Zaven Kaprielian

Oligodendrocyte and astrocyte development in rodents: An in situ and immunohistological analysis during embryonic development†

Lineally related multipotent neuroepithelial cells (NEP), neuronal restricted precursors (NRP), and glial restricted precursors (GRP) have been identified in the spinal cord. To determine the sequence of differentiation and identify lineage and stage‐specific markers, we have examined the spatiotemporal expression of established glial markers during rodent embryonic development and within fetal cell culture. In this report, we show that proliferating stem cells in the developing neural tube do not express any glial markers at E10.5. By E11, however, glial precursors have begun to differentiate and at least two regions of the ventral neural tube containing glial precursor cells can be distinguished, an Nkx2.2/Neurogenin 3 (Ngn3) domain and a platelet‐derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα)/Olig2/Sox10 domain. Radial glia, as identified by RC1 immunoreactivity, develop in concert with other glial precursors and can be distinguished by their morphology, spatial distribution, and antigen expression. Astrocytes as assessed by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunoreactivity are first detected at E16. A novel dorsal domain of CD44 immunoreactivity that can be distinguished from the more ventral glial precursor domains can be detected as early as E13.5. GLIA 40:25–43, 2002. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Axon guidance at the midline choice point

The central nervous system (CNS) of higher organisms is bilaterally‐symmetric. The transfer of information between the two sides of the nervous system occurs through commissures formed by neurons that project axons across the midline to the contralateral side of the CNS. Interestingly, these axons cross the midline only once. Other neurons extend axons that never cross the midline; they project exclusively on their own (ipsilateral) side of the CNS. Thus, the midline is an important choice point for several classes of pathfinding axons. Recent studies demonstrate that specialized midline cells play critical roles in regulating the guidance of both crossing and non‐crossing axons at the ventral midline of the developing vertebrate spinal cord and the Drosophila ventral nerve cord. For example, these cells secrete attractive cues that guide commissural axons over long distances to the midline of the CNS. Furthermore, short‐range interactions between guidance cues present on the surfaces of midline cells, and their receptors expressed on the surfaces of pathfinding axons, allow commissural axons to cross the midline only once and prevent ipsilaterally‐projecting axons from entering the midline. Remarkably, the molecular composition of commissural axon surfaces is dynamically‐altered as they cross the midline. Consequently, commissural axons become responsive to repulsive midline guidance cues that they had previously ignored on the ipsilateral side of the midline. Concomitantly, commissural axons lose responsiveness to attractive guidance cues that had initially attracted them to the midline. Thus, these exquisitely regulated guidance systems prevent commissural axons from lingering within the confines of the midline and allow them to pioneer an appropriate pathway on the contralateral side of the CNS. Many aspects of midline guidance are controlled by mechanistically and evolutionarily‐conserved ligand‐receptor systems. Strikingly, recent studies demonstrate that these receptors are modular; the ectodomains determine ligand recognition and the cytoplasmic domains specify the response of an axon to a given guidance cue. Despite rapid and dramatic progress in elucidating the molecular mechanisms that control midline guidance, many questions remain.

Molecular Control of Spinal Accessory Motor Neuron/Axon Development in the Mouse Spinal Cord

Within the developing vertebrate spinal cord, motor neuron subtypes are distinguished by the settling positions of their cell bodies, patterns of gene expression, and the paths their axons follow to exit the CNS. The inclusive set of cues required to guide a given motor axon subtype from cell body to target has yet to be identified, in any species. This is attributable, in part, to the unavailability of markers that demarcate the complete trajectory followed by a specific class of spinal motor axons. Most spinal motor neurons extend axons out of the CNS through ventral exit points. In contrast, spinal accessory motor neurons (SACMNs) project dorsally directed axons through lateral exit points (LEPs), and these axons assemble into the spinal accessory nerve (SAN). Here we show that an antibody against BEN/ALCAM/SC1/DM-GRASP/MuSC selectively labels mouse SACMNs and can be used to trace the pathfinding of SACMN axons. We use this marker, together with a battery of transcription factor-deficient or guidance cue/receptor-deficient mice to identify molecules required for distinct stages of SACMN development. Specifically, we find that Gli2 is required for the initial extension of axons from SACMN cell bodies, and that netrin-1 and its receptor Dcc are required for the proper dorsal migration of these cells and the dorsally directed extension of SACMN axons toward the LEPs. Furthermore, in the absence of the transcription factor Nkx2.9, SACMN axons fail to exit the CNS. Together, these findings suggest molecular mechanisms that are likely to regulate key steps in SACMN development.

