Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Zachary Ernst is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Zachary Ernst.


The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | 2001

Explaining the Social Contract

Zachary Ernst

Brian Skyrms has argued that the evolution of the social contract may be explained using the tools of evolutionary game theory. I show in the first half of this paper that the evolutionary game-theoretic models are often highly sensitive to the specific processes that they are intended to simulate. This sensitivity represents an important robustness failure that complicates Skyrmss project. But I go on to make the positive proposal that we may none the less obtain robust results by simulating the population structures that existed among our evolutionary ancestors. It is by extending the evolutionary models in this way that we should pursue the project of explaining the evolution of the social contract.


Studia Logica | 2007

Collective Action as Individual Choice

Zachary Ernst; Sara Rachel Chant

We argue that conceptual analyses of collective action should be informed by game-theoretic analyses of collective action. In particular, we argue that Ariel Rubenstein’s so-called ‘Electronic Mail Game’ provides a useful model of collective action, and of the formation of collective intentions.


Automated Reasoning and Mathematics | 2013

Toward a procedure for data mining proofs

Zachary Ernst; Seth Kurtenbach

In this paper, we report results of an experiment to use the mutual information criterion to automatically select formulas to guide the search for proofs using McCunes Prover9 system. The formulas were selected from the TPTP library of problems for theorem-provers.


Philosophy of Science | 2005

Robustness and Conceptual Analysis in Evolutionary Game Theory

Zachary Ernst

A variety of robustness objections have been made against evolutionary game theory. One of these objections alleges that the games used in the underlying model are too arbitrary and oversimplified to generate a robust model of interesting prosocial behaviors. In this paper, I argue that the robustness objection can be met. However, in order to do so, we must attend to important conceptual issues regarding the nature of fairness, justice, and other moral concepts. Specifically, we must better understand the relationship between moral concepts and formal characterizations of games.


Erkenntnis | 2009

What Fitness Can't Be

André Ariew; Zachary Ernst


Philosophical Studies | 2007

Group intentions as equilibria

Sara Rachel Chant; Zachary Ernst


Mind | 2008

Epistemic Conditions for Collective Action

Sara Rachel Chant; Zachary Ernst


Philosophy Compass | 2007

Philosophical Issues Arising from Experimental Economics

Zachary Ernst


American Philosophical Quarterly | 2007

The liberationists' attack on moral intuitions

Zachary Ernst


The Journal of Philosophy | 2005

A PLEA FOR ASYMMETRIC GAMES

Zachary Ernst

Collaboration


Dive into the Zachary Ernst's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge