patching during carotid endarterectomy: Long-term outcome

BACKGROUND Several studies have reported that carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty is superior to primary closure. Conventional polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex, W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) patching has been shown to have results similar to autogenous saphenous vein patching; however, it requires a longer hemostasis time. This study examined the long-term clinical outcome and incidence of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy using the new ACUSEAL (Gore-Tex) patching vs Hemashield Finesse (Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Mass) patching. METHODS The study randomized 200 patients (1:1) undergoing carotid endarterectomy to 100 with ACUSEAL patching and 100 with Hemashield-Finesse patching. All patients underwent immediate and 1-month postoperative duplex ultrasound studies, which were repeated at 6-month intervals. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the freedom from stroke, stroke-free survival, and the risk of restenosis for both groups. RESULTS The demographic and clinical characteristics, the mean operative diameter of the internal carotid artery, and the length of the arteriotomy were similar in both groups. The mean hemostasis time was 5.1 for the ACUSEAL patching vs 3.7 minutes for Finesse patching (P = .01); however, the mean operative times were similar for both groups (P = .61). The incidence of ipsilateral stroke was 2% for ACUSEAL patching (both early perioperative strokes) vs 3% for Finesse patching (2 early and 1 late stroke) at a mean follow-up of 21 months. The respective cumulative stroke-free rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 98%, 98%, and 98% for ACUSEAL patching vs 97%, 97%, and 97% for Finesse patching (P = .7). The respective cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 97%, 92%, and 88% for ACUSEAL patching vs 96%, 96%, and 91% for Finesse patching (P = .6). The respective freedom from > or =70% carotid restenosis at 1, 2, and 3 years was 98%, 96%, and 89% for ACUSEAL patching vs 92%, 85%, and 79% for Finesse patching (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Carotid endarterectomy with ACUSEAL patching and Finesse patching had similar stroke-free rates and stroke-free survival rates. The mean hemostasis time for the ACUSEAL patch was 1.4 minutes longer than that for the Finesse patch; however, the Finesse patch had higher restenosis rates than the ACUSEAL patch.

Complications of diagnostic carotid/cerebral arteriography when performed by a vascular surgeon

Carotid stenting has recently been considered as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy for certain patients with carotid stenosis. Hence, performing carotid arteriography with minimal morbidity and mortality is essential. The purpose of this study was to audit complications of diagnostic carotid/cerebral arteriography performed by a vascular surgeon with experience in endovascular interventions. One hundred one consecutive patients underwent 4-vessel arch aortography with selective carotid, subclavian, and/or vertebral arteriography with use of the Seldinger technique. Demographic data, indications, procedure approach (transfemoral, brachial), number of arteries punctured, type of selective injection, contrast volume, and procedure time were analyzed. Minor complications were those that do not significantly alter the health or activity of the patient or require extra hospitalization or treatment. Other complications were defined as major complications. The technical success rate was 99% (100/101 patients). These included the following: 82 patients with right carotid artery, 82 with left carotid artery, 15 with right subclavian artery, 21 with left subclavian artery, 11 with right vertebral artery, and 17 with left vertebral artery (a total of 228 selective injections). Indications for procedures included the following: transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke symptoms in 66%, asymptomatic carotid stenosis in 22%, upper limb claudication in 4%, and vertebrobasilar insufficiency in 4%. Right femoral puncture was used in 79%, left femoral in 12%, and left brachial in 9%. The mean amount of contrast used was 101 cc (45-250 cc) and the mean procedure time was 46 minutes (22-132 minutes). There were 5 complications in the whole series: 3 major complications (3%), including 1 minor stroke (1%) with carotid injection, 1 TIA, and 1 major retroperitoneal bleeding; and 2 (2%) minor complications. The major complication rate in this series compares favorably to published rates of 5.7% to 9.1%. There was no association between complications and specific risk factors except for a longer catheterization time (66 minutes versus 45 minutes, p= 0.011). Carotid/cerebral arteriography can be done safely by experienced vascular surgeons with minimal perioperative complications that compare favorably with what has been reported in the radiology literature.

Effect of statins on early and late clinical outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and the rate of post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis.

BACKGROUND This study analyzed the effect of statins on clinical outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the rate of restenosis. STUDY DESIGN We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 500 consecutive CEAs followed at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year. RESULTS There were 299 patients on statins vs 201 without. Combined perioperative MI/death rates were 2.7% vs 4% (p = 0.416) and MI/stroke/death rates were 4% vs 5% (p = 0.607) for statins vs no statins. At mean follow-up (27 months), MI, stroke, and death rates were: 9.7%, 2.3%, and 2.3% vs 9%, 2.5% and 4.5% (p = 0.18) for statins vs no statins, respectively. Diabetic patients not on statins had 4 times more deaths (8.5% vs 2.3%) and twice as many strokes/deaths (10.2% vs 5.3%). Patients with hypercholesterolemia who were not on statins had twice as many deaths (4.3% vs 2.2%). Rates of freedom from stroke/MI/death at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were: 94%, 90%, 85% and 77% vs 94%, 89%, 85%, and 82% (p = 0.87) for statins vs no statins, respectively. Rates of freedom from death only for patients on statins vs no statins at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were: 98%, 98%, 97.4% and 97.4% vs 98%, 96%, 94.8% and 94.8%, respectively (p = 0.191). For diabetic patients, rates of freedom from death at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 99%, 99%, 97%, and 97% for statins vs 97%, 90%, 90%, and 90% without statins, respectively (p = 0.048). Post-CEA restenosis rates ≥ 50% were not significantly different between statins vs no statins (p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS Statins significantly lowered death rates in patients with diabetes and tended to lower both death and stroke rates in diabetic patients and patients with hypercholesterolemia. Statins had no effect on post-CEA restenosis.

The value and economic analysis of routine postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND Several studies have reported on the role of postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with varying results. Most of these studies had a small sample size or did not analyze cost-effectiveness. METHODS We analyzed 489 of 501 CEA patients with patch closure. All patients had immediate postoperative duplex ultrasound examination and were routinely followed up both clinically and with duplex ultrasound at regular intervals of 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and every 12 months thereafter. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of ≥50% and ≥80% post-CEA restenosis over time and the time frame of progression from normal to ≥50% or ≥80% restenosis. The cost of post-CEA duplex surveillance was also estimated. RESULTS Overall, 489 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years were analyzed. Ten of these had residual postoperative ≥50% stenosis, and 37 did not undergo a second duplex ultrasound examination and therefore were not included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up was 20.4 months (range, 1-63 months), with a mean number of duplex ultrasound examinations of 3.6 (range, 1-7). Eleven of 397 patients (2.8%) with a normal finding on immediate postoperative duplex ultrasound vs 4 of 45 (8.9%) with mild stenosis on immediate postoperative duplex ultrasound progressed to ≥50% restenosis (P = .055). Overall, 15 patients (3.1%) had ≥50% restenosis, 9 with 50% to <80% and 4 with 80% to 99% (2 of these had carotid artery stenting reintervention), and 2 had late carotid occlusion. All of these were asymptomatic, except for one who had a transient ischemic attack. The mean time to ≥50% to <80% restenosis was 14.7 months vs 19.8 months for ≥80% restenosis after the CEA. Freedom from restenosis rates were 98%, 96%, 94%, 94%, and 94% for ≥50% restenosis and 99%, 98%, 97%, 97%, and 97% for ≥80% restenosis at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years, respectively. Freedom from myocardial infarction, stroke, and deaths was not significantly different between patients with and without restenosis (100%, 93%, 83%, and 83% vs 94%, 91%, 86%, and 79% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years, respectively; P = .951). The estimated charge of this surveillance was 3.6 × 489 (number of CEAs) ×

Biochemical markers in patients with open reconstructions with peripheral arterial disease

800 (charge for carotid duplex ultrasound), which equals

Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL (Gore-Tex) versus Hemashield-Finesse patching during carotid endarterectomy: Early results

1,408,320, to detect only four patients with ≥80% to 99% restenosis who may have been potential candidates for reintervention. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that the value of routine postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance after CEA with patch closure may be limited, particularly if the finding on immediate postoperative duplex ultrasound is normal or shows minimal disease.

Aortic Neck Anatomic Features and Predictors of Outcomes in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Following vs Not Following Instructions for Use.

The purpose of our study was to determine outcome differences as a function of baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in patients receiving lower extremity open reconstructions for the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. We retrospectively examined patients who underwent surgical reconstructions performed by a single operator during a seven-year time span who received preoperative hsCRP and BNP testing and post-procedure imaging. Outcomes of interest included major adverse limb events, a composite end point of target vessel revascularization, limb amputation, and disease progression, and major adverse cardiovascular events comprised of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. A total of 89 limbs in 82 patients were included in analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher hsCRP levels (>3.0 mg/L) trended toward, but failed to significantly associate with major adverse limb events at 24 months (hazard ratio: 2.2 [1.0–5.2], p = 0.06), however the use of a vein bypass conduit (vs. prosthetic reconstruction) significantly predicted major adverse limb events (hazard ratio: 3.2 [1.5–6.9], p < 0.01). Elevated BNP levels (>100 pg/ml), but not hsCRP, associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio: 3.5 [1.2–10.3], p = 0.03). Preoperative biochemical markers may assist in clinical decision making and stratifying patients regarding adverse events following open reconstructions.