Ephb receptors and ephrin-B3 regulate axon guidance at the ventral midline of the embryonic mouse spinal cord

EphB receptors and their ephrin-B ligands are required for midline guidance decisions at several rostrocaudal levels of the developing CNS. In the embryonic vertebrate spinal cord, ephrin-B3 is localized to the floor plate (FP) at the ventral midline (VM), ephrin-B1 and ephrin-B2 are expressed in the dorsal spinal cord, and decussated EphB receptor-bearing commissural axons navigate between these ventral and dorsal ephrin-B domains. Despite these compelling expression patterns, the in vivo role(s) for EphB and ephrin-B proteins in regulating the guidance of spinal commissural axons has not been established. Here, we use DiI (1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) labeling to assess the pathfinding of commissural axons in the spinal cords of ephrin-B and EphB mutant mouse embryos. In mice lacking ephrin-B3 or multiple EphB receptors, a significant number of axons followed aberrant trajectories in the immediate vicinity of the VM. Furthermore, forked transverse commissural (FTC) axons, a unique class of commissural axons that continues to project in the transverse plane on the contralateral side of the FP, were present at a markedly higher frequency in ephrin-B3 and EphB mutants, compared with wild-type embryos. Neither the midline guidance errors nor excessive numbers of FTC axons were observed in the spinal cords of ephrin-B3lacz mice that express a truncated form of ephrin-B3, which is capable of forward but not reverse signaling. In contrast to the midline guidance defects observed in EphB and ephrin-B3 mutant embryos, wild-type-like contralateral projections were observed in mice lacking ephrin-B1 and/or ephrin-B2.

UNC5A promotes neuronal apoptosis during spinal cord development independent of netrin-1

In addition to their role as chemorepellent netrin-1 receptors, UNC5 proteins may mediate cell death because they induce apoptosis in cultured cells. To test this in vivo, we generated Unc5a (formerly Unc5h1) knockout mice and found that this deletion decreased apoptosis and increased the number of neurons in the spinal cord. In contrast, loss of netrin-1 (Ntn1) did not affect the amount of apoptosis, suggesting that NTN1 is not required for neuronal apoptosis in vivo.

Axon guidance at the midline of the developing CNS

Bilaterally symmetric animals must be capable of transmitting information between the left and right sides of their body to integrate sensory input and to coordinate motor control. Thus, many neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) of a wide variety of higher organisms project so‐called commissural axons across the midline. Interestingly, these axons are never observed to re‐cross the midline. On the other hand, some neurons project axons that remain on their own (ipsilateral) side of the CNS, without ever crossing the midline. Recent studies demonstrate that specialized cells which reside at the ventral midline of the developing vertebrate spinal cord and Drosophila ventral nerve cord play critical roles in regulating the guidance of both crossing and non‐crossing axons. For example, these cells secrete positively‐acting guidance cues that attract commissural axons over long distances to the midline of the CNS. Furthermore, short‐range interactions between guidance cues present on the surfaces of midline cells, and their receptors expressed on the surfaces of pathfinding axons, allow commissural axons to cross the midline and prevent ipsilaterally projecting axons from entering the midline. Remarkably, as commissural axons cross over to the opposite side of the CNS, the molecular composition of their surfaces is dynamically altered so that they become responsive to repulsive midline guidance cues that they had previously ignored. Thus, this exquisitely controlled guidance system prevents commissural axons from crossing the midline more than once. Strikingly, many of the molecular mechanisms that control midline guidance appear to be evolutionarily conserved. Anat Rec (New Anat) 261:176–197, 2000.

Manipulating Robo Expression In Vivo Perturbs Commissural Axon Pathfinding in the Chick Spinal Cord

In vertebrate embryos, most spinal commissural axons cross the ventral midline (VM) and project either alongside or significant distances away from the floor plate (FP). The upregulation of repulsive Robo1/2 receptors on postcrossing commissural axons, in mammals, presumably allows these axons to respond to the midline-associated repellents, Slit1–3, facilitating their expulsion from, and prohibiting their reentry into, the FP. Compelling data suggest that Robo3 represses Robo1/2 function on precrossing axons and that Robo1/2 inhibit attractive guidance receptors on postcrossing axons, thereby ensuring that decussated axons are selectively responsive to midline Slits. However, whether Robo1/2 expel decussated commissural axons from the VM and/or prevent their reentry into the FP has not been explicitly established in vivo. Furthermore, some commissural axons do not require Robo1/2 to elaborate appropriate contralateral projections in the mouse spinal cord. Here, we use unilateral in ovo electroporation together with Atoh1 and Neurog1 enhancer elements to visualize, and assess the consequences of manipulating Robo expression on, dl1 and dl2 chick commissural axons. In response to misexpressing a cytoplasmic truncation of Robo1 and/or Robo2, which should block all Robo–ligand interactions, postcrossing commissural axons extend alongside, but do not project away from or reenter the FP. In contrast, misexpression of full-length Robo2 prevents many commissural axons from crossing the VM. Together, these findings support key and selective in vivo roles for Robo receptors in presumably altering the responsiveness of decussated commissural axons and facilitating their expulsion from the VM within the chick spinal cord.

Cloning and Expression of VEMA: A Novel Ventral Midline Antigen in the Rat CNS

A variety of molecules expressed at the midline of the developing central nervous system (CNS) control multiple aspects of pattern formation and axon guidance. We recently identified monoclonal antibody (mAb) CARO 2 as a novel marker of the ventral midline in the developing rat CNS, and the corresponding antigen as a membrane-associated 28-kDa protein. We report here the isolation of cDNA clones encoding the mAb CARO 2 antigen, which we rename VEMA, for ventral midline antigen. The deduced amino acid sequence of VEMA contains a single transmembrane domain near its N-terminus and several tyrosine-based internalization motifs. These structural features are consistent with the association of VEMA to intracellular membranes. In situ hybridization analyses demonstrate that VEMA mRNA is predominantly expressed at the ventral midline. The restricted distribution of VEMA, as well as several characteristics of its primary structure, suggest a role for this protein in regulating axon guidance in the mammalian CNS.

Distribution of EphB receptors and ephrin-B1 in the developing vertebrate spinal cord.

Contact‐dependent interactions between EphB receptors and ephrin‐B ligands mediate a variety of cell–cell communication events in the developing and mature central nervous system (CNS). These predominantly repulsive interactions occur at the interface between what are considered to be mutually exclusive EphB and ephrin‐B expression domains. We previously used receptor and ligand affinity probes to show that ephrin‐B ligands are expressed in the floor plate and within a dorsal region of the embryonic mouse spinal cord, while EphB receptors are present on decussated segments of commissural axons that navigate between these ephrin‐B domains. Here we present the generation and characterization of two new monoclonal antibodies, mAb EfB1‐3, which recognizes EphB1, EphB2, and EphB3, and mAb efrnB1, which is specific for ephrin‐B1. We use these reagents and polyclonal antibodies specific for EphB1, EphB2, EphB3, or ephrin‐B1 to describe the spatiotemporal expression patterns of EphB receptors and ephrin‐B1 in the vertebrate spinal cord. Consistent with affinity probe binding, we show that EphB1, EphB2, and EphB3 are each preferentially expressed on decussated segments of commissural axons in vivo and in vitro, and that ephrin‐B1 is expressed in a dorsal domain of the spinal cord that includes the roof plate. In contrast to affinity probe binding profiles, we show here that EphB1, EphB2, and EphB3 are present on the ventral commissure, and that EphB1 and EphB3 are expressed on axons that compose the dorsal funiculus. In addition, we unexpectedly find that mesenchymal cells, which surround the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion, express ephrin‐B1. J. Comp. Neurol. 497:734–750, 2006.

UNC5C is required for spinal accessory motor neuron development.

In both invertebrates and vertebrates, UNC5 receptors facilitate chemorepulsion away from a Netrin source. Unlike most motor neurons in the embryonic vertebrate spinal cord, spinal accessory motor neuron (SACMN) cell bodies and their axons translocate along a dorsally directed trajectory away from the floor plate/ventral midline and toward the lateral exit point (LEP). We have recently shown that Netrin-1 and DCC are required for the migration of SACMN cell bodies, in vivo. These observations raised the possibility that vertebrate UNC5 proteins mediate the presumed repulsion of SACMN away from the Netrin-rich ventral midline. Here, we show that SACMN are likely to express UNC5A and UNC5C. Whereas SACMN development proceeds normally in UNC5A null mice, many SACMN cell bodies fail to migrate away from the ventral midline and inappropriately cluster in the ventrolateral spinal cord of mouse embryos lacking UNC5C. These results support an important role for UNC5C in SACMN development.